How rising national debt can affect your finances
While the national debt may be hard to conceptualize, economists say its explosive growth has the potential to have major impacts on the economy that will be felt even by individuals.
'I liken it to a boa constrictor squeezing its prey — the debt is slowly doing the same to the American economy,' said Brett Loper, executive vice president of policy at the Peter G. Peterson Foundation, which commissioned a number of recent reports on the national debt. 'The squeeze comes in the form of slower growth, less job creation, higher costs of borrowing for consumers buying homes, or businesses investing in equipment. All of these are consequences.'
Learn more: 2025 housing market: Is it a good time to buy a house?
Apart from the tax legislation's predicted impact, the total debt has nearly tripled in the last 20 years, from $12.26 trillion in 2004 to $35.46 trillion in 2024, per data from the U.S. Treasury. A slow and steady rise began in the 1980s and was accelerated by the 2008 financial crisis and Great Recession after a period of relative stagnation post-World War II. At the same time, the debt-to-GDP ratio, comparing the size of the debt to the U.S. gross domestic product, has continued to grow, first reaching 100% in 2013 and up to 123% last year. The ratio had not ticked above 100% since right after World War II.
The total amount the U.S. government is spending on interest has also continued to make up a bigger percentage of overall expenditures, from 8% in fiscal year 2019 to 13% in FY 2024, per numbers from the U.S. Government Accountability Office. In 2024, net interest was the third-largest federal spending category, at $881.7 billion, after Social Security and other federal healthcare.
To put it in simple terms, the U.S. national debt is the difference between the amount of money the federal government is bringing in through taxes and other revenue versus the total amount of budgeted federal spending, in addition to deficits from previous years, said Steven Kyle, associate professor of applied economics and management at Cornell University.
Part of the increase in recent years is attributable to the COVID-19 pandemic, which ushered in a variety of special spending, as well as the regular drivers, including entitlement programs like Medicaid and Medicare, defense spending, and high interest on the debt itself, said University of Pennsylvania Wharton School professor of finance Itamar Drechsler. Increasing costs to maintain Medicare and Social Security, due to an aging population and the rising price of healthcare, have also helped drive up the national debt.
While much has been made about the debt-to-GDP ratio in recent years, Kyle notes that there's no exact percentage that indicates instability. Japan's ratio, for example, was at almost 250% in 2023, yet that nation is not considered to be in an insecure economic position.
'There is no magic level for that number that means a crisis,' Kyle said. '... The problem we're having right now is that people are doubting that the economic managers of the United States are serious people and that they're actually trying to address this.'
What is clear, according to Kyle, is that one way to address an increase in government spending would be a boost in revenue through higher taxes. But in this current political atmosphere, that almost certainly won't happen.
'On the revenue side, one where you are not allowed to utter the word tax, we have not been getting the revenue we need to cover the gap,' Kyle said. 'And, therefore, we've been accumulating national debt in good times and bad.'
While what Kyle calls the 'huge borrowing spree' of the pandemic was largely 'unavoidable,' the last few years could have been used to right the financial ship.
The national debt is projected to top $52 trillion by 2035, according to the Congressional Budget Office — an estimate reached before Trump's tax cuts were enacted
Using a 2055 scenario in which the debt-to-GDP ratio is at 156%, the Peterson Foundation published an analysis which found that the current path of debt could reduce the size of the economy by $340 billion in 2035, shrink the number of U.S. jobs by 1.2 million, and bring wages down by 0.6% relative to having an unchanged national debt.
A 2025 Yale Budget Lab report showed that a permanent deficit increase of 1% of GDP would lead, after five years, to consumers paying $60 more in annual auto loan interest, $600 more in annual mortgage interest, and about $1,000 more for small business loan interest. The general tone of a continually rising national debt and debt-to-GDP ratio is some level of doom.
'What happens when everybody gets nervous?' Kyle said. 'Consumers don't buy things, investors don't invest in new productivity capacity because they don't know what their profit margin is going to be next year. We get a recession, and that can affect people.'
Read more: How to recession-proof your money
Here are some other specific ways individuals could be impacted by rising national debt.
According to the Peterson analysis, the number of U.S. jobs could decrease by as much as 1.2 million in 2035 and 2.7 million in 2055 based on the projected trajectory of the national debt compared to if it were to stay at its current level.
This could also lead to a decrease in wages as high as 3% by 2055. Essentially, a rising federal debt means the opposite of wage growth.
One of the simplest ways to reduce the national debt is by increasing government revenue, and that is largely done through higher tax rates.
'Unless we have miraculous growth, that tax rate will have to rise on people,' Drechsler said. '... But it's becoming increasingly toxic to ever talk about raising them, so in this political climate, I'm not sure it's going to happen anytime soon.'
Whenever economists talk about economic growth, or a lack thereof, interest rates are generally the metric that follows. Higher interest rates determine who can buy property and cars and invest in a business.
Learn more: When will mortgage rates go down?
'If [government debt] gets bigger and bigger, interest rates are going to be going up, because deficits are a direct stimulus to the economy. If they run huge budget deficits, then the Federal Reserve will raise interest rates to keep inflation in check,' Kyle said. 'There's only a certain amount of money looking for a home to be invested in and if the federal government soaks up ever more of it, consumers will feel that.'
The Yale Budget Lab found that after 30 years with a 1%-of-GDP permanent increase in the federal deficit annual car loan interest would increase by $200 and annual mortgage interest on the median home by $2,300.
Increased inflation is also a likely facet of a U.S. economy with an increasing national debt. The same Yale Budget Lab study noted that a deficit increase of 1% of GDP would raise inflation to the degree that, after five years, a household would lose $300 to $1,250 in purchasing power in 2024 dollars.
Read more: What is inflation, and how does it affect you?
In a recent survey, the Peter G. Peterson Foundation asked about the news that Moody's had downgraded the United States' credit rating. Eighty percent of survey voters, including 80% of Republican voters, said that the rating downgrade made addressing the national debt a more urgent priority.
To Kyle, the big question is whether the United States might at some point default on its debt. That could signal an international debt crisis — for us and for future generations.
'People don't seem to realize that if we go ahead and break that debt ceiling, that means we're defaulting on our debt. We're not paying the interest on the debt,' he said. 'That would be an international catastrophe for which there is no precedent for a major reserve currency of the world. We don't know exactly what would happen, but it won't be good.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


News24
a minute ago
- News24
SA fires back at US human rights report, calls it ‘fact-free' hypocrisy
SA rejected the state department's human rights report as 'deeply flawed' and accused US of using distorted facts. The dispute centres on US claims about farmworker killings and land expropriation while cases are still in courts. Report highlights US hypocrisy by America which withdrew from UN Human Rights Council. South Africa has launched a scathing counterattack against the US, rejecting a damning human rights report as 'deeply flawed' and turning the spotlight on America's record in a dramatic diplomatic showdown that exposes the politics behind international criticism. On Tuesday, the department of International relations and cooperation registered 'profound disappointment' with the US state department's recent human rights assessment, which claimed SA's situation had 'significantly worsened' and accused government of taking 'substantially worrying steps towards land expropriation of Afrikaners'. Chrispin Phiri, spokesperson for International Relations and Co-operation Minister Ronald Lamola, expressed fury over what he called fundamental distortions, including the US citing a case where farmworkers were allegedly killed and fed to pigs as an 'extrajudicial killing' despite the matter being actively adjudicated by SA's independent judiciary. The report's reliance on a-contextual information and distorted facts is highly concerning. We register our profound disappointment with this report. We reject it, it's inaccurate and deeply flawed. This is not only premature but a fundamental distortion of the facts, as the individuals are formally arraigned before a court of law. Chrispin Phiri In a pointed counterattack, SA questioned America's moral authority to judge other nations, highlighting that the US had withdrawn from the UN Human Rights Council and 'therefore no longer sees itself accountable in a multilateral peer review system'. Significant and documented concerns about human rights within the US, including the treatment of refugees and breaches in due process by its agencies, such as the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency. According to The Guardian newspaper, the controversy reflects a broader pattern under Donald Trump's administration, which has dramatically softened criticism of some countries that have been strong partners of the Republican president, such as El Salvador and Israel, which rights groups say have well-established histories of abuses. Instead, the US state department has 'stepped-up criticism of Brazil and SA, both of which Washington has clashed with over a host of issues'. The publication noted that criticism of governments over LGBTQ+ rights, prominent in former president Joe Biden administration's reports, 'appeared to have been largely omitted' from Trump's version. The diplomatic spat highlights stark contradictions in international assessments. While the US condemned the Land Expropriation Act, the UN Human Rights Office in Geneva, Switzerland, praised the same legislation as a 'critical step in addressing the country's racially imbalanced land ownership'. This recognition from the UN's primary human rights body underscores the integrity of our legislative processes aimed at rectifying historical injustices in a constitutional and human-rights-based manner. Chrispin Phiri The US report accused SA of multiple violations, including arbitrary killings, detention, repression of racial minorities and inflammatory rhetoric against the Afrikaners. It claimed government failed to take 'credible steps to investigate, prosecute and punish officials who committed human rights abuses'. However, SA pointed to its transparency. Transparent systems, where information is freely available from our law enforcement agencies and Chapter 9 institutions, which are constitutionally mandated to protect and advance human rights. The controversy extends beyond SA. In Brazil, where Trump has clashed with the government over former president Jair Bolsonaro's legal troubles, the US found the human rights situation had declined after previously reporting 'no significant changes'. Trump has called Bolsonaro's prosecution for allegedly conspiring to overturn his 2022 election loss a 'witch-hunt' and threatened 50% tariffs on Brazilian goods. SA announced it would release 'a set of documents for public perusal during the week' to provide 'a complete and accurate picture' and counter what it called US distortions. Government pointed to reports from reputable sources, including the AFP fact-checks and BBC coverage, as evidence supporting their position on contested cases. The diplomatic clash reveals how human rights assessments have become increasingly politicised tools in international relations, with countries using moral authority as leverage against rivals while protecting allies from similar scrutiny.
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Targa Resources Signals Steady Leadership and Smart Liquidity Moves Amid Market Volatility
Targa Resources Corp. (NYSE:TRGP) is one of the best commodity stocks to buy, and here's why recent moves show they're not complacent. On August 1, 2025, the company quietly ushered in a leadership transition in its logistics arm, announcing that D. Scott Pryor will retire next March and internal veteran Benjamin J. Branstetter will step into the role. That internal elevation speaks volumes about continuity and confidence in the leadership bench. Before that, on July 28, the firm took care of business by extending its $600 million receivables securitization facility through August 2026, keeping a reliable, cost-effective liquidity line alive without rocking the economics. That kind of responsible financial housekeeping ensures operational flexibility and reflects sound planning amid energy market complexities. QiuJu Song/ Targa Resources Corp. (NYSE:TRGP) is a major midstream energy player in North America, owning and operating gathering, processing, transportation, and storage infrastructure for natural gas and natural gas liquids. The company enables energy delivery across key U.S. shale basins through its integrated midstream value chain. While we acknowledge the potential of TRGP as an investment, we believe certain AI stocks offer greater upside potential and carry less downside risk. If you're looking for an extremely undervalued AI stock that also stands to benefit significantly from Trump-era tariffs and the onshoring trend, see our free report on the best short-term AI stock. READ NEXT: and . Disclosure: None. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Yahoo
29 minutes ago
- Yahoo
The Twins are No Longer for Sale
In the latest middle finger to fans, this morning the Minnesota Twins posted the following letter on all their social media channels, coming directly from the Pohlads themselves. The key takeaway is the following quote: After a detailed process, our family will remain the principal owners of the Minnesota Twins… We are in the process of adding two significant limited partnership groups, each of whom will bring a wealth of experience and share our family values. Guess what folks? After all the hemming, hawing, and Justin Ishbia-induced teasing, we're stuck with what has turned into one of the worst ownership groups in baseball, which is saying a lot these days. While they're bringing in new investors to presumably add some more cash to the business, there is nothing in the history of Pohlad family ownership that suggests that money will be invested into the team rather than pocketed by greedy billionaires. This era of Twins baseball has been an unmitigated disaster since the high of the 2023 playoffs, which John Foley already recapped extensively. While there are definite arguments for a soft reset after missing the playoffs for (likely) four of the last five seasons, Derek Falvey, with a mandate from the Pohlads to shed salary, instead traded away their biggest free agent signing in franchise history, their five best relievers including two of the best in Twins history, and signs are pointing toward trades for Joe Ryan, Pablo Lopez, and Ryan Jeffers in the near future. I would love to be proven wrong, but this has moved from reset to a full-on rebuild, which becomes more likely with the Pohlads remaining in control for the foreseeable future. All this comes while team owner Joe Pohlad has refused to speak to the press or the fans. Joe is expected to speak to the press at some point today where he will likely dodge any and all relevant questions around the blowing up of a once-competitive team, but as we've learned with Joe Pohlad in particular, it's better to look at his actions rather than his words. This is the same man that said they would be open to increasing payroll after their success in 2023, just to shed $30M instead, directly leading to their collapse in the proceeding two seasons. In a world where billionaires are rapidly destroying our tax dollars, constitutional rights, and social safety nets, perhaps it's fitting they do the same to our favorite baseball team too. After all, billionaires taking away any semblance of light at the end of the tunnel via their mere presence is the new American Dream.