logo
Chatbots' new job: minding tots

Chatbots' new job: minding tots

Axios21-07-2025
Young children who directly interact with chatbots face new developmental risks, pediatricians and psychologists warn.
Why it matters: Assessing the impacts early could help protect a new generation from becoming guinea pigs for tech we don't fully understand.
The big picture: Most kids under five aren't using voice-based AI yet. Young kids already see AI-generated content — but on its own, that isn't necessarily a new problem.
Low-quality images and videos commonly known as AI slop don't differ that much from the low end of mass-produced kids' media that's been around for decades.
The real concern is interaction with live AI, which can be both powerfully engaging and confusing at the same time.
Imagine "Blue's Clues," but the character answers in real time and adapts to a child's input.
Talking with AI could shape children's brain development and social connections in unknown ways.
Chatbot use — especially among young children — is still new. There are no long-term studies on its impact, but we do know a lot about how screen time and tech use affect child development.
The amount of time kids spend on devices is disrupting or arresting other important developmental milestones, Scott Kollins, psychologist and chief medical officer at family software company Aura, told Axios.
"We've seen that with older kids. And with kids between zero and five, their brains are developing faster, and they're hitting these super important social milestones more frequently."
Interacting with AI chatbots, Kollins warns, has "the potential to be even that much more disruptive" — but right now, "it is all conjecture in terms of this specific type of interaction."
What they're saying: Interaction with generative AI could "fundamentally change the human brain," says Dana Suskind, a pediatric physician and expert on early childhood and early language development.
Suskind says teenagers and adults are already forming relationships with AI companions. The same could happen with younger kids.
"The content and experience that kids are exposed to in early years isn't just sort of changing things the same way social media impacted adolescent brains," Suskind told Axios. "It is actually changing the foundational wiring of the human brain."
"Children naturally anthropomorphize," Suskind wrote in an email, "but with responsive AI, we're entering uncharted territory for how this might shape their developing sense of reality and relationships."
Between the lines: Some child development researchers worry that chatbots could reshape how children learn trust, empathy and connection.
A small study from 2024 showed that kids ages 3-6 were more likely to trust a robot than a human, even when that robot had proven to be less reliable than the human.
Trust is a particularly thorny problem for those who rely on AI, since many researchers argue that these tools might always be prone to making things up.
Chatbots also tell people what they want to hear.
They're trained to please, which means they're unlikely to say "no" — a word that small children need to learn to deal with.
"It changes the way that kids learn about the cadence and the natural progression of interaction with others," Kollins says. "That's a problem if [young kids] don't learn how responding in a certain way or broaching particular kinds of topics might be met with certain reactions."
The other side: AI can make up stories, answer questions or generate elaborate images at the whim of a creative child.
Many parents are already using chatbots to ease the stress of parenting, including helping to satisfy kids' boundless curiosity.
Amazon's smart home devices — now with Alexa+ boosted AI — come in styles aimed at the youngest users and promise that "kids can create unique stories they dream up with Alexa."
Some early studies show that when children engage in story-based dialogues with AI, rather than just listening passively, they learn more vocabulary and comprehend content better.
In some cases, researchers found these gains were comparable to those from human interactions.
Kollins says that as adults our responsibility to provide our young children with all the information and content that's meaningful or stimulating will be reduced, and that's not all bad.
"Why should [our children] rely just on this narrow sliver of what dad knows, versus the universe of content?" Kollins says.
Yes, but: AI interactions may crowd out important human interactions and activities for young children.
CNN tech reporter Samantha Murphy Kelly wrote in 2018 that because she used Amazon's voice assistant so often, "Alexa" was among the first four words her toddler understood.
Some scientists also worry that even if AI tools do benefit some kids, those gains could just deepen existing educational disparities.
"The one thing that makes us uniquely human," Kollins says, "whether it's for younger kids or even for older kids, is just the entire range of non-verbal communication... subtle facial expressions and body language... that you miss when you're in front of a screen."
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Brands are trying to get to your door in 15 minutes or less
Brands are trying to get to your door in 15 minutes or less

Axios

time10 minutes ago

  • Axios

Brands are trying to get to your door in 15 minutes or less

The dream of instant commerce is getting closer to reality — not necessarily because technology is improving, one company says, but simply by being nearer to more people for faster delivery. Why it matters: We're used to instant gratification in our entertainment and human interaction — but still have to wait for our stuff, unless we're willing to deal with the burden of getting up off the couch and getting it ourselves. That's changing. Driving the news: Last month Disney took the wraps off a partnership with delivery service GoPuff, offering custom mini-stores tied to its properties. An on-screen QR code takes viewers to the storefront, letting them purchase select items within 30 seconds for delivery in as little as 15 minutes, depending on their location. Zoom out: 25 years ago, the dream of both TV and Internet commerce was one-click shopping — hit a button on a remote and automatically buy what you saw on screen for immediate delivery. There was even an industry shorthand for the technological and commercial goal: "Rachel's sweater," as in, being able to click and immediately buy the clothes Jennifer Aniston's character wore on the then-smash hit "Friends." Society hasn't quite achieved that dream, yet, but it's closer. What they're saying: "I can go from seeing an advertisement to having it in your hand in literally 15, 20 minutes," GoPuff co-CEO Yakir Gola tells Axios. The company's hundreds of "micro-fulfillment centers" cover most major U.S. cities. They're positioned as a source for "everyday essentials," Gola says; top products include eggs, water and paper towels. Yes, but: Brands are starting to drive demand, too, either in the form of the Disney deal, or in white-label arrangements where GoPuff handles back-end fulfillment. Starbucks has even piloted a program where baristas it trains make drinks inside GoPuff fulfillment centers for rapid delivery. The intrigue: A number of retailers are piloting programs with drones and delivery robots, aiming to get products faster from store to door. GoPuff's Gola says the company's gone a different route, with internal development of software and AI tools to optimize how deliveries are batched and dispatched. Others have the same idea. Walmart — the world's largest retailer — says it is also using AI plans to speed up delivery times, and plans to bring 3-hour delivery to 95% of U.S. households by the end of 2025. The bottom line: We're getting closer to an era where it's faster for people to bring things to you than for you to go get it yourself.

Exclusive: Embedded tax startup April raises $38M
Exclusive: Embedded tax startup April raises $38M

Axios

time18 hours ago

  • Axios

Exclusive: Embedded tax startup April raises $38M

April, an embedded tax platform, has raised $38 million in a Series B round led by QED Investors, founder Ben Borodach tells Axios exclusively. Why it matters: Embedding tax tools directly into financial apps can improve financial decision-making and boost customer retention. Zoom in: Nyca Partners and Team8 also participated in the Series B round, bringing the total funding April has raised to date to $78 million. How it works: Fintech apps and financial institutions use April's APIs to integrate tax filing and planning directly into their platforms, enabling year-round, real-time tax management. April operates on a SaaS-based model, offering flat-rate pricing to fintech partners, who can choose to mark up services for their end customers. "Our vision is to embed tax in every financial decision," Borodach says. "Taxes should be happening where you're managing your money. They should be happening in real time, and they should be personalized to you." Context: New York-based April operates in a market dominated by legacy tax-preparation giants like Intuit, H&R Block, Thomson Reuters, and Wolters Kluwer. But it recently became the first new company in 15 years to achieve national e-file coverage in all 50 states, Borodach says. The company has also launched a series of new products over the past year, including pro-assisted and pro-led tax filing, quarterly estimate tools for small business owners, and paycheck withholding optimizers. As a result, it is seeing increased demand from wealth management platforms, including integrations with digital advisers catering to mass-affluent clients and an upcoming partnership with a trillion-dollar asset manager. By the numbers: April claims it can reduce the time it takes to prepare and file taxes from the IRS' reported 13‑hour average down to just 22 minutes. The company processed hundreds of thousands of returns through partnerships with over 50 fintech apps and financial institutions this past tax season. It has seen its business grow three times year-to-date and more than seven times over the past 12 months, Borodach says. What's next: The company is preparing to launch advanced tax planning tools around capital gains, retirement planning, and stock transactions.

AI's global race in the dark
AI's global race in the dark

Axios

time21 hours ago

  • Axios

AI's global race in the dark

The U.S.'s great AI race with China, now freshly embraced by President Trump, is a competition in the dark with no clear prize or finish line. Why it matters: Similar "races" of the past — like the nuclear arms race and the space race — have sparked innovation, but victories haven't lasted long or meant much. The big picture: Both Silicon Valley and the U.S. government now agree that we must invest untold billions to build supporting infrastructure for an error-prone, energy-hungry technology with an unproven business model and an unpredictable impact on the economy and jobs. What they're saying:"America is the country that started the AI race. And as president of the United States, I'm here today to declare that America is going to win it," Trump said at a Wednesday event titled "Winning the AI Race." Policy experts and industry leaders who promote the "race" idea argue that the U.S. and China are in a head-to-head competition to win the future of AI by achieving research breakthroughs, establishing the technology's standards and breaking the AGI or "superintelligence" barrier. They suggest that the world faces a binary choice between free, U.S.-developed AI imbued with democratic values or a Chinese alternative that's under the thumb of the Communist Party. Flashback: The last time a scientific race had truly world-shaping consequences was during the Second World War, as the Manhattan Project beat the Nazis to the atomic bomb. But Germany surrendered well before the U.S. had revealed or made use of its discovery. The nuclear arms race with the Soviet Union that followed was a decades-long stalemate that cost fortunes and more than once left the planet teetering on an apocalyptic brink. The 1960s space race was similarly inconclusive. Russia got humanity into space ahead of the U.S., but the U.S. made it to the moon first. Once that leg of the race was over, both countries retreated from further human exploration of space for decades. State of play: With AI, U.S. leaders are once again saying the race is on — but this time the scorecard is even murkier. "Build a bomb before Hitler" or "Put a man on the moon" are comprehensible objectives, but no one is providing similar clarity for the AI competition. The best the industry can say is that we are racing toward AI that's smarter than people. But no two companies or experts have the same definition of "smart" — for humans or AI models. We can't even say with confidence which of any two AI models is "smarter" right now, because we lack good measures and we don't always know or agree on what we want the technology to do. Between the lines: The "beat China" drumbeat is coming largely from inside the industry, which now has a direct line to the White House via Trump's AI adviser, David Sacks. "Whoever ends up winning ends up building the AI rails for the world," OpenAI chief global affairs officer Chris Lehane said at an Axios event in March. Arguing for controls on U.S. chip exports to China earlier this year, Anthropic CEO Dario Amodei described competitor DeepSeek as "beholden to an authoritarian government that has committed human rights violations, has behaved aggressively on the world stage, and will be far more unfettered in these actions if they're able to match the U.S. in AI." Yes, but: In the era of the second Trump administration, many Americans view their own government as increasingly authoritarian. With Trump himself getting into the business of dictating the political slant of AI products, it's harder for America's champions to sell U.S. alternatives as more "free." China has been catching up to the U.S. in AI research and development, most tech experts agree. They see the U.S. maintaining a shrinking lead of at most a couple of years and perhaps as little as months. But this edge is largely meaningless, since innovations propagate broadly and quickly in the AI industry. And cultural and language differences mean that the U.S. and its allies will never just switch over to Chinese suppliers even if their AI outruns the U.S. competition. In this, AI is more like social media than like steel, solar panels or other fungible goods. The bottom line: The U.S. and China are both going to have increasingly advanced AI in coming years. The race between them is more a convenient fiction that marshals money and minds than a real conflict with an outcome that matters.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store