logo
An open letter to President Donald J Trump

An open letter to President Donald J Trump

Time of India16 hours ago
Dear President Trump,
When you assumed office, India felt a surge of hope. A hope that your clarity on partnerships and strategy would lead to a stronger, more principled global leadership. We believed our time-tested ties would deepen, built on parity, not pressure. Yet on August 6, 2025, your administration chose to impose an additional 25% tariff on Indian imports, raising the total to 50%, citing our continued purchase of Russian oil. For two nations that have long claimed a strategic, values-based partnership, this move is deeply disappointing—and strategically incoherent.
Today, August 7, marks the anniversary of the Swadeshi Movement—a historic assertion of economic self-reliance. If India were to channel that spirit today and initiate a boycott of U.S. businesses, the impact would be far greater on America than on us on multiple fronts. U.S. firms earn over $80 billion annually from India, with critical stakes in education, tech, finance, and IP. US Aviation deals with India alone were worth $2.45 billion in 2022, and sectors like MRO, navigation, and air traffic systems remain deeply tied to India. Moreover, U.S. exports in manufacturing exceed $42 billion. Meanwhile, India's $200 billion IT industry powers much of America's digital backbone. Over 70% of skilled U.S. visas go to Indians because a third of your AI workforce is of Indian origin, while additionally, Indian students contribute $8 billion annually to your economy. If India looked inward, it wouldn't just signal economic nationalism—it would unearth America's dependence on Indian markets, talent, and momentum.
Your own administration's 2025 Annual Threat Assessment identifies China as a systemic rival challenging U.S. interests through conventional and asymmetric tools. And yet, you choose to use the word 'penalty', which is unparliamentary and diplomatically unwelcome. India is not just resilient—we are rising. A 'dead economy' cannot be the world's fourth-largest, soon to be the third, and remain the fastest-growing among major nations. With a 1.4 billion population and a median age under 30, we are dynamic, digital, and determined. Morgan Stanley estimates our middle class alone will drive $5 trillion in consumption by 2031. This is not just India's story—it's the Global South's opportunity for the Global North. It is also telling that your close ally, the European Union, recorded over €67.5 billion in trade with Russia last year, including record LNG imports, even as it calls for others to scale back. What is more surprising is that the United States continues to quietly import uranium hexafluoride for its nuclear industry, palladium for its EV industry, fertilisers, and chemicals from Russia—the same Russia from which you do not want us to buy oil. In fact, your remarks on August 5 this year revealed a startling lack of awareness about this very dependence. And yet, India is singled out for securing energy access in line with its sovereign needs. Should a nation sanction India for trade with Russia when it itself relies on the Kremlin for its domestic interests?
Instilling the spirit of Vasudhaiva Kutumbakam, we have stood by the US in the Quad, in counterterrorism, during COVID, and through intelligence sharing post-9/11. Yet, we have also seen trust tested—through military aid to Pakistan, strategic silences, and visa uncertainties. Still, we chose engagement over estrangement. But the future now lies in the hands of those who understand that diplomacy and cooperation are the way forward—not sweeping tariffs.
Mr. President, let us choose dialogue over discord, coordination over coercion. Let us shape the future—through respect, resolve, and renewed commitment to a rules-based global order.
Facebook Twitter Linkedin Email Disclaimer
Views expressed above are the author's own.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Pakistan lost nearly ₹127 crore after closing airspace to India in 2 months: Report
Pakistan lost nearly ₹127 crore after closing airspace to India in 2 months: Report

Hindustan Times

time11 minutes ago

  • Hindustan Times

Pakistan lost nearly ₹127 crore after closing airspace to India in 2 months: Report

Pakistan has reportedly lost nearly ₹127 crore in over two months since it shut its airspace to India following the suspension of the Indus Waters treaty after the April 22 Pahalgam terror attack. Pakistan shut its airspace to all Indian airlines on April 24 (Unsplash/Representative) According to a Dawn report, Pakistan's the Ministry of Defence has informed the National Assembly that the country lost the amount from April 24 to June 30, and that the loss was in overflying revenue. However, while it submitted the data of the losses, Pakistan's Defence Ministry reportedly said amounts reflected 'revenue shortfalls, not overall financial losses', adding that overflight and aeronautical charges have remained the same. 'While financial losses occur, sovereignty and national defence take precedence over economic considerations,' the Defence Ministry reportedly said in a statement. Pakistan shut its airspace to all Indian airlines on April 24 as it rejected India's decision to suspend the Indus Waters Treaty of 1960. Islamabad had said that any stopping or diversion of water under the pact would be seen as an 'act of war'. Pakistan has since stopped allowing any Indian plane to use its airspace, reducing its transit traffic by nearly 20%, Dawn further reported. The publication also said that a similar closure of airspace back in 2019 led to a loss of ₹235 crore. Pakistan had shut the airspace to India followed by an Indian Air Force strike on a Jaish-e-Mohammed (JeM) terror camp in Balakot in February, 2019. Both India and Pakistan continue to close airspaces to each other. While New Delhi has extended the closure of its airspace to the neighbouring country till August 23, Pakistan has reportedly extended it till the last week of this month.

Inside Track: Wheeling in Circles
Inside Track: Wheeling in Circles

Indian Express

time11 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

Inside Track: Wheeling in Circles

At the start of 2025 we were led to believe that we were Donald Trump's special friend and that India would probably be the first to conclude a trade tariff agreement with the US. Now we are not just back of the queue, but could be blackballed! A close observer of Trump-India relations has a different take from others for the mysterious fallout. It was not initially about Russian oil, Pakistani perfidy or thwarting Trump's Nobel Peace Prize ambitions. Trump was infuriated with India's dilatory tactics in signing a deal, which goes back to his first presidency. His joint appearance with Modi in Texas in 2019 was meant to help seal an agreement, but talks fell through a day later in New York. Time and again, as in Gujarat February 2020, like the traditional smooth-talking Indian trader, our officials assured that a deal was almost through, without confessing candidly that some portions of the deal concerning agriculture and dairy products were non-negotiable. Unfortunately, Trump is focused on just this sector, since his Republican supporters come from the farm belt. As US Commerce Secretary Howard Lutnick remarked angrily, 'You claim to be such a big country and you can't accept a bushel of American corn.' After being re-elected, President Trump was even willing to overlook past slights. (PM Modi did not call or even telephone Trump during his three visits to the US during the Biden presidency.) But in 2025, once again, despite the head-start in negotiations, the deal has not materialised! Retired IAS officer Subhash Chandra Garg's new book is titled No Minister. The former Finance Secretary does not hold back in recalling riveting encounters with his ministerial bosses, some of whom, in fact, refused to take no for an answer, despite bureaucrats citing the rules and the wishes of the incumbent PM. Garg names P Chidambaram among the naysayers who, as finance minister, threatened then PM Manmohan Singh with his resignation unless his proposal that 60-70 secretary level-posts were allotted to the Indian Revenue Service cadre. In Garg's view, this unbalanced the bureaucratic structure without improving tax collection. Similarly, Andhra CM Chandrababu Naidu, on whom the Vajpayee government was dependent for survival, cornered more than 40 % of the portfolios of Indian projects approved by the World Bank in 1999 and 2000. Despite objections from the government, Naidu forced them to agree to his audacious demand, in disregard of fair Central resource distribution. Similarly, Kamal Nath bullied his way so that 5% of the total pool of government houses in Delhi was part of his discretionary quota, which largely included newly constructed category type VII and VIII bungalows in Moti Bagh. Considering it is an intra-party contest to elect the fairly modest position of secretary (administration) of the Constitution Club, it is surprising that the poll has attracted intense national interest and media scrutiny. In contrast, Rajeev Shukla (Congress) has been elected unopposed as secretary (sports) and Tiruchi Siva (DMK) as secretary (culture) without any rancour. There seems more than meets the eye in the fierce tussle between the two ill-matched adversaries for the post of administrative secretary. The jocular, down-to-earth ex-MP and UP Jat leader Sanjeev Balyan, who only joined the club eight years ago, appears to have been pitch forked into the contest, while Rajiv Pratap Rudy, the suave Bihar MP who has been the guiding spirit behind the club for the last 25 years, is credited with upgrading its facilities, including gyms, saunas, lounges and sports facilities. Balyan's most vocal campaigner is controversial Bihar MP Nishikant Dubey, who is fighting with all the vehemence and caste calculations of a panchayat election and throwing names of powerful central politicians. Pratap, more discreet, is believed to be backed by an influential regional satrap, who has not shown his hand openly. Amidst constant reports of Air India's slipping standards, I am pleased to report my recent personal experience of the airlines, which demonstrates that the staff's spirit of service beyond the call of duty, the hallmark of JRD Tata's original Air India, has not vanished. While flying back from Kenya on an AI flight, the senior air hostess noticed my distress as I rummaged through my carry bag and under the seat for my missing iPad, which had obviously been left behind in Nairobi. I presumed resignedly that recovering my iPad was like looking for a needle in a haystack, but I had not reckoned with the resourcefulness of the very helpful air hostess and the AI Nairobi manager. The latter, with the assistance of his counterpart at the Nairobi airport lounge, located the missing iPad, got it identified through WhatsApp photos and arranged to have it returned to Delhi within a week.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store