Supreme Court Unanimously Greenlights Lawsuit Over FBI's Botched Raid
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources.
Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content.
The Supreme Court ruled unanimously on Thursday that an Atlanta family whose home was mistakenly raided by the FBI in 2017 can move forward with their lawsuit, granting them a new day in court.
The decision stems from a pre-dawn incident in which an FBI SWAT team broke down the family's front door, deployed a flashbang grenade, and pointed weapons at Trina Martin, her then-boyfriend Toi Cliatt, and her 7-year-old son—only to realize moments later they had entered the wrong house.
Although the agents quickly apologized and relocated to the correct address—blaming a GPS error for the mistake—Martin and Cliatt were left with emotional trauma and a damaged home. Their lawsuit against the federal government, alleging assault, false arrest, and other claims, was initially dismissed by lower courts.
The 11th Circuit Court of Appeals had ruled that the agents were protected under the Constitution's Supremacy Clause, which prioritizes federal law over state law.
But Martin's legal team, backed by advocacy groups across the political spectrum, appealed to the Supreme Court, arguing that such protections should not shield federal agents from accountability in clear cases of harm. The Court's decision reverses the lower rulings and revives a debate on law enforcement oversight and federal immunity.
This is a breaking news story. Updates to follow.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Hundreds expected to protest along Concord Parkway Saturday
On Saturday, we will see around 1,800 protests nationwide, 14 of which are scheduled for our area. Channel 9's Almiya White spoke with organizers in Concord who said they were taking a stand against the Trump administration. ALSO READ: Charlotte-area communities prepare for protesters on Saturday Sidewalks along Concord Parkway are expected to be filled with hundreds of demonstrators Saturday morning. 'Democracy is under threat,' said Phil Henry with invisible Concord. Henry is an organizer for the organization for the No Kings Rally and March. They are planning a protest on the same day President Donald Trump is set to hold a military parade in Washington, D.C., to celebrate the Army's 250th birthday. The event also coincides with the president's 79th birthday. 'This is the one thing we can do to bring attention to the fact that President Trump is ignoring the Constitution and his legal authority,' said Henry. He went on to say protesters plan to take a stand in a peaceful manner. 'Our intention is to be completely nonviolent,' said Henry. The Concord Police Department says they respect everyone's right to peacefully protest and have made the same preparations as they would for any other peaceful protest. 'We'll have marshals here. There are going to be eight of us. We all identified yellow safety vests. We all have radios, and we have the process that we must follow to get hold of the police if anything happens,' the department explained. Demonstrators will march about 700 feet in Concord. And at the end of the protest, Henry said he hopes leaders will remember this country is for the people. 'We're trying to change a few hearts and minds,' Henry said. 'We want to keep our name and our cause in front of people.' The march is scheduled to take place from 11 a.m. to 2 p.m. VIDEO: Charlotte-area communities prepare for protesters on Saturday
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Federal judge dismisses Shanquella Robinson wrongful death lawsuit against FBI, State Department
CHARLOTTE, N.C. (QUEEN CITY NEWS) — A federal judge Friday dismissed the wrongful death lawsuit made by the family of Shanquella Robinson against a pair of federal agencies. The FBI and State Department had motioned to dismiss the suit in January due to the alleged lack of jurisdiction over claims made against them. Robinson's estate made the amended claims in November 2024 seeking damages from the agencies based on their alleged negligence in relation to her 2022 death in Mexico. The estate also sought immediate release of related records from the FBI. PREVIOUS: Robinson's family pushes for case to be heard in U.S. Robinson, a Charlotte woman, died while vacationing with friends at a resort in Cabo San Lucas. Court documents show the autopsy report done in Mexico showed the cause of death was a severe spinal cord injury and neck trauma. However, when her body was returned home, a second autopsy by the FBI contradicted the report. In November 2022, the FBI informed Robinson's mother, Sallamondra, 'that it opened an investigation into the murder,' but in April 2023 told Sallamondra, her family and the public that the agency was no longer pursuing federal prosecution of the Cabo Six. In Friday's ruling, U.S. District Judge Max O. Cogburn Jr. agrees with the agencies argument that the family's Freedom of Information Act claim against the FBI and State Department must be dismissed because 'this Court lacks derivative jurisdiction over Plaintiff's FOIA claim.' 'Because the North Carolina court 'never acquired jurisdiction over either the subject matter [FOIA claim] or the [FBI] as a United States agency,' this Court 'can acquire none from the removal under NC Statute 1442.' The Robinson family still has a civil lawsuit against the members of the Cabo Six, accuses them of lying about Shanquella's death and trying to cover it up. They are pushing for this case to be heard in the United States. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
US courts now a high-risk venue for immigrants
Minutes after an immigration judge rejected his asylum case earlier this week, Oscar Gato Sanchez was arrested as he exited a federal courthouse in Houston. "I'm a Cuban citizen unjustly arrested," he told AFP as plainclothes officers led him away on Monday. His aunt Olaidys Sanchez, a 54-year-old legal resident of the United States, sobbed against a nearby wall. Her nephew was placed in an unmarked gray vehicle that took off with sirens blaring, heading towards an immigrant detention center in Conroe, about 80 kilometers (50 miles) north of Houston, according to official documents. Gato Sanchez is now among dozens of migrants detained there, awaiting deportation. In recent weeks, there has been an uptick of immigration enforcement operations at courthouses, as thousands of migrants pursue the asylum process by attending hearings. Agents from US Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) enter the court facilities unidentified, migrant advocates say, and those who do wear badges often cover their faces. Since President Donald Trump returned to power in January, ICE has been authorized to conduct enforcement activities in courts. AFP journalists have also witnessed arrests at courthouses in New York. In late May, US media published footage from a court in San Antonio, Texas, where a woman who had just been arrested cried out to ask anyone in earshot to pick up her children from school. Meanwhile, a young boy tried to comfort his mother as they were loaded into a vehicle to be taken away. Gato Sanchez entered the United States in December 2023. Like many other migrants, he turned himself in to authorities after arriving and was freed on condition that he appear in court at a later date. He filed an aslyum petition in May 2024 and went on Monday to the Houston court, where a date was to be set for a hearing on his case. Instead, a judge rejected the petition, after a public prosecutor said it was "no longer in the best interest of the government," said Bianca Santorini, a lawyer who began representing Sanchez immediately after his arrest. "If you're here without legal status, as soon as your case gets dismissed, the case doesn't exist anymore, the asylum application doesn't exist anymore," she told AFP. "So as soon as he walks out, he's here with nothing pending," and it's at that vulnerable moment that the arrest occurs, she added. - Respecting rules - Santorini believes ICE now has informants inside the courtroom. "They're not walking to every person who walks out of court and saying 'let me see your paperwork, let me see what happened.' They already know when people walk out of court what happened," she said. Even though he had an aslum applicaiton pending, Gato Sanchez will not get his day in court, despite the Constitution guaranteeing such a right, she added. "It doesn't guarantee you'll win. It doesn't guarantee you get to stay, but it guarantees you have a day in court. Give me the day in court," she said. The majority of immigrants present themselves in court in good faith, said Cesar Espinosa, executive director of the immigrant-rights organization FIEL. "Most of these people are following some sort of law, whether it's asylum law or even showing up to court. They're here trying to do the right thing, to try to see if they can fight their case," he said. In Los Angeles, an ICE operation targeting undocumented workers outside a home improvement store set off demonstrations and clashes that resulted in Trump's controversial decision to send in the US National Guard and Marines. Espinosa said some Americans had welcomed the anti-immigrant raids and complained about the people being detained. "But when they're serving us, when they are being the backbone of our economy, nobody complains," he said. mav/ksb/jgc
