US judge tosses Rumble lawsuit claiming advertising boycott
In her ruling, opens new tab, U.S. District Judge Jane Boyle in Dallas said Texas federal court was not the proper forum for Rumble's lawsuit against Diageo and advertising and marketing agency WPP, which are both based in England, and Brussels-based World Federation of Advertisers.
Boyle's ruling did not address the merits of the lawsuit filed last year by Florida-based Rumble, which hosts U.S. President Donald Trump's Truth Social.
The judge also said it was an 'open question' whether her Texas court was the appropriate forum for a related lawsuit that X filed last year against the advertising federation and other company defendants.
Rumble and two lawyers representing the company did not immediately respond to requests for comment, and neither did World Federation of Advertisers and Diageo. WPP declined to comment. X did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The defendants in both lawsuits have denied they had an agreement to withhold advertising spending on Rumble.
Rumble's case focused on a 'brand-safety standards' initiative by the advertising federation called the Global Alliance for Responsible Media.
Rumble accused members of the alliance, which lasted until last year, of illegally boycotting platforms that did not comply with those standards.
In a court filing, opens new tab in February, Diageo and the other defendants countered that 'there are perfectly good non-boycott reasons why defendants and others have chosen not to advertise on Rumble, which prides itself on lax content moderation and brand-safety measures.'
The defendants told the court that Rumble's lawsuit was an attempt to force them to do business with the platform despite competitive reasons not to do so, and that Rumble was trying to 'weaponize the antitrust laws to create that business relationship.'
They also argued the lawsuit 'has nothing to do with Texas.'
The case is Rumble v. World Federation of Advertisers, Diageo, WPP ad GroupM, U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas, No. 7:24-cv-00115-O.
For plaintiff: John Sullivan of S|L Law; and Brandon Kressin of Kressin Powers
For WFA: David Miller, William Snyder and Charles Elder of Bradley Arant Boult Cummings
For WPP: Steven Lehotsky of Lehotsky Keller Cohn
For Diageo: D. Bruce Hoffman of Cleary Gottlieb Steen & Hamilton; and Amber Rogers of Hunton Andrews Kurth
Read more:
Media Matters sues to block FTC probe over Musk's X boycott claims
Google defeats Rumble's antitrust lawsuit over video sharing market
Advertisers ask US judge to dismiss lawsuit by Musk's X over ad spending
Musk's X reaches deal to drop Twitch from lawsuit over ad spending
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
31 minutes ago
- The Independent
How to get your AT&T settlement
Millions of AT&T customers could now be eligible for a claim of up to $7,500 each. In March last year, a vast data breach impacted 73 million current and former account holders. Private information, including birth dates and Social Security numbers, was stolen by hackers and shared in a dataset on the dark web. Then, in a second strike, which was revealed in July 2024, hackers managed to download massive amounts of AT&T data from a third-party cloud platform. Call records and texts belonging to 'nearly all' AT&T cellular customers were breached, the company said, reported the BBC. Lawsuits ensued across the country in both state and federal courts. On August 4, the company said that they had agreed to a settlement fund in federal court. For the first breach, a $149 million all-cash fund was established to settle the claims, and for the second, a $28 million all-cash payment was made. According to the settlement website, the U.S. District Court for the Northern District of Texas is set to have a final approval hearing on December 3, later this year. Meanwhile, any AT&T customers can file for compensation in between. How do I submit a claim? Those who had their data exposed, from the announcement made in March 2024, are each eligible for up to $5,000 and can make claims for "payment for losses that occurred in 2019, or later," according to the website. People impacted in the July announcement are eligible for up to $2,500 "for losses that occurred on or after April 14, 2024," the settlement administration said. To receive the payment, customers must provide documentation showing that the losses they incurred are "fairly traceable" to the AT&T data breaches. If your data was leaked in both breaches, you may be eligible for up to $7,500. You would then become what the settlement administration calls a "overlap settlement class member." The deadline to file a claim is set for November 18, 2025. You will receive the payment, if successfully claimed, in December at the earliest. 'Please be patient,' the settlement claim site said.
Reuters
32 minutes ago
- Reuters
Caterpillar, Deere count the costs of tariffs as soft demand limits pricing power
Aug 15 (Reuters) - Industrial machinery makers are being battered by steeper costs from U.S. President Donald Trump's sweeping tariffs, with sluggish demand and high interest rates leaving little room to pass those expenses onto customers. Caterpillar (CAT.N), opens new tab and Deere (DE.N), opens new tab, both sector bellwethers, have flagged hefty tariff-related hits this year, most of which they expect to absorb in the coming months as policy shifts keep markets on edge. Global companies that reported between July 16 and August 14 projected a combined financial hit of $14.2 billion to $15.8 billion for the full year, the Reuters' tariff tracker shows. During their respective earnings calls, Caterpillar said tariffs on imported components and materials would weigh on margins, while Deere warned of higher costs for steel and other inputs critical to its agricultural and construction equipment. The new round of tariffs, part of Trump's expansive push to protect U.S. manufacturing and narrow trade deficits, covers a wide range of industrial goods and raw materials. Machinery makers are already contending with a soft demand environment, as an uncertain economic outlook and elevated borrowing costs prompt customers to delay large capital investments. Deere was not able to raise prices as much as expected in its construction and forestry unit, while price increases in its agriculture business were modest and a bit below forecasts, Edward Jones analyst Faisal Hersi said. That has made it harder to pass on rising expenses, a sharp contrast to the pandemic years when resilient farm incomes and robust infrastructure spending allowed equipment makers to offset supply chain disruptions with price hikes and shield their margins. Quarterly operating profit in Deere's construction & forestry unit roughly halved from last year, while Caterpillar's overall operating profit fell nearly 20%. The tariff hit will be felt most in Deere's Small Ag & Turf and Construction & Forestry units, Jefferies analyst Stephen Volkmann said, with pricing moves only partially offsetting the blow. While the levies are designed to spur domestic production, they have raised concerns among manufacturers that rely on global supply chains. Deere expects just a 1% price gain this year in its largest division, Production & Precision Agriculture, leaving little to cushion a hit from normal cost inflation. Caterpillar is facing as much as $1.5 billion in tariff-related costs in 2025, including $400 million to $500 million in the third quarter alone, but is keeping its revenue guidance slightly above 2024 levels. "Currently, inventory destocking is the norm as demand cools, pressuring CAT and DE's ability to push through higher prices onto their customer base," CFRA Research analyst Jonathan Sakraida said. On the demand side, Caterpillar is finding some relief in its Energy & Transportation unit, which supplies engines, turbines, and locomotives for industries from power generation to rail, with strength there helping offset weakness in its Construction Industries and Resource Industries segments. Deere, with its heavier reliance on the farm equipment market, has faced a sharper slowdown, with sales down nearly 18% so far this year. Caterpillar's power generation business, for instance, is avoiding deep discounts to clear inventory, while Deere is expected to take a more aggressive pricing stance in Brazil as those markets move into a recovery phase, Sakraida said. The world's largest farm equipment maker, which expects $600 million in tariff impacts this year - $100 million north of its prior expectation, has cut its annual profit forecast twice this year as slowing farm equipment sales weigh on results.
Reuters
32 minutes ago
- Reuters
Start-up Grand Slam Track struggling to compensate athletes
NEW YORK, Aug 15 (Reuters) - Grand Slam Track is struggling to compensate its athletes after pulling its final meet of the year in Los Angeles, CEO Michael Johnson said on Friday, adding that the start-up did not receive funding that had been committed to it. The track circuit lured in top talent with promises of massive paydays in its debut year but was forced to cancel the fourth and final meet on the calendar after trimming back another event in Philadelphia from three to two days. Last month, Front Office Sports reported that Grand Slam Track owed around $13 million to athletes who had participated. "It is incredibly difficult to live with the reality that you've built something bigger than yourself while simultaneously feeling like you've let down the very people you set out to help," Johnson said in a statement. "We promised that athletes would be fairly and quickly compensated. Yet, here we are struggling with our ability to compensate them." The four-time Olympic gold medallist said the start-up was unable to meet dated payment timelines after it did not receive funding committed to it: "We saw circumstances change in ways beyond our control." Despite this, Johnson said Grand Slam Track has no plans to shut down and would move forward with a 2026 season after its athletes have been paid.
