
Six months of Trump 2.0: Chaotic policy shifts, resilient markets
In just six months since Donald Trump returned to the White House, markets have experienced a whirlwind of policy headlines, geopolitical recalibrations, and economic crosswinds. Echoing Lenin's famous words, there are decades where nothing happens, and weeks where decades happen. The first half of 2025 has seen the U.S. government adopt a more self-directed, assertive role on the world stage, rekindling protectionist rhetoric, floating ambitious tax and spending plans, and throwing policy support behind innovation and national security.
Yet, markets have remained largely resilient. Equities have continued climbing, optimism around artificial intelligence has bolstered tech valuations, and volatility has remained subdued despite repeated threats of tariffs, tighter immigration rules, and political pressure on the Federal Reserve.
Looking ahead, markets may need to shift their focus from headline noise to tangible outcomes. Several Trump-era themes now appear poised to move from speculation into execution—potentially reshaping capital flows and investment leadership in the second half of 2025.
Trade tensions: rhetoric high, execution light
Trade was one of Trump's most frequently mentioned topics in H1, with repeated threats of tariffs, especially targeting China and Mexico. However, so far, the execution has been limited. Tariffs have been repeatedly threatened but not enforced. Investors have largely shrugged off the noise, with markets often rallying after key deadlines pass uneventfully.
Trump's approach to trade is being interpreted more as a tactical tool than an imminent threat to global commerce.
Looking ahead: If tariffs are implemented following the August 1 deadline, cyclical sectors—particularly autos, industrials, and U.S. retailers—could face margin pressure.
Conversely, another delay could restore risk appetite, especially for Asia-based exporters and global supply chain beneficiaries like India and Southeast Asia.
Fed independence: pressure builds, markets stay calm
Trump's persistent criticism of the Federal Reserve and calls for rate cuts have put the Fed's independence under increasing scrutiny. Despite this, Chair Jerome Powell has so far resisted political pressure. Trump's public criticism has escalated, including suggestions of removing Powell and risks of a shadow Fed chair.
Although inflation has moderated, the Fed has maintained a steady policy stance—citing data dependence and caution around tariff-induced price volatility.
Markets, however, are already pricing in rate cuts, supporting risk sentiment.
Looking ahead: Powell's Jackson Hole speech in August and the September FOMC meeting will be key indicators of policy direction.
If cuts materialize, they may reinforce the notion of a 'Trump Put'—suggesting policy will accommodate market weakness.
If the Fed resists, volatility could reemerge, particularly across rate-sensitive assets.
The 'Big Beautiful Tax Bill': promise or pipe dream?
In typical Trump fashion, the 'Big Beautiful Tax Bill' was announced with fanfare, promising tax relief and a pro-growth boost to the economy. But so far, the plan remains more vision than law. The proposal includes corporate tax cuts, capital gains relief, and incentives for small businesses.
Markets initially cheered the announcement, viewing it as a revival of 2017-style fiscal stimulus.
However, concerns about funding, timing, and political gridlock have begun to surface.
Looking ahead: The market appears to expect some version of the tax bill to pass, even if scaled down.
A legislative impasse could spark policy disappointment and reverse optimism in tax-sensitive equities.
Conversely, even partial passage could extend the rally in small- and mid-cap stocks and stimulate business investment.
The new Trump trades: investment themes to watch from here
As the policy headlines begin to transition into implementation, investors are starting to reposition toward themes that may have more staying power through Trump's second term.
Artificial intelligence and infrastructure
Trump has announced a $500 billion public-private AI infrastructure initiative, with participation from major firms including Softbank, OpenAI, and Oracle. Additionally, the GOP's tax bill proposes: $250 million in funding for AI-driven cybersecurity programs,
Tax breaks for chipmakers building fabrication facilities in the U.S.
Corporate spending remains strong, despite short-term earnings volatility: U.S. AI utilization rates have doubled year-on-year, according to Census Bureau data.
Companies like Microsoft and Meta are ramping up AI development, adjusting internal structures to prioritize generative AI.
Global investment competition is intensifying. China continues to pursue Nvidia chips, while Meta is expanding its in-house AI labs
This level of commitment suggests AI is not a fad, but a structural shift that could define the next cycle of corporate capital expenditure.
Defense and security
Trump has signed several executive orders to support military innovation, cybersecurity, and domestic shipbuilding. The GOP spending bill allocates: $150 billion for defense overall,
$29 billion specifically for shipbuilding,
$170 billion for border enforcement.
Geopolitical instability, from Russia-Ukraine to tensions in the Taiwan Strait, underscores the strategic focus. A $24 billion budget has also been proposed for a space-based missile defense system dubbed the 'Golden Dome.'
These commitments make defense one of the more durable Trump trades, likely to benefit from bipartisan support.
Metals and mining
Resource nationalism is becoming a prominent theme under Trump. Executive orders supporting rare earths, copper, and energy exploration aim to reduce dependence on foreign suppliers. Highlights include: A Department of Defense investment in MP Materials, making the Pentagon its largest shareholder.
Proposed tariffs on imported steel, aluminum, and copper, aimed at reviving U.S. production capacity.
These developments signal longer-term support for U.S. mining and energy infrastructure, with implications for commodity prices and industrial equities.
Digital assets and bitcoin
Trump has taken a surprisingly proactive stance on crypto: An executive order was signed establishing a U.S. strategic Bitcoin reserve.
A broader digital finance strategy aims to position the U.S. as a leader in blockchain innovation.
Key legislative milestones are expected in H2, including a Senate vote on the Stablecoin Bill and the CLARITY Act.
While crypto remains volatile, the regulatory direction under Trump appears to support innovation rather than suppression—potentially unlocking institutional flows.
Small-cap stocks
With more exposure to domestic demand and less sensitivity to global supply chains, small-cap equities are poised to benefit from: Proposed tax cuts,
Looser regulatory conditions,
Fiscal spending programs targeting infrastructure and innovation.
These factors could unlock outperformance, particularly if the 'Big Beautiful Tax Bill' advances in Congress.
Banking sector
The combination of rate cuts and deregulation is creating a constructive backdrop for U.S. banks: Lower funding costs may boost profitability,
Looser regulatory oversight could accelerate M&A activity,
Underlying credit fundamentals remain relatively stable.
This makes the banking sector attractive to investors looking for mean reversion and income.
Fed rate cut plays
Despite the Fed's current stance, markets are already discounting potential cuts by year-end. If rate cuts materialize, they would have broad implications: Duration-sensitive sectors such as utilities, REITs, and consumer staples stand to benefit as bond yields decline.
High-dividend equities may regain favor, especially among income-seeking investors reallocating from cash.
Growth equities, particularly in technology and communication services, may get an additional boost as discount rates fall.
The falling US dollar could support non-U.S. equities and commodities, reinforcing flows into emerging markets and gold.
China: from manufacturing to innovation
China's economic trajectory is increasingly defined by a shift from export-led manufacturing to high-tech innovation:
Despite demographic headwinds and trade restrictions, capital continues to flow into AI and semiconductors.
China's pivot reflects a deeper transformation—from quantity to quality, and from global outsourcing to domestic capability.
U.S. dollar outlook
The combined impact of political interference in Fed policy, rising fiscal deficits, and potential rate cuts could push the dollar lower. A weaker dollar would: Make US assets less attractive for foreign investors,
Enhance the appeal of European and Asian equities,
Boost earnings for U.S. multinationals,
Provide tailwinds for gold, oil, and other commodities.
This macro backdrop favors international diversification, selective EM allocation, and commodity exposure in H2.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Al-Ahram Weekly
3 hours ago
- Al-Ahram Weekly
Hamas rejects Trump remarks on Gaza talks breakdown - War on Gaza
Hamas officials expressed surprise on Saturday at US President Donald Trump's claim that the group "didn't really want" a ceasefire and captive release deal for Gaza, citing what they said was progress in negotiations. Trump made the allegation on Friday, a day after Israel and the United States quit indirect negotiations with Hamas in Qatar that had lasted nearly three weeks. "Trump's remarks are particularly surprising, especially as they come at a time when progress had been made on some of the negotiation files," Hamas official Taher al-Nunu told AFP. "So far, we have not been informed of any issues regarding the files under discussion in the indirect ceasefire negotiations", he added. Nunu, who is close to Hamas's most senior political officials, said he was "surprised" that Israel and the United States had left the talks. Announcing the recall of US mediators on Thursday, Trump's special envoy Steve Witkoff accused Hamas of not "acting in good faith". Though not part of the Hamas negotiating team, Hamas politburo member Izzat al-Rishq insisted the group had shown "flexibility" in the talks. "The American statements deliberately ignore the real obstructionist to all agreements, Netanyahu's government, which continues to put obstacles, deceive and evade commitments," he said. Both Hamas officials called on the United States to be more even-handed in its role as mediator in the quest for a ceasefire after more than 21 months of Israel's war on Gaza. "We call for an end to the US bias in favour of Netanyahu, who is obstructing any agreement", Nunu said. The Israeli war -- described as genocide by numerous aid and human rights groups -- has killed or injured nearly 200,000 Palestinians and driven Gaza's 2.3 million people into famine. *This story was edited by Ahram Online. Follow us on: Facebook Instagram Whatsapp Short link:


Egypt Independent
5 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Trump just made a problematic Ghislaine Maxwell situation look even worse
Interviewing Ghislaine Maxwell is the Trump administration's first big move to allay concerns about its hugely unpopular handling of the Jeffrey Epstein files. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche on Friday wrapped up two days of interviews with Epstein's convicted associate. But there were already all kinds of reasons to be skeptical of this move and what it could produce, given the motivations of the two sides involved. And President Donald Trump epitomized all of them in a major way on Friday. While taking questions on his way to Scotland, Trump repeatedly held open the possibility of pardoning Maxwell for her crimes. 'Well, I don't want to talk about that,' Trump said initially. When pressed, he said, 'It's something I haven't thought about,' while conspicuously adding, 'I'm allowed to do it.' This wouldn't be the first time Trump has appeared to dangle a pardon over someone providing evidence that could impact him personally and politically. (In this case, he has demonstrated past personal ties to Epstein, and his administration is scrambling to clean up its botched handling of the Epstein files after previously promising to release them.) A similar situation played out during the Russia investigation, when Trump repeatedly left open the possibility of pardoning key witnesses like Paul Manafort, Michael Flynn and Michael Cohen. Critics alleged this amounted to obstruction of justice. Special counsel Robert Mueller's report didn't draw conclusions on possible obstruction, but it did cite Trump's pardon comments as 'evidence' that Trump's actions 'had the potential to influence Manafort's decision whether to cooperate with the government.' Manafort indeed wound up being a decidedly uncooperative witness, with a bipartisan Senate report saying his repeated lies hamstrung its own investigation. And Trump later pardoned him in a move that could certainly be understood as a reward for his lack of cooperation. That bit of history looms large here, given the parallels. But Trump is really just exacerbating an already dubious situation. There were already plenty of reasons to be skeptical of this move to interview Maxwell, and nobody involved seems particularly bothered to address those problems or even combat the perception of them. The first reason is the state of play in Maxwell's criminal case. It might seem far-fetched that Trump would ever pardon a convicted child sex-trafficker like Maxwell (even though he did 'wish her well' after she was charged). But there are other things his administration could do to help her. Among them would be taking actions in her ongoing appeal of her 2021 conviction. The Trump Justice Department has already taken highly suspect actions in another criminal case involving someone Trump wanted something politically from: New York Mayor Eric Adams. The administration earlier this year moved to dismiss the charges against Adams while suggestively citing its desire for the New York Democrat to assist in its crackdown on illegal immigration. Multiple prosecutors resigned in protest, with one claiming it was a 'quid pro quo' in her resignation letter. And the judge in the case appeared to sympathize. 'Everything here smacks of a bargain: Dismissal of the indictment in exchange for immigration policy concessions,' the judge said. Maxwell's lawyer, David Oscar Markus, has also been remarkably solicitous of Trump and the administration. Last week he called Trump the 'ultimate dealmaker' while claiming that the Justice Department had violated a deal with Maxwell. This week, he praised the Trump administration's 'commitment to uncovering the truth in this case' and said he and Maxwell were 'grateful that the government is trying to uncover the truth.' Markus on Friday also suggested an openness to a pardon. 'The president this morning said he had the power to do so,' Markus said, 'and we hope he exercises that power in a right and just way.' Indeed, also relevant here are the lawyers involved. Critics have cried foul that the DOJ official interviewing Maxwell was Blanche, rather than a non-political prosecutor who has been involved in the case who would have much more expertise. Not only is Blanche a top political appointee of Trump's; he's also his formal personal lawyer. Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, right, leaves his hotel for the federal courthouse on Friday in Tallahassee, Florida. Colin Hackley/AP 'The conflict of interest is glaring,' Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer of New York said Thursday on X. 'It stinks of high corruption.' What's more, Blanche appeared on a podcast last year with Markus and labeled him a 'friend.' 'You are by far the best out there,' Blanche said. But one of the biggest reasons to be skeptical is that Maxwell is someone the Trump Justice Department – the first one, at least – labeled a brazen liar. Back in 2020, the DOJ charged Maxwell with two counts of perjury – on top of the more serious charges she faced – while citing a 2016 civil deposition she gave. In the deposition, Maxwell claimed no knowledge of Epstein's 'scheme to recruit underage girls for sexual massages,' despite later being convicted of helping in the effort. She also claimed she didn't know about Epstein possessing sex toys, which was contradicted by witnesses at her trial. Maxwell's lawyers at the time said 'the questions asked were confusing, ambiguous, and improperly formed.' She was never actually tried for perjury. After her conviction on the more serious charges, prosecutors agreed to dismiss the perjury charges if her conviction stood, citing a desire to avoid further emotional trauma for the victims. But the Trump Justice Department in 2020 still called her credibility into question. In a 2020 filing, it said Maxwell's lies 'should give the Court serious pause' about trusting her. It also said Maxwell's 'willingness to brazenly lie under oath about her conduct … strongly suggests her true motive has been and remains to avoid being held accountable for her crimes.' All of that would seem relevant to today, especially given Trump's demonstrated willingness to wield his power to help people who help him – whether using pardons or anything else. Maxwell, who has years left in her 20-year prison sentence, clearly has motivation to say things Trump wants. That doesn't mean the interviews of Maxwell couldn't glean something important. Even witnesses with credibility problems can provide important information, if it's corroborated with other evidence. But right now, Trump and Co. aren't trying very hard to make this situation look kosher. And Trump's pardon comments take that to another level.


Egypt Independent
5 hours ago
- Egypt Independent
Gaza airdrops a 'distraction' from Israel's aid blockade, charity boss says
We've been reporting Saturday on the UK's vow to support aid airdrop efforts in Gaza. Israel's decision to let foreign countries drop supplies into the besieged Palestinian territory is also facing mounting criticism – the process has previously been seen as costly and unsafe. These airdrops are expected to take place 'in the coming days' according to an Israeli security official. 'Airdrops are not a solution to starvation in Gaza; they're a distraction,' Steve Cutts, interim CEO of UK-based charity Medical Aid for Palestinians said in a statement Friday. 'Palestinians in Gaza are starving not because of a lack of available food, but because Israel is deliberately blocking it,' Cutts said. 'Dropping aid from the sky cannot meet the colossal needs of 2.3 million people or replace the safe, coordinated aid delivery that only open land crossings can provide.' Juliette Touma, the director of communications for the United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees (UNRWA), says airdropping aid into Gaza is both costly and dangerous. Israel has banned UNRWA from operating in Gaza after accusing it of having staff involved in the October 7 attack. 'In general, in humanitarian settings, airdrops are used as a last resort. They are very, very expensive and can be quite dangerous,' Touma previously told CNN, adding that 'in the context of Gaza, we know that airdrops were not very helpful and in some cases there were fatalities.' The last airdrops into Gaza took place in October 2024 and were condemned at the time for being dangerous and not meeting Gazans' needs. In March 2024, CNN reported at least five people were killed when airdropped aid packages fell on them.