
National power grid needed to fend off Trump and build clean economy: advocates
In an open letter published Thursday, the 105 environmental, labour, Indigenous and community groups urge federal officials to fund an east-west power grid that prioritizes renewable energy, Indigenous and community ownership and energy efficiency as 'key projects in the national interest.'
'Better integrating Canada's electricity system is crucially important for energy security and economic competitiveness in the near term, but it is also a no-regret investment for the long-term prosperity of everyone living in Canada,' the letter reads. Upgrading power grids could create more than 300,000 jobs over the next 25 years, it adds.
A national power grid mega-project could also drive clean economic growth, and if materials like aluminum and steel are procured in Canada, it could also support those sectors under pressure from US tariffs, advocates say.
The groups argue that federal leadership is required to pull off a project of this scale due to challenges related to permitting, funding and interprovincial trade barriers. A study published in the Osgoode Hall Law Journal in 2022, found that more interprovincial transmission lines could boost interprovincial trade of renewable power by connecting privately owned wind, solar and other power sources to more customers.
The Liberals' 2025 platform included a commitment to build out an east-west electricity grid. The platform explicitly says the project will be developed with provinces, territories, Indigenous partners and stakeholders and 'will unleash clean growth across the country.'
The Prime Minister's Office did not return a request for comment.
A national power grid mega-project could also drive clean economic growth, and if materials like aluminum and steel are procured in Canada, it could also support those sectors under pressure from US tariffs, advocates say.
A coast-to-coast high voltage direct current (HVDC) line could be built in under five years, at a cost of roughly $24 billion, according to a study from the David Suzuki Foundation — $10 billion less than the recently completed Trans Mountain expansion project.
'Building an east-west electricity grid across Canada is a huge opportunity that will improve our energy security and create thousands of jobs,' said Stephen Thomas, clean energy manager with the David Suzuki Foundation, in a statement. 'With demand for power going up, our electricity system needs to be powered by renewable energy, not fossil fuels.
'A renewable-backed electricity grid will lower people's energy bills while limiting environmental harm and pollution.'
A briefing note prepared for a meeting between federal and Ontario officials in December that Canada's National Observer received through a federal access to information request describes the process leading up to the federal clean electricity regulations. The document notes that Environment and Climate Change Canada 'made significant changes to relax the regulations in the final design,' following 'substantial stakeholder feedback.'
Those relaxed regulations, published in December, allow fossil fuels to be used to generate electricity as far into the future as 2050, despite originally intending to be net-zero by 2035. The rules will still push provinces and utilities to transition to clean electricity — a widely recognized prerequisite to decarbonize other sectors like transportation, buildings and heavy industry — but 'flexibilities' to allow gas-fired power plants to operate well past 2035 are now baked into the country's decarbonization efforts.
The 105 groups behind Thursday's letter want the federal government to achieve a net-zero power grid by updating Canada's electricity strategy. They also call for upholding legal rights for Indigenous communities, including the right to free, prior and informed consent; labour supports like prevailing wage requirements and training capacity; and upgrades to both transmission and generation in line with affordable, reliable, clean electricity.
Last year, then-energy and natural resources minister Jonathan Wilkinson told Canada's National Observer that some provinces were eager to collaborate on expanding the power grid — with the notable exceptions of Alberta and Saskatchewan.
Even though a nationwide grid has long been discussed, a likely starting point is strengthening regional tie-ins between provinces with significant hydro resources and those still reliant on fossil fuels to better manage supply and demand.
A bit of geographic luck has already positioned Canada relatively well for this approach. Each province that still depends on burning coal, oil or gas to generate electricity has a neighbour with hydropower that can lend a hand. Some like British Columbia, Manitoba, Quebec and Newfoundland and Labrador have massive hydro resources, while others like Alberta, Saskatchewan, New Brunswick and Nova Scotia still rely on fossil fuels.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


National Post
2 hours ago
- National Post
Terry Newman: Poilievre's win means Carney's cakewalk is over
This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. The Tory leader's record of tearing apart Liberal policies will ensure in September, Parliament will be a trial by fire for the prime minister Conservative Party Leader Pierre Poilievre speaks after his win during the Battle River-Crowfoot byelection in Camrose, Alta., Monday, Aug. 18, 2025. THE CANADIAN PRESS/Jason Franson Despite naysayers and a longest ballot committee, Pierre Poilievre handily won his seat in Battle River-Crowfoot Monday, which means he will be returning to Parliament in September. THIS CONTENT IS RESERVED FOR SUBSCRIBERS Enjoy the latest local, national and international news. Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events. Unlimited online access to National Post. National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. SUBSCRIBE FOR MORE ARTICLES Enjoy the latest local, national and international news. Exclusive articles by Conrad Black, Barbara Kay and others. Plus, special edition NP Platformed and First Reading newsletters and virtual events. Unlimited online access to National Post. National Post ePaper, an electronic replica of the print edition to view on any device, share and comment on. Daily puzzles including the New York Times Crossword. Support local journalism. REGISTER / SIGN IN TO UNLOCK MORE ARTICLES Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account. Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments. Enjoy additional articles per month. Get email updates from your favourite authors. THIS ARTICLE IS FREE TO READ REGISTER TO UNLOCK. Create an account or sign in to continue with your reading experience. Access articles from across Canada with one account Share your thoughts and join the conversation in the comments Enjoy additional articles per month Get email updates from your favourite authors Up until this point, Prime Minister Mark Carney has had it easy. The Liberals haven't faced the Conservative leader in the House of Commons since December. And due to Poilievre's loss of the Carleton riding in the federal election, Carney has never had to face the opposition leader's razor-like questioning in Parliament. That respite will be over soon. Poilievre's return means Carney and the Liberal party's cakewalk is over. So far Carney has enjoyed public support for his policies and proposals, but Poilievre could be returning to the House at precisely the right time, as it becomes increasingly obvious that this country's problems, from the gigantic deficit, to housing affordability to our relationship with the United States, are not so easily solved. With the Conservative leader grilling the prime minister day in and day out, these problems will only be magnified. This newsletter tackles hot topics with boldness, verve and wit. (Subscriber-exclusive edition on Fridays) By signing up you consent to receive the above newsletter from Postmedia Network Inc. Please try again In fact, even out of Parliament, Poilievre has been successful at spotlighting criticisms of the Liberals EV mandate which he's described as akin 'to banning rural way of life.' The Conservatives are planning a nationwide campaign targeting the mandate, which a poll has suggested that Canadians think is 'unrealistic' and should be shelved. And there appears to be much more where that came from. Earlier this month, Poilievre challenged Carney to 'get shovels in the ground' for at least two energy projects by March 2026, a year after his swearing-in as prime minister. Carney campaigned on being committed to fast-tracking major project approvals in order to boost Canada's economy against tariff threats from Trump. Both the 'One Canadian Economy' and 'Building Canada Act' passed on June 26, but so far, no energy projects have manifested under Carney who is placing great emphasis on advancing the interests of clean growth and climate change. Poilievre has also repeated requests for Carney to repeal the industrial carbon tax and Impact Assessment Act in order to speed up private projects. Carney has explicitly refused to repeal both. Carney positioned himself as the best man for the job to fight Trump's proposed 25 per cent tariffs, later increased to 35 per cent, and to secure a new trade deal with U.S. President Donald Trump. Carney failed to reach a deal with Trump first by July 21 and then by Aug. 1. Carney claims negotiations will continue, but the elbows up facade has faded, providing more opportunities for Poilievre to criticize and differentiate his party. Carney has made clear on many occasions that he isn't a fan of being questioned, but, unless the prime minister refuses to show up to work, Poilievre will be there waiting to pounce, providing news reporters with regular punchy, quotable attacks. This advertisement has not loaded yet. This advertisement has not loaded yet, but your article continues below. It will much more difficult for Carney to defend obviously poor decisions such as his controversial statement that he intends to recognize Palestine as a state in September based on conditions that are not likely to be met that 'Hamas must disarm; and that Hamas must play no role in the future governance of Palestine.' Carney hasn't explained why a terrorist organization would suddenly choose to disarm after 18 years… for Mark Carney. The real test will ultimately be public opinion, and Poilievre's record of tearing apart Liberal policies will ensure September Parliament will be a trial by fire for Carney. The prime minister's polling numbers won't remain positive indefinitely. Despite a survey from early August showing Carney's approval rating at a somewhat-positive 56 per cent, only 36 per cent of Canadians seem to think the country is heading in the right direction. And of course they don't. All of the same problems that existed under former Prime Minister Justin Trudeau are not only still there, and they appear to be getting worse. As Post columnist Tristin Hopper points out, capital is fleeing the country, government is collecting more tax than ever before, never before has the gap between Canadian and U.S. GDP been wider, insolvencies haven't been this high since the Great Recession, housing is still unaffordable, and somehow, there are more bureaucrats on the government payroll than ever. Some might argue that this was all a product Trudeau's leadership, even though Carney advised the Liberals on economic policy informally during COVID and formally, since September 2024 when they appointed him as the Chair of the Liberal Party's Task Force on Economic Growth until he became leader of the party. This problem will be two-fold for Carney in September. Not only will he have to face questions about policy decisions since he has become prime minister, but his relationship with Brookfield means that some of his personal interests and business relations may also be a subject for debate once Parliament convenes in the fall. Poilievre, on the other hand, is a much better known quantity — often attacked for being a 'career politician.' One of the benefits of being a career politician is that everyone already knows where he stands, and they already know his life story. It would be strange for a skeleton to suddenly emerge from Polievre's closet at this point. Carney came in as a fresh face, but the party itself, especially notable cabinet ministers, didn't change much, they were just shuffled — Joly, Miller, Guilbeault, Freeland, Anand, Hajdu, Champagne and Fraser — just shifted around in a game of political musical chairs, as if these ministers would suddenly perform better in their latest positions. This all spells political trouble for Carney. And it begs another question: Which Carney can Canadians expect in House of Commons in the fall? Brookfield Carney? Former bank governor Carney? Climate Carney? Elbows up Carney? Who knows where those elbows have gone. They certainly haven't solved trade issues with Trump nor were they invited to what is being referred to as a successful meeting in Washington, D.C. about the future of Ukraine. It looks like Carney's going to need some elbow grease to explain this and more to the returning Opposition leader in the fall.


Toronto Star
3 hours ago
- Toronto Star
The Carney government made a serious misstep in response to the Air Canada strike
The news that reached Canadians in the early hours Tuesday was most welcome. Air Canada and its striking flight attendants had reached a deal and the airline would again be wheels up. While the news was met with relief, it showed the folly of a federal government that not only overreached, but also showcased a callous disregard for those fighting the scourge of unpaid work, further inflaming an already volatile situation. Ultimately, the two sides came to an agreement at the bargaining table. This is where deals should be reached under our process of collective bargaining. Yet Prime Minister Mark Carney and his labour minister, Patty Hajdu, had seemed eager to upend that process and hastily replace it with one that threatened jail time for union leaders.


Ottawa Citizen
4 hours ago
- Ottawa Citizen
Does the government's plan to cut departmental spending go far enough?
Fall is around the corner, and with it, the decisions of Prime Minister Mark Carney's upcoming spending review are near. Article content Over the past week, pundits and pollsters have continued to wade into the debate about whether and how the public service should be shrunk, as the federal government looks to cut departmental budgets by up to 15 per cent over three years. Article content Article content Along with that news, here are four public service stories from the past week we've been following so you don't have to. Article content Article content Article content The government's spending review does not go far enough in its scope, according to a new analysis by C.D. Howe Institute fellow John Lester, who previously served as an economist in the federal government. Article content In the analysis, Lester took aim at the exclusion of 'large swaths of program spending through exemptions and carveouts,' which he said will limit the potential savings to an estimated $22 billion in 2028/29, which falls short of the targets set by Carney. Article content In contrast, Lester argued the spending review should aim to save $50 billion in order to put 'federal finances on a fair and prudent path.' Article content Lester said the narrow scope of the review imposes cuts across departments equally. The approach will make it 'impossible to eliminate or restructure the programs performing poorest overall,' according to Lester. Article content Article content Article content A poll released by market-research firm Léger suggests the majority of Canadians want to see the size of the federal public service reduced. Article content The survey revealed that 54 per cent of respondents believed the size and cost of the public service should be reduced. Twenty-four per cent said that the size of the public service should be maintained, while 4 per cent said it should increase and 17 per cent were unsure.