
Pakistani diplomats ordered to vacate homes in Delhi
India has reportedly ordered Pakistani diplomats in New Delhi to vacate their residences before the expiry of their contracts, amid continuing harassment and surveillance, according to sources cited by Express News.
The sources said Pakistani diplomats are under constant watch, and their home internet services are being frequently suspended.
The orders to vacate came before the official end of the diplomats' housing contracts, with four to five Pakistani officials already instructed to leave their residences.
The strain in India–Pakistan diplomatic relations began after the Pahalgam attack in Indian Illegally Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (IIOJK), which led to a military confrontation between the nuclear-armed neighbours.
Also Read: Pakistan rubbishes India's claim of 'nuclear blackmail'
Earlier in May, the Indian government declared two Pakistani officials posted at the Pakistan High Commission in New Delhi persona non grata, accusing them of 'activities not in keeping with their official status.'
In a tit-for-tat move, soon after India's decision, Pakistan declared a staff member of the Indian High Commission in Islamabad persona non grata and directed the diplomat to leave the country within 24 hours.
After the Pahalgam attack, India immediately blamed Pakistan for the incident. However, Pakistan categorically rejected the accusation.
In response, India undertook a series of hostile actions, including suspending the 65-year-old Indus Waters Treaty (IWT), cancelling visas for Pakistani citizens, closing the Wagah-Attari border crossing, ordering the shutdown of the Pakistan High Commission in New Delhi, and reducing diplomatic staff at each other's embassies.
Tensions further escalated, when missile strikes hit six cities in Punjab and Azad Jammu and Kashmir, destroying a mosque and killing dozens of civilians, including women, children, and the elderly. In a swift military response, Pakistan's armed forces shot down Indian warplanes, including three Rafale jets.
The confrontation intensified again in the early hours of May 10, when India targeted several Pakistani airbases with missile strikes. In retaliation, Pakistan launched Operation Bunyanum Marsoos, damaging Indian military installations, including missile storage sites, airbases, and other strategic targets.
On May 10, US President Donald Trump announced that a ceasefire had been reached following intense diplomatic efforts overnight. Minutes later, the agreement was confirmed separately by Foreign Minister Ishaq Dar and the Indian foreign secretary.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Business Recorder
an hour ago
- Business Recorder
Military aid to Ukraine: Europe gives more, widening gap with US
PARIS: Europe again increased its military aid to Ukraine in May and June, unlike the United States, and is depending increasingly on its defence industry rather than existing weapons stockpiles, the Kiel Institute for the World Economy said Tuesday. Europe, the United Kingdom included, sent or earmarked a total of 80.5 billion euros ($93.7 billion) in military aid between the start of the war in February 2022 and the end of June 2025 against 64.6 billion euros allocated by the United States. The Germany-based Institute's data shows that the overall European military aid had outstripped the United States in the spring for the first time since June 2022. 'A significant proportion of the weapons provided no longer comes from stockpiles but is procured directly through the defence industry,' the institute said. 26 EU leaders say Ukraine should have freedom to decide its future 'This means that Europe now also leads the US in terms of total volume of military aid provided through industry since the start of the war.' Taro Nishikawa, a project lead at the research body's Ukraine Support Tracker, said it was 'a clear indication of the expanding role of defence manufacturing in military assistance.' In May and June, Europe earmarked 10.5 billion euros of military aid to Ukraine: Germany put up a package of five billion euros, followed by Norway with 1.5 billion euros and Belgium with 1.2 billion euros. The Netherlands, the United Kingdom and Denmark each earmarked between 500 and 600 million euros. At least 4.6 billion euros of the European military aid, or 44 percent of the overall amount in May and June, is set to be channelled through procurement contracts, mainly with Europe-based defence firms, notably based in Ukraine, the Kiel Institute said. Over the same period, Washington approved major exports of arms to Ukraine in May but not in the form of military aid under the Kiel Institute's definition because they have to be paid for by Ukraine itself. The United States was the main provider of aid to Ukraine before Donald Trump's return to the White House on January 20, 2025 when he broke with his Democrat predecessor Joe Biden's Ukraine support strategy. US Vice President JD Vance told the conservative news channel Fox News, in an interview broadcast on Sunday, that he believed Washington had now ended its financial support for Ukraine. 'But if the Europeans want to step up and actually buy the weapons from American producers, we are okay with that,' he said. Trump and his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin are scheduled to meet in Alaska on Friday to reach, according to the US president, a possible agreement on exchanging territory to bring an end to the war in Ukraine sparked by the Russian invasion more than three years ago.


Business Recorder
2 hours ago
- Business Recorder
Indian refiners using term deals as hedge against Russian supply risk, govt says
NEW DELHI: India's state oil refiners will continue to use annual contracts to secure oil supplies and hedge against market volatilities as the future of cheap Russian purchases is in doubt, the oil ministry said in a report to parliament on Tuesday. India has emerged as the leading buyer of Russian seaborne oil, which is sold at a discount after some Western nations shunned purchases and imposed restrictions on Russian exports over Moscow's 2022 invasion of Ukraine. However, U.S. President Donald Trump, who announced 25% import tariffs on Indian goods last month, is threatening further levies due to India's Russian oil purchases. And state refiners are currently awaiting clarity from the government on whether to continue importing Russian oil. 'Increased imports of Russian crude into India may not last forever,' the ministry said in a report responding to a parliamentary panel's questions that did not directly mention the United States or Trump's threatened tariffs. The report said that state refineries were moving forward with all of their term contracts with other suppliers and regions to secure supply requirements. Refiners consider factors including supply security, international politics and trade relations when finalising their procurement plans, it added. India's HMEL plans to shut refinery for 40-day maintenance, sources say 'This approach ensures both energy security and the procurement of crude oil at optimal value,' the report said. India, the world's third-largest oil importer and consumer, relies on Russian crude for more than a third of its imports. State refiners, which account for over 60% of the country's 5.2 million barrels per day of refining capacity, have paused purchases of Russian oil due to narrowing discounts. Private refiners Reliance Industries Ltd, Nayara Energy, and HPCL-Mittal Energy Ltd are continuing with their purchases. Trump has made bringing an end to the war in Ukraine a priority of his administration. He is due to meet with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin, with whom he's had a tumultuous relationship, in Alaska on Friday as part of his efforts to secure a peace deal.


Express Tribune
6 hours ago
- Express Tribune
SC questions LHC's decision in Imran bail rejection ruling
The Supreme Court issued a notice on Tuesday to the prosecution in a petition filed by Pakistan Tehreek-e-Insaf (PTI) founder Imran Khan, challenging the Lahore High Court's (LHC) rejection of his post-arrest bail in eight cases linked to May 9 incidents. A three-member bench of the Supreme Court, headed by Chief Justice of Pakistan (CJP) Yahya Afridi and comprising Justice Shafi Siddiqui and Justice Mian Gul Hassan Aurangzeb heard the case. The bench headed by CJP Afridi observed that the court would not give any final finding that could affect the merits of the pending case. CJP Afridi asked the both the defence and prosecution counsels to assist the court on the legal question of whether final observations can be made in a bail order. He noted that the LHC had given a final opinion in its bail decision, raising the question of whether such findings were permissible. Read: PTI heavyweights jailed for 'attacks on state institutions' Earlier, LHC rejected bail petitions filed by PTI founder in eight cases linked to the May 9, 2023, riots, prompting sharp criticism from the party, which called the ruling a "blatant miscarriage of justice". The decision, delivered by a two-member bench led by Justice Shahbaz Ali Rizvi, followed the conclusion of arguments from both prosecution and defence. Imran's legal team had argued that the former prime minister was implicated without credible evidence while he was already in custody and denied any involvement in the violence. Before the apex court on Tuesday, Punjab government counsel Zulfiqar Naqvi told the court that no notice had been issued to them in the matter, to which the CJP said the notice would be issued today. Denying PTI counsel Salman Safdar's request to prepone the hearing, the court slated the hearing for August 19 as per schedule. Protests on May 9, 2023, broke out across the country after Imran's arrest from the premises of Islamabad High Court (IHC), where he appeared for a hearing in connection with a graft case. Several civil and military installations were damaged during the protests and ensuing chaos. Imran, who has been jailed since August 2023 after multiple convictions, remains a central figure in Pakistani politics despite his ouster in April 2022 through a no-confidence vote. Several PTI leaders and workers remain incarcerated over the May 9 incidents, while others have been granted bail.