BlackRock CEO Larry Fink says to look Down Under to reform Social Security
Show Caption
Hide Caption
Elon Musk claims there are 150-year-olds on Social Security
Tesla and SpaceX CEO Elon Musk incorrectly claims there are 150-year-olds on Social Security.
Fox - 5 DC
For anyone who depends on Social Security to pay bills (and millions of Americans do), a 21% cut in benefits may be devastating. Even if someone works for years to maximize their monthly benefit, a reduction is sure to impact their everyday budget. Yet, cuts are on the horizon if Congress can't agree on a plan to shore up the Old-Age, Survivors, and Disability Insurance (OASDI) program before the trust runs dry.
Take a page from Australia's
book
Larry Fink, CEO of global investment company BlackRock, believes Social Security could be reformed by switching to retirement savings similar to Australians' superannuation system (also called the "super").
In Australia, employers contribute a percentage of each employee's salary into a superannuation fund, a long-term investment (like Social Security) designed to save for retirement. Thanks to the superannuation guarantee, employers must contribute a minimum amount to their employees' accounts. That percentage currently sits at 11.5%. Employees can also contribute to their super up to a limit.
Superannuation funds offer various investment options, and employees can choose where their contributions go. While superannuation contributions and earnings are subject to tax, the rate is typically lower than other income tax rates.
Like Social Security, savings built up in a super fund are generally not tapped until an employee retires.
Fink's perspective
Fink claims that Social Security is an inferior retirement savings model compared to the superannuation program. Still, he believes Social Security has become so politicized that no one wants to discuss changes. He contends that politicians are too afraid to broach the subject.
Private companies invest in and manage millions of Australian superannuation accounts, while the U.S. Department of Treasury manages the Social Security trust fund. Given that BlackRock manages the world's largest portfolio of assets (worth a cool $11.5 trillion in 2024), Fink's admiration for the Australian system may be based on the belief that private investment firms are better positioned to manage and grow retirement savings.
Benefits of the Australian system
Australia's superannuation system provides some pretty sweet (and unusual) benefits, including:
Lower taxes: Contributions to super funds are taxed at 15%, well below the maximum of 47% on regular income.
Discounted insurance rates: Thanks to group discounts, some super funds offer cheaper insurance premiums.
Low-income workers get a boost: The Australian government adds extra funds to the accounts of low-income individuals, giving their super accounts a chance to earn more as they grow.
Free professional advice: Many funds offer free advice to contributors to help manage their retirement savings.
Discounts and rewards: Funds often provide investors with exclusive deals and discounts.
Tax-free in retirement:
Once a person reaches 60, they have tax-free access to their superannuation.
Social Security has been a lifeline to Americans since 1935, and a recent Navigator Research report found that 85% of Americans oppose cuts to the program they've spent years paying into. Whether changes designed to strengthen the program include elements of the Australian system or not, most people just want to know that Social Security will be there when they need it.
Dana George has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy.
The Motley Fool is a USA TODAY content partner offering financial news, analysis and commentary designed to help people take control of their financial lives. Its content is produced independently of USA TODAY.
The $
22,924 Social Security bonus most retirees completely overlook
Offer from the Motley Fool: If you're like most Americans, you're a few years (or more) behind on your retirement savings. But a handful of little-known "Social Security secrets" could help ensure a boost in your retirement income. For example: one easy trick could pay you as much as $22,924 more... each year! Once you learn how to maximize your Social Security benefits, we think you could retire confidently with the peace of mind we're all after. Simply click here to discover how to learn more about these strategies.
View the "Social Security secrets" »
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
23 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Rebooting Auto: How Tech Pioneers Are Reshaping the Global Automotive Establishment (APAC)
Global automakers are facing an accelerating wave of disruption from technology companies in China and Silicon Valley. This is unfolding on multiple fronts: smartphone makers bringing device expertise into the car (Xiaomi); AI specialists pushing autonomous driving closer to commercial reality (Waymo, Baidu, Tesla); and, more broadly, a shift in what defines differentiation in cars — batteries, software and semiconductors — disciplines outside the traditional industry's core strengths. In this webinar, Bloomberg analysts from our technology and mobility research teams will assess which companies are best positioned to join a reshaped cast of players in the global automotive value chain in the decade ahead, and explore the implications of the industry's 'rebooted' future. Demian Flowers Global Automotive Industry Specialist Bloomberg Steven Tseng Senior Analyst Bloomberg Intelligence Steven Tseng is a senior analyst covering the Asia Pacific technology hardware supply chain, with specific focuses on computing hardware, consumer electronics, and ODM/EMS related sectors. Prior to joining Bloomberg Intelligence in December 2021, he had 20 years of experience as a sell-side research analyst at the firms such as Daiwa Capital Markets, Samsung Securities, RBS, ABN AMRO, etc. Before that, he was a corporate banker with Citibank Taipei. Steven holds an MBA degree from National Chengchi University in Taiwan. He is also an Institutional Investor-ranked analyst and The Thomson Reuters Analyst Awards winner. Mandeep Singh Head of Global Technology Research Bloomberg Intelligence Mandeep Singh, CFA is a senior equity analyst and the global head of technology sector research at Bloomberg Intelligence. His coverage includes infrastructure software and Internet companies and he is an established thought leader for secular trends in tech space including generative AI, cloud, machine learning and cybersecurity. Mandeep's research focuses on business models, valuations and growth prospects of technology companies, which translates to actionable ideas for the investment community. He is also host of the podcast series called 'Tech Disruptors', which features conversations with thought leaders and management teams on disruptive trends. Mandeep has a MBA from New York University and Masters in Data Science from Columbia University. Andrew Grant Head of Intelligent Mobility BloombergNEF Andrew Grant leads BloombergNEF's global Intelligent Mobility research team, which produces research, datasets and long-term outlooks on shared mobility services and autonomous vehicles. Andrew is also an author and the lead modeler of BNEF's annual 'Long-Term Electric Vehicle Outlook'. Based in London, U.K., Andrew holds MSc Applied Economics and Bachelor of Business Science in Economics degrees from the University of Cape Town.
Bloomberg
2 hours ago
- Bloomberg
Behind Australia's Billionaire List: Who's Winning in 2025?
This week on the Bloomberg Australia Podcast: Who's climbing — and slipping down — the ranks in the nation's billionaires' club? Never miss an episode. Follow The Bloomberg Australia Podcast today. Australia's richest are getting richer — with Gina Rinehart and Harry Triguboff climbing higher in the Bloomberg Billionaires Index, while others like Atlassian's founders take a hit. Together, the nation's top ten fortunes are now worth $144 billion. So where's the money being made and what does it say about the broader economy?
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Tesla shareholder group urges probe, ‘appropriate remedial action' from Nasdaq over Elon Musk's $29 billion pay package
In the latest twist in a long-running battle over Elon Musk's compensation at Tesla, the SOC Investment Group has requested that Nasdaq formally investigate 'and take appropriate remedial action' against Tesla for its recent $29 billion equity grant to the CEO. In a letter to Nasdaq, the group raised concerns about compliance with executive compensation rules and shareholder transparency. The SOC Group, formerly known as the CtW Investment Group, works with pension funds sponsored by a coalition of unions representing over 2 million members; many of those funds are Tesla investors. In a letter dated Aug. 19, 2025, addressed to Erik Wittman, deputy general counsel and head of enforcement at Nasdaq, SOC expressed 'serious concerns' about Musk's new compensation package. Specifically, SOC said it was concerned that Tesla's board circumvented Nasdaq listing rules when awarding Musk a '2025 CEO Interim Award,' disclosed earlier this month. The group claims this equity award should have required a shareholder vote, as stipulated under Nasdaq's rules, given that it materially amended compensation plans. Tesla's board approved Musk's new equity package under the company's 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, largely as compensation for his previously awarded—and overturned—$56 billion options package from 2018, known as the '2018 CEO Performance Award.' That older award was (twice) overturned by the Delaware Chancery Court owing to questions regarding board independence—a decision currently being appealed at the Delaware Supreme Court. Fortune's Shawn Tully reported that the new package will only apply if Musk and Tesla lose on appeal in Delaware. He also noted that unlike with the $56 billion award, the newer $29 billion award includes restrictions that protect shareholders: The shares vest on the second anniversary of the grant, or early August 2027, only if Musk serves for the entire period as CEO or chief of product development or operations. Musk can't sell any of those vested shares until five years later, or on Aug. 3, 2030. Fortune's Amanda Gerut reported that, such restrictions notwithstanding, the package lacks hard performance targets for Musk. Brian Dunn, director of the Institute for Compensation Studies at Cornell University, told Fortune that experts sometimes refer to these as 'fog-the-mirror grants.' In other words: 'If you're around and have enough breath left in you to fog the mirror, you get them.' The objections lobbied by SOC Investment Group in its letter have nothing to do with either feature of the grants. The group argues that the Tesla board dodged shareholder approval for the package, in contravention of Nasdaq listing policy. Tejal Patel, executive director of the SOC Investment Group, told Fortune in an interview that the 'real issue is the fact that the original plan … was pretty clear in the disclosures that the company did not intend to include Elon Musk in that plan.' Acknowledging that such issues are usually raised with the Securities and Exchange Commission, she added: 'Admittedly, this is the first time I've flagged something like this to Nasdaq, [and that's] because it was a very specific listing standard.' Her understanding of the Nasdaq standard is that 'this is exactly what it was designed to avoid.' Shareholders likely 'did not believe' they were voting to approve a new Musk package The SOC Investment Group emphasizes that when Tesla shareholders approved the 2019 Equity Incentive Plan, company disclosures explicitly excluded Musk from eligibility, stating that his compensation would be exclusively tied to the extraordinary 2018 award. 'When shareholders voted on the 2019 Plan it is likely that, based on the available disclosures and research, they did not believe they were voting on an equity plan that would cover compensation to Mr. Musk,' the SOC letter notes, 'precisely because of the 'truly extraordinary' nature of the 2018 CEO Performance Award.' The SOC letter also notes that Tesla's 2019 proxy statement repeated multiple times that the 2019 plan was not intended to cover awards to Musk. Furthermore, the letter mentions that major proxy advisory firms indicated that the 2018 CEO Performance Award was 'intended to be the sole means of compensation for Mr. Musk, relying on the Company's disclosures.' Therefore, SOC writes, the 2025 CEO Interim Award 'appears to expand the class of participants under the 2019 Plan in manner that would be sufficiently material to require a separate shareholder vote.' The letter also warns that Tesla's board has indicated further interim awards could follow, potentially bypassing shareholder votes while the Delaware case, the so-called Tornetta litigation, is pending. The SOC letter urges Nasdaq to act to 'restore 'the rightful balance between shareholder and management's interests,'' prevent dilution, and ensure executive compensation transparency. SOC has 'real concerns over director independence,' Patel told Fortune. 'This is sort of the outcome of having a board that is not independent.' She said her group is concerned with issues over a lack of director independence and the juggling of responsibilities by Elon Musk, and matters have 'come to a head in the last several months.' This timeline overlaps with Musk's brief engagement as a special advisor to the White House, including extensive involvement with the Department of Government Efficiency, or DOGE. The new compensation plan, if anything, 'was an opportunity for the board to get Musk to focus on Tesla, and instead' they've arrived at this package, she said. She also noted that the conditions under which Musk would receive the same pay, even if he was a chief of product development or operations, is 'pretty unheard-of.' A vocal, active shareholder SOC Investment Group has a long and active history of engagement with Tesla, focusing on issues such as executive compensation, governance, board independence, and labor rights. The group has repeatedly opposed large pay packages for Musk—including leading campaigns to encourage shareholders to vote against Musk's $56 billion option award and calling for votes against related awards, especially when it believed proper shareholder approval procedures were circumvented or governance standards were not met. The group has also urged Tesla shareholders to vote against the reelection of certain directors, such as Kimbal Musk and James Murdoch, citing concerns about lack of board independence from Elon Musk and alignment with shareholders' interests. Similar to its current letter to Nasdaq, it has requested investigations by regulators into Tesla's governance practices, arguing that the company's board favors Musk's interests over those of public shareholders. For example, the group asked the SEC to probe Tesla's plan to shrink its board in 2022. The group has also joined with other investors in co-filing shareholder resolutions calling for Tesla to adopt comprehensive labor rights policies, including noninterference with worker organizing and compliance with global labor standards. SOC has been involved in webinars and resolutions highlighting risks related to Tesla's approach to unions and labor issues across several countries. Tesla has not publicly responded to the letter and did not immediately respond to Fortune's request for comment. For this story, Fortune used generative AI to help with an initial draft. An editor verified the accuracy of the information before publishing. This story was originally featured on Sign in to access your portfolio
