
Assisted dying could become ‘tool' to harm women in England and Wales, say faith leaders
More than 100 women from Christian, Muslim, Jewish and Sikh groups have warned in an open letter that the terminally ill adults bill has 'insufficient safeguards to protect some of the most marginalised in society, particularly women subjected to gender-based violence and abuse by a partner'.
The proposed legislation could help such women to end their lives, says the letter, which was published on Sunday on the website of Theos, a Christian thinktank.
Concerns that the assisted dying bill could put vulnerable women in danger were raised earlier this year by charities involved in domestic violence and coercive control. They said some perpetrators drove their victims to suicide, and there was a 'significant risk' that coercion could play a part in some cases of assisted dying.
Lesley Storey, the chief executive of My Sister's Place, a charity that supports victims of domestic abuse, said the bill provided 'rigorous safeguards where currently there are none'.
In another open letter, co-signed by more than 40 women, Storey said the 'risk of coercion for terminally ill women in abusive relationships is real … It thrives in the absence of oversight, where there are no safeguards, checks, or balances'.
The safeguards in the bill included comprehensive assessments by professionals, mandatory coercion training, and new criminal offences around coercion. The bill sought 'to put in place robust protections to help ensure that potential coercion is exposed and prevented at every point,' Storey said.
The signatories of the female faith leaders' letter include Sarah Mullally, the bishop of London and the third most senior figure in the Church of England, as well as four other C of E bishops, alongside Zara Mohammed, the former secretary general of the Muslim Council of Britain, and Sam Clifford, the chief executive of Jewish Women's Aid.
They write: 'Domestic abuse victims who are also women of faith can face a particular form of abuse at the hands of their perpetrators, who may weaponise theologies and culture to harm and control their victims.'
The bill 'fails to take account of how faith and its role at the end of life, as well as its use by both perpetrators and the women they abuse, create complex dynamics that can lead to vulnerable women, who may also hold strong religious beliefs, seeing no way out but death', they continue.
The letter adds: 'Much of the debate inside and outside parliament has been conducted by those empowered to speak of the importance of personal choice, without consideration of those who struggle to be heard in the public square.
'It is the voices of the unheard, ignored, and marginalised that we are compelled by our faith traditions and scriptures to listen and draw attention to, in the pursuit of good law-making for the common good – legislation that considers and protects the most vulnerable, not just those who speak loudest.'
Women with abusive partners 'may seek assisted deaths to end their suffering at the hands of an abuser', the letter says, adding that the bill lacks safeguards and has 'too much potential to hurt vulnerable people'.
Chine McDonald, the director of Theos and the letter's lead signatory, said: 'The number and diversity of women of faith from across religious traditions, ages, and geographical locations who wanted to sign this letter shows the depth of concern about the effects of this bill on women and those in vulnerable situations. It's for them that, compelled by our faith and scriptures, we cannot and will not be silent.'
Kim Leadbetter, the Labour MP who proposed the bill, said: 'Following changes in committee, the bill now contains even stronger provisions to guard against coercion and pressure on people in end-of-life care.
'What this bill does is give women autonomy over their bodies as they reach the end, just as I believe they should have autonomy throughout their lives.'
The assisted dying bill has completed its committee stage and is due to return to the House of Commons on 25 April.
In the UK, call the national domestic abuse helpline on 0808 2000 247, or visit Women's Aid. In Australia, the national family violence counselling service is on 1800 737 732. In the US, the domestic violence hotline is 1-800-799-SAFE (7233). Other international helplines may be found via www.befrienders.org
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Herald Scotland
2 hours ago
- The Herald Scotland
Summerhall founder condemns apology over Kate Forbes event
He described the wording of a statement, which suggested Ms Forbes would be prevented from the Scottish Government-funded venue in future, as "idiotic" and "nonsense'. He insisted he would not have allowed it to be signed off had he still been responsible for Summerhall. Read more: Mr McDowell, who revealed he had attended the deputy first minister's event at Summerhall, said it would be 'impossible' for a Fringe venue to enforce any kind of ban on an individual taking part in future events. In an exclusive interview with The Herald, he suggested the main concerns for arts venues should be to ensure they operate within the law and uphold principles of freedom of speech. Robert McDowell has previously won Herald Angels Awards for his work at Edinburgh Festival Fringe venue Summerhall. (Image: Stewart Attwood) Summerhall Arts, which has taken over the running of shows and events at the venue from Mr McDowell, 'apologised unreservedly' to artists and performers appearing during the festival for the appearance of Ms Forbes in its programme. The deputy first minister, who was booked to appear as part of a series of political events organised by The Herald, has direct responsibility for the funding of Edinburgh's festivals as the culture secretary, Angus Robertson, represents the Edinburgh Central constituency. Ms Forbes announced £300,000 for funding aimed at 'safeguarding' the future of the Fringe in March, when she described the festival as 'one of Scotland's signature events.' Summerhall, which is now run by chief executive Sam Gough and a board led by Deborah Christie, secured public funding for the first time in January when Creative Scotland decided to allocate the arts charity more than £600,000 for the next three years. Ms Forbes spoke at Summerhall days after announcing she would not be standing in next year's Holyrood election, saying she wanted to focus more on family life. A devout Christian and a member of the Free Church of Scotland, Ms Forbes was criticised during her SNP leadership battle over her views on gay marriage, abortion and trans rights. The apology from Summerhall Arts, an arts charity formed months before the venue was put up for sale by Mr McDowell's family, said it should have considered the likelihood of Ms Forbes being booked for The Herald's Unspun Live events, and the 'understandable upset it would cause'. Alerting companies to the appearance of Ms Forbes hours before she was due to appear, the venue added: 'Our main concern is that cancelling the event could pose significant additional risk to the safety and wellbeing of LGBTQ+ artists, staff and audiences by attracting those who share Kate Forbes' views outside of these walls to Summerhall. 'We do not believe LGBTQ+ rights, nor their existence, is up for debate. We recognise that the LGBTQ+ community make up a significant proportion of our artists, audiences and staff, and we have work to do to repair the damage from this oversight. 'At this stage, we can guarantee that we will be writing robust, proactive inclusion and wellbeing policies that prevent this from happening again.' Mr McDowell, who bought Edinburgh University's former vet school building to turn it into a year-round culture venue, said he was no longer involved in the programming or running of Sumerhall, but had been visiting every day during the Fringe to attend shows and events. Mr McDowell told The Herald: 'I've not been able to find out who issued that apology. I don't know who wrote it. If I had been asked, I would have said that it was nonsense. 'Of course, these things are up for debate. Everything is always up for debate. What are the arts if they don't allow freedom of speech? 'If somebody has an objection to something you don't ban it. You just turn up and ask a question or make a statement. It's an opportunity to say what you think. 'Whoever compiled that statement was just addressing their friends. It's part of a cancel culture kind of way of thinking. 'Some people sometimes take it upon themselves to sort of think that if the feel strongly enough about something there ought to be a law and if there isn't they will impose their views. 'Sometimes people feel that if someone has gone out on a limb they have to show a bit of a solidarity and then get carried away 'Unfortunately we all have to try to tolerate it and hope that will get over themselves at some point. "The idea that you could ever construct a way of doing this is idiotic. It would be possible. There's no way you could second guess artists or shows. 'I could see how the apology happened, but I thought it was silly and stupid. It's what happens when people rush to judgment. 'I don't like the way everybody rushed to judgment on JK Rowling. She can cope with that. I'm on her side, pretty much, but I can understand why some people aren't.' Mr McDowell drew a contrast between the apology over Ms Forbes and the efforts of long-time arts campaigner and promoter Richard Demarco to bring artists from around the world to Edinburgh. He was recently forced to move part of his archive from Summerhall, where he had been offered space by Mr McDowell after he opened the venue in 2011. He said: 'Demarco crossed the Iron Curtain more than 90 times, not because of propaganda or politics, but to embrace across the divides. That's we have to do in the arts, that is our job. 'One of the good things about the country and democracy we live in is freedom of speech, where can have debate and we can have discussion. 'What I do not like is where people do not want to have debate or do not want to discussion, or where they say: 'It's more important that I don't ever feel uncomfortable'. 'Venue management only have to apply the laws. They can have views and opinions, but they cannot censor. This is about freedom of speech.' Mr McDowell said he would be opposed to any attempt to ban elected politicians from speaking or being interviewed. He added: 'It's extremely important for freedom of speech for journalists to be able to question people in public, and to have further discussion and debates in public. 'I sat in on Kate Forbes' session. I think she is a lovely person. I used to enjoy meeting Alex Salmond, even though he and I had opposite views. I respected him. He was a real person.' Creative Scotland issued "dignity at work" guidance to all applicants for long-term funding. They state: "Everyone working in Scotland's creative and cultural sectors is entitled to be treated with dignity and respect, whether they are an employee, freelancer, contractor, board member or volunteer. "Creative Scotland does not tolerate bullying, harassment, or victimisation under any circumstance, and expects the same of any organisation that we support with public funding. "Those applying for activity that involves employing other people should ensure that they have appropriate safeguards in place to ensure dignity at work, including approaches to ensure best practice in areas such as equality and diversity, harassment and bullying, disciplinary and whistle-blowing. "Our role is as a funder, and we do not have a regulatory role. However, we expect all grant recipients to take their responsibilities around safeguarding and dignity at work seriously when in receipt of public funds and failure to do so could result in payments being suspended or grants withdrawn." A spokesperson for Creative Scotland said: "We are in dialogue with Summerhall Arts to understand recent events and the steps they are taking to address concerns that have been raised." The Herald has teamed up with to make the purchase of tickets for the Edinburgh Festival Fringe so much easier. To buy tickets, please click here.


Daily Mirror
3 hours ago
- Daily Mirror
DARREN LEWIS: 'It's up to each of us to challenge hate from thugs and racists'
Our society is poisoned by the narrative that the UK is under threat from Black and Brown men. The systematic bid to deem anyone non-white as someone to fear is at critical mass, writes Darren Lewis We warned about it. Now it's happening. Pockets of hate from thugs and racists, fed on lies and hungry to choose violence. I saw some distressing examples on social media last week: a Black man grabbed by the neck by a middle-aged white guy and punched – with his assailant demanding to know his address and telling him to '**** off'. And the viral clip that appeared to show a racially aggravated assault on two elderly Sikh men outside Wolverhampton railway station. Three teenagers have been arrested. And the man attacked and racially abused by two men at a Metro Station in North Shields in broad daylight. hurling insults at Black Bournemouth player Antoine Semenyo. Arrests have been made, but these kind of attacks continue across the country. Many highlight the spike in the number of Muslims and migrants harassed and assaulted in public across England since last summer's riots and the explosion of hate and xenophobia. The attackers don't even care about being filmed with phone cameras these days. They are fuelled by the rhetoric of the usual suspects spreading fear and division on social media. You will have heard it from the politicians indulged by print, TV and radio platforms who care less for the safety of ordinary people than they do for the engagement that anger and controversy generates. It is getting worse. Last week, Good Morning Britain newsreader Marverine Cole reiterated a truth we've known for some time now. Our society is poisoned by the narrative that the UK is under threat from Black and Brown men. The systematic bid to deem anyone non-white as someone to fear is at critical mass. It has never really gone away. Enoch Powell, the National Front and others pushed it in the 60s, 70s, 80s and 90s. In the past 15 years or so it has been UKIP, then the Tories and Reform in a race to the bottom, with Labour leader Sir Keir Starmer even pandering to the online right. Now, powered by Big Tech, it is rampant. When it triggered an indiscriminate targeting of Black and Brown people on the UK's streets last summer, sections of our mainstream media threw their hands in the air in faux outrage, asking: 'How could this happen?' Now some of those same platforms are producing rage bait for those who either don't have time or the inclination to read the details. The attacks you've read about here are so often the result. And the tip of the iceberg. Sections of social – and mainstream – media are dripping with the hate that will get someone killed. And if that happens, not a single one of them will be able to wash the blood off their hands. The standard of our politicians, on all sides, is so poor there are few principled enough to lead us through this nightmare. So it's on us to push back. To support those producing the stats to expose, for example, the lie that London has fallen. Crime has been proven to have fallen there. More of us need to debunk the liars and fantasists skewing statistics and throwing around words like 'per capita' to claim men arriving on small boats are more likely to commit crime compared to the rest of us. More of us need to point out the lack of focus on paedophiles like Gordon Hamilton, Stuart Compton and Michael Bolderston, all white, all sentenced in the past few weeks. As a father of two girls, protecting them from animals from any demographic has, and will always be, a priority. We now have to protect each other from those who wish to divide us.


Reuters
6 hours ago
- Reuters
Israel revokes visas for some Australian diplomats
TEL AVIV/SYDNEY, Aug 18 (Reuters) - Israel's foreign minister said on Monday he had revoked the visas of Australian diplomats to the Palestinian Authority, following a decision by Canberra to recognise a Palestinian state and cancel an Israeli lawmaker's visa. The Australian government said it had cancelled the visa of a lawmaker from Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu's governing coalition who has advocated against Palestinian statehood and called for Israel to annex the occupied West Bank. Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar said Australia's ambassador to Israel had been informed that the visas of representatives to the Palestinian Authority had been revoked. Like many countries, Australia maintains an embassy to Israel in Tel Aviv and a representative office to the Palestinian Authority in the West Bank city of Ramallah. "I also instructed the Israeli Embassy in Canberra to carefully examine any official Australian visa application for entry to Israel," Saar wrote on X, describing Australia's refusal to grant visas to some Israelis as "unjustifiable". Australia's government did not immediately comment. The Palestinian foreign ministry issued a statement condemning Israel's decision as illegal and "in violation of international law. Australia is set to recognise a Palestinian state next month, a move it says it hopes will contribute to international momentum towards a two-state solution, a ceasefire in Gaza and the release of hostages held by Palestinian militants in Gaza. Simcha Rothman, a parliamentarian from the Religious Zionism party led by far-right Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich, had been scheduled to visit Australia this month at the invitation of a conservative Jewish organisation. Rothman said he was told his visa had been cancelled over remarks the Australian government considered controversial and inflammatory, including his assertion that Palestinian statehood would lead to the destruction of the state of Israel and his call for Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank. "Nothing that I said personally has not been said over and over again by the vast majority of the public in Israel and the Government of Israel," Rothman told Reuters by phone. Rothman said he had been informed that his views would cause unrest among Australian Muslims. Asked about Canberra's decision on Palestinian statehood, Rothman said that would be a "grave mistake and a huge reward for Hamas and for terror". Australia's Minister for Home Affairs Tony Burke said in an emailed statement that the government takes a hard line on those who seek to spread division in Australia, and that anyone coming to promote a message of hate and division was not welcome. "Under our government, Australia will be a country where everyone can be safe, and feel safe," he said. The Home Affairs Ministry declined further comment. Rothman had been invited by the Australian Jewish Association to meet members of the Jewish community and show solidarity in the face of "a wave of antisemitism," AJA Chief Executive Robert Gregory said. In June, Australia and four other countries imposed sanctions on Smotrich and National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir over accusations of repeatedly inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank.