logo
Empty corridors and a quiet hum: if there were fireworks at Albanese's economic roundtable, they were well hidden

Empty corridors and a quiet hum: if there were fireworks at Albanese's economic roundtable, they were well hidden

The Guardian2 hours ago
'What's on your agenda this week?'
'Hanging out for three days while we wait.'
So went a conversation overheard in Parliament House, between two people from organisations represented at the government's economic reform roundtable, just before the three-day meeting kicked off.
Rome wasn't built in a day, and Australia's economy won't be fixed in three days (although with productivity gains, who knows how we could have supercharged the Roman construction sector).
Government sources were quick to stress the 'constructive' atmosphere in the room; in a rosy five-line statement after the first day's activities, an upbeat Jim Chalmers described the vibe as 'outstanding', 'promising', 'productive', 'constructive' and 'consensus building' – proving, if nothing else, productivity is high among his media team.
But those of us stuck outside the cabinet room – that is, everyone but the 30-odd participants – were left waiting and wondering what the economic inner circle were discussing.
Parliament House wasn't exactly abuzz – more a quiet hum as staffers of interest groups drifted the halls like tumbleweed, trying to fill in time between sessions.
Aussies cafe, usually the spot to see and be seen in Parliament, lay near-empty.
Journalists skulked around the ministerial wing, trying to learn any scraps from inside; while shadow treasurer Ted O'Brien, the Coalition's sole invitee, bustled out during the lunch break, appearing to take a phone call but perhaps just hoping to avoid questions.
Nationals senator Matt Canavan, taking advantage of an unexpected lull in the middle of the day, set up a real-life version of the 'change my mind' meme on the front lawn of the building, spruiking his own pirate version of a roundtable on Tuesday.
A special media space set up for press conferences lay mostly empty, barely used beyond quick stand-ups from one business group and one union secretary, where each criticised the other over an ACTU push for employers to pay a levy to train workers.
Industry leader Innes Willox reportedly called that idea a 'crock of shit'. ACTU assistant Secretary Liam O'Brien said these weren't 'new tensions', but said the summit was helping thorny issues get 'surfaced in a productive way.'
In public comments, at least, participants played nice, saying compromises were being found. But on the outside, like waiting for chimney smoke from the papal conclave, we were left to interpret the smallest signals emanating from the cabinet room.
Phones and smart watches had to be surrendered at the cabinet room door, the tech devices of the nation's key policy minds left stranded in little plastic boxes. Sadly the large 'no mobile phones' sign didn't include a warning to switch them to silent, leaving one smart watch to ring deafeningly during Chalmers' opening address and spotlight moment, prompting a mad scramble from the staffers in the lobby.
We managed to nip inside the cabinet room as Anthony Albanese and Chalmers made their opening addresses to the roundtable (it was an oval table), to check out the seating plan. Flanking the PM were treasury secretary Jenny Wilkinson, and Chalmers (on Albanese's left this time, not his right-hand man). Sitting directly opposite, Productivity Commission chief Danielle Wood, former treasury secretary Ken Henry, and Commonwealth Bank boss Matt Comyn.
Sitting on the far rounded edge of the cabinet table, as far from Albanese as would be possible, was Ted O'Brien.
Albanese said he didn't expect participants to agree on every issue. With unions, business groups, environment leaders and politicians in one room, it's probably hard to agree on the coffee order, let alone the future economic direction of the country. But in the spirit of consensus (a word you're hearing a lot this week, alongside 'constructive') the PM invited all the roundtable members to drinks at the Lodge on Wednesday night.
It will follow a key economic summit of another kind on Monday night at the PM's house. Chalmers, in business-casual mode, in a quarter-zip jacket meeting Albanese… and his dog, Toto.
'I'm delighted at how specific people's ideas have been and how constructively participants have worked together,' Chalmers said after day one, praising participants for having 'risen to the occasion' with 'a lot of consensus building'.
But with business groups and unions expecting a key confrontation on AI and regulation on day two, let's check back tomorrow to see if the smoke signals are quite as positive.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Australia cancels visa of far-right Israeli politician
Australia cancels visa of far-right Israeli politician

The Independent

timea minute ago

  • The Independent

Australia cancels visa of far-right Israeli politician

Australia has cancelled the visa of an Israeli lawmaker from prime minister Benjamin Netanyahu 's governing coalition who has advocated against Palestinian statehood and called for Israel to annex the occupied West Bank. Simcha Rothman, a Knesset member from the Religious Zionism party led by far-right finance minister Bezalel Smotrich, was scheduled to visit Sydney and Melbourne this month at the invitation of a local conservative Jewish organisation. Explaining the decision to suspend Mr Rothman's visa, Australian home affairs minister Tony Burke on Monday accused him of intending to 'spread a message of hate'. 'If you are coming to Australia to spread a message of hate and division, we don't want you here. Australia will be a country where everyone can be safe, and feel safe,' Mr Burke said. In apparent retaliation, Israel has since revoked the residency visas of Australia's representatives to the Palestinian Authority. It comes after Australian prime minister Anthony Albanese announced last week that his country intends to recognise a Palestinian state at next month's UN General Assembly. In June, five countries including Australia and Britain sanctioned Mr Smotrich and national security minister Itamar Ben-Gvir for repeatedly inciting violence against Palestinians in the West Bank. Mr Rothman said that he was informed his visa had been cancelled due to remarks the Australian government considered controversial and inflammatory, including his claim Palestinian statehood would lead to the destruction of the State of Israel and his call for Israeli sovereignty over the West Bank. "Nothing that I said personally has not been said over and over again by the vast majority of the public in Israel and the government of Israel," he told Reuters. "I think the government of Australia needs to decide, do they want to be on the side of Hamas, or do they want to be on the side of Israel?' he told the Australian Broadcasting Corporation. A far-right lawmaker, Mr Rothman was slated to make a series of appearances at Australian synagogues and Jewish schools, hosted by the Australian Jewish Association (AJA). AJA chief executive Robert Gregory said that the purpose of Mr Rothman's visit was "to show solidarity with Australia's Jewish community, which is facing a wave of antisemitism," and that during his visit he was to meet with victims of antisemitism. The revocation of visas held by Canberra's diplomatic representatives to the Palestinian Authority was announced by foreign minister Gideon Sa'ar, who also warned that any future Australian officials' visa applications to enter Israel would be 'carefully examine[d]'. 'This follows Australia's decision to recognise a 'Palestinian state' and against the backdrop of Australia's unjustified refusal to grant visas to a number of Israeli figures,' he said. Australian foreign minister Penny Wong criticised the decision, saying: 'At a time when dialogue and diplomacy are needed more than ever, the Netanyahu government is isolating Israel and undermining international efforts towards peace and a two-state solution.'

State pension age could rise to 70 as DWP launches huge new review
State pension age could rise to 70 as DWP launches huge new review

The Sun

time2 minutes ago

  • The Sun

State pension age could rise to 70 as DWP launches huge new review

FEARS have been raised that the state pension age could be increased to 70 as the Government has ordered a huge new review. Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall has commissioned the review of the official retirement age and said she would be considering automatic increases. 2 The review will look at whether it could be worth linking the state pension age to life expectancy. Ministers are considering changes to the state pension age as part of a bid to boost public finances. The state pension age is currently set at 66. Under current plans, it will rise to 67 between 2026 and 2028. It's then set to rise again to 68 between 2044 and 2046, with a review to be carried out every six years. Using 2022 projections, the average 66-year-old man in 2025 is projected to live another 19.2 years. This is expected to rise another 1.9 years by 2050. For women, the average 66-year-old can expect to live another 21.8 years. Their life expectancy will also increase by 1.9 years by 2050. Officials fear that with rising life expectancy and dropping birth rates, the cost of health and social care will increase dramatically in the coming years with an ageing population. How to track down lost pensions worth £1,000s It's estimated that a quarter of the UK's population will be aged 65 or older by 2050. Suzy Morrissey, who has been commissioned to review the official retirement age, said she will look at the experience of other countries that already automatically link payments to life expectancy. This is the case in Denmark, which recently raised its retirement age to 70. The call for evidence will also look at the mechanisms used in countries such as Finland, Italy and the Netherlands. Ms Morrissey said: "Most of us will expect to receive at least some state pension once we reach state pension age. "The impact of decisions around state pension age are far-reaching. Therefore, I want to make sure I have heard views from a broad range of organisations, experts and individuals throughout the course of my review, including those who have an interest in the wider social and economic impacts of an ageing society." Some experts have warned that automatic increases could create "chaos" in retirement plans. Former pensions minister and partner at LCP, Sir Steve Webb, told The Telegraph that automatically linking life expectancy to the state pension age could have increased it by up to eight years. "Having a completely automatic formula to move from changes in life expectancy to changes in state pension age could cause chaos for people's financial planning," he said. "Every time the population projections are updated, this could move the dates for pension age changes by up to a decade, which would make it impossible for people to plan for their retirement finances." Meanwhile research by Just Group found 62% of people retire before receiving the state pension, sometimes due to redundancy or ill health. Therefore increasing the state pension age further could mean more people being forced to retire before they can receive the state pension. Plus, the research showed more than 40% of current state pension recipients said the payments account for the majority of their income. How does the state pension work? AT the moment the current state pension is paid to both men and women from age 66 - but it's due to rise to 67 by 2028 and 68 by 2046. The state pension is a recurring payment from the government most Brits start getting when they reach State Pension age. But not everyone gets the same amount, and you are awarded depending on your National Insurance record. For most pensioners, it forms only part of their retirement income, as they could have other pots from a workplace pension, earning and savings. The new state pension is based on people's National Insurance records. Workers must have 35 qualifying years of National Insurance to get the maximum amount of the new state pension. You earn National Insurance qualifying years through work, or by getting credits, for instance when you are looking after children and claiming child benefit. If you have gaps, you can top up your record by paying in voluntary National Insurance contributions. To get the old, full basic state pension, you will need 30 years of contributions or credits. You will need at least 10 years on your NI record to get any state pension.

Burkina Faso's junta expels top UN official over child rights report
Burkina Faso's junta expels top UN official over child rights report

BBC News

time2 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Burkina Faso's junta expels top UN official over child rights report

Burkina Faso's junta has expelled the UN's top official to the West African nation over a report about children caught up in the jihadist Flore-Smereczniak was declared "persona non grata" because of her role in drafting the report that came out in a two-year period, the study detailed more than 2,000 cases of reported child recruitment, killings, sexual violence and abuse - blaming Islamist insurgents, government soldiers and civilian defence military government, which came to power in September 2022 and is led by Capt Ibrahim Traoré, said it had not been consulted by the UN, saying the report contained unfounded allegations. It did not cite any documentation "or court rulings to support the alleged cases of violations against children attributed to the valiant Burkinabé fighters", the government's statement 2015, jihadist rebels affiliated with al-Qaeda and the Islamic State group have waged an insurgency that has killed thousands of people and forced millions to flee their has prompted political instability, with two military coups in 2022. Capt Traoré took power promising to deal with the dire security situation within "two to three months". How an al-Qaeda offshoot became one of Africa's deadliest militant groupsWhy Burkina Faso's junta leader has captured hearts around the worldHow 'blood gold' is fuelling conflict in West Africa Ms Flore-Smereczniak was appointed in July 2024 - more than 18 months after her predecessor was Mauritius, she has worked in areas experiencing or recovering from conflict for more than two decades, holding posts in Ivory Coast, Chad and Malawi, according to the UN representative before her, Italian Barbara Manzi, was declared "persona non grata" by the junta in December 2022 not long after publishing a blog post describing how the crisis was affecting education and health services, forcing many to close UN has not yet officially commented on the latest expulsion, but the UN chief had expressed his regret over the decision to expel Ms Manzi whilst reiterating the UN's desire to engage with the junta to support Burkinabé have been concerns over the effectiveness of Capt Traoré's operation to quash the militants - with the junta rejecting the assistance of former colonial power France in favour of the first half of 2025, jihadist group JNIM said it had carried out over 280 attacks in Burkina Faso - double the number for the same period in 2024, according to data verified by the BBCRights groups have also accused the army of targeting civilians as well as suppressing political activity and the freedom of year, the military government announced it was extending junta rule for another five also said that Capt Traoré, who has built up the persona of a pan-Africanist leader, would be allowed to run for president in 2029. You may also be interested in: Burkina Faso outcry over 'conscription used to punish junta critics'Why 'pan-Africanist' influencers pushed rumours of a coupWhy France faces so much anger in West Africa Go to for more news from the African us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store