What Israel's Soaring Markets Are Saying About the Iran War
Iranian ballistic missiles are raining down on Tel Aviv and Haifa. Israel's main airport is shut. Much of the workforce is moving in and out of bomb shelters. For most countries, such a wartime scenario would send investors fleeing and markets tanking.
Yet the opposite is happening. Israeli markets are buoyant, outperforming the world. Israeli stocks, which trade Sunday through Thursday, have been posting solid gains. The TA-125 Index, also known as the Tel Aviv 125 Index, rose for five straight sessions as of the end of last week, even as global markets tread cautiously amid the specter of a prolonged Middle East war. It rallied again on Sunday after the U.S. strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
23 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
What's Next After the Initial Fallout from US Strikes on Iran
What's next? The unprecedented US airstrikes on Iran have set traders and governments worldwide on edge, as the Islamic Republic warns of retaliation and Israel shows no sign of letting up in its assault. Asian currencies and stocks fell, European stock futures declined while oil advanced, then erased gains, after Washington struck Iran's nuclear sites over the weekend. China and Pakistan were quick to condemn — even though China hasn't yet offered substantial assistance to Tehran besides rhetorical support and Pakistan is at the same time taking steps to build stronger ties with the White House. The US State Department issued a ' Worldwide Caution ' alert for Americans. More critically, President Donald Trump's decision to deploy bunker-busting bombs — in Washington's first direct military action against Iran after decades of hostility — has pushed the Middle East into uncharted territory. Did the end justify the means? While the US attacks have set back Iran's nuclear ambitions and dealt its clerical regime a humiliating blow, the program hasn't been completely destroyed. The move may ultimately lead Tehran to end international monitoring of its nuclear program and consider going ahead to develop a bomb. Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei hasn't been seen in public in 11 days but remains in control. Even as diplomatic allies Russia and China have stayed on the sidelines and its network of armed proxies in the region remains weakened, Tehran still has ways to inflict pain on the US as it plans its retaliation. Two supertankers, each capable of hauling about 2 million barrels of crude, U-turned in the Strait of Hormuz after the US airstrikes on Iran raised the risk of a response that would ensnare commercial shipping in the region, according to vessel tracking data compiled by Bloomberg. The two empty freighters then sailed south, away from the mouth of the Persian Gulf. The turning oil carriers offer the first signs of re-routing, something that oil traders will scrutinize. Any disruption to traffic through the strait, a major artery for global crude and natural gas, raises the specter of a spike in energy prices. That's bad news for Asia, which buys more than four-fifths of all the crude produced in the Middle East, 90% of which goes through the Strait of Hormuz.
Wall Street Journal
25 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Stocks to Watch Monday: Exxon, Tesla, Northern Trust
↗️ Exxon (XOM), Chevron (CVX), BP (BP), Occidental Petroleum (OXY): Energy stocks gained modestly in premarket trading after the U.S. attacked Iranian nuclear facilities over the weekend. Investors are watching for signs Iran could block oil shipments through the Strait of Hormuz. ↘️ IAG (UK:IAG), Air France-KLM (FR:AF), Singapore Airlines (SG: C6L): Global airline stocks edged lower. Carriers including Air France cancelled some flights to the Middle East after the attack. U.S. airline stocks were little changed ahead of the open. ↗️ Tesla (TSLA): The electric-vehicle maker launched its long-awaited robotaxi service over the weekend. Shares rose 1.5% premarket.
Yahoo
30 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Trump just made the Fed's rate deliberations even more complicated
The Federal Reserve was already wrestling with a lot of uncertainty about the future path of monetary policy, and President Trump's weekend strike on Iran's nuclear sites will likely make that path even cloudier in the near term. The uncertainty of the part of central bank policymakers was already evident last week in the Fed's latest "dot plot" outlining future interest rate moves. While eight officials saw two cuts still happening in 2025, seven officials predicted no cuts at all — up from the four officials who made that call previously. Trump's strikes on three Iranian nuclear sites over the weekend inject yet another layer of unknowns into those discussions as central bank officials prepare for their next meeting in July and gauge the impact of the president's trade, tax and immigration policies on the path of inflation and economic growth. There are worries from some Fed watchers that a sustained increase in oil prices would add to the inflationary impulse already present in the US from Trump's tariffs. Wall Street analysts at JPMorgan Chase (JPM) have warned that a prolonged conflict and the potential closure of the critical Strait of Hormuz could drive oil prices as high as $120 a barrel, pushing US inflation back toward 5%. That could bolster the argument of some hawks at the Fed that rates need to stay where they are for longer to protect against another inflation surge. On the other hand, there is also an argument circulating on Wall Street that the conflict could push the Federal Reserve to cut interest rates sooner than expected. "A sustained rise in oil prices could cause the Fed to strike a more dovish tone," Oxford Economics chief US economist Ryan Sweet wrote in a recent note to clients before Trump's attack, arguing that an extended oil shock could dent demand and potentially spill over into an otherwise resilient labor market. For this view to hold, Fed officials would have to get comfortable with the idea that any sudden spikes in oil prices tend to cause only a temporary rise in inflation that can be overlooked — and that any such shock could pose a bigger threat to growth and jobs than to inflation itself. Fed Chair Jerome Powell told reporters last Wednesday that while it's possible there could be higher energy prices, what has tended to happen when with turmoil in the Middle East is a spike in energy prices that tends to come down. "Those things don't generally tend to have lasting effects on inflation," Powell said at a press conference after the Fed held rates steady for the fourth meeting in a row. "Although of course in the 1970s, they famously did, because you had a series of very, very large shocks. But, we haven't seen anything like that now. The U.S. economy is far less dependent on foreign oil than it was back in the 1970s." Powell will likely be asked for his views of how Trump's new actions will affect the economy as he appears before House and Senate committees Tuesday and Wednesday, as part of a regular semi-annual appearance before Congress. The Fed will also get a new look at inflation this Friday with the release of the May Personal Consumption Expenditures (PCE) report. Economists expect annual "core" PCE — which excludes the volatile categories of food and energy — to have clocked in at 2.6%, up from the 2.5% seen in April. Over the prior month, economists project "core" PCE at 0.1%, unchanged from May. One influential voice at the Fed did get louder about the case for cuts in the days before Trump's attack, dismissing concerns that any inflation from the president's tariffs could be long lasting. In fact, Fed governor Christopher Waller on Friday told CNBC that rates could be cut at the next meeting on July 29-30. "We could do this as early as July,' Waller said. 'I think we've got room to bring it down, and then we can kind of see what happens with inflation,' he said, adding the central bank could pause if needed due to a shock from developments in the Middle East. One of his colleagues, San Francisco Fed president Mary Daly, is not on the same timetable. 'For me, I look more to the fall,' Daly said in a separate interview on CNBC. 'By then, we'll have quite a bit more information, and businesses are telling me that's what they're going to look to for some resolution.' Richmond Fed President Tom Barkin additionally told Reuters in an interview published Friday that he was not in any rush to cut due to concerns that tariffs could push inflation up and data showing the labor market remains resilient. That aligns with statements made by Powell. He noted last week that recent inflation reports have been favorable, but that goods prices have been moving up following the introduction of new tariffs and there could be more of that this summer. "We're beginning to see some effects, and we do expect to see more of them over the coming months." Thus, the right thing to do for now, he added, is 'hold where we are' on rates. Click here for in-depth analysis of the latest stock market news and events moving stock prices Sign in to access your portfolio
