Pro-Palestine march closes Sydney Harbour Bridge
Two hours into the march, attendees received a text from NSW Police that read, "In consultation with the organisers, the march needs to stop due to public safety and await further instructions". They have asked everyone on the bridge to stop walking north and turn back toward the city in a "controlled" way. Police have not yet provided an estimate of the numbers attending the march.
Transport for NSW told motorists to avoid the city, warning of major delays and disruptions across Sydney's road and public transport network due to the protest.Sydney-based activist organisation Palestine Action Group lodged a notice of intention for the march across the Sydney Harbour Bridge last Sunday, in response to what it called the "atrocity" in Gaza.Police rejected the application on the grounds that there was not enough time to prepare a traffic management plan, and warned of a potential crowd crush and other safety concerns.In a statement the following day, NSW Premier Chris Minns said they could not allow Sydney to "descend into chaos" and would not be able to support a protest of "this scale and nature" taking place on the bridge.
The police also made an application to the NSW Supreme Court for a prohibition order for the event, which was declined just 24 hours before the protest was due to go ahead.According to the Australian Broadcasting Corporation, Justice Belinda Rigg said safety concerns regarding the march were "well founded", but march organiser Josh Lees from the Palestine Action Group had "compellingly" explained the reasons why he believed there is an urgency for a response to the humanitarian situation in Gaza.She said there was no evidence that a prohibition order would enhance public safety, and ordered the Sydney Harbour Bridge to be closed to vehicles, in addition to the roads surrounding the proposed route.The final-hour authorisation means that attendees will be protected under the Summary Offences Act, meaning they will not be charged for offences specifically relating to public assembly, such as blocking traffic.The NSW Jewish Board of Deputies said that they were "disappointed" by the Supreme Court's decision to authorise the protest on the Sydney Harbour Bridge, in a statement published to their Instagram.Australia has been under mounting pressure to recognise Palestinian statehood, after France, Canada and the UK all separately indicated that they would do so with conditions at the upcoming United Nations General Assembly in September.Speaking on ABC's 7.30 programme, Prime Minister Anthony Albanese said he wants to see conditions met that achieve lasting security for Israel before Australia commits to recognition of a Palestinian state, and that he would not be pushed into the decision by other nations.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
39 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Major update on NSW MP Gareth Ward after he was convicted of sexual assaults
A sitting politician who argued his sexual abuse convictions were not enough to expel him from state parliament has lost a court bid to halt a vote removing him as an MP. Gareth Ward, 44, remains the member for the NSW south coast seat of Kiama while he awaits sentencing for sexually assaulting an intoxicated political staffer after a midweek event in the state's parliament in 2015. The former state families minister was also found to have sexually abused a drunken 18-year-old man at his South Coast home in 2013. A Labor-led vote to expel Ward from parliament, slated for Wednesday, was delayed after a court ordered a halt at the MP's request. That injunction was dismissed by the NSW Court of Appeal on Thursday, paving the way for a parliamentary debate on Friday as to whether Ward should be removed. 'The fact that Mr Ward has file a notice of intention to appeal does not affect the power of the assembly to expel him,' Chief Justice Andrew Bell said. The chief judge ordered the sitting MP to pay the assembly's costs of the lawsuit and rebuked him for launching the legal bid without giving his opponents proper notice on Monday, saying it was not appropriate. At a hearing earlier in the day, the MP's barrister Peter King argued a letter he received from the Labor government about the planned expulsion vote only referred to the convictions and did not lay out a case for Ward's expulsion. The letter did not detail any 'unworthy conduct' - the expulsion power Labor is relying on to turf Ward - he told a panel of three Court of Appeal judges. Four MPs have been expelled from NSW parliament, the last in 1969, under the 'unworthy conduct' power. 'Are you seriously submitting that (Ward's) convictions ... are not conduct unworthy?' Chief Justice Andrew Bell asked. 'The four counts are evidence of the fact of conviction, but they're not evidence of the facts which underlie that conviction,' Mr King replied. When the barrister tried again to make the same argument, Justice Jeremy Kirk chimed in. 'There can't be any mystery about it: he was tried publicly on an indictment,' the judge said. 'He, of all people, must know what behaviour led to his conviction.' Even if he staves off the vote, Ward faces automatic expulsion under a separate power if he fails to overturn his convictions on appeal. Mr King also attacked the proposed motion to expel Ward now as unlawfully punitive by denying him a parliamentary return if he won a conviction appeal. The jailed MP could also not speak against the motion in parliament. 'In short, he is to be expelled by a kangaroo court,' Mr King said. Lawyers for parliamentary speaker Greg Piper denied the proposed expulsion was punitive. Instead, it was the lower house protecting the trust and confidence of its members as well as the community, barrister Craig Lenehan SC argued. Ward had been given 'all the procedural fairness in the world', including an offer to provide lengthy written submissions against his expulsion, in circumstances where parliament could have just moved against him without notice. Any expulsion of Ward will trigger a by-election in the electorate he has held since 2011. Initially running under the Liberal banner, he secured a 2023 poll win as an independent, despite having been charged with sexual assault and suspended from parliament. A vote to expel him is almost certain to pass with support from leaders of Labor and the coalition. 'The Opposition is ready to have Gareth Ward expelled from parliament forthwith,' Opposition Leader Mark Speakman said in a statement after Thursday's court ruling. Ward has been remanded in custody ahead of his sentence for the sexual assaults. 1800 RESPECT (1800 737 732) National Sexual Abuse and Redress Support Service 1800 211 028
The Guardian
39 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Labor under pressure on plans to regulate AI as Coalition accuses government of mixed messages
The federal government is facing mounting pressure to confirm how it plans to regulate fast-growing artificial intelligence technology, with the Coalition critical of mixed messaging from Labor ministers about whether new laws are needed. As debate erupts over big tech companies seeking access to Australian material including journalism and books to train AI models, Anthony Albanese has stressed the importance of protecting copyright. But the shadow productivity minister, Andrew Bragg, has urged Australia not to squander its opportunity to harness AI's benefits, warning against any major new rules. 'The risk is that we over-regulate. The risk is that we make ourselves even more uncompetitive,' Bragg told Guardian Australia. '[AI] might be the only free kick we get on productivity.' Sign up: AU Breaking News email A suggestion from the Productivity Commission to give big tech companies an exemption to copyright laws for 'text and data mining', or to expand existing fair dealing rules, prompted fierce pushback from arts, creative and media companies this week, alarmed that Australian work could be used by massively wealthy tech companies – without compensation – to train AI models. Federal ministers, including the treasurer, Jim Chalmers, have said they have no plans to change copyright law, and spoken in favour of creatives and rights holders. Albanese on Thursday echoed concerns over protecting copyright, but also said the government was keen to reap the benefits of AI technology, including productivity gains, expected to be a focus of the upcoming economic reform roundtable. 'My government's a government that supports the arts,' Albanese said at a press conference in Melbourne, calling AI a 'complex' issue. 'We as a society will work [the balance of AI risks and opportunities] through. It's good there's debate about it, but copyright and intellectual property is important.' The government's plans to respond to the fast-moving technology have shifted, prompting Bragg to call on Labor to offer certainty to the industry. Former industry and science minister Ed Husic had set out plans for a standalone AI act to regulate the field; the productivity minister, Andrew Leigh, has advocated for a low-intervention approach described by some as 'light-touch'; the new industry and science minister, Tim Ayres, has spoken about regulation and legislation among plans still to be decided, as well as giving trade unions more say in developing the sector. Chalmers has pushed for a 'sensible middle path' between high and low regulation. 'I just think the government has no idea, really, what it wants to do. They have more position than you can poke a stick at on AI,' Bragg said, noting these positions. 'We don't need new laws,' he said. 'The government need to say to the regulators, 'How are you going in enforcing the laws the parliament already has on the books?' before they look to put more laws on those books.' Julian Leeser, the shadow attorney general and arts spokesperson, echoed similar sentiments, saying creators deserve fair compensation and calling for clarity from the government. 'In the real world, we wouldn't let someone use an artist's work for commercial purposes without paying for it. The virtual world should be no different,' he said in a statement. 'This government just doesn't know what it's doing when it comes to AI, and it has no plan to protect Australian artists.' Labor senator Tony Sheldon, who chaired an inquiry into AI in the last term of parliament, wrote on X that copyright laws 'must be enforced to ensure big tech fairly licenses and compensates artists, writers, and other creatives'. 'Despite the Productivity Commission's interim report, the Albanese Government has been clear - we stand with Australia's creative workers and industries, and we will not compromise our copyright laws,' Sheldon wrote. 'If the Googles and Amazons of the world want to use Australia's extraordinary trove of written and recorded treasures, they can license and pay for it just like everyone else.'
The Guardian
2 hours ago
- The Guardian
Labor decision to lift ban on PwC ‘an insult' to inquiry that investigated Treasury scandal, Pocock says
The finance department has rejected a last minute plea from three senators who led parliamentary inquiries into PwC Australia urging it not to lift a ban on the consultancy firm competing for new government work. Last month, Guardian Australia revealed the finance department had recommended the end of a long-term ban triggered by a scandal involving the misuse of confidential Treasury information. Former PwC Australia partners no longer working at the firm remain under investigation by the Australian federal police. Finance's report into the ethical soundness of PwC Australia and its recommendation was due to be published on 25 July, until the finance minister, Katy Gallagher, requested the department consider the views of Greens senator Barbara Pocock, Labor senator Deborah O'Neill and Liberal senator Richard Colbeck. The three senators wrote to the department last month urging it not to lift the ban, which was introduced in April 2024, while the tax leaks scandal was being investigated by federal police. 'In our view, there is no meaningful justification for giving them the green light after such little time and while significant investigations remain ongoing,' the three senators wrote. The department wrote to the senators on Thursday and confirmed that while their views were respected, it would not be changing its position. 'Finance considers that it would not be appropriate to delay a decision on its assessment of the ethical soundness of PwC Australia,' the department wrote in a letter seen by Guardian Australia. PwC Australia cannot bid for consultancy work until 2028 due to a non-compete clause with spin-off advisory service Scyne, which was created after the firm sold its entire government services division for just $1 at the height of the scandal. But PwC Australia can bid for other work with the government, including audit services. The decision is also an important step for the firm as it seeks to rebuild its trust with the private sector, which is the primary focus of its business. All government departments have now been told they should 'treat PwC Australia equitably as they would any other potential supplier when undertaking procurement processes'. But the finance department will require PwC Australia to provide six-monthly updates on its internal cultural overhaul and closely monitor its conduct until 30 June, 2027. The PwC Australia's chief executive, Kevin Burrowes, thanked the finance department for its decision and said the firm was 'proud of the progress we've made over the past two years'. 'There is more work to do as we strive to become the pre-eminent professional services firm, with a focus on delivering exceptional outcomes for our clients, using our deep-industry sector expertise,' Burrowes said. But the decision has angered Pocock who said she was 'deeply disappointed in the government'. 'The government decision to let PwC back into the contracting consulting fold is an insult to the senators and MPs who worked on two parliamentary inquiries examining what went wrong at PwC,' Pocock said. 'We made a raft of recommendations which have yet to be enacted, while the Government renews its contracting relationship with this disgraced entity.'
