Police vow to make arrests if mass pro-Palestine Action protest goes ahead in London
The force issued the warning as organisers said they were 'very confident' at least 500 people would attend the planned protest in central London on Saturday against the Government's decision to ban the organisation last month.
A campaign group has denied the mass protest will try to overwhelm the police and justice system.
A formal announcement will be made on Tuesday as to whether the 500 protesters target set by organisers has been reached and the demonstration will go ahead.
More then 200 people were arrested at a wave of protests across the UK in response to the proscription last month, as part of the campaign co-ordinated by Defend Our Juries.
Many of the protesters were detained after writing and holding up the message 'I oppose genocide I support Palestine Action' on placards or pieces of cardboard.
A Defend Our Juries spokesperson told the PA news agency: 'It is wrong to characterise this (planned demonstration) as a plan to overwhelm the police and court systems.
'If we are allowed to protest peacefully and freely, then that is no bother to anyone.'
In a further statement on its website, the campaign group said the Government had 'overreached itself' by banning Palestine Action and it was 'vital' that its campaign succeeded.
'Our groups and movements are coming together like never before, finding unity under repression,' it added.
'By refusing to give into fear and by standing together, we will face down this assault on us all.'
No location for the protest has so far been shared, but it is understood that it will take place in London and will be the only demonstration that Defend Our Juries organises on Saturday.
The Metropolitan Police said it would have 'the resources and processes in place to respond' to the planned large gathering.
A force spokesperson said: 'We are aware that the organisers of Saturday's planned protest are encouraging hundreds of people turn out with the intention of placing a strain on the police and the wider criminal justice system.
'The Met is very experienced in dealing with large-scale protests, including where the protest activity crosses into criminality requiring arrests.
'While we will not go into the specific details of our plan, the public can be assured that we will have the resources and processes in place to respond to any eventuality.
'Our officers will continue to apply the law in relation to Palestine Action as we have done since its proscription.
'Anyone showing support for the group can expect to be arrested.'
Those interested in joining the demonstration have been asked to come to briefing calls on Tuesday or Thursday, while some have had non-violence training arranged for them, Defend Our Juries said.
The move to ban Palestine Action came after two Voyager aircraft were damaged at RAF Brize Norton in Oxfordshire on June 20, an incident it subsequently claimed, which police said caused about £7 million worth of damage.
Home Secretary Yvette Cooper announced plans to proscribe Palestine Action three days later, saying that the vandalism of the planes was 'disgraceful' and the group had a 'long history of unacceptable criminal damage'.
A High Court ruling on Wednesday decided that Palestine Action's co-founder Huda Ammori had several 'reasonably arguable' beliefs in her challenge over the group's ban that would be heard at a three-day hearing in November, but a bid to pause the ban temporarily was refused.
The ban means that membership of, or support for, Palestine Action is now a criminal offence punishable by up to 14 years in prison, under the Terrorism Act 2000.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Chilling google reviews by Anita Rose killer show he visited village multiple times
Chilling Google reviews left by the killer of a mother-of-six show he visited her village multiple times before the attack and commented on dog walkers. Roy Barclay viciously assaulted Anita Rose on her morning dog walk on July 24 last year and left her for dead on a country path in Brantham. Barclay was given a life sentence with a minimum mandatory term of 25 years at Ipswich Crown Court on Wednesday. Roy Barclay was jailed at Ipswich Crown Court. (Image: Suffolk Police) Before the murder and during his time on the run on Suffolk's most wanted criminals list, he avoided being recalled to prison for two years by sleeping in makeshift camps. During this time, Barclay left a large digital footprint, leaving hundreds of reviews on Google Maps. One review, which Google says was last edited a year ago, shows that Barclay visited Decoy Pond, which is just 8 minutes away from where Anita Rose was found. Google Maps shows that Roy Barclay left more than 40 reviews in the area near where Anita Rose lived over a three-year period. (Image: Google) Analysis shows the photos were posted between April and July - the month he murdered Anita Rose. The review said: "Decoy Pond is a very scenic, tranquil place. "Despite its ugly surroundings, Decoy Pond somehow manages to remain a secluded spot, even when there's the frequent noise from the nearby mainline railway embankment." Meanwhile, another review, which was marked two years ago, showed he visited Pattles Fen in the north of the village. The review said: "It's really for dog walkers, with just the one path that meanders around & comes out pretty well where it began." Ms Rose was attacked by Barclay in Brantham while she was on her morning dog walk. (Image: Suffolk Police) He also reviewed the Cattawade Picnic site, which is just a 22-minute walk from the site where Anita Rose was killed. In total, Barclay wrote 598 Google reviews and posted over 4,175 photos between 2022 and October 2024, predominantly rating sites in East Anglia. He reviewed the area around Brantham, East Bergholt and Manningtree more than 40 times over that period. He posted pictures of churches, Amazon lockers, libraries, beaches, council buildings, statues and more, earning himself a 'Level 8' contributor status (the highest being level 10). After the murder, he also wrote consistently about Flatford in his final reviews. "It's a beautiful, unspoilt rural idyll that somehow exists in its own timelessness, as if awaiting the return of John Constable," he wrote in a review in October 2024. Six days later, on October 21, Barclay was arrested at Ipswich County Library and was subsequently charged with murder.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Darlington man 'Chop Off' strangled mother leaving her fearing for her life
A violent man left his mother fearing for her life as he strangled her before stamping all over her body. Shaun O'Connor, known as Chop Off, launched the brutal and sustained attack on his mother after he flooded her bathroom after shouting he was going to 'kill her'. The 42-year-old grabbed her in a headlock before wrapping a towel around her head after she confronted him about his behaviour. Teesside Crown Court heard how she tried to 'play dead' in a desperate attempt to get her son to stop the attack inside her Darlington home. Jenny Haigh, prosecuting, said O'Connor's mother called the mental health crisis team which resulted in the defendant becoming enraged and launching his attack on her. She said: 'He grabbed hold of her in a headlock, grabbed a towel and put it around her head. She said he was pushing her face down onto the floor and she couldn't breathe. 'She says he was telling her he wanted her 'gone' and she could feel pressure on her neck. She tried to play dead but she couldn't do that as she couldn't breathe.' Miss Haigh said when the police arrived at the victim's home, she managed to throw the house keys out of the window to help them get in. 'She shouted down to the police that her son was trying to smothercate her and she said that if the police hadn't got there when they did, she 'would have been gone',' she added. 'She said she was petrified and passed out. The complainant said that he was stamping all over her body and she told police that he wanted to kill her.' Shaun O'Connor (Image: Durham Constabulary) The prosecutor said O'Connor's mother was fearful for her life and believes that if the police hadn't arrived when they did she would have been 'in the ground'. The court heard how O'Connor had previous convictions for assaulting his mother including one on Christmas Day where he pushed her into a bush and on another occasion where he wrapped masking tape around her face. See more court stories from The Northern Echo by Vulnerable Darlington man hid in Tesco store while armed with five-inch knife Banned Ferryhill driver caught on petrol station CCTV at wheel of his BMW Three people, including a Big Brother contestant, admit role in pub arson attack Unlock unlimited local news subscribe today and save on an annual subscription. Enjoy access to our ad-free mobile and tablet app, as well as the digital edition of the paper. Don't miss out – subscribe now! Click here for details. In 2023, O'Connor was sentenced to two years in prison after he sexually assaulted two women, exposed himself to another, assaulted an innocent man and carried out a sickening sex act in a police station cell after his arrest. O'Connor, whose address was given as HMP Durham, pleaded guilty to attempting to inflict grievous bodily harm, intentional strangulation and two charges of criminal damage. Recorder Paul Reid adjourned the sentencing hearing to allow more time for a victim impact statement to be prepared and to obtain a medical update on the injuries suffered by the victim. O'Connor will return to court September 5 to be sentenced.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Could an outright ban on zero-hours contracts harm working mums?
Since the Labour government came into power in the summer of 2024, ministers have pledged to crackdown on 'exploitative' zero-hours contracts as part of changes to the employment bill. Under the new rules proposed, employers will have to offer workers a contract that guarantees a minimum number of hours every week – a change many see as a significant step forward for job security. More than one million people in the UK are working on a zero-hours contract basis, in areas ranging from hospitality and warehouses to the NHS. Women are disproportionately affected by the precarious nature of zero-hours work, which contributes to the gender pay gap. Read more: Why did shared parental leave fail in the UK? According to the Trades Union Congress, women are 34% more likely than men to be on such contracts, and they earn nearly £10 less an hour than men who aren't on them. However, some argue that an outright ban, without tackling the growing shortage of flexible jobs, won't truly level the playing field for women and working mothers. Chronic lack of flexible work In a push to pre-pandemic flexible working arrangements, almost half of all businesses across the UK now want staff back in the office on a full-time basis, a British Chambers of Commerce survey of more than 500 businesses found. At the same time, more than a million UK workers have quit their jobs in the past year because of a lack of flexibility. This U-turn is hitting mothers hard, with one in four forced to leave the workforce because it's impossible to work and care for children without adequate flexibility. 'An outright ban on zero‑hours contracts could indeed harm working mothers, but not for the reasons you'd expect,' says Elizabeth Willets, founder of the recruitment firm Investing in Women. 'The issue isn't that women choose precarious work. It's that our labour market offers so few truly flexible, professional-level roles – and zero‑hours contracts often become the only way to combine work and caregiving.' Women aren't taking on zero-hours roles by choice. For many, there is no quality flexible or part-time equivalent. According to the 2023 Flexible Jobs Index by Timewise, the number of jobs advertised as flexible has plateaued. Only 31% overtly offer it – which is a negligible change from 30% in 2022. 'It leaves women balancing insecurity against inflexibility as their only options,' says Willets. Women need enough to live and plan on That being said, there's a need to balance flexibility with financial stability. For those without guaranteed hours, it's hard to anticipate income and schedule childcare in advance, says Rachel Carell, founder and CEO of childcare organisation Koru Kids. 'We've worked with many working mums as freelancers doing things like marketing and design – but rarely on zero hours,' she says. 'I've heard again and again that flexibility is vital, but so is the ability to plan and earn enough to live on. Zero-hours contracts rarely offer that.' Read more: What to expect from a maternity discrimination employment tribunal About 80% of zero-hours contract workers want regular hours, with 75% reporting financial hardship due to insufficient hours. And, these contracts can sometimes limit flexibility too. According to TUC research, two-thirds (67%) of mothers on zero-hours contracts have difficulty managing work with childcare – and two-thirds have missed out on a planned family event because of needing to work. When Carell launched the business, most of the nannies were on zero-hours contracts. 'But we moved away from these contracts voluntarily, because we heard from Koru Kids nannies that they didn't provide the security the nannies needed. We worked with parents to design new contracts that still gave flexibility, but also offered predictable hours and income,' she explains. Finding a flexible middle ground Clearly, change is needed – but simply banning zero-hours contracts may not be the solution. What could be done to keep those who rely on flexibility in the workforce, without forcing them to sacrifice their income? 'Countries like New Zealand, Germany and Ireland have shown ways to regulate zero-hours use while preserving flexibility,' says Willets. In 2016, New Zealand banned the insecurity of zero-hours contracts, not the adaptability. Employers still get to increase hours when needed, but workers start from a guaranteed base, are compensated for standby time and can decline extra work without fear of losing future shifts. 'Short-term reforms could also include guaranteed minimum hours after six months, notice periods for shift changes and pension contributions from day one, regardless of earning thresholds,' adds Willets. 'In the long-term? The real fix lies in businesses offering genuine alternatives like quality job shares, part-time roles aligned with professional pay scales, term-time contracts that don't penalise women and flexible working from day one.' Offering quality part-time work in senior roles would no doubt help to narrow the gender pay gap, which widens at higher salary levels. Below salaries of £20,000, 22% of job adverts offer part-time work, but this almost halves to 12% at the £20k point. And, it reduces to just 6% amongst jobs paid more than £60,000 a year. Improving access to promotions for part-time workers is also key. Michelle Chikanda, who founded the leadership firm Legacy Never Dies to work around her 2-year old son, adds that a ban on zero-hours could lead to more permanent and consistent work being available, if the government aids businesses. 'A ban must be matched with tax incentives for businesses that reduce the cost of hiring certain groups of people, like working mothers, creating a sustainable solution for all parties,' she says. Ultimately, the goal should be to replace zero-hours contracts with stable, flexible roles that don't force women into choosing between work, stability and their families. 'That's how we build real equity,' says Willets. 'Not with one-size-fits-all reform, but with thoughtful change grounded in lived reality.' Read more: How to speak to your boss about miscarriage How to stay motivated during a long job hunt Does mental health first aid work?Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
