logo
Government rethinks home owner buyouts amid rising climate costs

Government rethinks home owner buyouts amid rising climate costs

NZ Herald17-07-2025
But, in a changing world and climate where these events are happening harder and faster, is the idea of the Crown stepping in with unlimited cash sustainable?
This week, Prime Minister Christopher Luxon said the Government 'won't be able to keep bailing out people in this way'.
Insurance Council New Zealand chief executive Kris Faafoi told The Front Page it's not the first time the Government has voiced similar views.
'Regardless of which stripe you are, the appetite for continuing the kind of buyouts that we've seen over the last decade-and-a half is starting to wane,' Faafoi said.
'That's a Government decision to make. But, from the insurance perspective, if they're gonna invest, if they're gonna spend taxpayer money, then instead of paying out after an event has happened, we'd prefer that you spend that money to protect the communities that we're seeing being devastated by these kinds of events on a relatively regular basis.'
Estimates have the amount paid out after the Auckland Anniversary Weekend floods and Cyclone Gabrielle in the billions of dollars. Hundreds of sites in Auckland that are now vacant after storm-damaged homes were removed will be offered to community groups for playgrounds, planting and even grazing sheep and horses.
Auckland Council is the new owner of about 260 empty sections from the clearing of homes deemed a risk to life in future storms, and expects to have all 1200 homes in the same category cleared by the end of 2027.
The buyout process has left the council with scores of properties of little value, and is a result of a $2 billion Government storm recovery package, set up in October 2023.
Faafoi said something needs to be done to reduce the impact of climate events in the future.
'So there are some difficult decisions to be made ... We are seeing these kinds of events happen more and more often.
'Insurance is obviously quite important in those situations for Kiwis to fall back on. You would've seen in the last 12 to 24 months after [Cyclone] Gabrielle, that people have found, along with everything else, that paying those insurance premiums can be a challenge.
'In order to keep it manageable in the long term, that kind of risk reduction, getting infrastructure put in place [has meant] some difficult conversations, so we can make sure that if things do happen, we're lowering the impact of those weather events.'
Faafoi said those 'difficult conversations' will have to include the question: who pays?
An independent climate adaptation report, released earlier this month by the Ministry for the Environment, suggested home owners whose houses are weather-damaged should not expect buyouts in the future.
'That's the billion-dollar question. At the end of the day, I think the Government will end up deciding that the report from the independent reference group, which said beneficiaries pay.
'Now in some instances, that might be a community or an individual family or business... I think one of the promising signs from that report is in some instances, some communities won't be able to pay, and they see a pretty clear indication that, in some instances central government might have to chip in and make sure it can protect communities.
'It's extremely complex. From an insurance perspective, we wanna see some urgency. We wanna see some clear leadership from central government. We've seen some good indications of that from the Prime Minister this week, and really, we just need to get on with it.'
Listen to the full episode to hear more about what changes could happen to buyout schemes, and whether they should be a thing of the past.
The Front Page is a daily news podcast from the New Zealand Herald, available to listen to every weekday from 5am. The podcast is presented by Chelsea Daniels, an Auckland-based journalist with a background in world news and crime/justice reporting who joined NZME in 2016.
You can follow the podcast at iHeartRadio, Apple Podcasts, Spotify or wherever you get your podcasts.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Crown and council to take voting edge over Māori on Waitakeres body
Crown and council to take voting edge over Māori on Waitakeres body

Newsroom

time10 hours ago

  • Newsroom

Crown and council to take voting edge over Māori on Waitakeres body

Joint oversight of the Waitakere Ranges by Māori, Auckland Council and the Crown will not now be through a committee with equal representation after feedback from west Aucklanders, some opposed to 'co-governance'. From initial proposals of an equal five seats for tangata whenua and five representing public bodies, the latest deed to establish the oversight committee has moved to six to five in favour of the council and Crown entities. The change leaves west Auckland-based iwi Te Kawerau ā Maki feeling 'a little bruised, and beaten up' after years of waiting, but accepting it 'could live with' the council's change of representation and wanting to get on and protect the ranges. Iwi chief executive Edward Ashby told Newsroom: 'It was pretty clear there was a fear – and I do think it is an irrational fear because it's an advisory body and we are not the boogie man. But we are really focused on the outcome. We are not too worried by the numbers.' The deed for the Waitakere Ranges Heritage Area Forum, a body to be set up under a 2008 law but only now being finalised, goes before Auckland Council's policy and planning committee on Thursday. The Waitākere Ranges Heritage Area Act recognised the 27,700 hectares of publicly owned land in the ranges as nationally significant, needing protection. It specified the Crown, council and nominated iwi to develop the deed and oversight body, a non-statutory body to identify areas of cooperation and develop a strategic plan for the area. It aims to identify areas tangata whenua can contribute to the management of public land and to acknowledge their traditional relationship with the ranges. The five seats for Māori are initially to be taken up by Te Kawerau ā Maki, as another iwi listed in the Act, Ngāti Whātua, has declined. Under the deed, there will be no change of ownership of land under the deed or forum structure, and the forum would not be able to direct spending of council or Crown funds, other than its own delegated budget. In April, the New Zealand First party complained the forum would be an example of 'co-governance' with Māori able to set strategy and veto council or government measures related to the ranges. MP Shane Jones said his party would never agree to an iwi having '50 percent sovereignty over the Waitakere forest'. Ashby dismissed the criticisms in April as scaremongering and said the forum as proposed was not co-governance. If it had been, there would have been a different structure and entity established. The deed simply acknowledged tangata whenua's special relationship with the ranges area. Around 2250 people and organisations made public submissions on the heritage forum deed, with 51 percent in favour, 39 percent against and 10 percent recorded as 'other'. Analysis of the submissions by research firm Ipsos said there was concern among those opposed to the deed at the prospect of 50-50 representation on the joint committee giving tangata whenua 'disproportionate influence' over management of the public land. Those in favour of the deed and shared oversight acknowledged the iwi role of kaitiaki or guardian and the importance of tangata whenua having a strong voice and seat at the table. It appears that public feedback, rather than the political claims by NZ First and the Act Party, has now seen the forum membership weighting changed to favour the public bodies. Council staff recommend three seats for the Waitakere Local Board, two for the council governing body and one for the Department of Conservation – and five seats to be occupied by Te Kawerau ā Maki, to be shared with Ngāti Whātua should that iwi choose at a later date to participate. The role of chair would come from the iwi side and deputy chair from the public bodies. Waitakere ward councillor Shane Henderson says the composition of the forum changed 'in response to feedback, not to scaremongering from central government politicians but the voices of West Aucklanders that fed back into the process'. He said the new balance allowed half of the six-member Waitakere local board to join the forum, with two ward councillors. DoC's strong interests in the heritage area also needed representation. 'So the new numbers work a little better on that basis too.' Te Kawerau ā Maki chief executive Edward Ashby. Photo: Supplied Ashby says the change in representation came after the consultation and was put to Te Kawerau ā Maki by the council. 'It's a place the council came to that we could live with at the end of the day. It's about giving these people some certainty that there would not be a super majority of Māori on the committee. There's been a lot of misunderstanding of the original proposal. 'It's good the deed is out there and people can read it; it clearly says it's advisory, about public land, it does not have power to make any decisions about budgets. That's all in there.' He said the political claims from Jones and Act's David Seymour, among others, led to fears among some members of the public. 'I do understand that if you are reading scaremongering headlines on Facebook you might react. It's unfortunate. 'It's just the political reality of the time. The original proposal was for 50-50, not out of any power grab but simply that the Crown and council was on one side of the equation and on the other side was Te Kawerau ā Maki and Ngāti Whātua. It was as simple as that.' He noted much of the feedback against the proposed deed had come from beyond Waitakere and Auckland. 'But, there's this beautiful area. It's our heartland and I'm biased. It really needs to be looked after. We really need to get together on how we make it work.' The six-five composition of the forum was 'at least an outcome that takes some of the edge out of some people's concerns, even though I think they were not well-founded concerns'. He hoped the compromise result did not turn the clock back in other areas of the country. 'I like to think most New Zealanders are fair minded … and I would hope that progress made is not lost. There's been some really good progressive stories.' The council's policy and planning committee considers the proposed deed on Thursday, with the full Governing Body having the final say before the forum is appointed. Ashby says: 'We just want to get on with it.'

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store