Melbourne shopping centre locked down after reports of group with machete
A major shopping centre in Melbourne's northeast has reportedly been plunged into lockdown after reports of a group wielding a machete.
The Northland Shopping Centre was reportedly in lockdown on Sunday afternoon following a fight including a number of youths, callers told 3AW.
Patrons told the Victorian radio station that they were locked inside individual stores.
'Tell people not to go there at the present time until its given the all-clear,' Bill, whose daughter was at the centre, told 3AW.
Victoria police are expected to provide further details shortly.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 days ago
- Scoop
Major Changes To Proposed Anti-Stalking Law
Minister of Justice Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith is welcoming changes to toughen up the proposed anti-stalking law, including being triggered after two specified acts within 24 months. 'This change better recognises patterns in stalking behaviour and time that can pass between incidents. For example, stalking that occurs around anniversaries would not be covered under the original 12-month period,' Mr Goldsmith says. 'We've said from day one victims are our priority. Returning them to the heart of our justice system underpins all our work to restore law and order. 'Stalkers have been able to evade real consequences for their actions for far too long. As I announced in November, the offence will have a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment. 'This builds on our work already underway to restore real consequences for crime, with our sentencing reforms coming into effect at the end of this month. 'I want to thank those who made submissions during the select committee process. Your input has identified some important ways we can combat this insidious behaviour. 'The Justice Committee has now put forward a raft of recommendations, which government parties have agreed to. 'This includes strengthening the pattern of behaviour definition to only require two specified acts, and within a two-year period.' Other changes made to the Bill by the Committee to enhance its effectiveness include: Addressing the publishing of any statement or other material relating to the other person, or purporting to originate from that person (also known as doxing). Adding new sections to enable the disposal of any intimate visual recordings possessed by a person convicted of the new stalking and harassment offence. Adding the new offence to the Firearms Prohibition Orders regime, allowing those orders to be made when a person is convicted of the new offence. Clarifying the new aggravating factor relating to stalking by more clearly linking the associated stalking and harassment-type behaviours to the offence the person is charged with. Making it clear that restraining orders under the Harassment Act 1997 and orders under the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015 can be made when a person is discharged without conviction in relation to the new offence.
1News
4 days ago
- 1News
Five revealing moments from Erin Patterson's cross-examination
The prosecution has stepped up its questioning of Erin Patterson - the Victorian woman accused of killing three people and attempting to kill a fourth by serving them a meal laced with poisonous mushrooms. After days of giving evidence in her own defence, Patterson has now faced cross-examination from prosecutor Nanette Rogers SC, who has challenged her on everything from deleted photos and cancer claims to the exact wording of her emoji use in private messages. Australia Correspondent Aziz Al Sa'afin explains some of the biggest moments from the cross-examination so far. (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT 1. 'You knew they were death cap mushrooms' Nanette Rogers began by suggesting Patterson knew she had cooked with death cap mushrooms and deliberately got rid of the evidence. 'You knew that they were death cap mushrooms that you'd been dehydrating, correct?' 'No, I didn't know that,' Patterson replied. The prosecution then accused her of deliberately disposing of the food dehydrator to cover her tracks. 'You were very keen to dispose of any evidence that might connect you with the possession of death cap mushrooms?' 'No, I didn't,' Patterson said again. ADVERTISEMENT (Source: 1News) 2. Photos allegedly show mushrooms being weighed Rogers showed the jury a series of images from Patterson's phone showing sliced mushrooms on a dehydrator tray, balanced on kitchen scales in her home. Expert evidence has previously suggested the mushrooms pictured were consistent with Amanita phalloides - the deadly species known as death caps. 'I suggest you were weighing these mushrooms so you could calculate the weight required for... a fatal dose,' Rogers said. 'I disagree,' Patterson replied. She also denied claims that she foraged those mushrooms after seeing a post online about local sightings on the iNaturalist website. ADVERTISEMENT 3. Internet searches raise questions about cancer claim The prosecution questioned Patterson over her claim to her lunch guests that she had cancer - a lie she now says was a cover for planned weight-loss surgery. Court documents showed images and search results related to ovarian and brain cancer stored on Patterson's devices. 'I suggest this information from the internet would allow you to tell a more convincing lie,' Rogers said. 'That's theoretically true, but it's not what I did,' Patterson replied. She said she'd worried about her health in late 2021 and early 2022, but denied conducting searches in 2023 to support a fabricated illness. (Source: 1News) ADVERTISEMENT 4. Emoji use and 'eyerolls' spark courtroom debate The court was also shown Facebook messages Patterson sent to friends, in which she referenced her in-laws and used eye-roll and neutral-face emojis when talking about their religious advice. Rogers argued the tone was mocking. Patterson disagreed. 'There's a better eyeroll emoji than these,' Patterson said. 'I can't see anything about eyes rolling in there. I wasn't mocking, I was frustrated.' 5. Prosecution questions Patterson's use of the word 'panicked' and 'foraging' Patterson had previously told the court she panicked in the days after the fatal lunch, which led her to lie and destroy evidence. But Rogers challenged this, suggesting Patterson was not reacting emotionally, but acting to avoid detection. ADVERTISEMENT 'Can you please alert me to the answer that I gave where I said I panicked when I learnt that everyone was unwell?' Patterson asked during one exchange. Rogers paused before continuing: 'Certainly.' In a continued moment of back-and-forth, Rogers questioned Patterson on her use of other language - specifically whether she understood what 'mushrooming' meant. Patterson replied: 'I think it could mean a couple of things… foraging, but also other uses of mushrooms that are not eating.' When asked what she would call picking mushrooms for food, she said: 'Pick and eat.' She maintained she never used the word 'mushrooming' and would have said 'foraged' if that's what she meant. Patterson denies the charges and the trial continues next week. ADVERTISEMENT Aziz Al Sa'afin looks at the key questions in the trial Aziz Al Sa'afin answers your most asked questions about the mushroom trial (Source: 1News) Who is Erin Patterson and what is this trial about? Erin Patterson is a 50-year-old woman from Leongatha, Victoria, who is accused of murdering her former in-laws Don and Gail Patterson and Gail's sister Heather Wilkinson. She is also charged with the attempted murder of Ian Wilkinson, a local pastor who survived the same meal. All four guests became seriously ill after eating a beef wellington lunch prepared at Patterson's home in July 2023. What is she accused of doing? Prosecutors allege that Patterson used death cap mushrooms - one of the most poisonous fungi in the world - in the meal she served her guests. The Crown claims she knowingly poisoned them. The Defence says it was a tragic accident and Patterson has pleaded not guilty to all charges. What are death cap mushrooms? ADVERTISEMENT Death cap mushrooms (Amanita phalloides) are deadly fungi that can be easily mistaken for edible varieties. Even a small amount can cause liver failure or death. They are not typically sold in stores and are often found in the wild. Cooking them does not neutralise their toxicity. What has Erin Patterson said in court? She has told the jury that she did not mean to harm anyone and believes the poisoning was a tragic accident. She admitted to lying in a police interview about foraging mushrooms and using a food dehydrator, which she later dumped. She said she panicked and was scared she'd be blamed. Why does she say she lied to police? Patterson has admitted to lying about key details during her initial police interview. She said she was overwhelmed and frightened, particularly after learning two of her guests had died. She told the court: 'It was a stupid kneejerk reaction… I was scared, but I shouldn't have done it.' What does the prosecution say? The prosecution has accused Patterson of deliberately cooking with death cap mushrooms and trying to cover her tracks. They've pointed to deleted photos, dumped kitchen equipment, and online searches they allege were used to create a convincing cover story, including a lie about having cancer. ADVERTISEMENT What has she said about the cancer claim? Patterson admitted lying to her lunch guests about having cancer. She told the court she said it to cover up a planned weight-loss surgery and described feeling ashamed of her body. The prosecution says she researched cancer online to make her story more believable. Patterson denies that. Why has this trial received so much attention? The unusual and shocking nature of the case - involving a homemade meal, rare poisonous mushrooms, and a family tragedy - has made headlines around the world. The fact that Patterson is giving evidence in her own defence is also highly unusual in a murder trial. True-crime podcasters and filmmakers have descended on the town of Morwell to cover this trial only adding to the hype. What does the jury have to decide? The jury must decide whether Erin Patterson is guilty of murder or attempted murder beyond reasonable doubt. This means they must be sure of her guilt based on the evidence presented in order to return a guilty verdict. In a Victorian criminal trial, the jury's verdict must be unanimous - all 12 jurors must agree. They will be pushed until they can reach a unanimous verdict of guilty or not guilty. In the rare instance they can't, the judge may declare a hung jury, which could lead to a retrial. What if Erin Patterson is found guilty? ADVERTISEMENT If found guilty of murder, Patterson faces a maximum penalty of life imprisonment. The judge would determine her sentence at a later date. What happens if Erin Patterson is found not guilty? If Patterson is found not guilty, she will be acquitted of the charges and released from custody. An acquittal means the jury was not satisfied of her guilt beyond reasonable doubt and that the legal threshold for conviction was not met. What happens next? The trial is ongoing and has now lasted for six weeks. Cross-examination is underway, and Patterson is expected to remain on the stand into next week. Closing arguments will follow, then final instructions from the judge before the jury deliberates. The trial could stretch into late June.
1News
04-06-2025
- 1News
'Is that how you poisoned my parents?' — Patterson confronted by ex
Erin Patterson has told a Victorian court that her estranged husband once directly asked if she poisoned his parents, a moment she says sent her into a spiral of fear and doubt. The 50-year-old is on trial for the alleged murder of three family members and the attempted murder of a fourth, accused of serving a beef wellington laced with death cap mushrooms in July last year. Taking the stand for a third day in her own defence, Patterson shared details of a private conversation with Simon, whose parents Don and Gail were among the victims of the fatal lunch. "He said to me, 'Is that how you poisoned my parents, using that dehydrator'?" "I said of course not." ADVERTISEMENT Simon has denied making the accusation, but Patterson told the court the moment shook her and led her to reflect more deeply on what had happened. The 50-year-old accused says she misled family about medical tests and she served the fateful meal on mismatched plates. (Source: 1News) 'I was scared': Patterson feared she'd be blamed Patterson said the conversation triggered mounting anxiety about the meal and the ingredients used. "It caused me to do a lot of thinking about a lot of things," she said. "I was starting to think: 'what if they'd gone in the container with the Chinese mushrooms'?" Fearing she'd be blamed and knowing child protection services were coming to visit, she admitted she disposed of the food dehydrator at the Koonwarra tip. Emotional testimony about family breakdown ADVERTISEMENT In her testimony, Patterson also reflected on her rocky marriage with Simon, saying their ability to communicate had collapsed in recent years. "We just couldn't communicate well when we disagreed… we could never make each of us feel heard and understood." She described a growing distance from Simon's family, claiming her husband no longer wanted her involved in family matters. Earlier in the week, Patterson described the traumatic birth of her first child and the support she received from her now-deceased mother-in-law, Gail Patterson. "I had no idea what to do with a baby… Gail was really supportive and gentle and patient with me." She also recalled converting to Christianity after attending a church service led by Pastor Ian Wilkinson, the sole survivor of the fatal lunch. Patterson admits leaving out key details to health officials ADVERTISEMENT Death cap mushrooms (file image). (Source: The court also heard that Patterson left out certain information during early communication with health authorities, including her doubts about the supermarket-sourced ingredients. At the time, Victorian health official Sally Ann Atkinson was tasked with asking Patterson about the potential food poisoning outbreak and the origins of the ingredients from the fatal meal. She said she was overwhelmed and scared at the time and didn't know what to believe. "Very anxious, yeah. Very anxious," she told the court. When pressed she said she "thought it was a possibility" the mushrooms sourced from the Asian grocer were responsible for the poisoning. 'I panicked': Patterson explains wiping phone data ADVERTISEMENT The jury was also shown evidence that one of Patterson's phones was reset multiple times – something she admitted doing herself on three occasions – while saying her son had performed the first. She told the court the phone originally belonged to her but was handed over to her son after he damaged his own device earlier in the year. After retrieving it in August, Patterson said she cleaned the phone and eventually set it up again for her personal use. Patterson said the third reset, on August 5, was a direct result of panic. She told the jury she had reloaded her apps and logged into her Google account, which included photos of mushrooms and her food dehydrator. Winter's here, supermarket spying, and TikTok's new feature. (Source: 1News) "I just panicked and didn't want [the detectives] to see them," she said. The following day, Patterson said she remotely triggered another factory reset after police had searched her home. "After the search of my house and the interview and the detectives had brought me home, I remember thinking 'I wonder if I can log into my Google account and see where all my devices are'. So I did that, and I could see my phone, and [my children's devices], and it was really stupid, but I thought, 'I wonder if they've been silly enough to leave it connected to the internet', so I hit factory reset to see what happened and it did."
