Major Changes To Proposed Anti-Stalking Law
Minister of Justice
Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith is welcoming changes to toughen up the proposed anti-stalking law, including being triggered after two specified acts within 24 months.
'This change better recognises patterns in stalking behaviour and time that can pass between incidents. For example, stalking that occurs around anniversaries would not be covered under the original 12-month period,' Mr Goldsmith says.
'We've said from day one victims are our priority. Returning them to the heart of our justice system underpins all our work to restore law and order.
'Stalkers have been able to evade real consequences for their actions for far too long. As I announced in November, the offence will have a maximum penalty of five years imprisonment.
'This builds on our work already underway to restore real consequences for crime, with our sentencing reforms coming into effect at the end of this month.
'I want to thank those who made submissions during the select committee process. Your input has identified some important ways we can combat this insidious behaviour.
'The Justice Committee has now put forward a raft of recommendations, which government parties have agreed to.
'This includes strengthening the pattern of behaviour definition to only require two specified acts, and within a two-year period.'
Other changes made to the Bill by the Committee to enhance its effectiveness include:
Addressing the publishing of any statement or other material relating to the other person, or purporting to originate from that person (also known as doxing).
Adding new sections to enable the disposal of any intimate visual recordings possessed by a person convicted of the new stalking and harassment offence.
Adding the new offence to the Firearms Prohibition Orders regime, allowing those orders to be made when a person is convicted of the new offence.
Clarifying the new aggravating factor relating to stalking by more clearly linking the associated stalking and harassment-type behaviours to the offence the person is charged with.
Making it clear that restraining orders under the Harassment Act 1997 and orders under the Harmful Digital Communications Act 2015 can be made when a person is discharged without conviction in relation to the new offence.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RNZ News
2 hours ago
- RNZ News
Concern Mark Lundy parole board condition impinges
Mark Lundy hasn't been able to speak a word publicly since he was released from prison early last month. That's because the man twice convicted of murdering his wife and daughter in Palmerston North over 20 years ago cannot speak to the media, post on social media or even blog about his case. Given he proclaims his innocence, some experts are concerned that this Parole Board condition impinges on his right to freedom of speech. Jimmy Ellingham reports. Tags: To embed this content on your own webpage, cut and paste the following: See terms of use.
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
Prison Population Projected To Boom Over Next Decade
New Zealand's prison population is expected to increase by 36 percent over the next decade. The Ministry of Justice projects there will be 14,230 prisoners in June 2035, up from 10,488 in February 2025. The projections take into account government policies like the reinstatement of 'Three Strikes', and reforms to cap sentencing discounts and introduce more aggravating factors. Last year's report, which projected a prison population of 11,317 by June 2034, did not take into account those policies, as they had not yet been passed into law. "The new policy settings are expected to see more offenders receive prison sentences and for those sentences to be longer," said ministry sector insights general manager Rebecca Parish. The projected increase takes into account both the remand and sentenced populations. The number of those on remand is projected to increase steadily over the time period. The sentenced population is expected to increase rapidly until June 2028 and then gradually by June 2035. Those on remand have spent longer on remand, due to their cases taking longer to go through the courts, but Parish said initiatives were underway to reduce the time taken to resolve cases and the time spent in custodial remand. The ministry said it released these reports to evaluate long-term trends, and help inform investment, planning and policy decisions. Corrections Minister Mark Mitchell said he had every confidence that Corrections had the capacity and capability to safely manage short-term and long-term projections. "The government has invested significantly into our Corrections system to safely manage the increasing prison population. This includes funding for the expansion of Waikeria and Christchurch Men's prisons, and investment to enable Corrections to recruit, train, and deploy more frontline corrections officers," he said. Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith said last year's projections had made it clear that once the government's law and order policies had taken effect the numbers would increase. "This simply reflects our work to restore law and order to New Zealand, which we know is working. We've given police and the courts more tools to go after gangs, we've put a stop to public funding of background reports, we've toughened up our sentencing laws, and reinstated the Three Strikes legislation," he said. "We want to see fewer people in prison, but only after we see fewer victims of violent crime. Victims are our priority." The report was done in collaboration with Corrections, Police, Crown Law and the Serious Fraud Office. Labour corrections spokesperson Tracey McLellan said building expensive mega-prisons would not fix the problem in the long-term. "If the government were serious about reducing crime and keeping communities safe, they'd be focusing on the drivers of crime and providing rehabilitation," she said. "We need a government focused on truly breaking the cycle of crime to keep our communities safe."
Scoop
a day ago
- Scoop
Academic Freedom Legislation Important Step To Save Universities From Themselves
Research by the Free Speech Union and others clearly shows that academic freedom is in jeopardy in New Zealand, despite being enshrined in the Education and Training Act. Universities are not currently doing the job theyre legally obliged and publicly … The Inter-University Council on Academic Freedom (IUCAF), a subcommittee of the Free Speech Union, submitted today in support of the Education and Training Amendment Bill (No 2) 2025. The submission commends key strengths and provides several recommendations to ensure academic freedom is protected in New Zealand universities, says Professor Paul Moon, Co-Chairperson of IUCAF. 'Academic freedom is essential for universities to uphold if academics and students are to speak freely. We welcome the Education and Training Amendment Bill, which the Free Speech Union contributed to extensively, to protect and enable academics and students to speak without fear of retribution. 'Research by the Free Speech Union and others clearly shows that academic freedom is in jeopardy in New Zealand, despite being enshrined in the Education and Training Act. Universities are not currently doing the job they're legally obliged and publicly funded to do. 'We welcome the introduction of duties on universities to protect and promote academic freedom. We commend that the Bill would prevent universities from denying speakers based on controversial or unpopular opinions, and the introduction of annual reporting requirements. 'To ensure the Bill has the full effect of enhancing academic freedom in New Zealand, we have several recommendations. We've proposed that free speech policies avoid language that could actually limit speech, that a clear definition of 'institutional neutrality' is provided to avoid misunderstanding, and that annual reports be made publicly available. 'A culture of fear on our campuses has prevailed for too long. This is the reinforcement universities need to once again return to fostering open dialogue and debate.'
