logo
Labor reportedly considering forgiving more than $1bn in welfare debts following court ruling

Labor reportedly considering forgiving more than $1bn in welfare debts following court ruling

News.com.au18-07-2025
Debt recovery for overpaid welfare checks is set to resume following a landmark Federal Court ruling, but Labor is reportedly considering a bombshell debt forgiveness measure that would stop the collection.
The Federal Court handed down its decision on Tuesday that the method the government had been using since 2020 to calculate and collect debt was valid.
The Department of Social Services (DSS) had paused debt repatriation for social security employment checks received before 2020 as it awaited the key court judgment, but the department secretary Michael Lye said the court decision affirmed his 'legal position' and assessment activities would resume.
'Now there is certainty to the legal position, assessment activities will recommence in line with the court's decision and my obligations as secretary,' Mr Lye said.
The department could now reassess the debt of up to 160,000 people as far back as 1979, reportedly worth $1.1bn.
But the Australian Financial Review reported that government officials were aware that Social Services Minister Tanya Plibersek was considering options on the overpayments, going as far as to forgive the debts.
Greens questioning in senate estimates earlier this year revealed that Services Australia was chasing billions of dollars in decades-old debt.
Data showed that up to $4.9bn in unpaid debts were being pursued from more than 829,000 customers.
Ms Plibersek did not comment beyond a joint statement released with Katy Gallagher on Tuesday.
'The Albanese Labor government acknowledges the decision of the Full Court of the Federal Court in Matthew Chaplin v Secretary, Department of Social Services,' the statement read.
'Income apportionment is a historical practice which ran from the early 1990s to 2020. It is not used today. It has never been used by the Albanese Labor government.
'Income apportionment was a method used by Centrelink to calculate debts in circumstances where they did not have detailed information about days and hours worked.
'This methodology reduced unreasonable reporting burdens and paperwork on welfare recipients and was a genuine misinterpretation of the law.
'The Chaplin decision has reconfirmed that the process of income apportionment was not lawful. It also confirmed that the process used to calculate debt since 2020 is valid.
'The government will now evaluate its impact and develop a suitable response.'
Greens social services spokeswoman Penny Allman-Payne criticised the government for 'aggressively targeting income support recipients with cruel and ridiculous debt notices based on dubious data matching methods'.
'Income support payments are already below the poverty line, meaning thousands of income support recipients are making tough choices between skipping meals or paying the rent,' she said.
'The last thing they need is the government hounding them to disprove a dodgy debt notice, sometimes from decades ago.
'The Greens will be urging Labor to act to protect welfare recipients and finally put the Robodebt era behind us.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Fury as elite Sydney school tries to buy street on Lower North Shore
Fury as elite Sydney school tries to buy street on Lower North Shore

News.com.au

time23 minutes ago

  • News.com.au

Fury as elite Sydney school tries to buy street on Lower North Shore

A prestigious Sydney school's proposal to buy part of a public road from council has sparked fierce community opposition, with locals accusing the institution of trying to take over the neighbourhood. Sydney Church of England Grammar School – better known as Shore – has approached North Sydney Council to purchase a chunk of Edward St north of Lord St. The section of road – a known traffic bottleneck during pick-up and drop-off times – currently separates the Lower North Shore school's senior and preparatory campuses. Open Space & Infrastructure director Gary Parsons has recommended the council's chief executive be authorised 'to enter into discussions regarding the potential closure and sale' of the street section, The Daily Telegraph reports, including undertaking community consultation. The independent, all-boys school – which has annual tuition fees of up to $46,000 – would be required to provide a minimum $20,000 bond to cover the cost of council's preliminary 'investigations'. Council will deliberate the matter at a meeting on Monday night, but the offer has already been met with backlash from residents, who say closing the street would 'exacerbate the existing traffic chaos'. 'It is an education district but it is a residential district too,' Danielle Walters, who has lived in the area for two decades, told The Telegraph. 'How much are we doing to allow a school to dominate a whole area and what does it mean for us? If this is all going to be (a) school, should we just be selling our properties to Shore now?' Maree Faulkner, another longtime Lower North Shore local, echoed the sentiment on social media, writing there were 'three issues' with the potential acquisition. '1. This would exacerbate the existing traffic chaos in Edward St at school drop off/pick up times,' Ms Faulkner said. 'I'm already frequently prevented from accessing my property by the queues of massive SUV's and the private traffic wardens employed by SHORE. '2. This would further alienate Graithwaite (historic house) from the community – even preventing distant public viewing of this beautiful community landmark. 'And most importantly … 3. This is blatant evidence of the misuse of the tax payer $s provided to SHORE. A condition of the sale should be that, in addition to the sale price, SHORE must provide an annual donation of the equivalent amount to an underprivileged school in Western Sydney.' A Shore spokesperson confirmed to it has submitted an application to purchase the portion of street 'that directly borders the Preparatory School campus in North Sydney'. 'This proposal is part of a broader initiative to improve traffic flow and enhance safety for students and families during peak drop-off and pick-up times,' they said. 'The section of Edward Street in question is adjacent to existing School grounds and does not include any residential properties or homes. Shore remains committed to working collaboratively with Council and the local community to ensure the best outcomes for all stakeholders.' has contacted North Sydney Council for comment. Other residents noted they didn't see an issue with the street being sold to Shore, given 'nobody uses (it) unless it's school related'. 'It's a bit of a nothing street, it's basically a thoroughfare for the school anyway,' someone else pointed out. '(Locals) are only upset because they don't like the school,' another agreed. 'The piece of road runs through the middle of the school and is of no use to anyone but the school.' The move comes amid the cash-strapped council's ongoing struggle to finance the North Sydney Olympic Pool redevelopment, with the costs associated with it surging to an estimated $122 million. Last October, council warned it would need to make 'critical decisions' to salvage its finances, including seeking voluntary rates or an 'in-kind contribution' on their property holdings from the area's six independent schools, including Shore. 'Private schools own approximately 152,566 square metres in the LGA and if that were rated as a business it would result in additional rate revenue of over $1 million,' North Sydney Mayor Zoe Baker said at a December council meeting.

Mossman growers experiment with new industries as sugarcane future remains uncertain
Mossman growers experiment with new industries as sugarcane future remains uncertain

ABC News

timean hour ago

  • ABC News

Mossman growers experiment with new industries as sugarcane future remains uncertain

For more than 125 years Mossman's cane growers have delivered a crop to the mill for crushing, but for some this year will be the last. Since the closure last year of their local factory near Port Douglas in Queensland's far north, farmers have been experimenting with other crops, as the future of their multi-generational industry is still uncertain. Their current harvest is trucked 100 kilometres to Mulgrave for crushing, but this subsidised short-term solution may not be sustainable long term. The Queensland government has put together a $12.5 million package announced in the budget to support Mossman cane growers with the loss of the sugar mill. About $6m of those funds will fully subsidise the cost of transporting this season's cane harvest from Mossman to Mulgrave Mill, which is critical for growers to make a profit. The other $6m will be used to work towards long term solutions and projects beyond 2025. Discussions between stakeholders are taking place about how this money is best spent. Determined to stay on the land, growers say they have no choice but to try growing crops other than cane. Fourth-generation Mossman farmer Don Murday is the deputy chair of Queensland Cane, Agriculture and Renewables, a group that advocates for sugar growers. He believes making fuel from plants is the future for Mossman, and has been trialling bana grass, a crop similar to sugarcane but without the sucrose content, used to create biofuels. He said the results had been great so far and this would most likely be his last year growing sugarcane. "The leading projects I believe in this transition are bana grass for renewable energy," he said. "I'm going to transition into bana grass with maybe a few other crops in the interim, but I won't be planning any more sugarcane. "I may well be taking the sugarcane out after this harvest." From a financial perspective, Mr Murday said using the grass to produce biomass — organic material that can be converted into a renewable energy source — was a viable option. "With the predicted tonnages of the bana grass and the price that's being offered, we're looking at gross value of between $4,000 and $5,000 per hectare with lower growing cost than sugarcane," he said. "So I believe growing the bana grass will compare very favourably to growing the sugarcane at the current prices." Matthew Watson also farms in Mossman and has been trialling different crops including coffee, cocoa, corn and sorghum. He also sees potential in bana grass, which he said was practical to grow in the district. "Bana grass is a grass the same as cane … it grows the same, you can plant it the same, cut it the same [and] we've got all the machinery to do that," Mr Watson said. "It seems to be growing really well in the trial patches that they've got around the district at the moment. Growing anything without a local processor would be challenging, and Mr Murday and Mr Watson are both apprehensive about what will become of the Mossman factory. Mr Murday said he hoped it could be turned into a biomass processing facility. "It's probably 12 to 18 months before we're going to have any commercial quantities [of bana grass] available, and one of the processes that we're looking at is could effectively be operating within 12 months from the time they're given the go-ahead," he said. For now, Mr Murday is only growing bana grass for propagation — experimenting with reproducing the plants — and not for commercial processing. Mr Watson said it would be hard to see a clear future for his farm until more decisions about ownership of the mills or new processing facilities were made. "We really just don't know, unfortunately," he said. "The killer is the not knowing what you're doing from day to day, trying not to get stuck in the negatives."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store