logo
The UK's old landline network is being switched off. This is how it will affect you

The UK's old landline network is being switched off. This is how it will affect you

Yahoo29-04-2025

Traditional landlines in Britain are being phased out altogether in a major change to the telephone service.
From 2027, all households will use a new home phone service delivered over broadband, rather than the traditional copper phone network - although most households will be switched over this year.
Charities have told Yahoo News that while many older people in particular may feel "daunted" by the digital switchover, it was important to stress that landlines aren't being phased out altogether - it's the network that is changing.
Presenter Moira Stuart 75, has fronted a campaign - alongside BT - looking to raise awareness of the new replacement service, known as Digital Voice.
The new service includes scam-blocking features, and is delivered entirely over broadband.
Stuart, who worked for the BBC for 34 years, said, 'Like many people, I've relied on a landline for most of my life – so I was curious to understand what switching to Digital Voice really means."
Stuart previously almost fell victim to a bank scam, saying at the time, 'I was absolutely devastated, embarrassed and angry with myself'.
Digital Voice is a new service which uses the broadband network to route calls.
It replaces Britain's century-old copper wire network, which is no longer reliable enough to deliver high-quality services and which has become difficult and expensive to repair.
Instead of plugging a phone into a wall socket, customers typically plug it directly into a broadband router and make calls this way.
The way calls work won't change, but they will travel over the internet instead of the copper line, offering improved sound quality.
The full 'switch off' was originally planned for 2025 but was extended to 2027, although voice lines in homes will be switched off sooner.
BT has provided the following schedule for vulnerable customers as to when their services might be switched over.
Spring 2025: East of England, Northern Ireland, Wales, Yorkshire & Humber
Summer 2025: East Midlands, London, North East England, Scotland
Autumn 2025: North West England, South East England, South West England, West Midlands
The change will affect users who still use old-style copper-wire landlines for phones or other devices.
Since September 2023, there have been no new connections to the copper network, and BT is working to move customers off copper wire in services that have historically relied on such lines, like lifts.
BT says the rollout will prioritise vulnerable customers, offering free in-home visits from engineers.
There is an interim landline service for landline-only users which can support customers until 2030 if they do not have broadband.
If you're worried about your own connection or that of a family member, BT has a 'Connected Together' website dedicated to the switchover - which offers support information and tools in switching over. (Visit BT here for more details.)
One of the potential upsides however, according to BT, is that Digital Voice will provide built-in protection against scam and nuisance calls.
According to a study by the University of Portsmouth in 2024, older adults in the UK, particularly those over the age of 75, are experiencing an unprecedented number of attempted telephone frauds.
At least two-thirds of the respondents were targeted by scammers in the past six months, with nearly 75 per cent of the attempted frauds conducted via telephone.
BT says Digital Voice blocks 17,000 scam calls every day and flags over 158,000 as suspected nuisance calls.
Many older people also use telecare - a range of services that use alarms and sensors to check that people are okay - and BT says that these will only be upgraded to Digital Voice once BT is sure that the equipment is compatible.
People who use a telecare device will be offered an engineer visit (free) and a battery back-up unit in cases there is a power outage.
Caroline Abrahams CBE, Charity Director at Age UK told Yahoo News: 'Lots of people may feel daunted by digital developments and are worried about the digital switchover, but landlines aren't being phased out – it's the network that's being upgraded and services are changing.
'Switching over will be straightforward for most, but some households may need new equipment or support. If you or an older person you support uses a telecare device, pendant alarm or burglar alarm, let the phone company know and check with the equipment provider to see whether it needs to be upgraded ahead of the switch.
'In most cases people will be able to keep the same number and handset. Telephone providers will contact people affected in advance to let them know when their system is changing and what needs to be done. In some cases, an engineer will need to visit to make changes. When your telephone provider contacts you, let them know if you have any questions or concerns.
The new service will cost the same as before, BT says, and users who do not have broadband will be offered a connection.
Age UK's Abrahams says: 'If you don't already have broadband, your network provider will supply the connection – so you shouldn't face extra costs."

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Customer shocked by Aussie cafe's extra 30 per cent charge: 'Not normal'
Customer shocked by Aussie cafe's extra 30 per cent charge: 'Not normal'

Yahoo

timea day ago

  • Yahoo

Customer shocked by Aussie cafe's extra 30 per cent charge: 'Not normal'

A Sydney woman's breakfast treat got off to a sour start after she was faced with an additional cost she wasn't expecting. After ordering the $13 breakfast combo from the takeaway menu, she went to find a table but was stopped by the cashier who told her she'd have to pay more to sit down to have her egg and bacon roll and hot chocolate. When asked how much, the cashier at the Broadway cafe told her it would be $17 if she wanted to dine-in — an increase of 30 per cent. 'So now sitting comes with a $4 upgrade? Maybe the chair reclines, plays Netflix, and offers emotional support?' the stunned diner said. She declined to pay extra for a table, and instead stood 'awkwardly' in front of a bank, 'holding my greasy brown paper bag and eating like a pigeon' while she waited for the bank to open. The customer, who preferred to remain anonymous, told Yahoo News the charge came as a shock and has changed the way she buys coffee. "I mean, I know life is getting more and more expensive, but that much just to sit down and enjoy the brekky, then I don't think it's normal," she said. The woman said she couldn't see any signs advising of the price difference, but later noted the menu had 'takeaway' written on it. Another customer's review of the cafe from three years ago complained of the same issue. She was told a takeaway coffee would cost $3.70, whereas sitting in would be $4.50. When she asked why, staff told her it's "because we have to clean the mug". Yahoo News has approached the cafe to confirm its pricing policy but they have not responded. On the cafe's standard menu, viewed online, an egg and bacon roll was $13 and a regular hot chocolate $5.30. The takeaway combo of the two items sells for a discounted $13. Aussies reject tipping as restaurants and bars warned over cashless trend: 'Not part of our culture' Cafe defends 'ludicrous' $1 surcharge for no ice Cafe owner hits back at customer's wild public holiday surcharge threat: 'Scum of the earth' Franco Amitrano, who owns Cafe & Cuchina in Surry Hills, explained to Yahoo why dining in comes with a higher cost. His cafe, which has been operating for 11 years, charges customers an additional 20 cents if they choose to drink their coffee at the venue. Food is the same price, whether it's takeaway or dine-in. "Mainly it's because the barista takes a bit longer to make it look nice, to make latte art," he said. "For me, it's not the washing up that is part of (the cost), because you have to pay for cups anyway when you take it away. So it's kind of the same. "It's more because the barista has to take a bit longer to do the service and you have to get someone to deliver it to the table. So that's the extra in labour." Franco added that his customers have never had an issue with the additional cost, but he does think charging $4 extra for dining in is too much. "I don't think many people charge that kind of increase if you dine in," he said. While the different pricing structures for takeaway and dining in are becoming more common, they may not be in the best interest of the venue, Professor of Marketing at UNSW Nitika Garg told Yahoo News. 'It's becoming more common with prices going up and costs going up. People are reasonable and people are understanding of these structures, but I think there is a way to do it," she said. Garg explained that adding on extra costs to the customer is known in the marketing world as "unbundling". "Instead of bundling, you're unbundling the cost," she said, giving budget airlines as an example where the fare, the seat, the food and the luggage are all available but for additional costs. Unbundling typically leads to a poor customer experience and is usually "not advisable", she added. What would be more satisfactory from a diner's perspective is to have the same price across the board, "even if the takeaway price is slightly high",Garg said. Do you have a story tip? Email: newsroomau@ You can also follow us on Facebook, Instagram, TikTok, Twitter and YouTube.

The BBC cracks down on AI scraping.
The BBC cracks down on AI scraping.

The Verge

time2 days ago

  • The Verge

The BBC cracks down on AI scraping.

Posted Jun 20, 2025 at 12:01 PM UTC The BBC cracks down on AI scraping. The British broadcaster has threatened legal action against Perplexity for allegedly using BBC content to train AI, saying that the Perplexity chatbot was regurgitating its content verbatim. This is the first time that the BBC has taken action against an AI company, demanding that Perplexity cease scraping BBC content, delete copies of infringing material, and provide the broadcaster with 'financial compensation.'

BBC Threatens to Sue Perplexity, Alleging 'Verbatim' Reproduction of Its Content
BBC Threatens to Sue Perplexity, Alleging 'Verbatim' Reproduction of Its Content

CNET

time2 days ago

  • CNET

BBC Threatens to Sue Perplexity, Alleging 'Verbatim' Reproduction of Its Content

The BBC is threatening to sue AI search engine Perplexity for unauthorized use of its content, alleging the artificial intelligence company generates BBC's material "verbatim." In a letter to Perplexity CEO Aravind Srinivas, as published by The Financial Times on Friday, the BBC alleges that Perplexity's default AI model was "trained using BBC content." The BBC said it would seek an injunction unless Perplexity stopped scraping BBC content, deleted all BBC material and submitted a "a proposal for financial compensation." The BBC declined to comment but said reporting by the FT was accurate. In a statement to the FT, Perplexity said the BBC's claims are "manipulative and opportunistic" and that the broadcasting giant fundamentally doesn't understand how the technology, internet or IP law work. Perplexity also alleged that the threat of litigation shows "how far the BBC is willing to go to preserve Google's illegal monopoly for its own self-interest." A US judge ruled last year that Google violated antitrust law to bolster its search dominance. Since Perplexity is an online search engine built on top of a large language model, it can answer pretty much any question asked. This means that it needs good quality information to give users satisfying answers. The BBC alleges that since Perplexity generates answers built on BBC content, that lessens the need for readers to go to the BBC directly. There's also concern that AI companies aren't using its journalism correctly and impartially, which could damage its reputation. The BBC alleges that 17% of Perplexity search responses had major issues, and "the most common problems were factual inaccuracies, sourcing and missing context." Perplexity didn't immediately respond to a request for comment. While this is the first time the BBC has gone after an AI company, it isn't the first time Perplexity has run into issues with publishers. Outlets currently suing or threatening to sue Perplexity for copyright infringement include The Wall Street Journal along with the New York Post, Forbes and The New York Times. An investigation by Wired last year alleged that Perplexity found ways to get around blocks and scrape its content. In the midst of these complaints, Perplexity launched a revenue sharing program with publishers last year, which includes Fortune, Time, The Texas Tribute and Der Spiegel. Publishers are becoming highly defensive of their content, with AI companies seeing valuations sore on the backdrop of increasingly narrow margins in media. OpenAI, the creator of ChatGPT, currently has a valuation of $300 billion and Perplexity's valuation has also soared to $14 billion. Perplexity investors include SoftBank, Nvidia and Amazon and Washington Post owner Jeff Bezos. This is while journalism has struggled in the online age, with ad dollars being siphoned by Google and attention shifting towards social media apps. Since 2005, 2,900 local newspapers have closed in the US, according to a study from Northwestern University. (Disclosure: Ziff Davis, CNET's parent company, in April filed a lawsuit against OpenAI, alleging it infringed Ziff Davis copyrights in training and operating its AI systems.)

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store