£275m of Child Trust Fund cash has not been claimed – here's how to get yours
Child Trust Funds (CTFs) are long-term, tax-free savings accounts for people born between 1 September 2002 and 2 January 2011, which they can access when they turn 18.
Children received around £250 each from the government at the time their CTF was started, or £500 if they were from low-income families or in local authority care.
A second top-up was added when the child turned seven years old for those who qualified for Disability Living Allowance between 6 April 2009 and 5 April 2011, or turned seven between 1 September 2009 and 31 July 2010.
The accounts could also be added to by a parent, with the average amount held in CTFs totalling around £2,000. If no action was taken by families to claim the accounts when they were set up, they were allocated by HMRC.
However, according to The Share Foundation, a charity that helps track down unclaimed funds, more than £400 million is sitting unclaimed in HMRC-allocated accounts waiting for people to claim them. And more than half of the accounts belong to young adults on low incomes, with £274 million meant for disadvantaged young people left unclaimed.
The charity has warned that if no action is taken, there will be nearly £1bn lying dormant and unclaimed for low-income young adults by the end of this parliament.
Dawn Smith, 21, said her Child Trust Fund helped her achieve the best grade possible at university, where she was later offered her first job.
However, she said it took her over a year to access her fund due to a name change.
'My parents were aware of it, but we had no idea where it was or how much money was in it – we knew nothing,' she said.
She then searched online and found The Share Foundation, which helped her to claim her fund.
The Share Foundation is calling on the government to implement a new automatic release mechanism to ensure all HMRC-allocated funds are paid out when account holders turn 21 - without the need for them to make a claim.
Ms Smith told The Independent: 'I managed to claim mine in the second year of university. I studied music at university in London, which was very expensive. While my parents were doing as much as they could, once I got that trust fund, it all went towards uni.
'It went towards my equipment and anything I could use to get the best grade possible. I used it for things that were very needed at the time.
'It's helped me invest in my future. With having that trust fund helping me do so well, the uni has actually offered me a job, so I'll be a tutor for them.'
Chairman of The Share Foundation, Gavin Oldham, described the money as being 'hidden' from young people.
He said: 'The government has no funding for low-income young people, not because it lacks intent, but because it lacks the means. So why not release the £400 million that is currently sat unclaimed in HMRC-allocated Child Trust Funds belonging to young people aged 21 or over?
'This would provide an immediate resolution at no cost to them - and £274 million of this would be delivered immediately to low-income young people.'
The proposed changes would mean that if an unclaimed HMRC-allocated fund matched the national insurance number of someone either claiming benefits, on a payroll or student loan system, the money would be released to the corresponding accounts.
Lord David Blunkett, who has also called for changes to be made, told The Independent: 'A simple means of releasing the money directly to them using modern technology is a no-brainer. The trawl for contact details would be the same as banks uses when checking for 'unclaimed assets' and cross-reference with national insurance numbers would also help.
'Not only would this be a boon to the young people concerned at a moment when they need it most, but also an injection of cash into local economies across the country, which is bound to help the overall economy.'
An HMRC spokesperson said it works closely with providers to support young people to track their funds down and every young person is sent information about finding their account with their National Insurance letter.
The Treasury has been contacted for a comment.
To find your CTF, the government website advises you to contact your provider directly, if you know who the account is with.
If you don't, you can ask HMRC or contact The Share Foundation for help here: https://www.sharefound.org/
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Man United 'will step up talks for £100m Brighton star Carlos Baleba' as player's stance is 'revealed'
Manchester United are reportedly preparing to heat up their pursuit of Brighton midfielder Carlos Baleba. A figure of £100million is being bandied around for the 21-year-old, who has spent two seasons as a regular starter for the Seagulls after arriving from Lille in 2023. He still has three years remaining on his contract at the Amex, and the club holds the option of a 12-month extension on top of that, so the cards are firmly in Brighton's hands. But Fabrizio Romano reports that United are ready to intensify their move to snatch him and that, crucially, the player is keen to make the switch happen. Brighton are not so willing to sell given that he had an impressive season, featuring 34 times in the Premier League and scoring three goals for Fabian Hurzeler's side. The Sussex club are used to turning around stars for a mind-blowing profit - think Moises Caicedo, Marc Cucurella, and Joao Pedro - but are not in a position where they must sell. They finished eighth in the Premier League last time out, just five points off fifth-placed Newcastle, who secured Champions League football, and may feel they can kick on. While they have sold important players in Pedro, Simon Adingra, and Pervis Estupinan, they have re-invested in the next crop who they hope can shock the league. According to The Athletic, a move for the youngster is 'improbable' unless United are able to secure a series of lucrative sales before the window closes at the start of next month. All the same, United have established contact with Brighton. Following their dismal campaign last term, United have focused on bolstering their attack, recruiting Matheus Cunha, Bryan Mbeumo, and Benjamin Sesko for a combined outlay of £207.2million. Only Liverpool and Chelsea can boast a higher spend among the Premier League's money-spinning corridors this summer. One Manchester United fan has set up a GoFundMe page to try and raise funds for a Baleba bid, though in four days it has only raised £501 of its £120m target. Ruben Amorim has a desire to improve their midfield ranks. United currently have Casemiro, Manuel Ugarte, and Toby Collyer, while Bruno Fernandes and Kobbie Mainoo can also be deployed in the central midfielder positions in their 3-4-3 formation. Baleba told The Sun that praise from players like Declan Rice, Matheus Cunha and Joelinton, as well as watching Man City star Rodri lift the Ballon D'or, has encouraged him to set his sights on the most prestigious individual award in football. 'I want to win the Ballon D'or like Rodri,' Baleba said. 'His success has opened the door for midfielders like us to believe we can win the Ballon D'or one day.' The youngster was born and raised in Douala - also the birthplace of four-time African Player of the Year Samuel Eto'o. He has also cited former United midfielder Paul Pogba as one of his biggest inspirations.
The Guardian
an hour ago
- The Guardian
Frustrated Crystal Palace count cost after Cas upholds Europa League ban
The news Steve Parish was dreading arrived less than 24 hours after he basked in the glory of watching Crystal Palace win their second trophy in three months. Parish had been confident the club's appeal against their demotion from the Europa League would succeed as he discussed their prospects in the bowels of Wembley stadium after the Community Shield victory against Liverpool on Sunday. 'I really am, even more after Friday,' the club chair said. 'I don't understand that we cannot be in the competition. I really can't. But it's up to the judges to decide. We trust them and that they listened to everything we said so let's see.' Confirmation from the court of arbitration for sport that it had upheld the decision made by Uefa's club financial control body to punish Palace for breaching its multi-club ownership rules has brought Parish and the team's supporters back to earth. The Cas statement made clear the role of John Textor, the American businessman who last month sold his 43% stake in Palace to the New York Jets owner, Woody Johnson, was decisive. Textor has admitted that seconds after Palace's victory against Manchester City in May's FA Cup final that he feared for the worst regarding participation in the Europa League, given that he owns Lyon, who also qualified. The Cas panel – consisting of a Dutch former striker, a Swiss former fencer who competed in the 1984 Olympics and an Italian professor – backed Uefa's findings that Textor 'was a board member with decisive influence over both clubs at the time of Uefa's assessment date'. It also dismissed Palace's argument that they had received unfair treatment compared to Nottingham Forest and Lyon, and said missing the 1 March deadline for Textor to place his shares into a blind trust had been crucial. Textor has been the target of most Palace fans' frustration, although several have also taken aim at the Nottingham Forest owner, Evangelos Marinakis. Forest, who are poised to take Palace's Europa League place, wrote to Uefa a few weeks after the FA Cup final expressing concern that Palace may have contravened multi-club ownership regulations. Parish suggested last month in an interview with Gary Lineker that their Premier League rivals had played a role in the decision to ban them. 'We were told that and I think it's been made public,' he said. 'These things seem to be played out in public. There doesn't seem to be a lot of confidentiality that comes out of certain organisations. But we're led to believe that that's the issue – if there wasn't somebody that wanted to get in as a consequence, then there wouldn't be a problem. 'People have got to look at themselves. Some people will say it's fine, some people will say it's not. I don't really have control of that. I only have control of the arguments that we put forward to Uefa.' Forest declined to comment on Parish's remarks at the time. Palace's case is believed to have included evidence that only members of the European Club Association were informed Uefa's 1 March deadline for complying with multi-club rules could be extended until 31 May – a fact that enabled Marinakis to place Forest into a blind trust when it seemed they might qualify for the Champions League along with his Greek club, Olympiakos. Palace are also understood to have highlighted the burgeoning friendship between Marinakis and Textor. The American denies that had any bearing on his conduct and described as untrue reports he is planning to incorporate his Brazilian club Botafogo into the Greek shipping magnate's network of clubs. Forest sent a legal delegation to the Cas hearing to argue their case and they have been silent since Palace were demoted by Uefa last month. Marinakis has resumed control of shares in the two-time European champions after they finished seventh in the Premier League. Sign up to Football Daily Kick off your evenings with the Guardian's take on the world of football after newsletter promotion Their supporters can look forward to the Europa League's league stage while Palace prepare for a Conference League playoff against the losers of the Europa League qualifier between Norway's Fredrikstad and Midtjylland of Denmark. Midtjylland lead 3-1 going into their home leg on Thursday. It is estimated demotion will cost Palace up to £20m in lost revenue, given the Conference League's league stage has two fewer games than the Europa League's, although Oliver Glasner will fancy his chances of winning a competition that has had two English winners in its first four editions. The chance for Palace to play in Europe for the first time since a short-lived Intertoto Cup experience in 1998, when they qualified after being the only English team to apply for entry, will be consolation for a club that also missed out in 1991 when they finished third in the old First Division. Only the top two went into Europe via league position.
Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
HMRC uses AI to spy on social media posts
HMRC has admitted for the first time that it uses artificial intelligence (AI) to spy on taxpayers' social media posts. The tax authority examines workers' financial records, spending habits and tax returns to look for evidence of cheating – as well as posts on the internet. Social media posts about a large purchase or expensive holiday could trigger a red flag if the user seems to be spending beyond their means. A spokesman insisted the tools were only deployed for social media monitoring in criminal investigations with 'robust safeguards in place'. It is understood this has been the case for a number of years, and that all uses of the controversial technology by the tax office are within the law. However, advances in AI are likely to raise concerns about whether HMRC could in future deploy the technology more widely. Bob Blackman, a senior Conservative MP, said: 'If they suddenly start taking legal action against individuals based on that, it seems draconian and very challenging – to put it mildly. 'You've got to have a check and balance. The risk is that AI gets it wrong and someone is pilloried – it seems a bit strange if they start doing that with AI. Without a human check, you can see there's going to be a problem.' The tools used to examine social media in criminal cases exist alongside Connect, a separate IT system used by HMRC to examine financial data for routine tax investigation. The Connect system was first developed over a decade ago, but is thought to be increasingly important as HMRC tries to save money by relying less on human beings to carry out its investigations. It uses billions of data points – including information to spot signs of tax evasion. Rachel Reeves is hoping to make up £7bn of the £47bn 'tax gap' by identifying those who have not paid enough into the national purse. Improvements to the AI software could hold the key to achieving this, after officials last month unveiled plans envisioning its use in 'everyday' tax processes at HMRC. In a 63-page document, HMRC said its staff will use AI to identify suspected tax evaders and send out 'automated nudges' asking them to pay what they owe. The report suggests use of AI within HMRC will become increasingly widespread, with staff currently using chatbots to summarise calls with customers and perform basic administrative tasks. Risks of 'Horizon Post Office-type scandal' The groundwork for the embrace of AI technology appears to have been laid in May, when Labour changed the department's privacy policy. A statement that appears to have been removed said: 'HMRC's use of AI does not replace human judgement when collecting taxes or determining benefits, and our customer services processes always involve human agents.' It now states: 'Where the use of AI could impact customer outcomes, HMRC makes sure that the results are explainable, there is human involvement [and] we are compliant with our data protection, security, and ethical standards.' Senior MPs raised concerns that troves of personal data could be used to make important tax decisions without human judgement – possibly leading to errors. Sir John Hayes, a former security minister and chairman of the Common Sense Group of Tory MPs, said: 'Where confidential or sensitive material is concerned, people need to be assured that human beings with experience, common sense and judgement are making decisions. 'Automated processes remove human interactions. I would be very concerned that we will end up with a Horizon Post Office-type scandal.' Sir John, who has raised questions in Parliament about the use of AI by the HMRC, added: 'The idea that a machine must always be right is what led to the Post Office scandal. I am a huge AI sceptic.' Tax investigators already using AI Fears were raised that AI has already been handed key decision-making powers over people's tax affairs after a legal battle led to the tax office being ordered last week to reveal its use of the software. It came after tax advisors complained AI was used by HMRC when processing applications for tax reliefs that are available to certain businesses. Tom Elsbury, a tax expert, sent a Freedom of Information request in December 2023 to the tax office after he and colleagues concluded AI was used when assessing applications for tax credits by companies conducting research and development activities. HMRC refused to fulfil the request, and the decision was upheld by the information watchdog, but a First-tier Tribunal ruled on Friday that the Government must reveal whether it used AI by September 18. Ministers have insisted that there is always a human 'in the loop' when AI is used for decision-making in Whitehall, while HMRC stated humans will always have the 'final say' in matters that affect people. A similar project to expand AI uses is also being undertaken by the Department for Work and Pensions. It recently took part in a trial that saw 20,000 civil servants use AI technology for three months to draft documents and summarise meetings. A HMRC insider told The Telegraph that officials had asked a dozen tech companies to come up with ways AI could be used to tackle Britain's £46.8bn unpaid tax bill – which is thought to be mostly hidden in offshore bank accounts. AI 'assistants' Government sources said the main use of AI by the taxman was to create two 'assistants' to help the public fill in their tax returns and compliance officers to read them. The customer-facing tool is designed to warn users if they look likely to be submitting false information, based on patterns the system can spot in other users. If the AI tells a user that their return may be wrong, then it could serve as an official warning by HMRC, and lead to a faster crackdown by the authorities if they are later found to have lied, sources said. Compliance officers working at HMRC have also been given AI assistants that they use to sift through data, which ministers think will make the department faster and more efficient at spotting potential tax evasion. However, one source acknowledged that AI tools can make mistakes, and that the Government's new system could introduce errors. A HMRC spokesman said: 'Use of AI for social media monitoring is restricted to criminal investigations and subject to legal oversight. AI supports our processes but – like all effective use of this new technology – it has robust safeguards in place and does not replace human decision-making. 'Greater use of AI will enable our staff to spend less time on admin and more time helping taxpayers, as well as better target fraud and evasion to bring in more money for public services.'
