NZers are not getting a 'raw deal' on butter, says Nicola Willis
Nicola Willis met with Fonterra's chief executive Miles Hurrell at Parliament on Tuesday evening.
While the two meet regularly, there was increased interest in the meeting due to the current price of butter. Willis had earlier said it was something she would discuss with Hurrell.
Finance Minister Nicola Willis says the price of butter will be discussed at her meeting with the giant co-op. (Source: 1News)
Characterising the meeting as "constructive and engaging," Willis said Hurrell was candid about the way butter was priced in New Zealand.
ADVERTISEMENT
Her summary of her meeting with Fonterra largely zeroed in on her drive to increase supermarket competition.
The large proportion of what people pay for butter is dictated by global demand, which is something the government could not control.
"Were that price to come down, you would expect that to be reflected in the prices that New Zealand shoppers pay," Willis said.
Hurrell had told her that butter had once been the hardest product for Fonterra to sell globally, but the increasing demand was due to reporting on its health benefits.
"It was once viewed as a bogeyman," she said.
The meeting had reinforced Willis' interest in increasing supermarket competition to put downward pressure on the price of butter.
"All roads lead back to supermarket competition. I continue to believe that is the most powerful lever that the government has on this issue. We will never be able to control global dairy prices. What we can influence is the amount of competition in New Zealand's grocery sector and we have a lot of work underway to address that."
ADVERTISEMENT
Fonterra had also observed the supermarket competition.
Finance Minister Nicola Willis does not believe New Zealanders are getting a "raw deal" on butter. (Source: rnz.co.nz)
"Miles specifically conveyed that Fonterra operates in a number of markets around the world, most of which have a more competitive supermarket sector, and that it does feel different in New Zealand."
She would leave it to supermarkets and Fonterra to argue who was charging what margin.
"The sense that I got from my engagement with Miles is that it's a constant battle between them. Each party are probably going to point fingers at the other."
Hurrell would not answer questions when RNZ approached him outside Parliament on Tuesday night, but a Fonterra spokesperson said the meeting was "constructive".
Willis said she had encouraged Hurrell to front, in particular to explain what proportion of the margins go to Fonterra and what goes to supermarkets.
ADVERTISEMENT
Acknowledging that Fonterra's job was to get the best possible price for its shareholders, Willis also accepted New Zealanders saw the downsides of that when they were shopping.
"I've been satisfied that I don't think consumers are getting a raw deal. I think that there is good work going on to ensure that there is pressure and competition from Fonterra to try and keep its prices low. But I get it. Butter is expensive right now. There's no getting away from that."
rnz.co.nz
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Scoop
2 hours ago
- Scoop
ACT Announces Andrew Pickford As ACT Local Candidate For Hauraki
ACT Local has selected Andrew Pickford, a former international airline captain who now runs a family farm and local businesses, as its candidate for the Plains Ward of the Hauraki District Council in this year's local election. After more than 25 years flying for major airlines, Andrew swapped the skies for the paddocks. These days, he co-manages a sheep and beef farm and helps run two local franchise stores. He's also worked in project development, bringing practical experience in planning, logistics, and getting things done. He knows what it's like to juggle work, business, and family – and he's standing to bring that real-world perspective into council. The HDC needs someone like Andrew. Someone who will scrutinise spending and push for better value. Council forecast a $500,000 surplus for 2024 and instead delivered a $17 million deficit. Now rates are set to rise by 10.6%, with no real improvements in core services. Last year alone, the council's power bill increased by $650,000, a massive cost blowout that ratepayers are left to cover, with nothing to show for it. It's a clear sign the council has lost control of its finances. Ratepayers deserve better. As an ACT Local candidate, Andrew brings real-world experience from the private sector – where budgets are respected, every dollar is tracked, and waste isn't tolerated. "Flying taught me how to plan ahead, stay calm under pressure, and take responsibility. Farming has shown me the daily challenges families face. Running a business reminds me every day how important it is to spend wisely and stay focused on the essentials. "I want to bring all that experience and knowledge to council, which is why I'm standing with ACT — to bring common sense and accountability back to local government, so ratepayers get real value, not more waste.' – Andrew Pickford Earlier this year, ACT New Zealand announced it would be standing Common Sense Candidates for local government for the first time – after hearing from New Zealanders across the country who are sick of rising rates, ballooning budgets, and councils that ignore the basics while chasing ideological vanity projects. When you vote ACT Local, you know what you're getting: Fixing the basics Cutting the waste Lower Rates Stopping race-based politics Restoring accountability Ending the war on cars ACT Local Government spokesperson Cameron Luxton says: ' ACT Local candidates are community-minded Kiwis who've had enough of wasteful councils treating ratepayers like ATMs. It's time to take control on behalf of ratepayers — to restore accountability and deliver real value for money. ACT Local is about getting the basics right: maintaining roads, keeping streets clean, and respecting the people who pay the bills. Our candidates won't divide people by race or get distracted by climate vanity projects. They're here to serve, not lecture." – Cameron Luxton
Newsroom
6 hours ago
- Newsroom
When it's worth waiting for democracy
Undemocratic and a breach of human rights. That's what most experts and officials think of the Government's proposed changes to the electoral law. Last week Justice Minister Paul Goldsmith announced a suite of changes around who can vote and how they do so. Those include more opportunity for digital enrolment methods and introduce automatic enrolment updates. But the big one is the moving of the enrolment deadline. At the last election, you could rock up on election day, enrol and cast your vote at the same time. But under this bill New Zealanders would have to enrol 13 days before election day to be eligible to vote. Goldsmith says it's to ensure a final election result is achieved sooner but he's being met with fierce critics, including from some within his own party who think the change takes things a step too far. While entities like the Ministry of Justice can, and do, offer advice in the form of policy papers and regulatory impact statements, electoral law expert Graeme Edgeler says the final decision falls on the shoulders of who New Zealanders have elected to represent them – the politicians. 'The Government and the MPs are the ones that are elected, so they get to make the policy calls and argue for them and the opposition, if they want to, gets to argue against them,' he says. Edgeler says the Ministry of Justice had its own suggestions for reducing the number of special votes, for example, automatic enrolment updates. 'So if you tell MSD, 'Here's my new address,' they'll tell the Electoral Commission, 'Hey, this person has updated their address with us'; the Electoral Commission will see person's already enrolled … and so your enrolment should be updated automatically now,' he says. The Government took this suggestion on board, but Edgeler says stopping enrolment 13 days before election day takes things a step further. Goldsmith told RNZ that people don't start coalition negotiations until they know the final outcome. But while it might be a political preference to wait until the special votes are counted, Edgeler says there's nothing legally stopping politicians from starting negotiations as soon as election day finishes. 'The John Key-led National government, when it was first elected, it had its coalition negotiations complete and John Key was sworn in as Prime Minister before the special votes were announced,' he says. Edgeler says that's because the initial count on election night made the result clear, and he thinks that was the case with the last election as well. 'Prime Minister Chris Hipkins came out on election night and said, 'We've lost, we're not going to be the next government,' he says. National, Act and NZ First could have started coalition negotiations that same day if they had wanted to, so Edgeler doesn't think special votes delaying coalition negotiations is a good enough reason to push the enrolment deadline out to 13 days. Newsroom's political editor Laura Walters confirms that waiting until the final result is announced before starting negotiations is the preference of some political leaders. 'Winston Peters, the New Zealand First Leader, he doesn't like to actually start negotiations proper, if you will, until they have that final result back,' she says. Walters says Peters told her advanced enrolment also benefited political parties. 'He said if people don't enrol ahead of that voting period how do they know who they're campaigning to, who their message should be pushed towards,' she says. David Seymour was more blunt in his support of the change, saying only 'dropkicks' enrol on election day. But Walters says those 'dropkicks' include quite a broad sector of society. 'What we do know from Electoral Commission data is that these people tend to be younger, we've also seen a higher proportion of Māori and Pasifika and Asian, but especially Māori,' she says. Walters adds renters and people who move around a lot and forget to update their enrolment details as people who might also be caught out by these changes. Exactly how many people will be impacted by this change is unclear, but if last election is anything to go by, Walters expects the number of people impacted is in the hundreds of thousands. 'There were 450,000 people who registered or enrolled to vote during that advanced voting period and 110,000 people did that on election day,' she says. It's these figures the Attorney-General Judith Collins referred to in her report examining whether or not there was enough justified reason behind the changes to the election law. She ruled that denying voters the political franchise is a 'heavy price' to pay just to have the election result a week or two sooner. Aside from the automatic enrolment update Walters says reaction to the bill has been mostly negative. 'Essentially people are saying nothing should ever be done to suppress or reduce the number of people who are able to vote. Anyone who is eligible to vote, eligible to register to vote, should be given every opportunity to exercise that right. 'Is this worth it? Should the Government and the Electoral Commission be bearing a little bit more administrative cost, a little bit more administrative burden, maybe waiting a little bit longer after the election to get the results, isn't that just the cost of democracy?'
Scoop
7 hours ago
- Scoop
Greens Launch Petition Against Govt's Attack On Democracy
The Green Party has launched a petition calling on the Government to keep its hands off voting rights. 'We cannot allow this Government to rob New Zealanders of their democratic rights,' says the Green Party co-leader Marama Davidson. 'Make no mistake, the Government is making calculated changes to electoral law that erode the democratic rights of regular people and play into the hands of a wealthy few. 'By blocking voters and also opening the floodgates for anonymous donations from the rich, this Government is distorting the settings of our democracy in their favour. 'Who gets to vote and who gets to influence Parliament, decides the future of our country. These laws slam the door on everyday people while rolling out the red carpet for wealthy donors who bankroll parties in this Coalition Government. 'We are calling on the Prime Minister and the Minister of Justice to drop this anti-democratic legislation. 'A Green Government will reverse these rollbacks: restoring same-day enrolment, reinstating voting rights for prisoners, cleaning up campaign finance and extending the vote to 16-year-olds. 'Democracy is for everyone, we should be expanding voting and participation, not restricting it,' says Marama Davidson.
