logo
How Texas Bullied Big Banks Into Dropping Their Climate Commitments

How Texas Bullied Big Banks Into Dropping Their Climate Commitments

Yahoo16-07-2025
Speaking to a private gathering of conservative operatives and fossil fuel advocates in January, a top deputy to Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton gave 'the inside story' about how his office bullied Wells Fargo, one of America's biggest banks, into dropping out of a global initiative to reduce carbon emissions.
The official spoke in January at the exclusive Consumers' Research Summit in Sea Island, Georgia. Rolling Stone has exclusively obtained audio and documents from the event.
Brent Webster, the First Assistant Attorney General of Texas, recalled how his office moved to cut off lucrative bond business to Wells Fargo. Webster then shared how he, in a private dinner at the governor's mansion with Gov. Greg Abbott, Paxton, and the bank's execs, told the bank Texas could 'reinstate the bond market' if it left the Net Zero Banking Alliance.
When the Wells Fargo team got flustered, Webster said he threatened an antitrust lawsuit against them, telling the bank's executives they were this close 'to being sued right now.'
After the Texas attorney general launched an antitrust lawsuit against BlackRock and other large asset management firms, Webster said he called up his contact at Wells Fargo and warned, 'you guys might be next.' It worked: 'They left a week later,' he said. 'They left the Net Zero Banking Alliance, and then all the banks followed.'
On the plus side for the banks, once they left the alliance, Paxton allowed them to get municipal bond business again.
Paxton's office did not respond to Rolling Stone's request for comment.
In a statement, Consumers' Research Executive Director Will Hild, who interviewed Webster at the event, said that the organization is 'appalled at the lengths that Wall Street's financial cartels will go to defend their tyranny over consumers,' adding that 'we are proud of the courageous work that Brent Webster and Attorney General Paxton's office have done fighting for Americans against such antitrust abuse. If big banks and asset managers like BlackRock think that they can intimidate those who oppose their misdeeds into silence … they are mistaken.'
Consumers' Research, a one-time watchdog group that now works to limit consumer protections, has led the fight against environmental, social, and governance (ESG) investing, with support from Supreme Court puppetmaster and billion-dollar money man Leonard Leo. The organization and Leo have worked in coalition with Republican attorneys general, state financial officers, legislators, and national Republican groups to pressure businesses to drop public commitments to ensuring the future habitability of our planet.
Major ESG initiatives undertaken by Wall Street firms like Wells Fargo and BlackRock include membership in global groups like the Net Zero Banking Alliance and Net Zero Asset Managers, which require a commitment to achieving net-zero carbon emissions by 2050. These clean energy alliances became key targets, and ultimately casualties, in conservatives' 'war on woke.'
Of course, corporate climate pledges, like the one from the Net Zero Banking Alliance, and ESG were nowhere close to solving the global climate crisis. The banks never stopped funding the fossil fuel industry. That hasn't stopped conservatives — ranging from Donald Trump, Republican state officials, and dark money interests — from waging an all-out war on these concepts regardless, in an effort to ensure that no one with any institutional power at all prioritizes climate action.
Webster made clear how easy it is to weaponize the legal apparatus of the state to bring the financial industry to its knees. He urged his allies to do the same: 'Anybody who has power over state enforcers or influence over state subpoena power … states should be ramping up right now.'
'We're Not Recording This, Right?'
As part of their anti-ESG fight, conservatives have argued that, by participating in clean energy alliances, financiers have engaged in illegal boycotts and manipulation of the energy markets, and breached their fiduciary duty to shareholders and retirees to prioritize investment returns above all else.
They have led an efficient and thorough campaign. Conservative think tanks like the Texas Public Policy Foundation and Heritage Action wrote model bills; state legislators affiliated with the American Legislative Exchange (ALEC) worked to pass those bills; upon passage, state treasurers and investment officials in the State Financial Officers Foundation (SFOF) and Republican attorneys general used these laws to launch enforcement actions; and everyone kept up the drumbeat of attack.
Texas, for instance, passed the nation's first law banning banks from the municipal bond business if they are found to be discriminating against the fossil fuel industry.
Attorneys general have also weaponized federal antitrust laws to launch 'unsubstantiated' attacks 'against climate initiatives,' as several partners at the law firm Wilson Sonsini put it in an article published earlier this year by Thomson Reuters.
'At bottom, these are nothing more than political attacks, and the courts should quickly end the misuse of the antitrust laws for this political purpose,' they wrote.In his fireside chat with Hild, from Consumers' Research, Webster gave a basic outline of his role in initiating Texas' antitrust lawsuit against BlackRock for allegedly conspiring with coal companies in its investment portfolio to shut down coal production.
Hild wanted more information — the backstory to explain why, after Texas filed suit against BlackRock and asset managers, 'within weeks, what might seem unrelated at first,' big banks like Wells Fargo 'start dropping like flies' from the Net Zero Banking Alliance. It produced a domino effect, with BlackRock leaving Net Zero Asset Managers, which subsequently ceased all activities.Webster replied, 'We're not recording this, right? … Please don't quote me, because I'm telling the inside story on this.'
He then described the leverage he had against Wall Street: potential enforcement actions that could end lucrative profit streams for the banks, and the possibility of long, painful lawsuits.
'They're all deathly afraid of being sued,' Webster said, explaining: 'None of them want to be subject to depositions. None of them want to be subject to discovery.'
Leo Network Powering the Anti-ESG Coalition
Leo's network has long been the top funder of the Republican Attorneys General Association, which works to elect GOP attorneys general.. Marble Freedom Trust is the primary vehicle through which Leo disburses the $1.6 billion bequeathed to him from billionaire industrialist Barre Seid for the purpose of waging the right-wing movement's culture war. Seid secretly gifted his surge protector empire to Leo's dark money trust, before the business sold, creating a historic political advocacy fund for conservatives.
According to The Wall Street Journal, Leo's Marble Freedom Trust and his consulting firm CRC Advisors have pumped millions into anti-ESG efforts, with much of it going through Consumers' Research.
CRC Advisors played an active role in the Sea Island event. In planning documents from the Sea Island Resort obtained by Rolling Stone, Maria Marshall, a top Leo lieutenant at CRC Advisors, was listed as the point of contact for billing. A key cog in Leo's network, the 85 Fund, was listed as the account holder.
While the 85 Fund moved its corporate registration to Texas in 2023, the planning documents still listed its address in Washington, D.C., at the same building where Leo's organizations have long operated.
Consumers' Research was originally founded nearly a century ago, in 1929. Just six years after its founding, its workers split to form Consumers Union, which produces the well-regarded Consumer Reports magazine. Meanwhile, Consumers' Research would denounce unions as communist and the group became a shill for the tobacco industry.
The group was mostly dormant from 2002 to 2013, when it began advocating for conservative causes in court briefs, based on secret funding from Seid, according to leaked documents. Seid was eventually revealed to be the largest funder of Leo's agenda.
Since 2020, Consumers' Research has focused on fighting ESG investing and 'woke capitalism,' with aggressive million-dollar ad campaigns, research reports, and outreach to officials with any leverage over Wall Street.
Some of the anti-ESG coalition's biggest partners were in attendance at the Consumers' Research summit, including representatives from ALEC, Heritage Action, and SFOF. These organizations have all received funding from entities tied to Leo.
According to an analysis from Democracy Forward, the Leo network was ALEC's largest known donor in 2023. The same year, Hild, Consumers' Research's director, said that Consumers' Research was the largest donor to SFOF.
The ESG Fig Leaf
For the past several years, as the Biden administration pursued greater action on climate change, Wall Street sought both to hedge its financial risks, and profit from new financial products touting ESG investing and diversity, equity, and inclusion — marketing them to the climate and socially conscious consumer.
ESG assesses a company or investment decisions through a sustainability framework, in order to bolster long-term growth and reduce harm. Socially responsible investing has existed in various forms for decades and was implemented by many banks and pension funds through the 2010s, but it really became mainstream during the Biden administration, as climate change took on a renewed urgency.
Left-wing critics of ESG say these products are merely a fig leaf helping Wall Street evade regulatory oversight and greenwash their continued investments in the fossil fuel industry, and there is some truth to this.
Take for example, a chief target of the Leo coalition — BlackRock, the biggest pension fund manager in the world, with $12.5 trillion in assets under management. BlackRock has been at the forefront of ESG evangelism, while at the same time holding $400 billion in fossil fuel industry investments.
Right-wing critics argue that financial performance should be the only factor driving investment consideration. Though conservatives decry ESG as free market malpractice harming the almighty shareholder profit, studies by McKinsey and Bain & Company have found that ESG boosts financial performance.
On a broader level, of course, allowing for maximum climate devastation will be both immensely costly for the citizens of Earth, as well as for business interests.
At one point at the Consumers' Research summit, Webster spoke about the push to have Republican-led states end any investments with BlackRock, arguing that currently, 'red states are funding the war against us.'
Webster acknowledged that some state investment officials managing retirement funds for public employees have been uncomfortable with the idea of ending their arrangements with BlackRock, on the basis that it could hurt their retirement systems' finances.
'The biggest problem we have right now is both of our retirement funds, and I'm sure, I'm glad I'm not being quoted here, but they do not have the courage to stand up to BlackRock,' he said.
He argued that's why Republican governors and other officials with control over state retirement systems must appoint people to those systems who view BlackRock as a problem.
'That's the only way we're going to change this system,' he said. 'I'll tell you right now, the pension funds in the red states and the bond market in the red states is larger than anything BlackRock has. You have more power than you have ever realized.'
Webster continued, 'All of their security comes from your pensions and your bond markets. That's where the security for their risky investments come from. If you mess with their security, they have to change their entire business model.'
More from Rolling Stone
Jordan Klepper Charts Trump's Long History With Jeffrey Epstein on 'The Daily Show'
Why the Trump Administration Is About to Set Fire to 500 Tons of Emergency Food
Speaker Mike Johnson Splits From Trump, Calls for Release of Epstein Files
Best of Rolling Stone
The Useful Idiots New Guide to the Most Stoned Moments of the 2020 Presidential Campaign
Anatomy of a Fake News Scandal
The Radical Crusade of Mike Pence
Solve the daily Crossword
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

UNESCO sites in Illinois safe amid U.S. withdrawal
UNESCO sites in Illinois safe amid U.S. withdrawal

Axios

time16 minutes ago

  • Axios

UNESCO sites in Illinois safe amid U.S. withdrawal

President Trump's decision to withdraw from UNESCO by the end of next year will not affect U.S. participation in one of its key initiatives. The big picture: The United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization honors natural and cultural sites across the globe that must be preserved due to their significance to history and humanity. It has identified more than 1,200 sites for the World Heritage List, including three in Illinois. Driving the news: The Trump administration announced last week that the U.S. was pulling out of the organization because it "supports woke, divisive cultural and social causes that are totally out-of-step with the commonsense policies that Americans voted for in November," White House spokesperson Anna Kelly said in a statement. Flashback: Trump also pulled the U.S. out of UNESCO in 2017, citing anti-Israel bias, but President Biden had the country rejoin in 2023. State of play: The U.S. will no longer pay dues. UNESCO Director General Audrey Azoulay said the organization had financially prepared for the U.S. withdrawal. The U.S. remains a member of the World Heritage Convention, and it will continue to preserve and promote the 26 U.S. sites included on the list, an UNESCO spokesperson told Axios. "Even during previous UNESCO withdrawals in 1984 and 2017, the United States continued to nominate and support World Heritage inscriptions," Barbara Gordon of the Frank Lloyd Wright Building Conservancy told Axios. Eight U.S. Wright properties are included on the World Heritage List. Yes, but: "While UNESCO does not provide direct funding to the sites that comprise 'The 20th-Century Architecture of Frank Lloyd Wright,' several U.S. agencies that do support public Wright sites have experienced severe cuts," Gordon said. She added, "These funding reductions pose a serious risk to the continued stewardship, preservation, and interpretation of Wright's architectural legacy." Zoom in: Illinois sites include one near St. Louis and two in the Chicago area.

Money anxiety is basically a part-time job now
Money anxiety is basically a part-time job now

Axios

time16 minutes ago

  • Axios

Money anxiety is basically a part-time job now

Americans now spend nearly four hours a day thinking about money, the equivalent of a part-time job, per a new Empower study. Why it matters: Financial anxiety could be fueling recent pressure on consumer spending. If the negative economic vibes continue to drive less spending, that could weigh on the economy and the stock market. What they're saying: "People check their money like they're checking the weather," said Rebecca Rickert, head of communications and consumer insights at Empower. By the numbers: Top money worries center on everyday expenses. 57% of Americans cited bills, 51% pointed to inflation, and 34% are stressed about housing. Debt (30%), tariffs (28%) and retirement savings (24%) round out the list. The inclusion of tariffs among financial concerns mirrors recent polling indicating that voters are increasingly anti-tariff. Between the lines: Types of money worries vary across age, with younger generations worrying about housing costs, job security and debt, while older people are more concerned about stock market performance, retirement savings and emergency funds. The split shows financial stress tracks with life stages — older Americans are focused on preserving wealth, while younger ones are still trying to build it. Zoom in: What would ease financial anxiety? A higher income (47%) tops the list of stress relievers, followed by lower living expenses (45%) and a stronger economy (29%). Zoom out: One silver lining? The anxiety may be leading to better financial decisions. Nearly half of Americans say this anxiety is motivating them to shift from passive worries to proactive behaviors, Rickert said. 40% of millennials proactively work to improve their finances when these thoughts arise. 1 in 4 adjusts their spending habits monthly due to financial concerns, mostly by dining out less or buying fewer non-essentials. Yes, but: Sentiment, or vibes, about finances that are detailed in surveys do not always directly align with consumer behavior. Card spending was up across the board this quarter, according to bank earnings, which didn't point to broad evidence of consumers saving by dining out less. The bottom line: Consumers may say they're saving money by eating at home more, for example — but that could be a "microchoice," like one extra dinner at home per month, Rickert said.

Jim Beam column:Talking on phone doesn't cut it
Jim Beam column:Talking on phone doesn't cut it

American Press

time16 minutes ago

  • American Press

Jim Beam column:Talking on phone doesn't cut it

Public meetings are just that. They are always supposed to be open to the public. Some years ago, I asked a member of the Calcasieu Parish Police Jury how they managed to avoid controversial public meetings. It's no problem, he said, because they just discussed those issues over the phone. I was surprised Sunday when I read a story in The Advocate about Republican Gov. Jeff Landry's LA DOGE work and its leader said the group no longer meets and just 'talk on the phone as needed.' First, some background. LA DOGE is Landry's copy of President Donald Trump's Department of Government Efficiency that was led by billionaire Elon Musk who paraded around with a chainsaw to show he was cutting government by firing people and gutting programs. Landry asked his friend and businessman Steve Orlando to become the state's 'Fiscal Responsibility Czar.' Orlando, who is a volunteer, built a major business providing services to oil and gas companies. The two men say the goal of Louisiana's DOGE isn't slashing government jobs or services. It's using a business-minded approach to help agencies use taxpayer dollars wisely. The effort is primarily directed at the Louisiana Department of Health, the largest agency that gets $3.2 billion in state general funds and $16.4 billion from the federal government. One of its major successes, according to the health department and not from a public meeting, so far has saved the state $73 million. It did that by finding out when Medicaid recipients had moved out of state. The newspaper said at LA DOGE's urging the health department in April began using Office of Motor Vehicles data to help get those people off the Medicaid rolls. Mike Waguespack, Louisiana's legislative auditor, who is working closely with LA DOGE, said, 'We're tickled to death that the governor has really pushed his folks to dust off these reports and implement the recommendations that this office has given to the executive branch.' LA DOGE is also trying to transform the state Department of Children and Family Services, which has needed changes for much too long because of job losses dating back to when Bobby Jindal was governor. Orlando said savings at the state technology office have saved $4.5 million so far. He is also working with the University of Louisiana at Lafayette and the health department to use AI to detect Medicaid fraud. It's the first we've heard about the ULL plan. Like most Louisianans, Orlando said, 'I just want to know that when I pay my taxes, my money is actually being put to good use.' The success so far is commendable, but the fact remains that what LA DOGE is doing is public business and the public deserves to know how and when it is achieving success. We only know about these latest savings because Landry or Orlando told us that is what they have done. Meeting by telephone isn't the answer. It's dodging the state's public meetings and public records laws. State government is a business and taxpayers are the stockholders. They want to read about DOGE having meetings open to the public. Steven Procopio, president of the Louisiana Public Affairs Research Council, said, 'They (Landry and Orlando) are making plans about how state spending should be done. That is state tax dollars, and so therefore, the citizens have a right to be involved in that process, or at least to be informed (at public meetings and not just by their reports about what is happening). The Advocate said transparency experts said DOGE is subject to open meetings laws, which require a 'public body' to give notice of meetings that the public can attend. Bruce Hamilton, a civil rights attorney, said, 'The fiscal responsibility program (LA DOGE) looks like a public body, acts like a public body and functions like a public body. So to me, it's a public body, and it has to follow legal requirements for a public body, including holding open meetings.' Yes, and here is why Landry has a free hand in running state government by his rules and not by open meetings laws: When he was elected On Oct. 14, 2023, 1,904,669 Louisiana voters (63.7%) stayed home. Jim Beam, the retired editor of the American Press, has covered people and politics for more than six decades. Contact him at 337-515-8871 or

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store