Secrets in the shadows: What lunar eclipses teach us about Earth
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission.
Ready for a show? On the night of March 13 into the early hours of March 14, a total lunar eclipse will occur as the moon moves into the Earth's umbra, or shadow, turning the bright white lunar surface an eerie red. (It's no wonder this phenomenon is nicknamed the "blood moon.")
But eclipses aren't only an entertaining astronomical show — they have practical implications for science, too.
While eclipses might've inspired fear in many ancient civilizations, they also inspired scientific discovery. "In ancient Greece, philosophers realized that the Earth is round because the shape of the Earth's shadow on the moon is always curved during an eclipse," Christine Shupla, education manager at the Lunar Planetary Institute, told Space.com. "This is perhaps one of the best-known discoveries from lunar eclipses."
Today, lunar eclipses still teach us a lot about our planet, especially our atmosphere. The reddish color associated with total lunar eclipses occur because sunlight travels through our atmosphere and refracts towards the moon — the atmosphere scatters shorter-wavelength colors like blues and greens, allowing reds and oranges to reach the moon. It's the same reason why sunsets and sunrises feature those beautiful warm tones.
But the moon isn't always the same color during a total lunar eclipse. "How dark and what color the moon appears will tell us more about the changing composition of our own atmosphere," says Shupla. "For instance, sometimes the moon appears reddish, but other times it is much darker and brown-grey, for instance, after a large volcanic eruption has occurred."
We're also able to learn a bit about the moon during lunar eclipses, too, especially from lunar spacecraft. NASA's Lunar Reconnaissance Orbiter (LRO) "has made observations during prior eclipses, mainly focusing on how quickly the surface temperature changes once the moon is in the Earth's shadow," Noah Petro, LRO project scientist, told Space.com. "Some of the observations have shown that the surface doesn't cool down uniformly. That is, there are differences in surface properties around small craters that are only due to changes in the upper few centimeters of the surface, which is something we normally wouldn't detect."
LRO won't be taking active measurements during this eclipse, but it'll still be affected by it. The solar-powered spacecraft won't encounter direct sunlight during the eclipse, which lasts hours, affecting its power supply. "We put the spacecraft into an optimal orbit so that we fully charge our battery prior to the eclipse, turn off the instruments so we don't drain the battery, and then wait until the battery is recharged before turning the instruments back on," says Petro. "Think of it like putting your phone in low-power mode if you are away from a charger for an extended time."
Related stories:
— What time is the 'Blood Moon' total lunar eclipse this week?— Where will the 'Blood Moon' total lunar eclipse be visible this week?
— Lunar eclipses 2025 — When, where & how to see them
As more spacecraft land on the moon and begin their scientific operations — and, perhaps, as humans return to the moon through NASA's Artemis program — we'll likely continue to learn more about lunar eclipses and their effect on the moon itself.
In the meantime, for us Earth-bound viewers, it's just time to enjoy the show! "Unlike a solar eclipse, which can only be observed by those people along the path that the moon's shadow makes on the Earth, a lunar eclipse can be seen by everyone who can see the moon at that time — everyone on the same side of the Earth," says Shupla. For this March 2025 lunar eclipse, more than a billion people will be able to see the moon turn red.
And keep a sharp eye out — you never know what you might see during the eclipse. "In 2019, observers saw the flash of light from an impact on the moon during an eclipse," says Shupla.
Catch up with the latest lunar eclipse news and events with our lunar eclipse live blog.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
The Milky Way may not collide with neighboring galaxy Andromeda after all: 'From near-certainty to a coin flip'
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. A titanic cosmic collision between the Milky Way and its closest large galactic neighbor, Andromeda, may not be as sure a thing as scientists thought. Previously, it had been proposed that there was a good chance that Andromeda and our galactic home, which are moving together, would meet in around 5 billion years and merge to form a daughter galaxy dubbed "Milkomeda." New research has revealed that there is a much smaller chance that these two spiral galaxies will slam into each other and merge over the next 10 billion years than was believed. In fact, it's about 50/50. "Our main finding is that the merger between the Milky Way and Andromeda, which had been predicted to occur in around 4.5 billion years, is actually much less certain. We found only about a 50% chance that this merger will happen during the next 10 billion years," team leader and University of Helsinki researcher Til Sawala told "In short, the probability went from near-certainty to a coin flip. "I was prepared to find something different, but yes, the fact that there is only around a 50/50 chance of a merger was very surprising." Sawala and colleagues reached this conclusion by simulating the next 10 billion years of the Milky Way's journey through the new simulation was based on updated astronomical data from the Hubble Space Telescope and from the European Space Agency (ESA) star tracking mission Gaia. The team also factored in new estimates of the masses of smaller dwarf galaxies around the Milky Way, which, via their gravitational influence, impact the cosmic passage of the Milky Way. "The main difference between our research and previous studies is that we benefited from newer and more precise data, and that we considered a more complete system, including the effect of the Large Magellanic Cloud, the Milky Way's largest satellite galaxy," Sawala said. The team was able to present different scenarios of what could become of the Milky Way and Andromeda galaxies as they gradually move together."A head-on collision is very unlikely, we found a less than 2% chance for that. In most of the cases that lead to a merger, the two galaxies will indeed fly past each other at first, which will lead to a loss of orbital energy, and subsequently to a merger," Sawala said. "How close they come on their first passage is very uncertain, however, and if they don't come very close, meaning if their distance is more than around 500,000 light-years, they might not merge at all." The researchers found that if the orbits of the Milky Way and Andromeda come close enough for the two galaxies to gravitationally influence each other, then a merger is an eventuality. "But it's almost equally likely that they stay well separated, in which case they won't merge, and also continue to evolve mostly in isolation," The team found that while the odds of a merger with Andromeda drop when the Large Magellanic Cloud's influence is considered, with this adjustment, the Milky Way becomes more likely to cannibalize this satellite dwarf to this research, our galaxy is almost certain to merge with the Large Magellanic Cloud over the next 2 billion years. Related Stories: — Why do dwarf galaxies line up? 'Zippers' and 'twisters' in the early universe may solve a galactic mystery — Scientists calculate when the universe will end — it's sooner than expected — Amateur astrophotographer captures a stunning galaxy 24 million light-years from Earth (photo) "Of course, now we really want to find out whether the Milky Way and Andromeda will collide or not," Sawala said. "That will not only need more observational data, but also more complete modelling of their interaction, as well as of the effect of the environment in which they evolve. "Luckily, there will be more observational data coming very soon, next year, from the Gaia Space Telescope, and perhaps also from the Hubble Space Telescope." The team's research was published on Monday (June 2) in the journal Nature Astronomy.
Yahoo
8 hours ago
- Yahoo
Turning the Red Planet green? It's time to take terraforming Mars seriously, scientists say
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. The concept of terraforming Mars — transforming the planet's climate to support life as we know it — has long belonged to the realm of science fiction. But a new study argues that it's time to take the idea seriously. "Thirty years ago, terraforming Mars wasn't just hard — it was impossible," said Erika DeBenedictis, CEO of Pioneer Labs and lead author of the new paper. "But new technology like [SpaceX's] Starship and synthetic biology have now made it a real possibility." The paper debates the complex ethical questions that must be considered if we're to terraform Mars and lays the blueprint for a potential path forward. "Advocates argue that more life is better than less, and terraforming Mars could mark humanity's first act of planetary stewardship with a net positive environmental impact," said DeBenedictis. Put succinctly, "living planets are better than dead ones," said study co-author Edwin Kite, an associate professor at the University of Chicago. "We now know that Mars was habitable in the past, from data returned by the Mars rovers, so greening Mars could be viewed as the ultimate environmental restoration challenge." Though full terraforming may take centuries, if not millennia, the long-term goal would be a Mars with stable liquid water, breathable oxygen and a thriving ecosystem. In the short term, this might mean only small patches of microbial life; in the distant future, there could perhaps be human cities on the planet. And if we reach the scale of cities, perhaps that's a stepping stone to even more significant exploration for our species. "As we move out into the galaxy, we will need base camps, and a base camp on the scale of the galaxy is a habitable planet," said Kite. For co-author Robin Wordsworth, a professor of environmental and planetary science at Harvard, the argument for terraforming Mars goes beyond human colonization to the propagation of life in general. "I see humanity as part of the biosphere, not separate from it," he said. "Life is precious — we know of nowhere else in the universe where it exists — and we have a duty to conserve it on Earth, but also to consider how we could begin to propagate it to other worlds." It's not all about looking beyond the bounds of Earth; terraforming Mars could also help us solve climate and sustainability challenges at home, advocates say. Nina Lanza, a planetary scientist at Los Alamos National Laboratory and a co-author on the paper, sees Mars as a prime testbed for planetary engineering. "If we want to learn how to modify our environment here on Earth, to keep it in a configuration that suits us and other life forms, maybe it would be better to experiment on Mars and say, 'Look, does this work?'" she said. "I personally would like to be a little more conservative with our home planet. This is the only place we can live." There are technological lessons to be learned, too. "Concretely, developing and adopting green technology on Earth often falters because it must compete with dirtier alternatives that benefit from decades of infrastructure investment and entrenched interests," said DeBenedictis. "Mars is a unique target market because it has no oil, no existing infrastructure and no status quo. For this reason, developing green technologies for space is a powerful strategy for maturing it for use on Earth." But we should take a few lessons from "Jurassic Park" when thinking about terraforming, some scientists say: Before asking, "Could we?" we need to ask, "Should we?" "If we decide to terraform Mars, then we will really change it in ways that may or may not be reversible," said Lanza. "Mars is its own planet and has its own history. When we terraform, then we effectively don't have the opportunity to study that anymore, and we may lose knowledge about how planets form and evolve." Most dramatically, we may destroy potential evidence of ancient Martian life, if such evidence exists. "If we modify the environment on Mars, we're going to change the chemistry of the surface and of the subsurface, eventually," said Lanza, pointing out that such actions might erase any traces of life on Mars. "I can't say for certain. It's very complicated, but it's a risk." Terraforming Mars would require massive changes, namely the warming of the planet to support both oxygen-producing microbes and liquid water. While all the technologies to terraform Mars are not yet available, the authors of the paper propose three phases of development. First, scientists would use abiotic climate engineering techniques — such as deploying reflective solar sails, dispersing nanoparticles, or laying aerogel tiles — to warm the surface by at least 30 degrees Celsius (86 degrees Fahrenheit), enough to melt subsurface ice and release trapped carbon dioxide. This warming would thicken the Martian atmosphere and potentially support the presence of stable liquid water. The second phase would introduce extremophile microbes — likely anaerobic and genetically engineered ones — capable of surviving in Mars' harsh conditions and kickstarting ecological succession. These organisms would begin producing oxygen and organic matter, slowly altering planetary chemistry. The third and longest phase would focus on building a complex biosphere, increasing atmospheric pressure and oxygen content to eventually support more advanced plant life, and, in the very long term, potentially allow humans to breathe unassisted. Related stories: — Could we really terraform Mars? — New Mars terraforming idea: engineered, heat-absorbing dust nanoparticles — Bad news for terraforming: Mars' atmosphere is lost in space The study's authors agree: If we're to have any chance of terraforming Mars, we must move forward on multiple fronts simultaneously. "Answering the question of when and how to start making other worlds habitable requires a clear understanding of the costs and benefits, which can only be adequately assessed based on a combination of theory and experiments, with input from diverse fields including physics, chemistry, materials science and biology," said Kite. Right now, we need to continue to study Mars. Lanza advocates for the Mars Sample Return mission, a NASA-European Space Agency campaign to bring home material collected on the Red Planet by the Perseverance rover. "The samples are incredibly well documented and analyzed to the best of our ability on Mars," she said. "Now we need to bring those back, because that's going to help us answer some of these fundamental questions. What is Mars made out of? Are there traces of life?" And, as we continue to visit the Red Planet, we can put terraforming concepts into practice. "Upcoming Mars surface missions in 2028 or 2031 should include small-scale experiments to de-risk terraforming strategies, such as warming localized regions," said DeBenedictis. Then, of course, we need to continue to innovate new technologies that will allow us to terraform Mars in the future. All this is to say, while fully terraforming Mars might take generations, the decisions start now. "This is how we get from the imagination and the concept to some reality that has totally changed our world," said Lanza. "We should really keep doing science — it's transformational." The new study was published last month in the journal Nature Astronomy.
Yahoo
13 hours ago
- Yahoo
This tiny quantum computer could blow massive data centers out of the water with speed, power, and pure physics
When you buy through links on our articles, Future and its syndication partners may earn a commission. Nord Quantique promises quantum power without the bulk or energy drain Traditional HPC may fall if Nord's speed and energy claims prove real Cracking RSA-830 in an hour could transform cybersecurity forever A quantum computing startup has announced plans to develop a utility-scale quantum computer with more than 1,000 logical qubits by 2031. Nord Quantique has set an ambitious target which, if achieved, could signal a seismic shift in high-performance computing (HPC). The company claims its machines are smaller and would offer far greater efficiency in both speed and energy consumption, thereby making traditional HPC systems obsolete. Nord Quantique uses 'multimode encoding' via a technique known as the Tesseract code, and this allows each physical cavity in the system to represent more than one quantum mode, effectively increasing redundancy and resilience without adding complexity or size. 'Multimode encoding allows us to build quantum computers with excellent error correction capabilities, but without the impediment of all those physical qubits,' explained Julien Camirand Lemyre, CEO of Nord Quantique. 'Beyond their smaller and more practical size, our machines will also consume a fraction of the energy, which makes them appealing for instance to HPC centers where energy costs are top of mind.' Nord's machines would occupy a mere 20 square meters, making them highly suitable for data center integration. Compared to 1,000–20,000 m² needed by competing platforms, this portability further strengthens its case. 'These smaller systems are also simpler to develop to utility-scale due to their size and lower requirements for cryogenics and control electronics,' the company added. The implication here is significant: better error correction without scaling physical infrastructure, a central bottleneck in the quantum race. In a technical demonstration, Nord's system exhibited excellent stability over 32 error correction cycles with no measurable decay in quantum information. 'Their approach of encoding logical qubits in multimode Tesseract states is a very effective method of addressing error correction and I am impressed with these results,' said Yvonne Gao, Assistant Professor at the National University of Singapore. 'They are an important step forward on the industry's journey toward utility-scale quantum computing.' Such endorsements lend credibility, but independent validation and repeatability remain critical for long-term trust. Nord Quantique claims its system could solve RSA-830, a representative cryptographic challenge, in just one hour using 120 kWh of energy at 1 MHz speed, slashing the energy need by 99%. In contrast, traditional HPC systems would require approximately 280,000 kWh over nine days. Other quantum modalities, such as superconducting, photonic, cold atoms, and ion traps, fall short in either speed or efficiency. For instance, cold atoms might consume only 20 kW, but solving the same problem would take six months. That said, there remains a need for caution. Post-selection - used in Nord's error correction demonstrations, required discarding 12.6% of data per round. While this helped show stability, it introduces questions about real-world consistency. In quantum computing, the leap from laboratory breakthrough to practical deployment can be vast; thus, the claims on energy reduction and system miniaturization, though striking, need independent real-world verification. Upgrading to Windows 11 just got easier - Microsoft introduces a new business backup tool Check out the best 3D modeling software for 3D printing and more We've rounded up the best portable monitors available now
