Want to make a career pivot? Here's what this Google exec says you should do first.
But she encourages approaching a career shift with a plan.
"For people that are wanting to pivot, I would pivot with information," the senior director and founder of the Envisioning Studio at Google told Business Insider.
Lane, who started her career as a software developer and went on to create an AI prototyping lab that explores the impact of tech innovation on society, said that many people switch careers multiple times because they're uncertain.
She said job seekers should gather as much information as possible to make sure that the career pivot they're making is the right move.
That includes talking to people in the industry, watching YouTube videos about jobs that interest you, and trying out internships, Lane said. If you're earlier in your career, you should also try to choose a college that provides opportunities to gain work experience.
The idea is to "constantly get some feedback," Lane said.
Whether you're just starting out in the workforce or looking to make a shift mid-career, changing careers is common. However, Lane's advice comes amid an ongoing workforce transformation driven by AI advancements.
A 2025 World Economic Forum survey found that 41% of companies globally expect to reduce staff in the next five years because of the new tech, meaning more people may be forced to adjust.
"All the jobs are kind of evolving in this moment," Lane said. "Everything's kind of shifting. So you want to be in a space where you're getting a lot of signals."
That's how Lane navigated multiple career pivots. After starting her career as a software developer, Lane moved to program management and then later on transitioned to leading AI ethics and society at Microsoft.
After nearly two decades at Microsoft, Lane saw an opportunity for companies to engage more directly in conversations about the tools they were developing. That inspired her to build a team of creative strategists, philosophers, and researchers focused on discussing technology at Google.
"I don't like when technology is built, and then people have to deal with decisions that were made that weren't really intentional," Lane, who is also a visual artist, told BI.
Lane said when she was at Microsoft and was "poking around" for a new role, she met the person who would eventually become her boss at Google. She said he asked her what she wanted to do with her life and caught her off guard, so she asked if she could get back to him.
Even though she had an idea of her interests at the time, Lane said it was important to pause and think about what she really wanted.
"I wasn't prepared to just answer that on the fly," Lane said. "I thought, 'if someone's asking me, let me, reflect on it.'"
After some thought, Lane prepared a one-page pitch about the lab she wanted to create, which ended up becoming a reality.
Lane said once you get enough signals about what you like or don't like, you should listen to what "lights you up." If you find yourself following a path that doesn't make you excited, maybe it's not the right one.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Eater
11 minutes ago
- Eater
A Former Google Exec Takes Over Two Sonoma County Wineries
is the associate editor for the Northern California and Pacific Northwest region writing about restaurant and bar trends, coffee and cafes, and pop-ups. Remy Saves the World, a label under the Reeves Wine brand, now belongs to a former Google executive. Remy Saves the World A former Google executive has added two popular Sonoma County wine companies to his growing roster of businesses. Overshine Collective has purchased Healdsburg's Reeve Wines and Sebastopol's Martha Stoumen Wines. The Press Democrat reports that Collective is a holding company for David Drummond, former senior vice president of corporate development and chief legal officer for Google parent company, Alphabet Inc. The Reeve Wines acquisition includes the subsidiary wine labels BloodRoot and Remy Saves the Sea plus music festival benefiting gun safety reform, the Ramble. That said, joining the Overshine Collective — while a literal acquisition — includes equity options for the founders. Idlewild Wines founder Sam Bilbro, who also sold to the Overshine Collective, described it to the San Francisco Chronicle like tech companies buying each other and remaining independent brands. Drummond at the helm has also acquired Armida Winery, a 550-acre vineyard in the Russian River Valley, and debuted two wine brands, Overshine and Comunità. Wine bar pro and coffee ace team up One of the talents behind Nob Hill's Habibi bar, Bahman Safari, has moved the operation into its own location in the same neighborhood. Bar Bibi is set to open in the former Ristorante Milano space in August, per Tablehopper. A wine and dinner service will be dropping any day now. Bay Area barista and founder of pop-up Better Half Coffee Joshua Kaplowitz will run his operation inside the space, too. Treats for that daytime operation will come from Luis Villavelazquez's Bellaria. Dubai chocolate gets a local vegan candy twist Somewhat inevitable in the Bay Area, a vegan and gluten free riff on one of the internet's trendiest desserts has emerged. Richmond's Coracao chocolate — a longtime player in the region's plant-based chocolate game — just launched a Dubai chocolate bar. The pack of three arrives crowned in Santa Barbara pistachios and, rather than Kaitafe, crisped quinoa and toasted coconut to recreate that feature. Two major wine country players link The longtime favorite winery Ashes & Diamonds will host cuisine from the Sea Ranch Lodge in August. From Monday, August 18, through Sunday, August 31, the menu at the winery will come from produce grown at the lodge's coastal farm. Furthering the partnership, Ashes & Diamonds members will receive discounted rates on stays and farm tours. Eater SF All your essential food and restaurant intel delivered to you Email (required) Sign Up By submitting your email, you agree to our Terms and Privacy Notice . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
TechCrunch
11 minutes ago
- TechCrunch
More details emerge on how Windsurf's VCs and founders got paid from the Google deal
Even weeks after the revelation that Google paid Windsurf $2.4 billion to license its technology, while simultaneously hiring away its CEO and top talent, the deal's implications are still rattling some founders and startup employees across Silicon Valley. Google's payment to the startup was effectively split in two equal parts, according to two people familiar with the deal. Investors' portion was $1.2 billion. The other half was in the form of compensation packages for approximately 40 Windsurf employees hired by the tech giant with a substantial portion of that $1.2 billion going to the startup's co-founders, Varun Mohan and Douglas Chen, sources say. The transaction was a good outcome for VCs, which included Greenoaks, Kleiner Perkins, and General Catalyst. Windsurf raised a total of about $243 million as of its last raise in 2024 that valued the company at $1.25 billion, which means the total return to investors was about four times their original funding. Greenoaks, which led Windsurf's seed and Series A financings and owned 20% of the company, returned about $500 million on their $65 million investment in the startup, according to a person familiar with the matter. Kleiner Perkins, which led Windsurf's Series B, returned about three times its invested capital, according to another person familiar with the deal. Google, Kleiner Perkins, and Greenoaks declined to comment. General Catalyst, Varun Mohan, and Douglad Chen didn't respond to a request for comment. Even so, most investors were aiming for a more significant win from the company. Techcrunch event Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. Tech and VC heavyweights join the Disrupt 2025 agenda Netflix, ElevenLabs, Wayve, Sequoia Capital — just a few of the heavy hitters joining the Disrupt 2025 agenda. They're here to deliver the insights that fuel startup growth and sharpen your edge. Don't miss the 20th anniversary of TechCrunch Disrupt, and a chance to learn from the top voices in tech — grab your ticket now and save up to $675 before prices rise. San Francisco | REGISTER NOW In February, TechCrunch reported that Kleiner Perkins was in talks to lead a fresh round of funding valuing the startup, which was then known as Codeium, at a $2.85 billion valuation. That deal didn't happen, according to a person familiar with the matter, because Windsurf had instead agreed to be purchased by OpenAI for $3 billion. As we all know now, the OpenAI acquisition unraveled and Google swooped in with its deal structured to offer investor returns, obtain talent and IP without acquiring stock. But what's rattling the Valley is this: while Google's deal was good for the co-founders and VCs, it didn't benefit a large portion of Windsurf's approximately 250 employees, especially after they were expecting a payout from the sale to OpenAI. In a typical acquisition, employees would get money for the shares they owned, and often have their vesting schedule accelerated. However, Windsurf employees who were hired over the last year didn't receive a payout from the deal, these people said. The Google deal was especially unsettling to approximately 200 Windsurf employees not hired by the search giant. Instead of siphoning every penny of Google's payment into their own pockets, investors opted to leave the company with over $100 million in capital. One source says this was entirely funded by VCs, meaning their total payout was about $1.1 billion. However, another person said that the founders' equally chipped in to leave the company with a nest egg from the Google payment. Multiple people said that the money left for the company would have been sufficient to pay all remaining employees proceeds at Google deal's per-share valuation, regardless of how long they had been with the company. However, to have done that immediately would have been problematic, leaving the company with less cash to operate and – with founders, key people gone – with no investors ready to finance a new raise. The remaining leadership would likely have had to shut down after making such cash distributions, one of the people said. Meanwhile, another person claimed that the company had enough capital to pay out employees and continue to operate. That difference of opinion is only part of the reason the deal became so controversial. What's more, at least some of the employees Google did hire, despite attractive pay and benefits, saw their stock grants revoked and their vesting timelines restarted. That meant they'd have to wait an additional four years for their total payout in Google stock, according to people familiar with the deal. Some top VC condemned the three-year-old startup's co-founders for not sharing their windfall with all the people who helped build the company. 'Windsurf and others are really bad examples of founders leaving their teams behind and not even sharing the proceeds with their team,' wrote Vinod Khosla on X. 'I definitely would not work with their founders next time.' After several days of limbo following the announcement of the Google deal, Windsurf's remaining entity, under the leadership of interim CEO Jeff Wang, managed to sell itself to Cognition. Cognition acquired Windsurf's IP and product, and brought on all staff not hired by Google. While the exact deal terms of that sale were no't disclosed, the acquisition allowed every employee to financially gain from the sale, according to a blog published by Cognition. Two other sources estimated to TechCrunch that Cognition paid $250 million to acquire Windsurf's remaining entity. Cognition didn't respond to a request for comment.
CNBC
12 minutes ago
- CNBC
Google has dropped more than 50 DEI-related organizations from its funding list
Google has purged more than 50 organizations related to diversity, equity and inclusion, or DEI, from a list of organizations that the tech company provides funding to, according to a new report. The company has removed a total of 214 groups from its funding list while adding 101, according to a new report from tech watchdog organization The Tech Transparency Project. The watchdog group cites the most recent public list of organizations that receive the most substantial contributions from Google's U.S. Government Affairs and Public Policy team. The largest category of purged groups were DEI-related, with a total of 58 groups removed from Google's funding list, TTP found. The dropped groups had mission statements that included the words "diversity, "equity," "inclusion," or "race," "activism," and "women." Those are also terms the Trump administration officials have reportedly told federal agencies to limit or avoid. In response to the report, Google spokesperson José Castañeda told CNBC that the list reflects contributions made in 2024 and that it does not reflect all contributions made by other teams within the company. "We contribute to hundreds of groups from across the political spectrum that advocate for pro-innovation policies, and those groups change from year to year based on where our contributions will have the most impact," Castañeda said in an email. Organizations that were removed from Google's list include the African American Community Service Agency, which seeks to "empower all Black and historically excluded communities"; the Latino Leadership Alliance, which is dedicated to "race equity affecting the Latino community"; and Enroot, which creates out-of-school experiences for immigrant kids. The organization funding purge is the latest to come as Google began backtracking some of its commitments to DEI over the last couple of years. That pull back came due to cost cutting to prioritize investments into artificial intelligence technology as well as the changing political and legal landscape amid increasing national anti-DEI policies. Over the past decade, Silicon Valley and other industries used DEI programs to root out bias in hiring, promote fairness in the workplace and advance the careers of women and people of color — demographics that have historically been overlooked in the workplace. However, the U.S. Supreme Court's 2023 decision to end affirmative action at colleges led to additional backlash against DEI programs in conservative circles. President Donald Trump signed an executive order upon taking office in January to end the government's DEI programs and directed federal agencies to combat what the administration considers "illegal" private-sector DEI mandates, policies and programs. Shortly after, Google's Chief People Officer Fiona Cicconi told employees that the company would end DEI-related hiring "aspirational goals" due to new federal requirements and Google's categorization as a federal contractor. Despite DEI becoming such a divisive term, many companies are continuing the work but using different language or rolling the efforts under less-charged terminology, like "learning" or "hiring." Even Google CEO Sundar Pichai maintained the importance diversity plays in its workforce at an all-hands meeting in March. "We're a global company, we have users around the world, and we think the best way to serve them well is by having a workforce that represents that diversity," Pichai said at the time. One of the groups dropped from Google's contributions list is the National Network to End Domestic Violence, which provides training, assistance, and public awareness campaigns on the issue of violence against women, the TTP report found. The group had been on Google's list of funded organizations for at least nine years and continues to name the company as one of its corporate partners. Google said it still gave $75,000 to the National Network to End Domestic Violence in 2024 but did not say why the group was removed from the public contributions list.
