Commission confirms abuse in medical visa scandal
In a statement, the EAIC said its special task force – established under Section 17 of the Enforcement Agency Integrity Commission Act 2009 (Act 700) and chaired by Commissioner Datuk Seri Dr Razali Ab Malik – had completed its investigation into the scandal.
'It was found that there had been abuse of power by Immigration officers who approved medical visas for foreign nationals from several countries, despite knowing the application documents were incomplete and failed to meet the requirements set out in the Malaysian Immigration Circular No. 10/2001,' the statement said.
The commission has decided to refer the investigation findings to the Attorney General's Chambers.
'This is in line with Paragraph 30(1)(c) of Act 700, with a recommendation that criminal charges be brought against the Immigration officers involved – under provisions of Act 574 of the Penal Code, Act 155 of the Immigration Act 1959/63 and/or Act 150 of the Passport Act 1966.'
The 'counter setting' operation at Kuala Lumpur International Airport (KLIA) has been under scrutiny since late last year, focusing on claims that foreign nationals were granted medical treatment visas without complying with standard procedures.
theSun had earlier reported concerns from healthcare industry experts about loopholes in the medical tourist visa process, alleging that some visa holders never sought treatment at the approved medical centres.
In October last year, investigators seized 156 social visit pass application files (under the Medical Treatment Pass category), linked to a syndicate involving officers from the Immigration Department's Visa, Pass and Permit Division in Putrajaya.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
New Straits Times
10 hours ago
- New Straits Times
Tourist caught at border after overstaying social visit pass
BUKIT KAYU HITAM: A Chinese national was detained at the Immigration, Customs, Quarantine and Security Complex (ICQS) here on Friday after officers found that he had overstayed in Malaysia, over a month. Malaysian Border Control and Protection Agency (MBCA) in a statement today said the 39-year-old man was stopped during a routine inspection around 1pm as he attempted to exit the country into Thailand. Checks on his passport, MBCA said, revealed that his last recorded entry into Malaysia was on May 30 via the Sultan Abu Bakar Complex in Tanjung Kupang, Johor. "His social visit pass had expired and there was no exit endorsement from Thailand, confirming that he had overstayed in Malaysia for 34 days," it said. The man has since been arrested under Section 15(1)(c) of the Immigration Act 1959/63 (Amendment 2002) and handed over to the Immigration Department for further action. MCBA advised all foreigners residing in Malaysia to be mindful of their visa expiry dates and to renew their passes on time or leave the country before they expire.
The Star
a day ago
- The Star
Suhakam welcomes Farah Nini Dusuki as chief Children's Commissioner
KUALA LUMPUR: The Human Rights Commission of Malaysia (Suhakam) has welcomed the designation of Dr Farah Nini Dusuki as chief Children Commissioner until the end of her term as Human Rights Commissioner on March 8, 2026. In a statement on Saturday (Aug 2), Suhakam also welcomed the appointments of three new Human Rights Commissioners, Dr Mohd Al Adib Samuri, Dr Zufar Yadi Brendan Abdullah and Melissa Mohd Akhir, effective June 28 this year. Mohd Al Adib and Zufar Yadi have also been designated as children commissioners. All appointments and designations were made by Yang di-Pertuan Agong on the advice of the Prime Minister under Sections 5 and 6A of the Human Rights Commission of Malaysia Act 1999 (Act 597), reflecting the government's ongoing commitment to strengthening the protection and promotion of children's rights in Malaysia. "Suhakam is confident that the experience, expertise, and unwavering dedication of the new Commissioners will enhance the Commission's efforts to safeguard the rights and well-being of all children, including those who are undocumented and in conflict with the law," the statement read. Farah Nini, appointed as Suhakam Commissioner on March 8, 2023, is a respected academician at the Faculty of Law, University of Malaya, with over 32 years of experience in child rights and human rights. She holds a Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) in child law from Cardiff University and has worked extensively with government agencies and non-governmental organisations (NGOs) on legal reforms, complaint mechanisms, and public advocacy related to critical children's issues. According to the statement, Mohd Al Adib, a scholar at Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia, focuses on child rights within the Islamic legal framework, collaborating with ministries, the United Nations Children's Fund (UNICEF), and civil society on issues such as child marriage and the rights of refugee children. Zufar Yadi, with nearly four decades of experience, is active in social development and child-focused volunteer initiatives in Sarawak. Melissa Mohd Akhir, a child rights expert with regional experience, previously served as a Deputy Public Prosecutor and was involved in drafting child protection laws. She now focuses on access to justice and advocacy work. Suhakam said it looked forward to working collaboratively to build an inclusive and child-centred Malaysia, in line with the Convention on the Rights of the Child (CRC) and the Child Act 2001 and reaffirmed its commitment to ensuring that every child in the country is protected, heard and allowed to thrive. "Suhakam hopes that these appointments and designations will support and enhance institutional responses to key child rights issues, particularly in ensuring access to quality education, robust child protection mechanisms, and a just and rehabilitative juvenile justice system," it said. – Bernama
Malay Mail
2 days ago
- Malay Mail
When will Parliament act over concerns regarding arrest and remand of children? — Hafiz Hassan
AUGUST 2 — To arrest a person is to deprive him of his liberty by some lawful authority. (Osborn's Concise Law Dictionary) It is one of the initial steps taken in the criminal process which may lead to eventual prosecution of the arrested person. The main statute governing criminal process in Malaysia is the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC), which is also the general statute on criminal procedure and processes. Now, when an arrested person is a child, the child is governed by the Child Act 2001(CA). The CA is a specific statute governing matters relating to children, including criminal procedure applicable to children. Under Section 2(1) of CA, a child is a person under the age of 18 years. In relation to criminal proceedings, a child is a person who has attained the age of criminal responsibility as prescribed in Section 82 of the Penal Code. In the absence of a specific provision in the CA concerning any criminal procedure, the provisions of the CPC apply. Part X of CA contains provisions on criminal procedure in the Court for Children. It starts with Section 83 which stipulates that a child shall not be arrested and detained except in compliance with the CA. Part X now includes provisions on arrest following amendments in 2016. These are contained in the new Section 83A which states as follows: (1) A child who is arrested shall not be handcuffed unless - (a) the offence with which he is arrested for is a grave crime; or (b) the child forcibly resists the endeavour to arrest him or attempts to evade the arrest. (2) When a child is arrested, he shall be informed of his grounds of arrest, and a police officer shall, as soon as may be, before commencing any form of questioning or recording of any statement from the child, communicate to the parent or guardian, or relative of the child and a probation officer to inform - (a) the child's whereabouts; (b) the grounds of the child's arrest; and (c) the right to consult with a counsel of the child's choice. (3) A police officer may allow the probation officer and the parent or guardian of a child to be present at the place where the child is being detained after arrest to ensure the child's welfare. (4) Nothing in this section shall be deemed to affect the powers of a police officer to deal with a child arrested in accordance with the Criminal Procedure Code. The writer argues it's time for Parliament to act on a 20-year-old legal gap: Malaysia's Child Act still lacks clear provisions on the arrest and remand of minors, leaving vulnerable children subject to general criminal procedures. — Reuters pic But apart from the above, there are no other provisions in the CA relating to the arrest of children. One may say that the CA is not comprehensive on a matter that deprives a child of his liberty. Arguably, the arrest of children should be guided by special criteria and procedures, considering who and how vulnerable they are. They have the right to be treated in a manner consistent with the promotion of their best interest and their sense of dignity and worth. Critical as well, the CA makes no provisions on remand of an arrested child for the purpose of investigation. As the Court of Appeal (COA) in the case of PP v N (A Child) said, the CA '[does] not provide for the detention of a child for the purpose of investigations'. Accordingly, Section 117 of CPC applies. The COA further said that 'if Parliament had intended to categorically prohibit a child from being detained for investigations for more than 24 hours, it would have said so precisely.' The consequence is an arrested child is subject to the general law on criminal procedure and processes. The case was decided in 2004. It's been more than 20 years now. Aminuddin Mustaffa and Norshamimi Mohd Mazlan of Universiti Sultan Zainal Abidin (UniSZA) have argued that the law in the country '[does] not comply with international standards because it does not provide separate principles governing arrest and detention of children. The absence of clear and specific procedure of arrest of children appears to be inconsistent with the international standards set by the international instruments which require' that arrest of a child must be 'a measure of last resort and for the least reasonable period of time, in order for an arrest to be legally justifiable.' The writers have recommended that the law on arrest and remand of children be reviewed and reformed. [See Mustaffa, A., & Mazlan, N. (2022). 'Investigation process of children under Malaysian juvenile justice: To arrest or not to arrest?' Journal of Legal, Ethical and Regulatory Issues, 25(S2), 1-8] When will Parliament act? * This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
