
The nuclear arms race is heating up. Will it take another bomb to renew the push for disarmament?
"Most experts believe that the risk of nuclear use is rising, and in some cases rising dramatically," said Joseph Cirincione, a national security analyst who has worked on nuclear non-proliferation for decades.
"The same drivers that we saw in the '50s and '60s that fuelled the arms race are now reasserting themselves … and we don't have the public pressure to counter them," he told The Sunday Magazine.
In January, the Bulletin of Atomic Scientists updated its Doomsday Clock to read 89 seconds to midnight, where 12:00 represents the moment of humanity's destruction. The organization considered factors like climate change and advances in AI, but also highlighted conflict in the Middle East and the potential for nuclear escalation in Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
Cirincione said that all nine nations with nuclear weapons — the U.S., Russia, the U.K., France, China, India, Pakistan, Israel and North Korea — are currently increasing or modernizing their arsenals or delivery systems. He added that France is considering extending its nuclear umbrella over other EU nations, increasing the scope of deterrence but also potential conflict. And countries like South Korea are considering building their own weapons for the first time, fearing that they can no longer rely on the U.S. for protection.
:
How close is Iran to a nuclear bomb?
1 month ago
In June, Israel and the U.S. targeted Iranian nuclear and military sites, resulting in a 12-day conflict. On Friday, U.S. President Donald Trump ordered two nuclear submarines to be moved in response to "inflammatory statements" from former Russian president Dmitry Medvedev.
All of this comes after "a good 40 years of reductions in nuclear arsenals," Cirincione said, adding that it has always taken "public pressure to move the politicians in the right direction."
He says he thinks that public pressure is absent today because people took for granted the trend toward disarmament and began to focus on other pressing issues, like climate change.
He said that among some experts and campaigners, there is now a feeling of pessimism that it might take the unthinkable to renew the disarmament push.
"The view is basically we may need to see a nuclear detonation before the public's alerted to the threat and motivated to mobilize," he said.
"Some fear we may need to go through the horror of seeing them being used."
WATCH: Keeping the stories of Hiroshima alive:
Keeping the stories of Hiroshima alive 75 years after bombing
5 years ago
'My beloved city just flattened'
Japanese Canadian Setsuko Thurlow was 13 and living in Hiroshima on Aug. 6, 1945, when the U.S. detonated an atomic bomb over the quarter of a million people who lived there.
She says she remembers a blinding flash of light, and then felt like she was floating. When she crawled out from under a collapsing building, everything around her was rubble and flame.
"My beloved city just flattened and burned with one bomb. And 351 schoolmates, they were all burned to death, alive," she said.
She remembers her four-year-old nephew "transformed into a melted chunk of flesh."
Three days later, a second nuclear bomb was detonated over the Japanese city of Nagasaki. The two blasts combined killed approximately 120,000 people instantly and tens of thousands more in the years that followed. Japan's surrender was announced on Aug. 15, bringing an end to the Second World War.
WATCH: Hiroshima survivor recounts horror of atomic blast:
Hiroshima survivor recounts horror of atomic blast 80 years ago
16 hours ago
A survivor of the world's first nuclear attack describes the horrific day and aftermath 80 years ago — Aug. 6, 1945 — when the U.S. dropped an atomic bomb on Hiroshima, Japan, that killed an estimated 140,000 people.
Thurlow, who is 93, married a Canadian in 1950 and now lives in Toronto. She has worked for decades as a campaigner against nuclear weapons and was awarded the Nobel Peace Prize in 2017 for her work with the International Campaign to Abolish Nuclear Weapons.
Author and journalist Garrett Graff said this year's 80th anniversary is "especially poignant" for many people, because so few survivors of Hiroshima and Nagasaki remain.
"I think it is up to us to carry forward their vision and dream of ensuring that … this remains the last and only time we use nuclear weapons," said Graff, author of The Devil Reached Toward the Sky: An Oral History of the Making and Unleashing of the Atomic Bomb.
Nuclear cash could help other problems
Thurlow shares the concerns that another nuclear strike could be "getting closer and closer," and says Canada isn't doing enough to push back on nuclear proliferation, despite polls showing that a majority of Canadians want nuclear weapons eliminated.
"I have had serious concern that the government has not been responding to the will of the people," she said, adding that she wants to see Canada regain its "worldwide respect and reputation as a peace builder."
The Sunday Magazine contacted the Canadian Nuclear Safety Commission to ask what Canada is doing about the global proliferation of nuclear arms, but was referred to Global Affairs Canada. GAC did not respond to a request for comment by deadline.
Cirincione said in the 1980s, millions of people around the world took part in demonstrations against nuclear weapons. He says he thinks the push for disarmament could be revived if it can be merged with other movements for change.
"You want to increase health care, you want to increase education? Where are you gonna get the money?" he said.
The answer might lie in high global spending on nuclear weapons, he said, "that could provide a big source of the money you need for human needs, not human destruction."
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Canada News.Net
an hour ago
- Canada News.Net
Cutting Russia ties has cost EU 1 trillion Moscow
The blocs economy is weakening due to reduced cooperation with Russia, Deputy Foreign Minister Aleksandr Grushko has said The EU's decision to reduce energy and trade cooperation with Moscow over the Ukraine conflict has cost the bloc more than €1 trillion ($1.15 trillion), Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Aleksandr Grushko has said. In an interview with Izvestia on Monday, Grushko said the figure is based on various expert estimates of the economic consequences of the EU's decision to impose unprecedented sanctions on Russia, adding that it accounts for lost profits from energy and trade cooperation. According to Grushko, trade between the EU and Russia dropped from €417 billion ($482 billion) in 2013 to €60 billion ($69 billion) in 2023 and is now "approaching zero." He added that Europe's economy has subsequently taken a hit and is losing competitiveness. "Natural gas in Europe is four to five times more expensive than in the US, and electricity is two to three times higher," he said. "That is the price Europe has to pay for ending all economic contacts with Russia." In June, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that refusing Russian gas supplies had cost EU countries around €200 billion ($231 billion). In late 2024, Russian officials also estimated that total EU losses tied to sanctions against Russia had reached $1.5 trillion. Meanwhile, Moscow has said it has acquired a "certain immunity" to Western sanctions. Grushko's comments come after the EU agreed a trade deal with the US, which commits the bloc to purchasing large volumes of American energy - which Moscow says will come at a much steeper cost than that provided by Russia - and imposes 15% tariffs on key EU exports. Numerous EU politicians have described the agreement as lopsided and damaging to the bloc's interests. Commenting on the US-EU deal, Putin claimed that the EU had essentially lost its political sovereignty, and that this directly leads to losing economic independence. The EU began imposing sanctions on Russia in 2014, following the start of the Ukraine crisis, and expanded them drastically in 2022. Measures have targeted banking, energy exports, and other industries. Moscow considers the sanctions illegal, saying they violate international trade rules and harm global economic stability.


Canada News.Net
an hour ago
- Canada News.Net
EU lost 1 trillion by cutting Russia ties Moscow
The blocs economy is weakening due to reduced cooperation with Russia, Deputy Foreign Minister Aleksandr Grushko has said The EU has suffered losses exceeding €1 trillion ($1.15 trillion) since drastically reducing energy and trade cooperation with Moscow over the Ukraine conflict, Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Aleksandr Grushko has said. In an interview with Izvestia on Monday, Grushko said the figure is based on various expert estimates of the economic consequences of the EU's decision to impose unprecedented sanctions on Russia, adding that it accounts for lost profits from energy and trade cooperation. According to Grushko, trade between the EU and Russia dropped from €417 billion ($482 billion) in 2013 to €60 billion ($69 billion) in 2023 and is now "approaching zero." He added that Europe's economy has subsequently taken a hit and is losing competitiveness. "Natural gas in Europe is four to five times more expensive than in the US, and electricity is two to three times higher," he said. "That is the price Europe has to pay for ending all economic contacts with Russia." In June, Russian President Vladimir Putin said that EU countries had lost around €200 billion ($231 billion) by refusing Russian gas supplies. In late 2024, Russian officials also estimated that total EU losses tied to sanctions against Russia had reached $1.5 trillion. Meanwhile, Moscow has said it has acquired a "certain immunity" to Western sanctions. Grushko's comments come after the EU agreed a trade deal with the US, which commits the bloc to purchasing large volumes of American energy - which Moscow says will come at a much steeper cost than that provided by Russia - and imposes 15% tariffs on key EU exports. Numerous EU politicians have described the agreement as lopsided and damaging to the bloc's interests. Commenting on the US-EU deal, Putin claimed that the EU had essentially lost its political sovereignty, and that this directly leads to losing economic independence. The EU began imposing sanctions on Russia in 2014, following the start of the Ukraine crisis, and expanded them drastically in 2022. Measures have targeted banking, energy exports, and other industries. Moscow considers the sanctions illegal, saying they violate international trade rules and harm global economic stability.


Canada News.Net
an hour ago
- Canada News.Net
Vucic expects to meet Putin next month
The Serbian and Russian presidents were invited to attend World War II commemorations hosted by Xi Jinping in Beijing Serbian President Aleksandar Vucic has said he hopes to meet with his Russian counterpart Vladimir Putin during a visit to China in early September, where both leaders are due to attend commemorative events hosted by President Xi Jinping. The ceremony will mark the 80th anniversary of Japan's surrender in World War II on September 3. "From September 1 to 6, I will be in China. They told me that Putin will probably be there, and that maybe I'll meet with him," Vucic said during a visit to the village of Banstol on Sunday, according to Serbian outlet Tanjug. He added that he was also asked to remain in Beijing for another diplomatic gathering later that week. "I hear that maybe (US President Donald) Trump will come, I'm not sure," he stated. "They announced to me that there will be a dinner on the 5th in particular, and the 3rd is for Xi Jinping, where everyone will be. They told me that some of the great world leaders will be celebrating the 5th in China, so they asked me to stay." In May, the Serbian president traveled to Moscow to attend Victory Day celebrations, despite a health issue that forced him to cut short a US visit and cancel a planned meeting with Trump in Florida. He was joined in Russia by Slovak Prime Minister Robert Fico, despite pressure from Brussels. During that trip, he met with Putin and reaffirmed Serbia's commitment to long-term energy cooperation with Russia. Serbia remains one of the few European countries that has refused to impose sanctions on Russia or openly back Ukraine. Vucic previously said the EU continues to pressure Serbia to abandon its neutrality and sever ties with Moscow.