logo
Analysis: Upwards of 80K Utahns could lose health insurance under ‘big, beautiful' bill'

Analysis: Upwards of 80K Utahns could lose health insurance under ‘big, beautiful' bill'

Yahoo23-05-2025

A supporter wears an "I love Medicaid" button during a news conference held at Pioneer Park in Salt Lake City on May 6, 2025. (Katie McKellar/Utah News Dispatch)
Though the full ramifications of the 'big, beautiful' tax and spending bill that narrowly passed the U.S. House this week are still murky — especially since the bill is likely to change as it makes its way through the Senate — the bill as currently written could jeopardize health insurance for tens of thousands of Utahns.
Plus, states including Utah would need to grapple with an estimated $625 billion in cumulative Medicaid cuts over 10 years from work requirements, stricter eligibility rules and a pause on provider taxes — changes that would likely lead millions of Americans losing Medicaid coverage.
On Friday, officials from the Utah Department of Health and Human Services told Utah News Dispatch they did not have state-specific estimates available detailing the potential impacts of the still-evolving federal budget reconciliation package on Utah's Medicaid program because it's still a 'moving target.'
U.S. House Republicans push through massive tax and spending bill slashing Medicaid
However, according to the health policy outlet KFF, the bill could result in an estimated $381 million loss in federal Medicaid dollars for Utah. The outlet used Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates to unpack the potential state-by-state impacts of a $625 billion federal cut to Medicaid in an analysis posted last week.
'Cuts of $625 billion will force states to make tough choices: maintain current spending on Medicaid by raising taxes or reducing spending on other programs; or cut Medicaid spending by covering fewer people, offering fewer benefits, or paying providers less,' KFF reported.
The vast majority of the cut would come from three sources: work requirements mandating that adults who are eligible for Medicaid expansion must meet work and reporting requirements (estimated to save $300.8 billion as people become ineligible), repealing the Biden administration's rule simplifying eligibility and renewal process (estimated to save $162.7 billion) and setting a moratorium on new or increased provider taxes (estimated to save $86.8 billion), accordion to KFF.
It depends on what states decide to do to respond to the cuts, but in another analysis posted Tuesday based on CBO estimates, KFF estimated the changes to Medicaid and the Affordable Care Act Marketplaces could increase the number of people without health insurance across the nation by 8.6 million.
Additionally, when combined with the effect of the expected expiration of the Affordable Care Act's enhanced premium tax credits, the CBO expects 13.7 million more people will be uninsured in 2034, according to KFF.
'Anticipating how states will respond to changes in Medicaid policy is a major source of uncertainty in CBO's cost estimates. Instead of making state-by-state predictions about policy responses, CBO estimates the percentage of the affected population that lives in states with different types of policy responses,' KFF noted, adding that states may choose to implement work requirements that are easier or harder to comply with, which would impact enrollment.
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
So KFF's analysis included a range of enrollment impacts varying by plus or minus 25% from a midpoint estimate.
Based on the budget reconciliation bill's changes to Medicaid, Utah is projected to see its uninsured population increase by a mid-range estimate of roughly 65,000 — somewhere between 49,000 on the low end and up to 81,000 on the high end, according to the analysis.
When combined with the expected expiration of the Affordable Care Act's enhanced premium tax credits, KFF estimated that Utah's uninsured population could increase by even more — roughly 150,000, or a 4% increase. That estimate could vary between 110,000 on the low end or up to 190,000 on the high end, according to KFF.
Other states would see bigger impacts than Utah, where about 350,000 total Utahns enroll in Medicaid. About half of the 13.7 million more people who would be uninsured under both policy changes live in Florida (1.8 million), Texas, (1.6 million), California (1.5 million), New York (800,000), and Georgia (610,000).
Utah health advocates who have been watching the budget reconciliation bill's progress expressed deep disappointment in its passage out of the House.
'I've yet to meet any Utahn who said that when they voted in November, they were looking for which candidate was most focused on kicking as many people off Medicaid,' said Stephanie Burdick, an advocate with the newly-formed Protect Medicaid Utah Coalition.
'Yet here we are,' Burdick said. 'The U.S. House of Representatives passed a bill that could force almost 80,000 Utahns off their health insurance.'
The proposed federal cuts also come as Utah state officials — anticipating the Republican-controlled White House and Congress' appetite to implement work requirements on Medicaid — are considering a waiver to impose work requirements on Utah's adult Medicaid adult expansion population.
About 75,000 Utahns have enrolled in Utah's Medicaid expansion program, an estimated 7,500 (10%), would not qualify for an exemption and be subject to the work requirements. That means that if they don't start working or submit documents showing they're applying for at least 48 jobs during a three-month period, they could lose their medical coverage.
Between Utah's proposed work requirements and the proposed federal Medicaid cuts, Burdick said state officials and federal politicians in D.C. are 'both deadset on one thing: increasing the number of uninsured Utahns and squeezing more time and more money out of working families.'
'How is this aligned with Utah values?' Burdick said, urging Congress to 'go back to the drawing board and find ways to increase access and affordability to health care for all Americans and this is the opposite.'
Advocates sound alarm as Utah looks to impose work requirements on Medicaid expansion
Nate Crippes with the Disability Law Center, also a member of the Protect Medicaid Utah Coalition, issued a statement saying health advocates 'remain concerned about the devastating impact of the billions of dollars in Medicaid cuts on Utahns with disabilities.'
'Numerous provisions in this bill would be harmful to the disability community, including a work requirement that penalizes Medicaid beneficiaries for losing a job, and will strip health coverage from millions nation-wide, including many Utahns,' Crippes said.
He added that given the focus on people enrolled in Medicaid expansion, 'we are particularly concerned with the impact on those with mental illness and substance use disorder, who make up nearly 60% of the expansion population.'
'We see no beauty in a bill that denies healthcare to millions, shifts costs to the states and the middle class, and weakens our entire healthcare system,' he said. 'So we urge our senators to support the disability community, protect Medicaid, and stop this bill from passing.'
President Donald Trump and Republicans in Congress have lauded the bill as needed to curb government spending, cut taxes and provide resources to execute Trump's agenda around immigration, energy production and increased military investment.
Democrats criticized the bill as a tax cut that would largely benefit the billionaire class and lead the U.S. to raise its debt limit by $4 trillion.
Utah's Medicaid Director Jennifer Strohecker briefed Utah lawmakers this week on the status of Utah's Medicaid program, proposed changes including the state's version of work requirements, and possible impacts from the budget reconciliation bill if it receives final passage.
'Utah has the lowest Medicaid enrollment of every state, but for the 350,000 Utahns that do receive their health benefits through this program, it is a lifeline for preventive care, institutional care when it's needed, physical health, behavioral health,' she told the state Health and Human Services Interim Committee on Wednesday.
An estimated 1 in 10 Utahns are enrolled in Medicaid, she said. One in 6 babies are born with Medicaid as their health coverage.
In total, Utah's Medicaid program costs about $5.3 billion per year. More than 64% of it is funded with federal dollars, equaling $3.4 billion. About $1.7 in state dollars pay for the rest.
'Counterproductive and cruel': Advocates form coalition to protect Medicaid from federal cuts
Lawmakers including Rep. Tyler Clancy, R-Provo, and Rep. Ray Ward, R-Bountiful, asked Strohecker about Utah's proposed work requirement waiver and questioned whether it will lead to Utahns losing coverage due to administrative burdens.
'This was not meant to be an administrative hurdle or a barrier. This was not meant to take people off of the Medicaid program,' she said of Utah's proposal.
While Strohecker noted the federal proposal has a 'pretty big dollar figure tied to work requirements as it's proposed, Utah's design did not have that intent.'
'So it is our commitment to look at what are those administrative hurdles, what are those barriers, as it's designed today, and thoughtfully work through those with you all and with our partners at DWS,' she said, noting that Utah's proposal is still being drafted using feedback from public comment.
Though the original public comment period for Utah's proposed work requirements waiver was initially scheduled to end Thursday, state officials told Utah News Dispatch they decided to extend it through June 2, with one more public hearing scheduled for Tuesday.
'We have received a lot of helpful feedback and will consider those recommendations before submitting the request to (the federal government) within a month or two of closing the public comment period,' a Utah Department of Health and Human Services spokesperson said in an email.
However, Strohecker noted that Utah's waiver and the federal mandates included in the budget reconciliation package are two different proposals. The proposed federal mandated work requirements would require Americans to 'complete work requirements before you ever get Medicaid.'
The federal proposal has the potential to risk loss of health coverage for tens of thousands more Utahns than the state's work requirement waiver, as currently drafted.
Additionally, if Congress approves the bill as currently drafted, it included a provision that would penalize states that expanded coverage for immigrants by reducing the federal Medicaid matching rate for the Medicaid expansion program from 90% to 80% for states that either provide health coverage or financial assistance to purchase health coverage to certain groups of immigrants.
'I have a hard enough time': Utahns urge state not to impose work requirements on Medicaid
Last year, Utah started offering health insurance to noncitizen children through its State Children's Health Insurance Program, or CHIP. As of last week, 1,317 children were enrolled in that program, which has the capacity to cover up to 2,000 kids, according to the state's website.
Strohecker said that if the federal government penalizes Utah for its CHIP program and reduces its state match from 90% to 80%, that would trigger a law to 'terminate' Utah's adult Medicaid expansion program. She said lawmakers may need to consider what to do about that.
That may include repealing the state's CHIP program for 2,000 kids in order to save Utah's Medicaid expansion program, which covers 75,000 adults.
Rep. Steve Eliason, R-Sandy, acknowledged the federal bill is 'constantly evolving,' so state leaders will need to watch what happens, but he said 'assuming this bill passes, if this provision is left in there,' lawmakers may need to repeal CHIP.
'I think it's a really simple policy call, myself, that we need to sunset the (CHIP) program that would trigger the 10% penalty as well as our trigger law, because that would be a domino effect,' Eliason said. 'This is not making a policy comment on the underlying legislation, it's just that our hands would be tied, and it would be, I think, the greatest good for the greatest number.'
Senate Minority Leader Luz Escamilla, D-Salt Lake City, also acknowledged that the federal budget package is a 'moving target, so who knows what it's going to look like in the next week.' But she asked whether the Utah Legislature would need to convene in a special session to deal with fallout if the bill receives final passage before lawmakers' next general session in January.
Strohecker said that's a possibility.
'We've been keeping a very close eye on this legislation,' she said.
SUPPORT: YOU MAKE OUR WORK POSSIBLE

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Exclusive: HHS watchdog finds more than $16B in health savings
Exclusive: HHS watchdog finds more than $16B in health savings

Axios

timean hour ago

  • Axios

Exclusive: HHS watchdog finds more than $16B in health savings

The Department of Health and Human Services' watchdog identified more than $16 billion in overpayments, fraudulent billings and possible cost savings in health programs over a half year spanning the Biden and Trump administrations, including more than $3.5 billion to be returned to the government. Why it matters: The semiannual summary, first shared publicly to Axios, comes as the Trump administration says it's prioritizing government efficiency and rooting out waste, fraud and abuse. It reflects growing concern over federal payments to Medicare Advantage plans, along with enforcement actions like McKinsey agreeing to pay $650 million to settle charges that its advice caused Purdue Pharma to submit fraudulent claims stemming from the opioid crisis. The report was sent to Congress late Friday. By the numbers: The HHS Office of Inspector General identified $16.6 billion in real and potential savings from October 2024 through March of this year. The office's investigations identified $3.5 billion in funds due back to the federal government, and its audits found another $451 million that the government will recoup. More than $12 billion in potential cost savings were identified if HHS makes recommended policy changes. The office issued 165 recommendations over the six months. In one example, OIG found that Medicare could have saved $7.7 billion if it lowered payments for swing beds at critical access hospitals so that they match skilled nursing facilities. The change would require action from Congress, and the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services said it didn't agree with the recommendation. Nearly 400 civil actions, including settlements, resulted from OIG's work during the period. OIG says its work returned $11 to the federal government for each $1 invested in its office. "Whether it's us, whether it's [the Government Accountability Office], whether it's DOGE, whether it's state auditors, there's always a need for program integrity and oversight," said John Hagg, assistant inspector general in the IG's office of audit services. Zoom in: OIG over the six months covered in the report continued its investigations that raise concerns over improper payments in Medicare Advantage. OIG found that many patient diagnoses reported by privately run Medicare plans were supported only through health risk assessments. That allowed plans to be paid more to care for sicker, more expensive patients without enough supporting documentation, raising questions about their validity, per OIG. OIG recommended that Medicare further restrict plans' abilities to get higher payments based on diagnoses reported only on in-home health risk assessments in order to save an estimated $4.2 billion for Medicare. The office plans to do more work on Medicare Advantage in the near future, Melicia Seay, assistant inspector general in the office of evaluation and inspection, told Axios. "There's a lot of areas in terms of Medicare Advantage that we're exploring, whether it is the payment policy related to the program, the service delivery, quality of care," she said. Catch up quick: President Trump in January abruptly fired several agency inspectors general, including longtime HHS watchdog Christi Grimm. He claimed that"some were not doing their job."

These are the safest places in America for gay and transgender people
These are the safest places in America for gay and transgender people

USA Today

time2 hours ago

  • USA Today

These are the safest places in America for gay and transgender people

These are the safest places in America for gay and transgender people Which states are the best and worst for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer Americans to live and work? More and more, it's a question of partisan politics. Here's why. Show Caption Hide Caption See as rock climbers hang Transgender Pride flag in Yosemite Rock climbers unfurled a large Transgender Pride flag on El Capitan in Yosemite National Park. The National Park Service has since removed it. As Oklahoman legislators push to restrict trans rights and overturn the 2015 Supreme Court decision legalizing gay marriage, Zane Eaves says his identity as a transgender man has put a target on his back in his home state. One of 18,900 trans adults in Oklahoma, Eaves has received death threats as has his wife of 10 years and their two children. 'All the hatred and political stuff going on' are driving this Oklahoma lifer from the place he was born and raised, Eaves, 35, said. He has only crossed the state line three times in his life, but in recent weeks, he made the difficult decision to move his family to North Carolina to be closer to friends and allies. 'I am just trying to stay alive and keep my marriage,' Eaves said. Oklahoma ranks 44th in the nation on a list released Monday of the most and least welcoming states for lesbian, gay, bisexual, transgender and queer Americans. More and more, the question of where LGBTQ+ people feel safe is one of blue vs. red, according to advocacy group Out Leadership. LGBTQ+ equality fell across the board for the third straight year, according to Out Leadership's State LGBTQ+ Business Climate Index shared exclusively with USA TODAY. But the sharpest declines came in Republican-led states. While progressive strongholds championed supportive policies and protections, conservative states elected a slate of leaders who openly oppose gay and trans rights and sponsored an unprecedented wave of anti-LGBTQ+ legislation, Out Leadership CEO and founder Todd Sears said. So-called 'Don't Say Gay' bills, religious exemptions and other legislation tanked the rankings of 19 red states in the Out Leadership index, according to Sears. Today, the divide between states that roll out the welcome mat and less hospitable parts of the country is wider than ever, he said. The least and most welcoming LGBTQ+ states Each year for the last seven, Out Leadership has released the State LGBTQ+ Business Climate Index to gauge the overall climate for gay and transgender people state by state, mapping out where they will face the most and the least discrimination and hardship. Out Leadership's index measures the impact of state government policies and prevalent attitudes about the LGBTQ+ community, weighing factors such as support for young people and families, health access and safety, political and religious attitudes, work environment and employment and nondiscrimination protections. The Northeast had six of the 10 highest-ranked states, while the Southeast had six of the lowest-ranked. Massachusetts, led by the nation's first openly lesbian governor, Democrat Maura Healey and New York, which guaranteed gender-affirming care and LGBTQ+ refugee protections, tied for first place in this year's index, with Connecticut and New Jersey close behind. The least LGBTQ+ friendly state was Arkansas, which ranked last for the third straight year. South Carolina, Louisiana, South Dakota and Alabama also received low scores. The states that had the largest gains in the index were Kentucky and Michigan, which Out Leadership attributed to 'pro-equality' leadership from governors Andy Beshear and Gretchen Whitmer, both Democrats. The steepest declines were in Ohio, Florida and Utah, all led by Republican governors. Where are the safest places to live? The Out Leadership index was created as a LGBTQ+ inclusion reference guide for business leaders. But gay and trans people soon began using it to figure out where they should – and should not – live and work, never more so than now as rights rollbacks from the Trump administration and red statehouses hit close to home. Opposition to transgender rights was a central plank in Trump's presidential campaign and since taking office he has signed a series of executive orders recognizing only male and female genders, keeping trans athletes out of women's sports, banning trans people from serving in the military and restricting federal funding for gender-affirming care for trans people under age 19. Even states seen as safer for LGBTQ+ people have been navigating these edicts around trans athletes. Trump threatened to cut federal funding to California if a trans girl competed in a state track and field event held Saturday. AB Hernandez, a junior from Jurupa Valley High School in Riverside County, shared first place in the high jump and triple jump and second in the long jump. She shared the awards podium with her cisgender competitors under a new rule drafted by state athletics officials days before the event to mollify critics. Republican-led states have been in the vanguard of anti-trans legislation, causing greater geographic polarization and prompting fears among LGBTQ+ residents, even those who live in liberal cities. Jordan McGuire, a 27-year-old gay man in North Dakota, said the years he spent living in the Deep South taught him about the repressive discrimination routinely faced by gay and genderqueer people. At the same time, socially progressive cities in conservative states like Fargo and Grand Forks are no longer the safe havens they once were, he said. Now that his fiancee is transitioning to female, the couple is exploring a move to a 'sanctuary' state that will be safer for them. 'It feels like five or 10 years ago, trans people were not under the same microscope they are now and that has definitely influenced our move,' McGuire said. 'Yeah, people were prejudiced but it wasn't a witch hunt. They weren't looking for people in bathrooms and schools. But now things are so polarized.' That rising anxiety was captured in a post-election survey from UCLA's Williams Institute which found that nearly half of transgender people had already fled unsupportive communities and nearly 1 in 4 were considering uprooting their lives. The most frequently cited reasons for wanting to move were concerns about LGBTQ+ rights – 76% – the sociopolitical climate – 71% – anti-trans rhetoric and climate – 60% – and anti-trans laws and policies – 47%. LGBTQ+ Americans on the move Interest in relocating to friendlier states is even higher today than it was after Trump's reelection, say nonprofit workers who aid trans and gender-diverse people relocate to more liberal states with broader protections. So far in 2025, Rainbow Railroad in Canada has received more than 3,000 requests from LGBTQ+ people living in the United States, up more than 1,000% from the same time last year, according to communications director Timothy Chan. Nearly all requested international relocation support. For now, Rainbow Railroad can't aid Americans with resettlement services because of immigration restrictions, Chan said. TRACTION has heard from a record number of people from states as far away as Texas, Oklahoma and Arkansas with many of them reporting being threatened or feeling unsafe in their homes and neighborhoods, said Michael Woodward, the executive director of the trans-led organization in Washington state. Trans and gender-diverse people historically face financial hardship due to systemic oppression and discrimination, and need assistance finding jobs and housing as well as with interstate moving expenses that can run tens of thousands, Woodward said. TRACTION used to get a few applications a week until Trump won a second term. In the two weeks following the election, 'we received as many requests for assistance as we'd received in the entire life of the project thus far,' he said. After the inauguration, TRACTION started getting three to five applications every day. With one employee and a handful of volunteers, his organization is struggling to keep up with demand, Woodward said.

More Americans say neither party has strong leaders: CNN poll
More Americans say neither party has strong leaders: CNN poll

Yahoo

time2 hours ago

  • Yahoo

More Americans say neither party has strong leaders: CNN poll

Americans are more likely to say neither party has strong leaders than they are to attribute the characteristic to either the Democratic Party or the Republican Party, according to the latest CNN/SSRS poll. In the May poll, released on Sunday, respondents were asked which party is best described as 'the party with strong leaders.' More than 4 in 10 people — 43 percent — said 'neither party,' while Republicans followed close behind with 40 percent. Only 16 percent of respondents said the statement best describes the Democratic Party. By comparison, in a 2006 poll that asked the same question, only 10 percent of respondents said 'neither party,' while 49 percent said the Republican Party and 35 percent said the Democratic Party. Among registered voters in the latest poll, more respondents — 44 percent — said Republicans are 'the party with strong leaders,' while 40 percent said 'neither party' and 15 percent said the Democrats. The survey comes as Democratic officials reckon with new reporting suggesting former President Biden's inner circle took steps to shield the American public from signs of his alleged mental and physical decline as he embarked on his reelection campaign. The Republican Party also controls the White House, the Senate and the House of Representatives. The survey included 2,539 adults and was conducted May 5-26. The margin of error is 2.7 percentage points. Copyright 2025 Nexstar Media, Inc. All rights reserved. This material may not be published, broadcast, rewritten, or redistributed.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store