BFI election: Opposition gets down to form panel
It was learnt that several BFI members got together on Thursday to discuss the election prospects. The Delhi high court, on a plea by four state units of BFI challenging the validity of the electoral process, has fixed August 18 as the next date of hearing. 'We will put up a panel and we are discussing the possibilities,' said Rajesh Bhandari, BFI vice president and Himachal Pradesh Boxing Association (HPBA) president.
As per the election schedule the closing date of nomination is on August 11 (by 2pm). The publication of the final list of contesting candidates is on August 18 and elections are scheduled on August 21.
Though it remains to be seen how the election unfolds, Singh, who is seeking a third term in office, might not have it easy. 'It will not be a one-sided election, else the elections should have happened by now. There is a strong dissent about the way things have been handled at BFI. We were waiting for the court order but now that nomination needs to be filed we will take a call,' said another member on the condition of anonymity.
HPBA had sent Thakur's nomination that was rejected by Fairuz Mohamed, chairperson, BFI interim committee, as it violated statutes of BFI constitution approved by the World Boxing on May 18.
The new constitution has become a bone of contention. According to the plea in Delhi high court, the constitutional amendments have been done without following the mandatory ratification process. BFI, on the other hand, has said that the constitution has been approved by World Boxing and accepted by 30 out of 34 state boxing associations. The election is being held under the new constitution.
It has been learnt that some state units have written to the Sports ministry and Indian Olympic Association to ensure that elections are held as per the 2022 constitution of BFI.
A fact-finding committee of the IOA has recommended that the BFI election should be held in a free, fair and transparent manner and under the 'supervision of the IOA or an independent authority nominated by the High Court or the Sports Ministry. The elections must conform to the BFI's Memorandum (as amended up to 24.06.222 and as per the National Sports Code 2011,' it said in its recommendation to the Sports Ministry, on whose behalf the panel was constituted.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
4 days ago
- Hindustan Times
No merit in IOA's fact-finding committee's findings: World Boxing
New Delhi: World Boxing (WB), the global governing body of sport, on Friday summarily dismissed the findings and recommendations of IOA's three-member fact-finding committee while extending its unequivocal support to BFI's Interim Committee. Responding to IOA's July 30 letter that put forth a series of measures to 'protect the integrity of Indian boxing,' WB found no merit in the recommendations 'as they are contrary to the facts and available records.' HT has a copy of the letter. World Boxing president Boris van der Vorst has come down heavily on IOA's fact-finding committee's recommendations. (World Boxing) 'We note the findings of the Fact-Finding Committee constituted by the IOA. However, World Boxing does not find any merit in the conclusions drawn by this committee, as they are contrary to the facts and available records,' WB president Boris van der Vorst said in his letter to IOA dated August 6. 'In our view, the interim committee has fulfilled its responsibilities in the best possible manner. It is now time for all stakeholders to focus on successfully conducting the elections and restoring the duly elected Executive Committee of the BFI,' it added. IOA had constituted a fact-finding committee last month under the leadership of IOA treasurer Sahdev Yadav, with IOA Executive Council member Bhupender Singh Bajwa and advocate Payal Kakra as other members. The committee's measures, aimed to ensure 'democratic governance' of BFI, included conducting BFI polls under the supervision of IOA or an independent authority designated by the high court or sports ministry. It also called for BFI to be placed under the supervision of an IOA-appointed panel with all financial and policy decisions be taken 'under the direct oversight of IOA' until the new executive committee is elected. The IOA letter had also raised concerns over the interim committee's legitimacy and had objected to the appointment of outgoing BFI president Ajay Singh as its chief. WB, in its response, noted that IOA was given the option of appointing its representative in the interim committee but chose not to do so. 'It is important to highlight that, while forming the Interim Committee, World Boxing had specifically kept a position open for an IOA representative to ensure inclusivity and collaboration. However, the IOA chose not to appoint any member to the committee. Having declined participation in the duly constituted Interim Committee, the IOA has now independently formed a Fact-Finding Committee, the basis and mandate of which remain unclear,' WB said. BFI elections, originally scheduled for March 28 and delayed due to multiple litigations, will be held on August 21. The interim committee was appointed by WB in April to manage the day-to-day affairs of boxing. Its tenure was later extended till August 31 but Singh resigned as its chief on August 1, two days after IOA wrote to World Boxing and within hours of Singh announcing the elections.
Hindustan Times
5 days ago
- Hindustan Times
BFI election: Opposition gets down to form panel
New Delhi: While former union minister Anurag Thakur's nomination for the Boxing Federation of India (BFI) elections has been rejected for a second time and the issue is being heard in court, the faction supported by him is getting ready to put up a full panel of candidates against BFI president's Ajay Singh's panel. Representational image. (HT Photo) It was learnt that several BFI members got together on Thursday to discuss the election prospects. The Delhi high court, on a plea by four state units of BFI challenging the validity of the electoral process, has fixed August 18 as the next date of hearing. 'We will put up a panel and we are discussing the possibilities,' said Rajesh Bhandari, BFI vice president and Himachal Pradesh Boxing Association (HPBA) president. As per the election schedule the closing date of nomination is on August 11 (by 2pm). The publication of the final list of contesting candidates is on August 18 and elections are scheduled on August 21. Though it remains to be seen how the election unfolds, Singh, who is seeking a third term in office, might not have it easy. 'It will not be a one-sided election, else the elections should have happened by now. There is a strong dissent about the way things have been handled at BFI. We were waiting for the court order but now that nomination needs to be filed we will take a call,' said another member on the condition of anonymity. HPBA had sent Thakur's nomination that was rejected by Fairuz Mohamed, chairperson, BFI interim committee, as it violated statutes of BFI constitution approved by the World Boxing on May 18. The new constitution has become a bone of contention. According to the plea in Delhi high court, the constitutional amendments have been done without following the mandatory ratification process. BFI, on the other hand, has said that the constitution has been approved by World Boxing and accepted by 30 out of 34 state boxing associations. The election is being held under the new constitution. It has been learnt that some state units have written to the Sports ministry and Indian Olympic Association to ensure that elections are held as per the 2022 constitution of BFI. A fact-finding committee of the IOA has recommended that the BFI election should be held in a free, fair and transparent manner and under the 'supervision of the IOA or an independent authority nominated by the High Court or the Sports Ministry. The elections must conform to the BFI's Memorandum (as amended up to 24.06.222 and as per the National Sports Code 2011,' it said in its recommendation to the Sports Ministry, on whose behalf the panel was constituted.
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
5 days ago
- First Post
Olympic medalist Lovlina Borgohain accuses senior BFI official of 'gender-discriminatory behaviour'
Lovlina Borgohain, who had won bronze in the 2020 Tokyo Olympics, has accused Boxing Federation of India's executive director Col Arun Malik of 'disrespectful and gender-discriminatory behaviour' against her on a Zoom call. read more Tokyo Olympics bronze-winning boxer Lovlina Borgohain's allegations of 'disrespectful and gender-discriminatory behaviour' against national federation's executive director Col Arun Malik are being investigated and a report would be submitted soon, a Sports Authority of India (SAI) official has said. In a formal complaint addressed to Sports Minister Mansukh Mandaviya, Sports Authority of India (SAI) Director General, the TOPS (Target Olympic Podium Scheme) division, the Indian Olympic Association (IOA), and the Boxing Federation of India (BFI), Lovlina alleged that Malik humiliated her and undermined her achievements during a Zoom meeting on July 8, which was attended by SAI and TOPS officials. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD On the call Lovlina requested that her personal coach, who was also present in the online meeting, be allowed in the national camp, something that goes against the BFI policy. She also wanted the coach to be allowed to travel with her to train in Europe. According to Lovlina, Malik responded aggressively and spoke to her in a demeaning manner. 'He blatantly told me to 'shut up, lower your head and do as we say.' His words were not only disrespectful but also carried an alarming tone of gender-discriminatory and authoritarian dominance – something that no one, especially a woman who has brought honour to the nation, should be subjected to,' Lovlina stated in her complaint. 'I was made to feel small, unheard, and powerless. It was not just a personal insult – it was an attack on every woman athlete who dreams of standing tall, both in and outside the ring,' Lovlina stated in her complaint. She further asked for a 'fair and swift inquiry' and also 'necessary disciplinary action if these actions are found to be in violation of acceptable conduct.' Malik, however, 'categorically and unequivocally' denied the allegations, calling them 'devoid of any merit.' 'Lovlina's requests were considered and respectfully declined, as they are inconsistent with the policies of the Boxing Federation of India. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD 'As per BFI's Selection Policy published in January 2025, it is mandatory for all athletes to participate in the National Coaching Camp to be considered for evaluation and selection for international competitions,' Malik said in his reply. 'BFI, in the interest of fairness and uniformity, does not permit personal coaches or support staff within the National Camp.' Taking note of the complaint, the IOA formed a panel, comprising TOPS CEO NS Johal, IOA's athletes commission vice chairperson Sharath Kamal and a woman advocate. The entire interaction between Lovlina and Malik was recorded during the meeting and a member of the inquiry panel said a report would be submitted soon. The committee was to give the report within two weeks of receiving the complaint but has been unable to convene a meeting due to 'some prior commitments of its members'. 'Due to some pressing commitments, the panel has not been able to convene a meeting so far. But it would be done soon and since there is video available of the entire chain of events, it won't be a very complicated matter to deal with,' a panel member said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD It is learnt the Malik has asked the committee to expedite the process and also requested for the video recording of the interaction. Lovlina, meanwhile, has refused to comment on the matter. 'I don't want to focus on this right now because it will affect my game. I don't want to comment until the committee comes up with a decision,' Lovlina, who is also a world champion, said.
