logo
IRS Stimulus Checks Update: No new $1,390 payout this August, here's what taxpayers should know — Fact Check

IRS Stimulus Checks Update: No new $1,390 payout this August, here's what taxpayers should know — Fact Check

The IRS will not send $1,390 stimulus checks this late summer, offering relief to eligible households.
Rumors circulating online about new Internal Revenue Service (IRS) stimulus checks being issued this summer have been declared false by officials. Claims that taxpayers would soon receive $1,390 stimulus checks are not backed by any legislation or IRS confirmation. According to a fact-check report by The Associated Press, there is no new stimulus payment scheduled for distribution in the coming weeks.The confusion stems from social media posts and misleading reports suggesting that the IRS had approved additional rounds of payments for low- and middle-income Americans. However, IRS officials have confirmed that no new economic impact payments are planned unless Congress passes fresh legislation, as mentioned in a report by AP.
On Friday, several viral posts claimed that the IRS had approved $1,390 stimulus checks, sparking widespread speculation. The posts suggested the funds would reach taxpayers by the end of the summer.But these claims were swiftly refuted. The IRS clarified that any new round of economic impact payments, commonly known as stimulus checks, must be authorized through legislation. Neither the Senate nor the House has passed such a bill.Officials confirmed that there is no new IRS stimulus check update for 2025. Stimulus checks are not issued solely at the discretion of the IRS or the Treasury Department. They require Congressional approval, followed by Treasury's distribution.
Some of the speculation appears linked to a proposal by Republican Senator Josh Hawley of Missouri. In July, he introduced the American Worker Rebate Act, which aimed to provide rebates funded by tariff revenues. The proposed amount included at least $600 per individual, with additional payments for children.However, the bill has not advanced. It has neither cleared the Senate nor the House. For now, it remains referred to the Senate Finance Committee with no immediate prospect of becoming law, as confirmed in a report by AP. It is important to note that past rounds of IRS stimulus checks eligibility were strictly tied to laws passed by Congress. For example: 2008: The Economic Stimulus Act authorized direct payments during the Great Recession.
The Economic Stimulus Act authorized direct payments during the Great Recession. 2020–2021: Three major pieces of legislation, the Coronavirus Aid, Relief, and Economic Security (CARES) Act, the COVID-related Tax Relief Act, and the American Rescue Plan Act, enabled direct payments during the COVID-19 pandemic.
In each case, Congress enacted laws specifying the payment amounts, income thresholds, and distribution mechanisms. The Treasury Department and the IRS then executed the payouts.Adding to the public's misunderstanding is the IRS's announcement earlier this year regarding the Recovery Rebate Credit. The agency distributed about $2.4 billion to taxpayers who had failed to claim credits from 2021. The maximum refundable amount was $1,400 per individual.Those who had not filed their 2021 tax return were required to do so by April 15, 2025, to qualify. With that deadline long past, there are no new credits available.IRS officials have reiterated that this one-time correction should not be mistaken for approval of new stimulus checks.The Treasury Department, along with its Bureau of the Fiscal Service, managed the distribution of previous payments. These included both pandemic relief checks and earlier stimulus programs during the 2008 recession.Without Congressional approval, neither the Treasury nor the IRS has the authority to initiate new stimulus checks.Experts suggest that economic uncertainty, coupled with political rhetoric around tax rebates, created fertile ground for misinformation. Hawley's proposal, though not passed, may have been misrepresented online as already approved.Additionally, headlines referencing IRS refunds and delayed tax credits further contributed to the confusion.What Taxpayers Should Know
For now, there is no IRS approves stimulus checks announcement for 2025. Taxpayers are advised to rely only on official IRS releases and Treasury statements. The IRS maintains its updates on irs.gov, where verified information about credits, refunds, and other relief measures is published.While no payments are scheduled, political proposals remain on the table. Hawley and other lawmakers have floated the idea of using tariff revenues or other federal funds for rebates.However, unless such bills pass through Congress, taxpayers should not expect any checks. As history has shown, economic impact payments are rare and tied to extraordinary circumstances like recessions or national emergencies.
Despite viral claims, the reality is clear: no new IRS stimulus checks eligibility exists for summer 2025. The rumors are unfounded, and taxpayers should avoid misinformation circulating online. Unless Congress enacts new legislation, the IRS has no authority to distribute additional payments. No. The IRS has confirmed that there are no new stimulus checks approved for this summer. Any such payments would require Congressional authorization. The most recent update relates to the Recovery Rebate Credit from 2021, which allowed taxpayers to claim missed COVID-19 payments. That deadline expired on April 15, 2025, and no new credits or stimulus checks are available now.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Stealing not considered sin but calling someone a thief is': Opposition slams EC over authentication appeal
‘Stealing not considered sin but calling someone a thief is': Opposition slams EC over authentication appeal

Hans India

time37 minutes ago

  • Hans India

‘Stealing not considered sin but calling someone a thief is': Opposition slams EC over authentication appeal

Congress-led opposition parties hit back at the Election Commission on Sunday, over its appeal to authenticate their "vote chori" claims by filing a supporting affidavit and also termed its elaborate media address on the Bihar Special Intensive Revision (SIR) controversy a mere eyewash. Chief Election Commissioner (CEC) Gyanesh Kumar, flanked by senior EC officials, held a press conference in the capital and claimed that deliberate attempts were being made to fearmonger and misguide the voters of Bihar, apparently by opposition parties. It also stated that such fearmongering won't deter it from pursuing and implementing laid-down protocols. Replying to the CEC's presser, Congress accused it of being partisan towards the ruling party, while the RJD said that its clarification was devoid of any substance. Congress leader Pawan Khera, in a strong rebuttal, said: "Stealing is not considered a sin, but calling someone a thief is? Stop the theft, and we will stop calling you thieves. Why hasn't anyone given an account of one lakh votes from Mahadevapura?" Further accusing it breach of privacy, he said: "(BJP leader) Anurag Thakur is carrying digital voter lists of six constituencies—where did he get them from? Isn't that a breach of privacy? Did the Election Commission issue him a notice? No. But when it comes to CCTV footage, you say it violates privacy..." RJD MP Manoj Kumar Jha said: "No answers were given. Not a single question was answered. Maybe someone told them to hold the press conference because it was becoming embarrassing. So, they went ahead, but what was achieved? Which question did they actually answer? Forget the political parties—the voters are not convinced by your behaviour and conduct." "Logic cannot be used to justify opacity. Opacity means lack of transparency. The biggest concern is that the Election Commission appears neither impartial nor neutral. This should be a matter of serious concern for you." Purnia MP Pappu Yadav said, "The EC has no understanding of the Constitution or Babasaheb's (B.R. Ambedkar) ideas. After indulging in theft and robbery, will they speak about the Constitution?"

BJP leaders to be questioned regarding Suresh Gopi's suspected leopard tooth pendant
BJP leaders to be questioned regarding Suresh Gopi's suspected leopard tooth pendant

The Hindu

time37 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

BJP leaders to be questioned regarding Suresh Gopi's suspected leopard tooth pendant

At least two BJP leaders, who were seen accompanying Union Minister Suresh Gopi at Thrissur on the day he wore a chain with a pendant made of a suspected leopard tooth, will be summoned for interrogation. The Pattikkad Range Forest Officer is likely to issue notices to the party leaders to record their statements this week on a complaint filed by a Congress worker A.A. Mohamed Hashim. Mr. Hashim had complained that the act of wearing a leopard tooth, a wildlife trophy, was an offence punishable under the Wildlife Protection Act, 1972. The Forest department had recorded the statements of Mr. Hashim in this regard last month. Mr. Hashim, who shared the news video clips of Mr. Gopi walking along the Swaraj Round wearing the suspected wildlife trophy, had identified one of the accompanying persons as K.K. Aneeshkumar, the Thrissur district president of BJP. Though unable to name the other one, the complainant had said he was an identifiable person. In Kannur too He had indicated that the Minister was seen wearing the ornament made out of suspected leopard tooth at a public function in Kannur too. Mr. Hashim, while giving his statement to the department, wanted the suspected ornament to be seized and its period of manufacture ascertained. Information will be sought from the persons who were seen walking along with Mr. Gopi, on whether they had any idea that he was wearing the ornament made of a wildlife trophy. The possible existence of videos or pictures that would give clues on the material constituting the ornament will be explored, since the videos shared by the complainant are insufficient to prove the allegations, sources said. The investigating officer will decide on questioning Mr. Gopi after looking into the statements of the witnesses and the evidence, they said. Meanwhile, the Pattikkad Range Forest officer recently booked a wildlife crime against a person arrested by the Thrissur police for allegedly possessing suspected narcotic substances the other day. A suspected leopard tooth, ivory and a few strands of elephant tail hair were also recovered from the accused. The suspected wildlife trophies would be sent for analysis to ascertain their genuineness. If confirmed, the accused would be prosecuted under the Wildlife Protection Act, sources said.

Leak of complaint submitted to CPI(M) Polit Bureau triggers political controversy
Leak of complaint submitted to CPI(M) Polit Bureau triggers political controversy

The Hindu

time37 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Leak of complaint submitted to CPI(M) Polit Bureau triggers political controversy

A political controversy appears to be brewing over the media leak of a 'confidential complaint' purportedly submitted to the Polit Bureau (PB) of the Communist Party of India (Marxist) [CPI(M)] by a Kozhikode-based businessperson. The controversial letter reportedly implicated a group of CPI(M) leaders, including former Ministers, in financial scams centred around a U.K.-based businessperson from Kerala. The complaint emerged in the public domain on Sunday after the NRI businessperson adduced it as evidence in a libel suit filed by him against his rival and some sections of the media in a Delhi court. Graft charges The Congress-led United Democratic Front (UDF) and Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) seized on the somewhat knotty controversy riddled with accusations of financial shenanigans, corruption, money laundering and nepotism in an attempt to put the Left Democratic Front (LDF) government on the defensive. Leader of the Opposition V.D. Satheesan demanded a clarification from the party and the government on the veracity of the accusations raised by the Kozhikode-based businessperson. Mr. Satheesan said the crux of the litigation appeared to be bitter feuding between two business rivals for the patronage of powerful CPI(M) leaders. He noted financial transactions involving the next of kin of CPI(M) leaders might be at the root of the scandal. Nevertheless, Mr. Satheesan stated, Chief Minister Pinarayi Vijayan and CPI(M) State secretary M.V. Govindan owed the public an explanation. He said the presence of the U.K.-based businessperson at the CPI(M)'s 24th party conference in Madurai in April, and his attendance at the Kerala Loka Sabha conference added to the political intrigue. Kerala Pradesh Congress Committee (KPCC) president Sunny Joseph, MLA, stated that the sensational leak was mystifying and appeared to signal that 'something was rotten' in the CPI(M) 's State leadership. He said the scandal had the contours of official corruption with international ramifications and hidden rivalries within the CPI(M) leadership. Mr. Joseph demanded an investigation. 'Calls for inquiry' BJP former State president K. Surendran said the accuser had alleged in the letter that the NRI businessperson's paper company registered in Chennai had profited from government projects. 'If the accusations are true, they warranted an inquiry under the anti-money laundering and foreign exchange management laws,' he said. The CPI(M) was yet to formally react to the BJP and Congress's accusations.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store