AI-powered strategy helps Samsung retake lead from Apple in Q1 2025 smartphone market: IDC Report
The global smartphone market saw modest year-on-year growth of 0.4 per cent in the first quarter of 2025, with total shipments reaching 301.4 million units, according to the latest figures from the International Data Corporation (IDC).
Amid a backdrop of heightened geopolitical tensions and tariff uncertainty between the United States and China, Samsung reclaimed its position as the world's leading smartphone vendor, edging past Apple thanks to its AI-integrated product portfolio.
Samsung shipped 60.6 million units during the quarter, maintaining a 20.1 per cent market share, a slight increase of 0.6 per cent compared to Q1 2024. The South Korean tech giant's renewed dominance was fuelled by the strong performance of its flagship Galaxy S25 and the more affordable Galaxy A36 and A56, which brought advanced AI features to the mid-range segment.
'Samsung's focus on embedding AI capabilities across its product range — not just in premium models but in accessible mid-tier devices - has resonated with consumers, particularly in cost-sensitive markets,' said Francisco Jeronimo, Vice President of Client Devices at IDC. 'This broad AI strategy has given Samsung a crucial competitive edge at a time when market dynamics are shifting rapidly.'
Apple, meanwhile, posted its best-ever Q1 in terms of units shipped, delivering 58.7 million iPhones, an 11.6 per cent increase year-on-year. This impressive growth was largely driven by an aggressive stockpiling strategy ahead of anticipated U.S. tariffs on Chinese imports, as well as robust demand in several international markets. Despite this, Apple narrowly missed out on the top spot and faced headwinds in China, where its Pro models did not benefit from a government subsidy scheme targeting devices under CNY6,000 (approx. $820).
'The U.S. market grew by 8.3 per cent in Q1, reflecting strong consumer demand and urgency to purchase ahead of potential price increases,' noted Anthony Scarsella, IDC's Research Director for Client Devices. 'Apple capitalised on this moment well, but ongoing volatility in trade policy makes sustained momentum uncertain.'
Chinese brands also made notable gains, particularly within their domestic market. Xiaomi and Vivo benefitted significantly from a state-backed subsidy scheme aimed at boosting consumption. Xiaomi shipped 41.8 million units (up 2.4 per cent), while Vivo saw a 6.5 per cent increase, reaching 22.7 million units. OPPO, despite regaining fourth place, experienced a decline of 6.6 per cent due to weaker international performance.
The IDC report also revealed a shrinking share for smaller vendors grouped under the 'Others' category, whose collective shipments dropped 6.1 per cent year-on-year, indicating continued consolidation among the top players.
'Looking ahead, vendors will need to balance innovation, affordability, and geopolitical risk in order to sustain growth,' concluded Jeronimo. 'Samsung's current lead highlights how strategic product development, especially around emerging technologies like AI, can shape market leadership even in uncertain times.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
43 minutes ago
- Mint
Why superintelligent AI isn't taking over anytime soon
A primary requirement for being a leader in AI these days is to be a herald of the impending arrival of our digital messiah: superintelligent AI. For Dario Amodei of Anthropic, Demis Hassabis of Google and Sam Altman of OpenAI, it isn't enough to claim that their AI is the best. All three have recently insisted that it's going to be so good, it will change the very fabric of society. Even Meta—whose chief AI scientist has been famously dismissive of this talk—wants in on the action. The company confirmed it is spending $14 billion to bring in a new leader for its AI efforts who can realize Mark Zuckerberg's dream of AI superintelligence—that is, an AI smarter than we are. 'Humanity is close to building digital superintelligence," Altman declared in an essay this week, and this will lead to 'whole classes of jobs going away" as well as 'a new social contract." Both will be consequences of AI-powered chatbots taking over all our white-collar jobs, while AI-powered robots assume the physical ones. Before you get nervous about all the times you were rude to Alexa, know this: A growing cohort of researchers who build, study and use modern AI aren't buying all that talk. The title of a fresh paper from Apple says it all: 'The Illusion of Thinking." In it, a half-dozen top researchers probed reasoning models—large language models that 'think" about problems longer, across many steps—from the leading AI labs, including OpenAI, DeepSeek and Anthropic. They found little evidence that these are capable of reasoning anywhere close to the level their makers claim. Generative AI can be quite useful in specific applications, and a boon to worker productivity. OpenAI claims 500 million monthly active ChatGPT users—astonishingly far reach and fast growth for a service released just 2½ years ago. But these critics argue there is a significant hazard in overestimating what it can do, and making business plans, policy decisions and investments based on pronouncements that seem increasingly disconnected from the products themselves. Apple's paper builds on previous work from many of the same engineers, as well as notable research from both academia and other big tech companies, including Salesforce. These experiments show that today's 'reasoning" AIs—hailed as the next step toward autonomous AI agents and, ultimately, superhuman intelligence—are in some cases worse at solving problems than the plain-vanilla AI chatbots that preceded them. This work also shows that whether you're using an AI chatbot or a reasoning model, all systems fail utterly at more complex tasks. Apple's researchers found 'fundamental limitations" in the models. When taking on tasks beyond a certain level of complexity, these AIs suffered 'complete accuracy collapse." Similarly, engineers at Salesforce AI Research concluded that their results 'underscore a significant gap between current LLM capabilities and real-world enterprise demands." Importantly, the problems these state-of-the-art AIs couldn't handle are logic puzzles that even a precocious child could solve, with a little instruction. What's more, when you give these AIs that same kind of instruction, they can't follow it. Apple's paper has set off a debate in tech's halls of power—Signal chats, Substack posts and X threads—pitting AI maximalists against skeptics. 'People could say it's sour grapes, that Apple is just complaining because they don't have a cutting-edge model," says Josh Wolfe, co-founder of venture firm Lux Capital. 'But I don't think it's a criticism so much as an empirical observation." The reasoning methods in OpenAI's models are 'already laying the foundation for agents that can use tools, make decisions, and solve harder problems," says an OpenAI spokesman. 'We're continuing to push those capabilities forward." The debate over this research begins with the implication that today's AIs aren't thinking, but instead are creating a kind of spaghetti of simple rules to follow in every situation covered by their training data. Gary Marcus, a cognitive scientist who sold an AI startup to Uber in 2016, argued in an essay that Apple's paper, along with related work, exposes flaws in today's reasoning models, suggesting they're not the dawn of human-level ability but rather a dead end. 'Part of the reason the Apple study landed so strongly is that Apple did it," he says. 'And I think they did it at a moment in time when people have finally started to understand this for themselves." In areas other than coding and mathematics, the latest models aren't getting better at the rate that they once did. And the newest reasoning models actually hallucinate more than their predecessors. 'The broad idea that reasoning and intelligence come with greater scale of models is probably false," says Jorge Ortiz, an associate professor of engineering at Rutgers, whose lab uses reasoning models and other cutting-edge AI to sense real-world environments. Today's models have inherent limitations that make them bad at following explicit instructions—the opposite of what you'd expect from a computer, he adds. It's as if the industry is creating engines of free association. They're skilled at confabulation, but we're asking them to take on the roles of consistent, rule-following engineers or accountants. That said, even those who are critical of today's AIs hasten to add that the march toward more-capable AI continues. Exposing current limitations could point the way to overcoming them, says Ortiz. For example, new training methods—giving step-by-step feedback on models' performance, adding more resources when they encounter harder problems—could help AI work through bigger problems, and make better use of conventional software. From a business perspective, whether or not current systems can reason, they're going to generate value for users, says Wolfe. 'Models keep getting better, and new approaches to AI are being developed all the time, so I wouldn't be surprised if these limitations are overcome in practice in the near future," says Ethan Mollick, a professor at the Wharton School of the University of Pennsylvania, who has studied the practical uses of AI. Meanwhile, the true believers are undeterred. Just a decade from now, Altman wrote in his essay, 'maybe we will go from solving high-energy physics one year to beginning space colonization the next year." Those willing to 'plug in" to AI with direct, brain-computer interfaces will see their lives profoundly altered, he adds. This kind of rhetoric accelerates AI adoption in every corner of our society. AI is now being used by DOGE to restructure our government, leveraged by militaries to become more lethal, and entrusted with the education of our children, often with unknown consequences. Which means that one of the biggest dangers of AI is that we overestimate its abilities, trust it more than we should—even as it's shown itself to have antisocial tendencies such as 'opportunistic blackmail"—and rely on it more than is wise. In so doing, we make ourselves vulnerable to its propensity to fail when it matters most. 'Although you can use AI to generate a lot of ideas, they still require quite a bit of auditing," says Ortiz. 'So for example, if you want to do your taxes, you'd want to stick with something more like TurboTax than ChatGPT." Write to Christopher Mims at
News18
2 hours ago
- News18
iPhone Users Can Finally Know When Their Battery Will Die
Last Updated: iPhone battery management is getting better thanks to the new features added thanks to the iOS 26 update. The iOS 26 update is bringing a useful feature for iPhones Apple is finally making it easy to know when your iPhone will be charged up to 80 percent and these details will be available on the home screen itself. The iOS 26 update has a lot of new features and the Liquid glass design overhaul but some of the useful tools will be viewed as important as those changes from the company. The new intelligent battery saver mode called Adaptive Power was tipped to be introduced with the iOS 26 update and soon iPhone users will have to enable it on their devices. iPhone users are finally getting a reliable tool from Apple to help them analyse their battery usage and trends. But the new power mode is going one step further by giving you the exact time left for the iPhone to hit the 80 percent. This data will be right next to the charging percentage that you can see on the lock screen while charging the iPhone. As we have mentioned before, there are multiple benefits of having this feature. iPhone users will know how much time they have to keep their device plugged in for charging. And secondly, they will know the charging speed offered by the charger, and replace it for faster results if necessary. So, let's say you are using a slow charger and the iPhone is showing 8 minutes to 80 percent, you can easily look at replacing the adapter to get faster results. First Published: June 13, 2025, 07:30 IST
New Indian Express
3 hours ago
- New Indian Express
Homely meals ready at Kochi's new Samriddhi Kitchen
Steaming rice with two types of thoran, sambar, pickle and pappadam on a plantain leaf. Simply scrumptious! Those who like to make the meal 'special' can add a seafood or meat dish. We are at Samriddhi@Kadavanthra, which was opened on June 9 as an extension of the corporation's successful 'Samriddhi@Kochi' project that seeks to provide quality food at affordable prices. At `40, anyone who visits the new Samriddhi canteen GCDA headquarters in Kadavanthra can enjoy a homely vegetarian meal. For `30, one can add a fish curry. The space, which has already become a hit, is ambient with paintings on the walls and soft music. Sandra Joseph, a young professional working at a firm in Kadavanthra, says she has become 'a fan'. 'I love the meals they serve. There are other options, too, such as biryani and Chinese dishes. This place is beneficial for students and common folk,' she says. 'The space is neatly maintained, and the premises are hygienic. The food is tasty and worth the money.' The menu includes vegetarian meals, fish curry meals, chicken biryani, ghee rice, and varieties of fried rice and noodles — everything at affordable rates. The facility can accommodate about 60 people at a time, and serves at least 400 every afternoon. The facility, open from 7am to 10pm, also provides breakfast, snacks in the evening, and dinner. 'We see a rush during lunchtime. More people will come to the facility as it gets popular,' says a staffer.
