Expert insights on Enoch Godongwana's upcoming budget speech in South Africa
Experts have mixed feelings as Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana prepares to deliver his third expected budget speech on Wednesday.
Image: Pixabay
As South Africa braces for Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana's third budget speech on Wednesday, a wave of expert opinions reveals a landscape marked by both cautious optimism and pronounced concerns.
With rising economic pressures and a growing budget deficit, Godongwana faces the complex task of generating revenue without curbing growth.
Old Mutual chief economist Johann Els highlighted the anticipated revenue shortfall following the scrapping of a planned Value Added Tax (VAT) increase.
Els estimated a loss of around R13.5 billion for the current year, with an alarming three-year total that could reach approximately R75bn.
'This will have to be made up for; Treasury will have to revise their gross domestic product (GDP) growth forecast downwards; they have it at 1.9% for 2025, but most forecasts have GDP around 1.5%,' he said.
The ramifications of this budget speech extend beyond just lost tax revenue. Els said the budget speech was more than just a VAT increase that needed to be made up for.
'It is crucial that the government sticks to the deficit targets that they set in the first two budgets. Investors and rating agencies would not like it if the government tries to make up for the loss in revenue by borrowing more.
It is crucial that they stick to the budget deficit target of 4.6% for this year, easing lower over the next few years to -3.5%. The primary surplus target of +0.9% rising to +2% over the next three years should be maintained. Crucially, the debt-to-GDP ratio peaking this year at 76.2% should be maintained. I think there needs to be significant expenditure cuts in this budget.'
Professor Raymond Parsons, an economist at the North-West University (NWU) Business School, choed the sentiment that this budget could provide a much-needed opportunity.
'The third budget stands a good chance of being a successful one. It should benefit from the robust debate around the VAT controversy, which identified new options on both the spending and revenue of the budget to better 'balance the books'. The credibility of the budget will depend upon its ability to do two key things,' he said.
Parsons added that the government needed to stick close to its original goal of a debt-to-GDP ratio of 76.2%, and second, strongly reflect what is now needed to meet the Government of National Unity's commitment to a 3% job-rich GDP growth target in the medium term.
Neil Roets, CEO of Debt Rescue, welcome the confirmation that VAT will remain at 15%, sparing families from yet another blow, but said they remained concerned about the possibility of proposed increases in fuel levies and sin taxes.
Roets said that equally troubling was the persistent budget deficit.
'The possibility of turning to 'stealth' measures such as bracket creep or frozen medical aid credits only shifts the burden onto consumers. We urge Minister Godongwana to prioritise spending efficiency rather than add to household strain,' he said.
Benay Sager, Executive Head of DebtBusters, said that their expectation was spending cuts across the different departments as there just was not enough money to go around.
'We expect tax brackets to remain as they have been, and as a result of bracket creep, there will be more money coming in. We also expect additional taxes to be announced on things like, potentially, crypto and crypto trading and so on,' he said.
Casey Sprake, economist at Anchor Capital, said that the central challenge of the third iteration of Budget 2025 liesd in how effectively the government responded to several mounting fiscal pressures.
Sprake added that to offset the negative fiscal impacts, the government is likely to dial back some of the new spending introduced in the previous two Budget 2025 updates.
'In particular, increased allocations for frontline services are expected to be trimmed. However, Treasury is likely to protect infrastructure spending, positioning it as central to efforts aimed at boosting long-term economic growth,' Sprake said.
Weekend Argus
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
3 days ago
- IOL News
Trump's bid to dismantle multilateralism diminishes US influence
President Cyril Ramaphosa received a courtesy call from the People's Republic of China's Minister of Foreign Affairs, Mr Wang Yi, on the margins of the G20 Foreign Ministers meeting held at the Nasrec Expo Centre, Johannesburg on February 20, 2025. China, India, Brazil, and others are stepping up, demonstrating that cooperation can move forward even when one of the largest economies chooses to disengage, says the writer. Image: GCIS Reneva Fourie Despite his recent assurances to President Cyril Ramaphosa that he would attend the G20 Leaders' Summit later in the year, President Donald Trump's reliability is questionable. Since beginning his second term in office, Trump has distanced himself from international cooperation and multilateral institutions. His approach to global engagement appears transactional, unpredictable, and driven more by personal instincts than long-term strategy or shared responsibility. This trend has become increasingly evident during South Africa's presidency of the G20. The United States, while formally set to assume the G20 presidency next, has demonstrated a lack of meaningful participation in the lead-up to the Summit. Key officials have been absent from critical meetings. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent missed high-level sessions. Reports have surfaced that Trump instructed his administration to scale back involvement in the G20 altogether. The US also did not participate in the recent G20 Agricultural Chief Scientists meeting despite assurances to support President Ramaphosa having been given in the Heads of State bilateral. These developments raise serious concerns about the US's commitment to global cooperation. The G20 is one of the few spaces where developed and developing countries can collaborate to address global economic and financial challenges. Its member states account for around 85 per cent of global GDP, more than 75 per cent of international trade, and two-thirds of the world's population. However, it does not have a permanent secretariat. The success of the G20 depends on the ability of current, previous, and incoming hosts to work together, building continuity through what is known as the troika system. With South Africa preparing to hand over the presidency to the US, cooperation has become even more important. Unfortunately, the US is not fulfilling its required role. Trump's reluctance to engage with multilateral forums is part of a broader pattern. Earlier this year, he issued an executive order requiring a full review of US participation in international organisations. This review is already having several adverse consequences. Future funding for UNWRA, the World Health Organisation and UNESCO is uncertain. The United Nations is currently planning significant budget cuts of between 15 and 20 per cent as part of its UN80 Reform Initiative. Although Secretary-General, António Guterres, insists that the US does not directly cause these cuts, the reality is that it has not paid its dues in full. At a time when global coordination is essential, the reduction in funding and staff weakens one of the world's most important platforms for cooperation. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Next Stay Close ✕ The financial priorities outlined in Trump's 2026 budget proposal reflect a similar retreat. It includes only 9.6 billion dollars in new international spending, which represents a reduction of more than 80 per cent when expected rescissions are taken into account. The administration also plans to cut 15 billion dollars from renewable energy and carbon capture programmes and 4.5 billion dollars from conservation efforts. These proposals send a clear message. The US, under Trump, is turning inward, cutting itself off from collective solutions to the challenges that affect all countries. This approach is especially damaging to global trade. Trump's abuse of tariffs, often without consulting allies or respecting World Trade Organisation processes, has undermined the very foundations of the international trade system. By acting unilaterally and ignoring established norms, the US weakens the credibility of institutions that seek to facilitate fair and predictable global commerce. Despite these actions, work continues. Non-state US actors continue to engage in the technical and policy-related activities of various G20 working groups. Under its G20 presidency, South Africa has advanced a forward-looking agenda focused on inclusive growth, climate resilience, food security, and digital innovation. These priorities reflect the urgent needs of the Global South and speak to a broader shift in global leadership. China, India, Brazil, and others are stepping up, demonstrating that cooperation can move forward even when one of the largest economies chooses to disengage. Trump's absence may grab headlines, but it will not stop progress. The G20 was not designed to revolve around one country. It works best when all members contribute but does not collapse when one refuses to participate as another country can always replace the US for next year's presidency. Important initiatives are already moving ahead without the active involvement of the US. Should Trump ultimately decide not to attend the Leaders' Summit, the impact on the Summit itself will likely be minimal. The real cost will be to the US, which risks losing influence, credibility, and the ability to shape global decisions. The longer-term consequences of this approach could be even more significant. When the US withdraws from global leadership, it creates a vacuum that others are more than willing to fill. The G20 will proceed, consensus will be reached, and international initiatives will move forward. By not being at the table, the US risks being left behind, losing further influence, missing opportunities, and a diminished role in shaping global policies. In an interconnected world, isolationism is not a sign of strength but shortsightedness.
Daily Maverick
3 days ago
- Daily Maverick
Running on empty – OECD, banks and business warn SA of stagnation
The OECD's latest Economic Survey, backed by Treasury, leading economists, the RMB/BER Business Confidence Index and the recently released Kearney Global Economic Outlook, warns that failure to implement urgent structural reforms risks tipping South Africa into an entrenched economic stall. South Africa's economic growth is not just slowing – it's stalling. The OECD's 2025 Economic Survey is a mirror that few policymakers want to face, and reinforces much of the analysis of South Africa's economic trajectory – and the answer is not good. GDP per capita remains lower than it was in 2007. South Africa is the only G20 country whose investment rate has declined over the past decade. That's not just a warning sign – it's an indictment. The RMB/BER Business Confidence Index, compiled by the Bureau for Economic Research, shows confidence remains below the 50-neutral mark across sectors, with manufacturers and retailers especially pessimistic about fixed investment prospects. RMB Macroeconomist Keabetswe Mojapelo told Daily Maverick, 'It's not just interest rates – it's policy unpredictability and grid instability weighing on business decisions'. What's new is the institutional alignment. Treasury, economists consulted by Daily Maverick, and the OECD itself now converge around a single diagnosis. As economist Dawie Roodt put it: 'We know what needs to be done, but the politics always get in the way.' Can we grow below water? The OECD projects just 1.5% GDP growth in 2025 – a figure too weak to reduce unemployment, too shallow to sustain revenue and far below peer economies. India has averaged above 6% for the past decade. South Africa, by contrast, is now 0.7% smaller than it was in 2019 in real per capita terms. The Kearney Global Economic Outlook, published in May 2025, places South Africa in the 'low potential' quadrant, citing sluggish domestic reform momentum, capital flight risk and tepid FDI inflows despite global capital rotation. Public investment has collapsed – down 26% since 2016. 'It's been a lost decade for growth… there's a risk this becomes the new normal,' says Izak Odendaal, chief investment strategist at Old Mutual Wealth. Debt dominates our fiscal table Debt-to-GDP stands at 77.4%. Crucially, interest payments now absorb 5.2% of GDP, outpacing allocations to school infrastructure and police services combined, and noted as 'fiscally unsustainable' in the OECD's report. 'The electricity reform is the clearest example of a reform that is actually working… But now it's time for phase two: fixing the grid, getting the transmission constraints resolved and ensuring that independent power producers can come fully online,' says Odendaal. Treasury acknowledges the bind, but has yet to commit to a fiscal anchor. Options include an expenditure ceiling, a primary surplus path, or a hard cap linked to GDP, but no model has been confirmed, which means no clear roadmap to solving our economic crisis. 'We're waiting for a crisis,' says Roodt. 'Just like with load shedding.' Electricity retrospectively a core constraint Load shedding cut 1.5 percentage points from GDP in 2023. The number of blackout days has dropped – from 289 in 2023 to just 69 so far in 2024 – but fragility remains. Grid access for IPPs is constrained, Eskom's debt is unresolved, and municipal billing failures compound the risk, particularly in metros where Eskom's non-payment battles have delayed revenue and planning cautions that while the load-shedding reprieve has helped sentiment, 'corporate boards remain wary. Private investment in energy hinges on regulatory transparency and a credible path to grid upgrades.''Restoring energy security remains essential to unlocking growth,' Deputy Finance Minister Ashor Sarupen said at the OECD report launch. The OECD highlights overdue steps: transmission unbundling, tariff reform, and substation investment. Sarupen confirmed alignment with the Just Energy Transition Investment Plan (JET-IP) but warned of slow procurement cycles. Good plans, but slow hands The OECD praises Operation Vulindlela's design: 74% of phase one reforms are complete or on track. But execution lags in core infrastructure – rail, water, ports. Delays in freight rail liberalisation and digital spectrum rollout are holding back productivity. 'We're shifting water and electricity to utility models,' said Sarupen. Yet, as Odendaal notes, 'There's a danger in mistaking plans for outcomes.' The OECD calls for binding timelines, stronger intergovernmental coordination, and clarity on cost-recovery mechanisms for state internal sentiment tracking finds infrastructure policy scepticism remains high among surveyed CFOs and investors, despite recognition of Operation Vulindlela's design integrity. Jobs, grants, fiscal issues Unemployment is 32.6%. Among youth, it's over 60%. Over half of South Africans now rely on social grants. 'It's not just unemployment,' Roodt observes. 'Absolute poverty is rising too.' The OECD warns that job creation 'remains insufficient to absorb new entrants,' and that the labour market is structurally exclusionary. South Africa's employment-to-population ratio is far below its emerging market peers – not a temporary downturn, but a reflection of deep systemic failure. Informal work remains the fallback for millions, yet remains under-supported and outside the tax, training, and credit warns that 'continued joblessness and poor training-to-work transitions are not just economic drags, they risk becoming political liabilities.' Odendaal highlights the risk to institutional stability: 'The legitimacy of the entire system is increasingly under pressure. If a third of your population can't find a job and more than half are on grants, what kind of social contract is that?' He adds: 'We risk ending up with a situation where unemployment isn't just a growth or budget issue anymore – it starts undermining trust in public institutions.' Treasury points to youth employment schemes, such as the Presidential Employment Stimulus and SETA-linked training. But uptake is low, and outcomes are poorly tracked, with the subsequent risk being these programmes becoming little more than a political goodwill gesture. Education and the fragile foundation The OECD report dedicates an entire chapter to education. South Africa performs below comparable middle-income countries in foundational literacy and numeracy. Grade 4 reading levels are among the lowest globally, as shown in the PIRLS (Progress in International Reading Literacy Study). Without basic education reform, the OECD warns, 'skills shortages will persist, and inequality will deepen.' Fixing the early learning pipeline is no longer optional. What climate transition? The carbon tax rate is R236 per tonne, but exemptions currently shield around 95% of emissions, including Eskom, which remains exempt until 2026. The OECD argues this undermines pricing signals and fiscal potential. Sarupen says allowances will be phased down: 'From 2026, exemptions will narrow. We're preparing the industry for a just transition.' Odendaal is less sanguine: 'The real political heat comes when those exemptions fall away.' The OECD warns that without enforcement, the carbon tax becomes symbolic. With enforcement, it becomes politically explosive. Monetary policy highlighting credibility The OECD recommends tightening the SARB's inflation band from 3-6% to 3-5%, and eventually to 2-4%. Roodt supports the move: 'The Reserve Bank already sees 3% as the midpoint. It's the right signal.' The global trend is toward narrower bands: Brazil and India target 4%; the US Fed anchors at 2%. South Africa's wide range weakens predictability. Disinflation and declining oil prices have opened a window, but anchoring expectations requires follow-through and communication. Broken municipalities Only 15% of municipalities received clean audits, according to the 2023/24 Auditor-General report. Treasury's municipal formula is under review, and Section 139 interventions have risen, but with limited impact. Odendaal is blunt: 'Local government isn't just failing – it's actively deterring investment.' The OECD agrees: municipal dysfunction is a top-tier risk to housing, infrastructure and basic services. SOEs face parallel crises. Eskom and Transnet's bailouts continue, but performance lags. The OECD calls for hard budget constraints, better board vetting and enforced turnaround all datasets – from the OECD survey to bank confidence trackers and global macro outlooks – the signals are converging. South Africa's structural constraints are no longer abstract policy concerns. They are now active barriers to private investment, job creation and political in the private sector, hope is cautious. Mojapelo notes that while sentiment indicators remain weak, 'credible movement on energy, logistics and fiscal clarity could shift the dial – but the window is narrowing.' It's reform or relapse This is not a technical debate, but an economically existential one. The OECD warns that without implementation credibility, South Africa risks falling into a low-growth trap that becomes ever more permanent.'Growth must be inclusive, climate-aligned and reform-led,' Sarupen said.
The Citizen
3 days ago
- The Citizen
Political events happening in June expected to affect South African SMEs
'The fuel levy increases will compound existing cost pressures for SMEs, particularly those in logistics, manufacturing, and retail sectors that rely heavily on transportation.' June will provide some relief for Small and medium enterprises (SMEs) following the South African Reserve Bank's (SARB) Monetary Policy Committee's (MPC) decision to cut interest rates by 25 basis points. Another relief is that inflation is largely stable, and the exchange rate is trending favourably, giving the MPC some room for monetary easing. The economy needs every bit of help it can get, and this cut will no doubt be reflected in business confidence. Miguel da Silva, group executive for business banking at TymeBank noted how upcoming events will impact South Africa's position in a rapidly evolving global landscape and the effect of this reconfiguration on SMEs. ALSO READ: Reserve Bank cuts repo rate thanks to lower inflation, stronger rand Budget treads tricky course without cutting expenditure 'The national budget outlined a programme of continued expenditure propped up by less contentious funding mechanisms than previously tabled,' said Da Silva. After much debate, the Value Added Tax (VAT) rate will remain at 15%, providing certainty for SME pricing and cash flow planning following the proposed increase's withdrawal. To make up the shortfall, the general fuel levy has increased by 16 cents per litre for petrol and by 15 cents per litre for diesel. 'The fuel levy increases will compound existing cost pressures for SMEs, particularly those in logistics, manufacturing, and retail sectors that rely heavily on transportation.' With many small businesses already operating on razor-thin margins, this 16-cent increase represents an additional burden that will likely be passed on to consumers, potentially dampening demand in an already constrained market. ALSO READ: GDP grew marginally in first quarter – agriculture helped keep economy afloat First quarter GDP figures 'The Minister also revised his predictions for our economic growth to 1.4% in 2025, down from 1.9%. With the official unemployment rate now at 32.9%, the disconnect between our economic ambitions and the harsh reality that only 16.8 million South Africans are in active employment highlights the urgent need for policy innovation,' he added. Da Silva said what seems clear is that under these constrained market conditions, there is no way for established businesses to incorporate the millions of South Africans seeking employment. There is far greater potential for entrepreneurs to create new jobs, and a focus on small business support and development must be prioritised. 'SME funding will remain an important area of discussion and entrepreneurs; funders and public-sector representatives will meet to discuss the state of small business funding in South Africa at the SME SA Funding Summit 2025 on 12 June – but even more important is the creation of an environment which is conducive to entrepreneurship: less red tape and dependable infrastructure.' ALSO READ: Tariffs and Agoa: How Parks Tau summarised US-SA trade talks Agoa forum in DRC The relationship between SA and the US remains fraught, but at least there is dialogue. 'Apart from the Presidential meeting in the Oval Office, trade, industry and competition minister Parks Tau and agriculture minister John Steenhuisen have submitted a new trade framework to US trade representative Jamieson Greer. 'There are key areas where US investment might help us unlock value at home, and which might appeal to the deal-centric nature of the US administration. Developing a domestic source of natural gas would bolster SA's regional competitiveness and energy security, and we remain a key source of scarce minerals,' he added. The annual conference on the African Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa) between trade ministers of Agoa-eligible countries and the US is scheduled to take place in the Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC) in June. This will be an important indicator of what the US will do when Agoa expires in September 2025, though it seems unlikely at this stage that SA's Agoa benefits will be extended. While the overall impact of losing Agoa would not be immense for SA, some sectors – particularly the automotive and agricultural sectors – would be significantly affected. Both sectors have extensive value chains, and SME suppliers are rapidly adjusting their operations. 'The potential loss of Agoa benefits creates particular uncertainty for SME suppliers in the automotive value chain, many of whom have built their business models around preferential access to US markets. 'These companies now face the complex challenge of either finding alternative markets or restructuring their operations to remain competitive under standard trade terms.' ALSO READ: Analysts say Trump's bid to weaken Brics will fail as US influence declines Brics summit in Brazil Da Silva added that the Brics Summit, scheduled to take place in Brazil in early July, will again put SA in the US crosshairs, as provocative issues (such as an alternative to the dollar as the world's reserve currency) will be raised and debated by Brics countries. 'The timing could not be more delicate. For SMEs, particularly those in export-oriented sectors, this diplomatic tightrope walk translates into very real business planning challenges. 'Where do allegiances lie in a rapidly shifting global order? This geopolitical balancing act requires SMEs to develop strategies that can withstand diplomatic volatility while capitalising on emerging opportunities within both Western and Brics markets.' NOW READ: Political uncertainties that will impact SMEs in the coming months
