Trump's bid to dismantle multilateralism diminishes US influence
Image: GCIS
Reneva Fourie
Despite his recent assurances to President Cyril Ramaphosa that he would attend the G20 Leaders' Summit later in the year, President Donald Trump's reliability is questionable. Since beginning his second term in office, Trump has distanced himself from international cooperation and multilateral institutions.
His approach to global engagement appears transactional, unpredictable, and driven more by personal instincts than long-term strategy or shared responsibility.
This trend has become increasingly evident during South Africa's presidency of the G20. The United States, while formally set to assume the G20 presidency next, has demonstrated a lack of meaningful participation in the lead-up to the Summit. Key officials have been absent from critical meetings. Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent missed high-level sessions.
Reports have surfaced that Trump instructed his administration to scale back involvement in the G20 altogether. The US also did not participate in the recent G20 Agricultural Chief Scientists meeting despite assurances to support President Ramaphosa having been given in the Heads of State bilateral. These developments raise serious concerns about the US's commitment to global cooperation.
The G20 is one of the few spaces where developed and developing countries can collaborate to address global economic and financial challenges. Its member states account for around 85 per cent of global GDP, more than 75 per cent of international trade, and two-thirds of the world's population.
However, it does not have a permanent secretariat. The success of the G20 depends on the ability of current, previous, and incoming hosts to work together, building continuity through what is known as the troika system. With South Africa preparing to hand over the presidency to the US, cooperation has become even more important. Unfortunately, the US is not fulfilling its required role.
Trump's reluctance to engage with multilateral forums is part of a broader pattern. Earlier this year, he issued an executive order requiring a full review of US participation in international organisations. This review is already having several adverse consequences. Future funding for UNWRA, the World Health Organisation and UNESCO is uncertain.
The United Nations is currently planning significant budget cuts of between 15 and 20 per cent as part of its UN80 Reform Initiative. Although Secretary-General, António Guterres, insists that the US does not directly cause these cuts, the reality is that it has not paid its dues in full. At a time when global coordination is essential, the reduction in funding and staff weakens one of the world's most important platforms for cooperation.
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Advertisement
Video Player is loading.
Play Video
Play
Unmute
Current Time
0:00
/
Duration
-:-
Loaded :
0%
Stream Type LIVE
Seek to live, currently behind live
LIVE
Remaining Time
-
0:00
This is a modal window.
Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window.
Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan
Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque
Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps
Reset
restore all settings to the default values Done
Close Modal Dialog
End of dialog window.
Next
Stay
Close ✕
The financial priorities outlined in Trump's 2026 budget proposal reflect a similar retreat. It includes only 9.6 billion dollars in new international spending, which represents a reduction of more than 80 per cent when expected rescissions are taken into account.
The administration also plans to cut 15 billion dollars from renewable energy and carbon capture programmes and 4.5 billion dollars from conservation efforts. These proposals send a clear message. The US, under Trump, is turning inward, cutting itself off from collective solutions to the challenges that affect all countries.
This approach is especially damaging to global trade. Trump's abuse of tariffs, often without consulting allies or respecting World Trade Organisation processes, has undermined the very foundations of the international trade system. By acting unilaterally and ignoring established norms, the US weakens the credibility of institutions that seek to facilitate fair and predictable global commerce.
Despite these actions, work continues. Non-state US actors continue to engage in the technical and policy-related activities of various G20 working groups. Under its G20 presidency, South Africa has advanced a forward-looking agenda focused on inclusive growth, climate resilience, food security, and digital innovation.
These priorities reflect the urgent needs of the Global South and speak to a broader shift in global leadership. China, India, Brazil, and others are stepping up, demonstrating that cooperation can move forward even when one of the largest economies chooses to disengage.
Trump's absence may grab headlines, but it will not stop progress. The G20 was not designed to revolve around one country. It works best when all members contribute but does not collapse when one refuses to participate as another country can always replace the US for next year's presidency.
Important initiatives are already moving ahead without the active involvement of the US. Should Trump ultimately decide not to attend the Leaders' Summit, the impact on the Summit itself will likely be minimal. The real cost will be to the US, which risks losing influence, credibility, and the ability to shape global decisions.
The longer-term consequences of this approach could be even more significant. When the US withdraws from global leadership, it creates a vacuum that others are more than willing to fill. The G20 will proceed, consensus will be reached, and international initiatives will move forward.
By not being at the table, the US risks being left behind, losing further influence, missing opportunities, and a diminished role in shaping global policies. In an interconnected world, isolationism is not a sign of strength but shortsightedness.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
40 minutes ago
- IOL News
Calls for Accountability in South Africa's Leadership
The recent controversy surrounding Deputy President Paul Mashatile's failure to declare a diamond gift from a dubious businessman, coupled with Ramaphosa's refusal to demand accountability, exemplifies a leadership void marked by impunity. Image: GCIS The continued erosion of ethical governance under President Cyril Ramaphosa's leadership is a betrayal of the democratic values South Africans fought to uphold. Research from a 2013 study on South African local government (ResearchGate) underscores a persistent pattern of ethical lapses among public officials, a crisis that has only deepened under Ramaphosa's watch. The recent controversy surrounding Deputy President Paul Mashatile's failure to declare a diamond gift from a dubious businessman, coupled with Ramaphosa's refusal to demand accountability, exemplifies a leadership void marked by impunity. Even declarations made in Parliament seem weak and ineffective at holding people accountable, except for just being a mere 'slap on the wrist.' This echoes the unresolved Phala Phala scandal, where millions in hidden cash exposed a troubling lack of transparency. Video Player is loading. Play Video Play Unmute Current Time 0:00 / Duration -:- Loaded : 0% Stream Type LIVE Seek to live, currently behind live LIVE Remaining Time - 0:00 This is a modal window. Beginning of dialog window. Escape will cancel and close the window. Text Color White Black Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Background Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Opaque Semi-Transparent Transparent Window Color Black White Red Green Blue Yellow Magenta Cyan Transparency Transparent Semi-Transparent Opaque Font Size 50% 75% 100% 125% 150% 175% 200% 300% 400% Text Edge Style None Raised Depressed Uniform Dropshadow Font Family Proportional Sans-Serif Monospace Sans-Serif Proportional Serif Monospace Serif Casual Script Small Caps Reset restore all settings to the default values Done Close Modal Dialog End of dialog window. Advertisement Next Stay Close ✕ Ad loading Cabinet ministers from Ramaphosa's ANC are repeatedly singled out for corruption allegations, yet the President shirks his constitutional duty to enforce integrity. Ramaphosa himself has said, 'I can't answer for him, and he has answers for all his matters… let's wait for that,' deferring responsibility to the Deputy President. This is not leadership that upholds a no-nonsense stance over allegations of inappropriate behaviours. He must demand accountability from his Deputy President and ministers without fear or favour, ensuring a clean and ethical government. Instead, Ramaphosa's silence and deflection foster a culture of unaccountability that undermines public trust, a trend criticised since the post-apartheid era. We condemn this failure unequivocally. South Africans deserve a government that reflects the highest standards of integrity, not one mired in scandal and evasion. President Ramaphosa must act decisively, hold his executive to account, and restore the moral authority of his office. Anything less is an affront to the nation's democratic aspirations. Teboho Loate COPE Acting Deputy President
The Citizen
3 hours ago
- The Citizen
'It's just gone', Trumps tariffs cost SA company R750m overnight
The blow risks the livelihoods of the company's 500 employees and around 3 000 people working in its local supply chain. South African companies are already starting to face the impact of the US President Donald Trump's tariffs, with one losing R750 million in contracts overnight. Trump ordered the reimposition of 30% tariffs on dozens of trading partners, including South Africa, on Thursday – his cornerstone strategy for reshaping global trade to benefit the US economy. The rand fell to its lowest level in three months, while thousands of jobs are in danger. The US president has warned of slapping an additional 10% on the Brics nations and any other economy aligned with the grouping. Millions lost Jendamark Automation, based in Gqeberha, Eastern Cape, is among several businesses that export high-level manufactured goods and agricultural products like ostrich leather and raisins to America, whose products have become 30% more expensive overnight. Managing director Siegfried Lokotsch told City Press that the impact has been swift and severe. The 500 employees at Jendamark Automation build automated assembly lines and develop production software for automotive manufacturers Ford, BMW, Volkswagen and Mercedes-Benz. According to Lokotsch, he had to inform the company's board that contracts worth R750 million, which they were on the verge of signing in the next few months, had evaporated. 'It's just gone.' ALSO READ: Trump's 30% tariffs on SA a 'barrier to trade and shared prosperity', Presidency says [VIDEO] Job losses Lokotsch said the blow risks the livelihoods of the company's 500 employees and around 3 000 people working in its local supply chain. The Nelson Mandela Bay Business Chamber, representing about 700 businesses in the region, is concerned about the scale of the threat. 'Big blow' Denise van Huyssteen, chief executive officer of the Nelson Mandela Bay Business Chamber. said the imposition of the 30% tariffs by the United States on South Africa on 7 August is a big blow for local businesses, especially in the automotive and agricultural sectors. 'The Eastern Cape economy is likely to be the most adversely affected in the country by these developments. This is not just an issue which affects companies that do trade with the US, it is a global issue. 'The global trading system has been upended, and relationships between long-standing trading partners will shift as countries move to protect their own interests and domestic economies. Multinationals will also adjust their manufacturing footprints to assemble in those markets where they can do so the most efficiently and competitively,' Van Huyssteen said. Concerns Van Huyssteen said they are deeply concerned about the impact of these developments may have on our automotive industry which is anchored by the Original Equipment Manufacturers (OEMs) which undertake completely-knocked down assembly in South Africa. 'These OEMs are responsible for creating well over a 100 000 jobs at their own operations and within their components supplier networks. 'Furthermore, it is estimated that the knock-on employment impact of these OEMs and components manufacturers results in over 500 000 formal jobs being created across the entire automotive supply chain. Around 40% of automotive employment in the country is located in the Eastern Cape,' She said. Van Huyssteen said it is essential that the government moves to strengthen trade relations with existing key markets such as Europe and Southeast Asia. 'This must be directed at retaining and growing mutually beneficial trade opportunities.' 'Negotiate' Last week, President Cyril Ramaphosa told journalists that South Africa would use the week-long delay in implementing 30% tariffs to 'negotiate as strongly and as hard as we can' to avoid the penalty and save jobs. South Africa offered to import liquefied natural gas and some US agricultural products, the trade ministry said last week, It said South African firms have also committed to investing in US mining and metals-recycling industries and to pursuing joint investment in critical minerals, pharmaceuticals and agri-machinery. ALSO READ: Ramokgopa dismisses claims US tariffs target BEE policy but admits it needs 'tweaking'
Daily Maverick
3 hours ago
- Daily Maverick
Southern African Liberation Movements Summit tries to revive its members' declining fortunes
The annual summit of the six southern African liberation movements reveals why they haven't evolved. The 2025 Liberation Movements Summit provided insights into why the six southern African movements governing or co-governing their countries have struggled to evolve into normal, democratic political parties. From 25 to 28 July, leaders gathered in Johannesburg for solidarity, introspection and mutual learning under the theme 'Defending the Liberation Gains, Advancing Integrated Socio-Economic Development, Strengthening Solidarity for a Better Africa'. The six movements are South Africa's ANC, the Zimbabwe African National Union-Patriotic Front (Zanu-PF), Tanzania's Chama Cha Mapinduzi (CCM), the Mozambique Liberation Front (Frelimo), the People's Movement for the Liberation of Angola (MPLA), and Namibia's South West Africa People's Organisation (Swapo). The summit's announcement by the host party, the ANC, said: 'This critical gathering reaffirms the ideological foundations of the six southern African liberation movements… and their historical role in securing independence, dignity and development across the region. It also seeks to reassert the relevance of these movements in a rapidly shifting global order.' The movements defeated colonial rule and apartheid and 'implemented landmark policies on land reform, education, housing, infrastructure and social protection', it said. 'However, these gains now face erosion due to renewed imperial pressures, economic crises and attempts at neocolonial interference. The [summit] provides a united platform to confront these threats and consolidate progressive regional responses.' Renewal is a good thing. But is this club the right vehicle for renewal and transformation? So the downturns of the six parties in government were entirely attributed to external forces, with no mention of internal causes. However, during the conference itself, some leaders did acknowledge internal ills. ANC secretary-general Fikile Mbalula said the movements' strategic imperatives now included defending the gains of liberation, which were 'under threat from internal erosion and external manipulation and interference', and confronting the reassertion of imperialism and geopolitical subversion. South African President Cyril Ramaphosa elaborated, saying the liberation movements had to 'contend with declining electoral support, shifting demographics, frustrated young people in our various countries, economic inequality and foreign interference'. He acknowledged a 'disconnect between our founding narratives and the lived realities of a new generation of young people' and admitted that 'many of the threats we face are internal', including corruption, patronage and the competition for public positions and resources. As a remedy, Ramaphosa said: 'We must institutionalise mechanisms for mutual accountability amongst our movements. We must find and hold each other to higher standards.' Namibian President Netumbo Nandi-Ndaitwah echoed that sentiment, saying 'we must hold each other accountable as sister parties' to fight corruption. As far as one could tell, none of the other parties echoed such introspection. Renewal is a good thing. But is this club the right vehicle for renewal and transformation? Lack of democracy, for example, cannot be blamed on outsiders. Only two of the six countries governed by these parties, South Africa and Namibia, can be considered truly democratic. Tanzania's CCM-led regime has imprisoned leading opposition leader, Tundu Lissu, on spurious grounds. Under Frelimo, Mozambique violently suppressed opposition at last year's election and last week charged the main opposition presidential candidate, Venâncio Mondlane, with 'incitement to terrorism' for leading protests against those presidential polls. In general, most of these liberation movements' refusal to allow full democracy is the main reason they have not evolved into real political parties. In Zimbabwe, Zanu-PF has systematically suppressed and dismantled any opposition since independence in 1980. Angola's ruling MPLA has also systematically stifled any opposition. Largely because of such manoeuvres, those four liberation movements have remained in power since independence or liberation. Under strong regional pressure, Zanu-PF briefly admitted the opposition Movement for Democratic Change into a coalition government from 2009 to 2013. But it conceded no real power and, in 2013, won another dubious election outright. It has ruled solo since then. Even in South Africa – one of the movement's two genuine democracies – the ANC fell to under 40% of the vote in national elections in 2024 and had to form a government of national unity with the liberal DA as its main partner. In general, most of these liberation movements' refusal to allow full democracy is the main reason they have not evolved into real political parties. For some of the six, the liberation ideology this summit was designed to revive appears to include an attempt to maintain state control over as much of the economy as possible. That has been one of the main causes of economic failure, as public infrastructure such as railways and ports crumbles. For the six movements themselves, there may indeed have been benefits from the summit, not least in picking up tips on how to stay in power despite the odds, and assurances of mutual political support. But for the populations of the six countries, it is hard to see much benefit. It seems unlikely that Ramaphosa's proposed peer review mechanism will see the light of day. And if it does, even less chance it will hold any of the movements accountable – especially for suppressing political opposition. It would appear that the democratic deficit wasn't even mentioned at the summit. Rather ironically, Ramaphosa observed: 'History demands that we don't allow our legacies to be buried under the rubble of revolutionary nostalgia.' Indeed, that is a real danger. And it was revealing that this was billed as a summit of liberation movements – not 'former' liberation movements, as they have described themselves up to now. That change may suggest that these movements, facing growing opposition to their rules, need to assert their continued relevance. The liberation struggle deserves an honourable place in Africa's history. In the present, we need to move on. The struggle – for democracy, prosperity and equality – should indeed continue, but not through this vehicle. Its members mostly can't offer each other good examples of how to achieve that. Zimbabwean President Emmerson Mnangagwa told the summit: 'We have a sacred duty and responsibility to retain power for the purpose of advancing the people's agenda. We should never allow ourselves to lose power.' That captured what appears to be the real purpose of this club – collaborating to stay in power. DM
