UK police detain 7 Iranians in 2 separate counterterrorism operations
This article was originally published by Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty and is reprinted with permission.
British police have arrested eight men — including seven Iranian nationals — in two apparently unrelated counterterrorism operations, officers said on May 4, and authorities are attempting to determine if there are 'any further risks' to the public.
'These were two major operations that reflect some of the biggest counter-state threat and counterterrorism operations that we have seen in recent years,' Interior Secretary Yvette Cooper told reporters on May 4.
Specific details remained scarce regarding to two actions.
London's Metropolitan Police said five men, including four Iranians, were arrested on May 3 over a suspected plot to target a specific, undisclosed site. Authorities said they were still attempting to determine the nationality of the fifth suspect.
Separately, three Iranian nationals aged between 39 and 55 were arrested in London in a second operation that was not related to the first matter, the Metropolitan Police said.
The Iranian Embassy in London did not immediately comment on the arrests.
In the first incident, the men, aged 29 to 40, were detained in West London and in Swindon, Stockport, Rochdale, and Manchester, police said.
'The investigation relates to a suspected plot to target a specific premises. Officers have been in contact with the affected site to make them aware and provide relevant advice and support, but for operational reasons, we are not able to provide further information at this time,' a police statement said.
Commander Dominic Murphy, chief of London police's Counter Terrorism Command, said, 'We are exploring various lines of enquiry to…identify whether there may be any further risk to the public linked to this matter.'
Authorities said the suspects are undergoing questioning and have not yet been formally charged.
In the second case, the three Iranian nationals were detained under the National Security Act, authorities said, without disclosing further details.
Searches were ongoing at their addresses, the police statement read.
The arrests come at a time of intensified tensions over suspected Tehran-supported activities in Britain.
Last year, Ken McCallum, the head of Britain's domestic spy service, said that since 2022, authorities had responded to 20 Iran-linked plots that potentially posed lethal threats to the public.
At the time, McCallum said hostile states, radicalized individuals, and the revitalized Islamic State (IS) terror group have combined to create 'the most complex and interconnected threat environment we've ever seen.'
In March 2024, Pouria Zeraati, a presenter at a Persian-language media organization in London critical of the Iranian government, was stabbed in the leg outside his home in London.
Two men were later arrested in Romania and charged over the attack on Zeraati, a TV host for the Iran International news network.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Indianapolis Star
40 minutes ago
- Indianapolis Star
Trump is failing at everything. We must hope he succeeds against Iran.
The Trump administration is failing. DOGE's budget-cutting efforts appear to have cost taxpayers more than they saved, the expulsion rate of illegal immigrants trails Biden-era rates and we are in a trade war that will force an embarrassing national retreat – but only after damaging our economy. Internationally, we have more fractured alliances today than at any time in the last century. Friend and foe alike are puzzled by Trump's behavior, as well as his unqualified cabinet picks at the Department of Defense and Department of National Intelligence. None of this is lost on Americans, placing Trump as the lowest-polling president in modern history. One need not be a cynic to suppose that Trump could view victory against Iran as a welcome distraction from his domestic struggles. Yet even those of us who question Trump's competence should recognize that his administration now confronts a genuine national security challenge that transcends partisan politics. As Trump weighs military strikes against Iran's uranium enrichment sites, Americans who oppose him can still hope he succeeds in neutralizing a decades-long threat. The case against Iran's regime stands on its own merits, independent of one's view of Trump's presidency. Iran has been exporting terror for more than 45 years. Its government has funded terrorists and state actors against the U.S., Israel and most other Middle Eastern countries. Iran imprisoned our embassy staff, killed marine peacekeepers, and captured sailors. It has cost the lives of thousands of Americans, tens of thousands of Iranians, and hundreds of thousands of other people across the Middle East. Destroying the Iranian government, its nuclear capacity and its ability to make war and export terror would make the world an objectively better place. Even a large majority of Iranians favor a different government. The challenge lies in the execution. The U.S. has been planning war with Iran since the late 1970s. Much of our force structure since the 1980s was in response to Iranian aggression. Indeed, the success of Desert Storm was partly a consequence of the training and preparation we undertook to fight Iran, not Iraq. The U.S. and Israel can, with relative speed, stop the Iranian economy, close its ports and end its oil exports. We can destroy its government agencies, scatter surviving leadership, destroy its air force and navy, cut off its armed forces from key supplies and destroy most arms stockpiles. We can attrit its air defenses, target its ballistic missile sites and generally render it unable to defend itself. The destruction of Iran would give democratically minded leaders across the Middle East time and space to expand their influence and power. We should increase foreign aid to these nations, especially through USAID, but Elon Musk has gutted that capacity at a time when it might be more important than ever. Conflict with Iran will be costly. We will lose men and women in that fight, and should expect for some of the worst images of war to appear before the American people. We will lose air crews, see our bases in the Middle East targeted, our ships fired upon and attacks to occur on American targets wherever Iran has pre-positioned terrorists. In a war with Iran, Americans should expect to be attacked at home. This is why Trump's leadership deficiencies are so concerning. His poor policy judgment, incoherent planning, sloppy crisis management and poorly staffed war cabinet represent exactly the wrong combination for such a complex undertaking. No American president has been less prepared to sell the case for war, build necessary coalitions or execute the careful strategy such an operation demands. If Americans are to spend hundreds of billions of dollars and send the flower of their youth into harm's way, Trump owes us a clear explanation of costs, benefits, and realistic war aims. We cannot expect air power alone to achieve "regime change" or "unconditional surrender" — hope is not a plan. If ground forces may be necessary, he must say so. Trump must prepare Americans for casualties at home and abroad, distinguish between the Iranian people and their government, and build bipartisan congressional support. His failure to maintain international alliances means Israel stands as our only partner — a diplomatic catastrophe that makes success far more difficult. Nothing in Trump's personal or public history suggests he can provide this kind of thoughtful leadership. The stakes demand we hope he proves us wrong. If he rises to the occasion, Americans should support him. If he cannot, he will likely fail, at enormous cost to the world.
New York Times
an hour ago
- New York Times
An Islamic Republic With Its Back Against the Wall
Beneath Israel's bombs lies an unpopular and repressive Iranian regime that has spent billions of dollars on a nuclear program and on projecting the Islamic Revolution through armed regional proxies, while presiding over a domestic economic disaster and stifling paralysis. An 86-year-old autocrat, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, rules this restive nation, as he has for 36 years, in his role as guardian of the revolution, a conservative calling at which he has proved adept. The supreme leader is no gambler. But his system, remote from a youthful and aspirational society, looks sclerotic to many, and he is now up against the wall. Over six days of fighting, Israel has struck the Natanz enrichment facility where a majority of Iran's nuclear fuel is produced, killed at least eleven of the regime's top generals and several nuclear scientists, bombed oil-and-energy facilities, taken complete control of Iranian air space, and sent tens of thousands of people into flight from Tehran. At least 224 people had been killed across Iran as of Sunday, a majority of them civilians, a spokesman for Iran's ministry of health said. But the figure was sure to have grown as Israel's bombardment continued in the days since. Iranian missiles have killed at least 24 Israelis. 'The Islamic Republic is a rotten tooth waiting to be plucked, like the Soviet Union in its latter years,' said Karim Sadjadpour, an Iran expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Washington. 'Khamenei is in the most difficult situation he has ever faced.' The ayatollah has faced threats to his rule before, though, and come out with his supremacy intact. In 2009, when millions of people took to the streets of Tehran to protest what was seen as a stolen presidential election, I watched as state-licensed thugs repeatedly beat brave women demanding dignity and freedom. For a few days, the future of the regime stood on a knife-edge. But with utter ruthlessness it prevailed. Many demonstrators were dragged off to be tortured, sodomized, and in the case of several hundred of them, killed. Want all of The Times? Subscribe.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Trump Wraps Situation Room Meeting as Iran Plan Remains Mystery
(Bloomberg) -- President Donald Trump concluded a meeting Wednesday with top advisers as he weighed whether to plunge the US into the ongoing war between Israel and Iran, but the White House offered few clues about whether he had decided to join the offensive aimed at destroying Tehran's nuclear program. Security Concerns Hit Some of the World's 'Most Livable Cities' JFK AirTrain Cuts Fares 50% This Summer to Lure Riders Off Roads Taser-Maker Axon Triggers a NIMBY Backlash in its Hometown How E-Scooters Conquered (Most of) Europe NYC Congestion Toll Cuts Manhattan Gridlock by 25%, RPA Reports Before the meeting, Trump told reporters he had not yet made a final decision but again chastened Iranian leaders for being 'late' to negotiate with him while reiterating his determination not to let the country obtain a nuclear weapon. Trump earlier in the week approved a military attack plan targeting Iran but withheld the final authorization as he weighed whether Tehran would meet his demands, the Wall Street Journal reported. 'I have ideas as to what to do,' the president told reporters in the Oval Office. 'I like to make the final decision one second before it's due because things change, especially with war.' Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said in a social media post that his country remained 'committed to diplomacy' and had never sought and would never seek nuclear weapons. But that may not be enough to deter Trump against an attack, even after the US president for weeks said he preferred a diplomatic solution. The position the US has conveyed privately to allies has generally matched Trump's public rhetoric, threatening to join strikes if Iran does not surrender, according to two officials from Western governments. Potential action could come within the next 24 hours, even as soon as Wednesday evening, the officials said on condition of anonymity. Asked earlier in the day if he was moving closer to bombing Iran, Trump said 'I may do it. I may not do it.' Trump claimed Iranian officials had offered to travel to Washington to engage in nuclear talks, though questioned whether they would be able to make the trip. He said Iran was 'a few weeks away' from having a nuclear weapon, a timeline that is more definitive than some US intelligence agencies' findings. 'They should have made that deal,' Trump said of Iran's leaders. 'In the end, they decided not to do it. And now they wish they did it.' Iran had been in negotiations with the US over its nuclear program for weeks, and had a further meeting scheduled, when Israel attacked Friday. The two Mideast nations have since traded missile strikes and escalating rhetoric — Israeli leaders threatening to topple the Islamic Republic, and their Iranian counterparts vowing defiance and retaliation — while the Trump administration weighs how deeply to get involved in its ally's war. Trump's ambiguous comments add a new layer of tension to the deepening Israel-Iran clash. The president, who has campaigned for a decade in opposition to American wars in the Middle East, also faces a tense divide among his supporters over whether the US should enter the fray. America has so far limited its participation to helping Israel defend itself against Iranian missile and drone launches. Trump said he encouraged Benjamin Netanyahu in a call Tuesday to 'keep going' with his offensive operations, adding that he gave the Israeli premier no indication that US forces would participate in the attacks. But the US is seen as being able to provide military firepower necessary to destroy Iran's underground enrichment facility at Fordow, which analysts say Israel is unable to do alone. Iran has warned it can hit American bases across the region, where tens of thousands of troops are stationed, if the US joins the Israeli attack. Since Israel's strikes started, Iran has fired 400 ballistic missiles and hundreds of drones at Israel, killing 24 people and injuring more than 800, according to the Israeli government. At least 224 Iranians have been killed by Israel's attacks. Israeli jets hit more than 20 military targets in Tehran in the past few hours, including nuclear and missile production sites, Israel's military said in a statement Wednesday. Internet access in Iran appeared to be crippled on Wednesday and into early Thursday, as the government said it was enforcing 'temporary' restrictions in response to attacks targeting the country's digital infrastructure. Authorities didn't disclose specifics on the scope of the restrictions, but many Iranians appeared to be cut off from major social media platforms for hours starting Wednesday evening. Iran has hit targets in Israel including a key oil refinery in the port of Haifa that was forced to shut down. 'The Americans should know that the Iranian nation is not one to surrender,' Iran's Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei said in a statement published on his official website Wednesday. 'Any military incursion by the United States will undoubtedly result in irreparable damage.' Out of Patience 'Good luck,' Trump said when asked for his response. 'We cannot let Iran get a nuclear weapon. I've been saying it for a long time. I mean it more now than I ever mentioned.' Dennis Ross, who served as President Bill Clinton's Middle East envoy and just returned from a trip to the region, said the Iranian regime is likely looking for an off-ramp from the current conflict despite the bellicose comments from Khamenei. Its top priority is survival, followed by avoiding a direct conflict with the US, said Ross, who's now a fellow at the Washington Institute for Near East Policy. 'When they feel profoundly threatened, they will make concessions. They certainly feel vulnerable and threatened right now.' Iran's missile and drone launches against Israel appeared to be subsiding Wednesday evening, although the reason wasn't immediately clear. While the Israeli army earlier said it had destroyed around one-third of Iran's missile launchers, Tehran still possesses thousands of ballistic missiles that can reach Israel, National Security Adviser Tzachi Hanegbi said Monday. US Ambassador to Israel Mike Huckabee announced Wednesday that the embassy is organizing evacuations of Americans in Israel who want to leave. Embassy personnel have already begun to depart the country, a spokesperson said. The announcements came a day after the US embassy in Jerusalem said it would be closed Wednesday through Friday. Trump said the Iranian government had contacted the US about the conflict and even proposed a White House meeting to settle the matter, yet he said his patience with the Islamic Republic had 'already run out.' Iran's mission to the United Nations denied that claim in an X post Wednesday, saying 'No Iranian official has ever asked to grovel at the gates of the White House.' The question of whether to strike Iran has the potential to cause domestic political headaches for Trump, whose base is split between isolationists and traditional conservative interventionists. Supporters of both political parties oppose the US joining Israel's attack on Iran by clear majorities, a YouGov survey found. Trump said his bottom line remains that 'Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon' and 'it's not a question of anything else.' During his first term, Trump withdrew from an agreement aimed at curtailing Iran's atomic program, which the US and other world powers had spent years negotiating. Republican hawks have been supportive of military action against Iran, but Trump has faced pressure from some of his isolationist supporters to take a more measured approach. 'We have all been very vocal for days now urging, 'Let's be America First. Let's stay out,' Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene said Tuesday on CNN. During a breakfast Wednesday hosted by the Christian Science Monitor, longtime Trump ally Steve Bannon said Trump's supporters want him to focus on issues most important to his base, like cracking down on immigration. But Bannon said that if the president has more information that backs the case for intervention 'and makes that case to the American people, the MAGA movement will support President Trump.' Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, appearing before the Senate Armed Services Committee on Wednesday, declined to answer directly whether Trump had asked the Pentagon to provide options for striking Iran. Hegseth said that 'maximum force protection at all times is being maintained' for US troops stationed in the region, and said that 'the president has options and is informed of what those options might be, and what the ramifications of those options might be.' The US has continued building its military presence in the region. The USS Ford carrier strike group is set to depart next week on a regularly scheduled deployment, initially in the European theater, according to a US official. Meanwhile, the head of the International Atomic Energy Agency said the location of Iran's near-bomb-grade stockpile of enriched uranium cannot currently be verified. IAEA Director General Rafael Mariano Grossi said Wednesday the whereabouts of the material are now unclear, given Tehran warned him the stockpile could be moved in the event of an Israeli attack. The agency continues to see no indication of significant damage to Iran's Fordow nuclear site, he added. Foreign ministers from the UK, France and Germany are planning to hold nuclear talks with their Iranian counterpart on Friday in Geneva, according to a person familiar with the matter. Reuters reported earlier on the meeting. --With assistance from Alex Wickham, Alberto Nardelli, Donato Paolo Mancini, Arsalan Shahla, Skylar Woodhouse, Akayla Gardner, Courtney McBride and Eric Martin. (A previous version of this story was corrected to fix the spelling of Wall Street Journal.) Ken Griffin on Trump, Harvard and Why Novice Investors Won't Beat the Pros Is Mark Cuban the Loudmouth Billionaire that Democrats Need for 2028? The US Has More Copper Than China But No Way to Refine All of It How a Tiny Middleman Could Access Two-Factor Login Codes From Tech Giants Can 'MAMUWT' Be to Musk What 'TACO' Is to Trump? ©2025 Bloomberg L.P. Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
