Taking A Look At Thai Beverage Public Company Limited's (SGX:Y92) ROE
One of the best investments we can make is in our own knowledge and skill set. With that in mind, this article will work through how we can use Return On Equity (ROE) to better understand a business. To keep the lesson grounded in practicality, we'll use ROE to better understand Thai Beverage Public Company Limited (SGX:Y92).
Return on equity or ROE is a key measure used to assess how efficiently a company's management is utilizing the company's capital. Put another way, it reveals the company's success at turning shareholder investments into profits.
Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit.
The formula for ROE is:
Return on Equity = Net Profit (from continuing operations) ÷ Shareholders' Equity
So, based on the above formula, the ROE for Thai Beverage is:
13% = ฿31b ÷ ฿229b (Based on the trailing twelve months to September 2024).
The 'return' is the yearly profit. That means that for every SGD1 worth of shareholders' equity, the company generated SGD0.13 in profit.
See our latest analysis for Thai Beverage
By comparing a company's ROE with its industry average, we can get a quick measure of how good it is. The limitation of this approach is that some companies are quite different from others, even within the same industry classification. You can see in the graphic below that Thai Beverage has an ROE that is fairly close to the average for the Beverage industry (12%).
That isn't amazing, but it is respectable. Even if the ROE is respectable when compared to the industry, its worth checking if the firm's ROE is being aided by high debt levels. If a company takes on too much debt, it is at higher risk of defaulting on interest payments. Our risks dashboardshould have the 2 risks we have identified for Thai Beverage.
Virtually all companies need money to invest in the business, to grow profits. That cash can come from issuing shares, retained earnings, or debt. In the case of the first and second options, the ROE will reflect this use of cash, for growth. In the latter case, the use of debt will improve the returns, but will not change the equity. That will make the ROE look better than if no debt was used.
Thai Beverage does use a high amount of debt to increase returns. It has a debt to equity ratio of 1.02. There's no doubt its ROE is decent, but the very high debt the company carries is not too exciting to see. Debt increases risk and reduces options for the company in the future, so you generally want to see some good returns from using it.
Return on equity is useful for comparing the quality of different businesses. In our books, the highest quality companies have high return on equity, despite low debt. If two companies have the same ROE, then I would generally prefer the one with less debt.
Having said that, while ROE is a useful indicator of business quality, you'll have to look at a whole range of factors to determine the right price to buy a stock. The rate at which profits are likely to grow, relative to the expectations of profit growth reflected in the current price, must be considered, too. So I think it may be worth checking this free report on analyst forecasts for the company.
If you would prefer check out another company -- one with potentially superior financials -- then do not miss this free list of interesting companies, that have HIGH return on equity and low debt.
Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) simplywallst.com.This article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
E&E News
7 minutes ago
- E&E News
What's next for DOGE after the wild Trump-Musk breakup?
The very public internet feud between President Donald Trump and Elon Musk this week has thrown the fate of Musk's 'Department of Government Efficiency' operation into question. A clash over the Trump-backed spending bill devolved Thursday, with Musk suggesting Trump ought to be impeached and the president suggesting halting government contracts for Musk's companies. Trump downplayed the significance of the pair's blowup Thursday evening, and Republicans appeared eager to ease tensions after their dispute dominated headlines. But their bitter public brawl has raised a host of questions about how the Trump-Musk relationship will change moving forward. Advertisement Some federal employees are hopeful that DOGE will lose power within the administration after its early push to slash funding and fire employees. The fracas also raises questions about whether Musk's allies who remain in the DOGE operation will stick around, or might leave — or be nudged out — sooner than they had planned. 'The girls are fighting, and I'm here for it,' said one Energy Department career official who was granted anonymity to speak candidly. 'This could bode well for shaking things loose at DOE,' that person said. 'Right now, there is an ironclad hold on all funding activities, and that freeze is mostly at the request of DOGE.' Asked Friday about DOGE's fate in the wake of the Trump-Musk fight, White House spokesperson Taylor Rogers said in an email, 'The Trump administration will continue the mission of cutting waste, fraud, and abuse across all agencies to ensure the federal government is effectively using taxpayer dollars.' Rogers added that the passage of 'The One, Big, Beautiful Bill' and the rescissions package the White House sent to Congress are 'essential to further codifying the DOGE cuts.' EPA and the Energy and Interior departments did not respond to requests for comment about whether DOGE's stature within the administration and inside federal agencies will change in the wake of the fight. 'We were hopeful for this failure of relationships,' said an Interior Department employee who was granted anonymity because they fear retaliation. 'There is still a feeling that DOGE is heavily influencing things here,' due in part 'to contracts and agreements being scrutinized,' that person said. The public spat between Trump and Musk could give agency heads like Energy Secretary Chris Wright more leeway to make decisions independently, said a former Energy Department career staffer who was granted anonymity because they fear retribution. Musk being on the outs could also possibly make new hires and normal funding flow a little more likely, said that former staffer, who added that it's unclear whether the gutting of agency staffing and funding was due to Musk's efforts in particular. Tom Pyle, president of the conservative think tank Institute for Energy Research, said it's 'too early to tell' what the feud means for DOGE over the long term. Musk formally left his DOGE post last week, when Trump hosted a farewell event with the Tesla CEO in the Oval Office. Musk said last Friday that his exit was not the 'end of DOGE, but really the beginning.' When Trump created DOGE, he required agencies to establish their own DOGE teams. Many of the officials deployed early on by the administration have ties to Musk's companies, including SpaceX, X and xAI. Trump praised the DOGE team's work last week and said that many DOGE people would be 'staying behind' after Musk's departure. Musk contended at the time that he was leaving because his time as a temporary special government employee had come to an end, but Trump disputed that claim in one of his disparaging posts Thursday on Truth Social. 'Elon was 'wearing thin,' I asked him to leave, I took away his EV Mandate that forced everyone to buy Electric Cars that nobody else wanted (that he knew for months I was going to do!), and he just went CRAZY!' Trump posted. It remains to be seen whether DOGE was 'just a pet project that Donald Trump created for Elon Musk,' said Joel Payne, a Democratic strategist. The answer will become clear pretty quickly, Payne said. 'I think it's probably a pretty good bet that at a minimum it is not the high-profile effort that it was.' But even if there's a public effort to declare a truce, Payne said, 'I doubt the relationship between their collective worlds will ever be OK.' Despite the rift, Republicans and some agency employees aren't expecting an immediate or dramatic shift in DOGE's work at agencies. 'The DOGE folks that have been planted in these agencies have some pretty firm backing from the White House, and I don't think this changes that dynamic,' Pyle said. 'I think that they're still empowered to do their work, at least for now.' Sean Spicer, who served as White House press secretary during Trump's first term, said DOGE 'is much bigger than a group of staff. It has been a mentality that is now part of every department and agency.' Trump's energy and environmental Cabinet bosses — Wright, Interior Secretary Doug Burgum and EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin — were all together in Alaska this week to discuss energy issues and stayed out of the fray on social media. They have all previously praised Musk and the DOGE team's work. Nicole Cantello, president of an American Federation of Government Employees union local that represents employees in EPA's Chicago-based region, doesn't expect big changes in store for DOGE. 'We believe the spat between Trump and Musk will have no effect on the plan to dismantle the EPA,' Cantello said Friday. 'This administration has shown time and again that it is determined to put polluters first, over the health of the American people.'
The Hill
9 minutes ago
- The Hill
5 winners from the Trump-Musk breakup
The vicious blow-up between President Trump and Elon Musk has shaken up the power dynamics in Washington, D.C. As Musk burns his bridges to the White House and MAGA world, several of his political and business rivals stand to benefit. And while Musk's enemies may relish his ouster, some of Trump's biggest rivals could also gain from the president's feud with the world's richest man. Here are the people, businesses and factions that could win from Musk's loss. Musk's alienation from Trump gives Jeff Bezos a major opportunity to improve his tumultuous relationship with the president and fuel the growth of Blue Origin, his aerospace company. Even before Musk's alignment with Trump, he and Bezos butted heads for years as the billionaires dueled each other for dominance over the private sector space race. At the same time, Bezos was fending off Trump's attacks on the Washington Post and facing off with the administration in court. Musk's SpaceX had already cemented itself as the industry leader before joining forces with Trump, far outpacing Blue Origin in total launches while also servicing the International Space Station. But Musk's growing ties to Trump threatened to deepen SpaceX's connection to the government and siphon billions of dollars in federal contracts away from Blue Origin. With Musk out of Trump's good graces, Bezos now has an opening to build on months of work to curry the president's favor. Ahead of the 2024 election, Bezos spiked the Post's pending endorsement of former Vice President Harris, a move critics derided as self-interested. In an op-ed for the Post, Bezos said that his decision was made based on editorial principle alone, but acknowledged how his business empire has become a 'complexifier' for the paper. Amazon was also one of several major tech companies to donate $1 million to Trump's inauguration, and inked a documentary deal with Melania Trump reportedly worth $40 million. Musk's exit is another win for Boeing after months of progress moving forward from a series of scandals and safety lapses. As Boeing faced federal investigations into its safety protocols for commercial aircraft, it also suffered an embarrassing setback in its spacecraft efforts during the Biden administration. Astronauts Butch Willmore and Suni Williams spent months stuck on the ISS after taking off from Earth on Boeing's Starliner in June 2024. What was supposed to be a week-long mission turned into a nine-month ordeal in which several Starliner maintenance issues delayed their return to Earth. Former President Biden rejected Musk's offer to bring Wilmore and Williams home with the SpaceX Dragon, but the administration refused amid its own feud with the tech CEO. The Biden administration held an electric vehicle summit earlier in his term, but snubbed Musk, sending the Tesla CEO on his path toward endorsing Trump. Wilmore and Williams finally returned to Earth in March after Trump dispatched the Dragon to bring them back. Musk threatened Thursday to ground the Dragon amid Trump's threats to scrap SpaceX's federal contracts, which would have debilitated the U.S. space program. While Musk has since pulled back from that threat, his feud with Trump gives Boeing an opening to move forward from the Starliner mishap. Before this week, Musk's most notable falling out with an ally may have been his feud with OpenAI CEO Sam Altman. Musk, one of the co-founders of the nonprofit artificial intelligence (AI) firm behind ChatGPT, has battled Altman in the courts and on the Internet over his leadership. He had consistently criticized Altman for plans to make OpenAI a for-profit business — plans that have since been scrapped — and sued the company for an alleged breach of its commitments. Musk has also launched xAI, one of several rivals to OpenAI, and incorporated the Grok chatbot into X, the social media platform formerly known as Twitter. Trump, however, ignored Musk's disdain for Altman and made OpenAI a major player in Project Stargate, his effort to build out AI data and energy centers. Musk was forced to abide Trump's partnership with Altman, and the president dismissed his adviser's beef with OpenAI when touting the benefits of the deal. 'No it doesn't. He hates one of the people in the deal,' Trump said in January when asked if Musk's criticism bothered him. 'I've spoken to Elon. I've spoken to all of them, actually. The people in the deal are very, very smart people,' Trump continued. 'But Elon, one of the people in the deal he happens to hate, but I have certain hatreds of people too.' With Altman's arch rival out of the White House, the path is clear for an even bigger role in Trump's efforts to boost AI. While Musk shared Trump's support for stricter border security, he spent his stint with the president at odds with some of the Trump's closest advisers and major MAGA movement leaders. Even before Trump took office, a war over H-1B visas erupted between Musk and several Trump allies, who are fiercely opposed to courting immigrants and back Trump's severe immigration restrictions. Musk squared off with former Trump strategist Steve Bannon and right-wing activist Laura Loomer over the H-1B program. 'I will go to war on this issue the likes of which you cannot possibly comprehend,' Musk, reportedly a former H-1B recipient, wrote in one of several posts on the social platform X defending the visas. While the tech CEO said H-1Bs were essential for U.S. competitiveness, Bannon and Loomer accused Musk of supporting a 'scam' that would undermine Trump's America First platform. Musk has also butted heads with Stephen Miller, a top Trump White House policy advisor and the architect of much of the president's immigration restriction agenda. In recent days, Miller has been front and center in defending Trump's tax cut and spending bill, the measure behind the rupture between Musk and Trump. 'The reconciliation bill cuts taxes, seals the border and reforms welfare. It is not a spending bill. There is no 'pork.' It is the campaign agenda codified,' Miller said on X Thursday, a clear swipe at Musk, if not by name. Bannon has gone even further, urging Trump to seize control of SpaceX and deport Musk, a native of South Africa, citing allegations his legal status in the country had lapsed. Democrats have had a miserable start to 2025, but the Musk-Trump feud is undoubtedly good news for the time being. The messy online battle between Trump and Musk gave Democrats some relief from months of ineffectual attempts to impede the president's agenda, recriminations over the 2024 election, divisions about their future and a lack of clear leadership, resulting in historic unpopularity. 'Oh, man, the girls are fighting, aren't they?' Rep. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez (D-N.Y.) quipped Thursday. 'We'll see what the impacts are of it legislatively.' Trump, eager to quash a distraction from his legislative push, sought Friday to ice the feud with Musk and move forward. But one first-term Trump White House aide said Musk's alienation could lead to further fractures in the GOP, which could give Democrats some room to breathe after a brutal six-month stretch. 'We think we've seen some real legislative gridlock—but with new life and momentum breathed into the Freedom Caucus' power, I don't think we've seen anything yet,' the former White House aide said. 'At a time when Republicans need to be united more than ever, the most dangerous faction I've seen could be accelerating quickly—and congressional leadership may soon find they have less control than ever.' Democrats were already banking on Musk being an electoral liability in next year's midterm elections, though were wary of drawing his money into the race. If Musk follows through on threats to punish Republicans who voted for Trump's bill, the divided field could boost Democrats even further. 'He's already suggested Republicans wouldn't have kept the House without his help, and while he previously downplayed any plans to get politically involved, that's harder to believe as the rhetoric between him and Trump heats up,' the former White House aide said. 'The midterms are a prime opportunity to back up that claim—and in swing districts where a couple million dollars can tip the scales, his involvement could be a game-changer.' Alex Gangitano contributed
Vox
11 minutes ago
- Vox
Elon Musk and Donald Trump's fallout, explained
President Donald Trump and Elon Musk have quickly turned on each other in a very public and bitter feud. Their split isn't just personal, but has major implications for the rest of the country, with Musk now strongly opposing Trump's 'big, beautiful bill.' It is the centerpiece of Trump's legislative agenda, which includes tax cuts, Medicaid reductions, and increased border spending. The proposal would also significantly raise the national debt. Musk took aim at the bill as 'massive, outrageous, pork-filled…a disgusting abomination' that would 'massively increase' the budget deficit. 'Shame on those who voted for it: you know you did wrong. You know it.' In response, Trump threatened Musk's federal contracts. Then Musk threatened to start a new political party and accused Trump of covering up 'the Epstein files.'
