Mercedes-Benz drops attempt to repossess car of Deion Sanders' son Shilo
Mercedes-Benz drops attempt to repossess car of Deion Sanders' son Shilo
Mercedes-Benz has backed down from its attempt to repossess the car of Colorado football safety Shilo Sanders.
The company's financial services arm filed a document in court Monday saying it has withdrawn its motion for relief from the bankruptcy court where Sanders is trying to free himself of more than $11 million in debt.
It didn't say why, but Shilo's father and coch, Deion Sanders, said Friday that Shilo had fulfilled his financial obligations while acknowledging there was a 'disruption in the payments process.' The company could have decided to drop it if he recently paid what he owed.
The issue came to a head last week when Mercedes-Benz Financial Services filed documents in court that accused Shilo of defaulting on his monthly payments for his $135,000 car. It said he was $6,877 past due and wanted the court's permission to repossess the car that he agreed to buy in May 2023.
Bankruptcy case remains pending
Shilo Sanders, 25, filed for Chapter 7 bankruptcy about five months later, in October 2023, which triggered an automatic stay or hold on debt collection against him by his creditors. Mercedes-Benz asked the court for relief from this stay on April 1 so it could get the car back. Even after filing for bankruptcy, Sanders had continued to make payments on it in 2024 but stopped doing so from December to January, according to the company's court filing.
'Debtor (Sanders) indicated an intent to retain the motor vehicle and reaffirm the obligation,' the company said in its motion filed April 1.
By withdrawing its request, the company ends a brief sideshow in a larger bankruptcy case that remains pending and in dispute.
Debt stems from disputed incident in 2015
Almost all of Shilo's debt is owed to a security guard at his former school in Dallas, John Darjean, who is fighting to collect all that he is owed.
It stems from an incident in 2015, when Darjean said Shilo severely injured him when he tried to confiscate Shilo's phone at school. Shilo has said it was in self-defense. But Darjean sued Shilo and both of his parents for damages. Then after both parents were dropped from the case by early 2019, Shilo was the sole remaining defendant when he went off to college at South Carolina that year.
About a year later, in 2020, Shilo dropped his attorneys in the case because he was 'unwilling or unable to continue funding' his defense, according to his attorneys then.
Then when the case finally went to trial in 2022, he didn't show up for it. The judge heard evidence in the case without him there and issued a $11.89 million default judgment against Shilo, all owed to Darjean.
By filing for bankruptcy, his goal is to have the debt discharged so he can get a 'fresh start in life, free from the oppressive burden of his debts,' as his attorney wrote.
If Shilo succeeds, he will emerge with relatively little financial damage. But if the debt is not discharged by the court, Darjean could pursue debt collection against him in the future.
Shilo recently has been preparing for the NFL draft and on Friday ran the 40-yard dash in 4.52 seconds – a good time for a safety prospect. He was Colorado's leading tackler in 2023 and third-leading tackler in 2024 despite missing three games with a broken forearm.
Follow reporter Brent Schrotenboer @Schrotenboer. Email: bschrotenb@usatoday.com
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Unlikely Heroes Former Anti-Trafficking CEO Files Federal Motion to Stop "Hostile Takeover" of Victim Charity by Billionaire-Linked Foundation
LOS ANGELES, June 9, 2025 /PRNewswire/ -- In a federal court filing that is raising concerns among nonprofit and survivor advocacy experts, Erica Greve, founder and former CEO of Unlikely Heroes, has filed an emergency motion to halt the proposed sale of estate assets—including confidential survivor records, donor files, and the organization's name, likeness, and mission—to a private foundation connected to a billionaire whose previous lawsuit allegedly resulted in the nonprofit's bankruptcy petition. The motion alleges that Human Investment Foundation (HIF), a Texas-based foundation founded by philanthropist Janet Jensen, former Unlikely Heroes donor and member of Women Moving Millions, is now poised to acquire the very nonprofit it spent years litigating against. HIF has no record of trauma-informed services, yet seeks to take over the nonprofit's identity and gain access to private records of children who experienced severe trauma and received services through Unlikely Heroes' programs. "These are not just documents," said Greve. "They are the medical, psychological, educational, and legal records of children who endured significant trauma. You don't sell that. You protect it with everything you have." Now, HIF could cause the unredacted files of those girls, including their asylum records, safe house addresses, photos and therapy documentation, to be transferred without consent, redaction, or oversight. "This is not just a nonprofit being sold," Greve said. "It risks undermining the trust placed in us by survivors. The very foundation whose lawsuit led to our closure is now trying to wear our name, use our channels, and access our children's deepest traumas while presenting itself as a philanthropic initiative." The motion further alleges that Trustee Sandra McBeth, who is overseeing the Chapter 7 liquidation, failed to provide legally required notice to the California Attorney General's Charitable Trusts Section, in violation of Government Code § 12598 and federal fiduciary obligations. Greve contends this has enabled a rushed and opaque foundation sale to an entity with alleged competing interests and no demonstrated qualifications to handle survivor care. In a further breach, the motion states that formal legal objections submitted by Hon. F. Whitten Peters, former U.S. Secretary of the Air Force and legal counsel for five survivors, were never filed with the Court by the Trustee or her Counsel, prompting concerns about proper court procedure and oversight of due process and legal ethics. Granting the motion would authorize HIF to operate under the Unlikely Heroes brand, initiate direct engagement with survivors, and potentially collect confidential information from trafficking victims under a false nonprofit identity. "This isn't about me," Greve said. "This is about the safety, dignity, and identities of survivors. These children trusted us with their stories, and I will not stand by while that trust is auctioned off." Greve requests that the Court stay the sale, appoint an independent examiner, and refer the matter to the California Attorney General for investigation. She also seeks a court-supervised accounting of donor-restricted funds, which may have been deposited after the nonprofit filed for bankruptcy, in potential violation of standard post-petition procedures. To date, Greve has personally incurred over $500,000 in legal fees defending the nonprofit, its survivors, and the principle that a child's trauma should never be treated as a transferable asset. "This case draws a hard line between protecting survivors and permitting the exploitation of their pain. No court should allow a child's story to be treated as commodities within an organizational transaction." About Unlikely HeroesFounded in 2011, Unlikely Heroes is a nonprofit organization dedicated to rescuing and restoring child survivors of sex trafficking. The organization has provided long-term housing, trauma-informed therapy, education, and medical care to more than 400 children across the United States, Mexico, the Philippines, Thailand and Nigeria. Among those served were five Nigerian girls who escaped the 2014 Boko Haram kidnapping in Chibok, Nigeria – an event that sparked the global #BringBackOurGirls movement. These survivors were brought to safety in the United States under the legal guardianship of Unlikely Heroes' founder Erica Greve, with the full consent of their families and the U.S. government. View original content to download multimedia: SOURCE Unlikely Heroes Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Associated Press
3 hours ago
- Associated Press
South Carolina senator sues his own legislature over $18,000-a-year pay raise
COLUMBIA, S.C. (AP) — A state senator is suing his fellow lawmakers in the South Carolina General Assembly saying they are illegally giving themselves what is effectively an $18,000-a-year raise for all members. The increase in the 'in-district compensation' — money set aside for legislative duties that has few limits on how it can be spent — is set to go from $1,000 a month to $2,500 a month for all 46 senators and 124 House members starting July 1. But Republican Sen. Wes Climer's lawsuit said the raise violates the state constitution, which bans the legislature from increasing their per diem during their term. House members would get 18 months of the extra money and senators would get more than three years of payments before facing reelection. His lawsuit compared it to asking a judge to preside over his own trial or a police officer to investigate himself. The legal question will likely hinge on whether the extra money is considered part of a per diem for lawmakers and meant to pay their daily expenses or if it is personal income that is taxable. Lawyers for the House and Senate have not answered the lawsuit. The raise was proposed by Republican Sen. Shane Martin late in the budget process in a proviso, which is a one-year order on how to spend money. The monthly stipend hadn't changed in about 30 years, and Martin said the increase was needed to offset inflation. Climer said Monday he and other opponents of the increase think it should have passed as a stand-alone bill with hearings and a full debate. 'Regardless of how you feel about a legislative pay raise, this is the wrong way to do it. It violates the Madisonian principles that the legislature cannot take the people's money and appropriate it to themselves in real time,' Climer said. Hours after receiving word of the lawsuit, the state Supreme Court ordered both sides to submit briefs before the end of the month in what appears to be an effort to make some kind of decision before the raises start when the fiscal year begins July 1. Otherwise 'we'd have to try to claw back money from legislators. And we don't want that,' said former Democratic state Sen. Dick Harpootlian, an attorney who filed the lawsuit on Climer's behalf. Along with the in-district compensation, lawmakers also get a salary of $10,400 a year that has not changed since 1990. In addition, they get money for meals, mileage to drive to Columbia and hotel rooms while in session. Legislators are considered part-time because South Carolina's General Assembly meets three days a week from January to May. The House sent an email to its 124 members giving them a chance to refuse the extra in-district compensation, and 34 declined the money, House Clerk Charles Reid said in an email. Senators could ask their clerk directly not to pay them, and Climer and two other Republicans have refused the raise, Senate Clerk Jeffrey Gossett said. Joining Climer in the lawsuit is retired educator and Republican activist Carol Herring. She said the raise going into effect immediately is counterproductive to being a good servant. 'I am concerned we are sending people to Columbia to serve in the General Assembly, and somehow it is seen more as a job than part-time service to our state,' Herring said.
Yahoo
3 hours ago
- Yahoo
Need Quick Cash? Christine Benz's Top 5 Tips to Boost Your Emergency Fund
Morningstar Director of Personal Finance Christine Benz understands that emergencies happen, and you may need cash quickly, despite long-term plans to manage and grow your family's assets. She's come up with a valuable checklist of top tips to get that money when you need it most. Just keep in mind that, when the clouds pass, you'll need to double down on your financial discipline to rebuild the coffers you've just depleted. Don't wait for the unexpected. If possible, set aside emergency funds that include highly liquid investments like bank savings and money market accounts. Avoid assets that are held in tax shelters, like 401Ks and educational savings plans, because you'll probably incur penalties for early withdrawals on these instruments. However, some tax-sheltered investments come with provisions that allow withdrawals for emergencies. Don't Miss: Maker of the $60,000 foldable home has 3 factory buildings, 600+ houses built, and big plans to solve housing — Maximize saving for your retirement and cut down on taxes: . Next, Benz says to consider getting quick cash from taxable accounts that incur the smallest penalties for withdrawal. "Taxable accounts" are roughly defined as nonretirement and non-tax-sheltered instruments, like taxable bonds and bond funds, multi-asset funds, actively managed stock funds (including mutual funds) and high-dividend paying stocks and funds. Tax efficiency is the name of the game, ruling out many of the categories listed above. Instead, consider drawing capital from more efficient instruments like municipal bonds, I Bonds, Series EE Bonds, individual stocks, equity exchange-traded funds, equity index funds and master-limited partnerships. Stocks that don't pay dividends could be the best choice for folks needing quick cash because buying back shares at lower prices is often possible. Trending: Invest where it hurts — and help millions heal:. This popular strategy falls into two categories, Roth individual retirement and traditional 401(k) retirement accounts. Roth holders pay tax as they go so there is no penalty for withdrawing cash when needed. However, depleting those funds may impact your ability to retire with sufficient assets. Alternatively, 401(k) accounts offer two ways to get fast money before the age 59 ½ withdrawal threshold. Benz believes the best option when raising emergency cash from a retirement account may be to take a loan that needs to be paid back, incurring a tax bill and 10% penalty. A second option is to take a hardship withdrawal, which is a one-time, fixed amount of money to cover an "immediate and heavy financial need." You'll need to jump through administrative hoops to get approval for this cash influx, which counts as taxable income and also incurs a 10% life and universal variable life insurance build cash value that can be a lifesaver in an emergency. As a rule, you can withdraw money from these policies, and it will be deducted from cash value. You may also be able to borrow from cash value, instead of taking an outright withdrawal. Keep in mind you'll owe interest on the loan, which is set by the insurer. And no, "term life" insurance policies do not build cash value. Do you own a home? If so, Benz says to think about emergency cash from a home equity line of credit, if you've built at least 15% to 20% equity. Watch out if you don't have a good credit rating or are taking a large loan relative to equity size. Banks and loan companies can charge high interest rates on this type of debt or deny the line of credit altogether. Read Next: Here's what Americans think you need to be considered wealthy. Image: Shutterstock UNLOCKED: 5 NEW TRADES EVERY WEEK. Click now to get top trade ideas daily, plus unlimited access to cutting-edge tools and strategies to gain an edge in the markets. Get the latest stock analysis from Benzinga? APPLE (AAPL): Free Stock Analysis Report TESLA (TSLA): Free Stock Analysis Report This article Need Quick Cash? Christine Benz's Top 5 Tips to Boost Your Emergency Fund originally appeared on © 2025 Benzinga does not provide investment advice. All rights reserved. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
