Motion to suppress alcohol evidence in deadly Longmeadow crash allowed
SPRINGFIELD — Nearly three years after a car crash took the life of a Longmeadow teen, the young driver charged with motor vehicle homicide won a motion to squash evidence related to alleged alcohol consumption.
On May 7, 2022, a collision on Green Willow Drive killed Katarina 'Kat' Boskovic, 18, and nearly killed classmate Shea Hamel. A Longmeadow High School senior, Zachary Elfman, then 17, was charged with drunken driving, motor vehicle homicide and related counts.
Now nearing 21, Elfman has pleaded not guilty to the charges.
The case has dragged for years and Juvenile Court Judge David B. Paradis recently issued an evidentiary decision that may imperil the case, though Hampden District Attorney Anthony D. Gulluni recently insisted the prosecution will withstand the blow.
'We're extremely disappointed and dismayed by the judge's decision with which we vigorously disagree, and it is legally flawed,' Gulluni said during an interview this week.
Paradis hung his ruling on the fact that Elfman was a juvenile and not permitted to speak with his father on scene, in addition to running afoul of Miranda warning standards and insisting that Elfman perform field sobriety tests despite an injury to his leg.
'The officer's questioning flagrantly violated the juvenile's Miranda rights and the right to have an interested adult present in his questioning,' the ruling reads.
Defense attorney Shawn P. Allyn lauded the judge's decision.
'The judge's findings are completely accurate and grounded in the record, application of the law is completely on point.' Allyn said. 'The police, upon their arrival, trampled over Zachary Elfman's constitutional rights, rushed to judgment and made multiple crime scene errors.'
The allegations are that a group of teens had been drinking heavily at Elfman's home before the three got in the car and drove away — striking a tree at the base of the street.
Boskovik, Hamel and Elfman were teammates on the high school's cross-country track team.
The case has been contentious with Allyn attempting to bar Boskovic's father from the courtroom and Paradis excusing Elfman from every hearing after his arraignment.
The next hearing in court is scheduled for May 7 — the third anniversary of the crash.
'Of all the dates they could have picked, how tone deaf is that?' said the Boskovic family's civil attorney, Raipher D. Pellegrino.
He, along with Gulluni, was critical of how long the case has continued and the delay of 14 months for the judge to issue his ruling on the evidence.
'Justice delayed is justice denied,' Pellegrino said.
Gulluni's office swiftly filed an appeal, attacking the judge's rationale.
The appeal noted Elfman made puzzling remarks in the police cruiser including 'Can I get the diagnosis? Can I get the diagnosis? What's the plan?'
Pleadings in the case have included wrenching details including when Elfman was informed Boskovic, to whom he referred as his 'best friend,' was dead and Hamel, who he claimed he didn't know, 'wasn't far behind.'
Hamel survived grievous injuries after a long stint in the hospital.
Elfman sobbed at the scene and repeatedly asked responding officers for a hug, according to court records.
Gulluni also critiqued the delay in the judge's ruling.
'We're hopeful that justice will prevail for the Boskovic and Hamel families,' he said. 'The idea that this decision took 14 months is frankly unacceptable. These are good people who've been through a nightmare.'
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
34 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Man accused of shooting cousin at Les Davis Pier in Tacoma, charges say
A 33-year-old man is accused of shooting his cousin after a fistfight at Tacoma's Les Davis Pier on Sunday. Officers were dispatched at about 9:30 p.m. to the 3400 block of Ruston Way after multiple people called 911 to report the shooting. The alleged shooter was on scene, according to charging documents. A crowd had formed around the injured man, who was lying on the ground, prosecutors wrote. The man was initially in critical condition after he was taken to Tacoma General Hospital, but police were later informed his status was changed to non-life threatening. The alleged shooter was standing a few feet away, and he complied with the officer's demands to drop to his knees, prosecutors wrote. He had not been shot and, the handgun was allegedly in his fanny pack. After officers arrested the man and read his Miranda rights, he allegedly said, 'I feared for my life because he did come at me attacking me,' documents show. A witness told police that she was sitting in her vehicle when she saw two men 'striking and grappling' with one another. The victim began walking away and, when he faced his cousin, the alleged shooter took out a handgun and fired at his chest, documents show. The gunman allegedly shot the victim again at his right hip. The witness said she went to the victim and started providing medical aid. She said the man allegedly repeated that it was 'self-defense' and approached to help. The witness responded saying it was not self-defense, and said she yelled at him to get back, documents show. The parents of the 33-year-old alleged shooter told police that the men were cousins and roommates, prosecutors wrote. Officers later learned from the victim's girlfriend that the men had been arguing all morning because the gunman wanted to kick the victim out of the apartment, prosecutors wrote. The girlfriend and victim went to the park to relax when the alleged shooter found them and started arguing with his cousin. Documents show the alleged shooter grabbed the victim's clothes from the vehicle and threw them on the ground. The girlfriend was in the driver's seat of her car when she heard two shots. She allegedly saw the defendant with a gun and the victim on the ground, bleeding. Other witnesses also told police they saw the man with a gun after they heard gunshots, documents show. Prosecutors in Pierce County charged the man with first-degree assault, domestic violence. His arraignment was scheduled for Monday afternoon where bail will be set. The man does not have any previous criminal convictions, court records show.
Yahoo
4 days ago
- Yahoo
Motion hearing in Lily Peters murder case set for Monday
CHIPPEWA FALLS — When will the trial for Carson Peters-Berger take place, and where? Will the case be moved to a different county in the state, or will a jury be brought to Chippewa County? Those are the questions that will likely be resolved Monday at a motion hearing in the murder case. The hearing is expected to last the entire day. Peters-Berger, who turned 17 in March, is accused of killing and then sexually assaulting his 10-year-old cousin, Lily Peters, in April 2022. Peters-Berger is charged in Chippewa County Court as an adult with first-degree intentional homicide and two counts of sexual assault. He was 14 at the time. The motion hearing is set to begin at 8:15 a.m. Monday before Judge Steve Gibbs and could take the entire day. Because a trial is likely to go a week or more, and because all the witnesses and experts will need to clear their schedule, it is expected Gibbs will set a trial for some point in 2026. In May, Gibbs issued an order that precludes all media from live-streaming the proceedings, in any way, of all pretrial evidentiary hearings. Media also will be barred from recording any live testimony, and 'all media may not directly quote the testimony of the witnesses,' but may 'summarize the content of the testimony.' An offender will face contempt proceedings. A flurry of motions and letters have been filed with the court this week in advance of the hearing. Defense attorney Michael Cohen filed a motion to suppress Peters-Berger's interview with police, contending that Peters-Berger's 'statements were taken in violation of his Miranda rights, and the second claim being that the statements were involuntary.' Cohen contends that Peters-Berger believed he was not free to leave the interview. However, District Attorney Wade Newell countered that 'the only issue is whether the defendant was in custody,' and Newell contends that Peters-Berger was not formally arrested at the time of his questioning. 'No arrest-like restraints were placed on the defendant,' Newell wrote in a new court filing. 'He was not handcuffed; no weapons were drawn; the defendant was not frisked. He was simply shown the way to the interview room.' Newell added: 'The defendant was told that he was not being forced to be there, and could leave whenever he needed to. In fact, to make it clear to him, the investigator point blank told him that he was not under arrest.' Newell also stressed that all comments made by Peters-Berger to police were voluntary. Gibbs granted a request to seal the transcript of the interview recording with police and a flash drive that contains video of the interview. Cohen also has requested the trial be moved out of Chippewa County, citing news reports in the Leader-Telegram, WEAU and WQOW, among others. 'A jury in this matter will obviously be compromised, if kept within the county of Chippewa, of a significant portion of people that have friends, neighbors, co-workers, family members, etc., that have strong concerns and emotions and feelings and opinions about this case,' Cohen wrote. 'It is unfathomable and unrealistic to think that jurors can just set aside all of their own emotions, anxieties, concerns about being known within the public for being on the jury if the jury were to find in contrast to what public opinion thinks the verdict should be.' Newell also filed a new letter, arguing against a motion to have the trial moved to a different county. 'While the defense is correct that the defendant need not prove actual prejudice exists, vague allegations of improper and prejudicial publicity and inconclusive evidence thereof do not make a showing that the community was so infected with passion and prejudice as to make it likely that a fair trial could not be had,' Newell wrote. 'All we have at this point is speculation as to what effects the pretrial publicity or memorial activity will have on any potential jurors. The state still contends the best way to determine if the community has been so infected with passion and prejudice, is with a well-written jury questionnaire that will determine individual juror biases or prejudices. This will ensure that an impartial jury is impaneled.' Cohen countered with a new letter, saying he will be asking for a pretrial questionnaire, but that is 'separate and distinct' from any request for a change of venue. As the Leader-Telegram reported earlier this year, only two cases — both murders — have been moved out of Chippewa County in the past 25 years. Because of all the motions that will be discussed, Cohen has requested the hearing be split into two different days. Cohen had previously argued that the case should not be in adult court because Peters-Berger is a juvenile. However, Judge Gibbs ruled on Jan. 22, 2024, that the case would remain in adult court, rejecting the defense's petition to have it moved to a juvenile proceeding. The Court of Appeals later agreed with Gibbs. Gibbs has since unsealed the name of the suspect. Peters-Berger has been held in the Northwest Regional Juvenile Detention Center in Eau Claire on a $1 million cash bond since his arrest. Lily Peters was killed on April 24, 2022, in Chippewa Falls. Her body was discovered the next morning. When interviewed by investigators, Peters-Berger told police he punched Lily in the stomach, struck her on the head three times with a heavy stick, then strangled her until she was dead. He then had sex with her body. He went home and put his dirty clothes in the laundry, but later returned to the scene, dragged her body a few feet, and covered her body with leaves.
Yahoo
5 days ago
- Yahoo
Family of slain Gulfport teen sues Grindr
A family member of a Gulfport teen who police say was tortured, killed and dismembered by a man she met on Grindr is suing the owner of the platform, alleging that its features and lack of safeguards for minors contributed to the girl's death. The lawsuit, filed last month in federal court against Grindr LLC by a representative of Miranda Corsette's estate, alleges that the 35-year-old man who killed the teen was able to target her through Grindr's app due to its 'lax age verification and hyper-precise geolocation.' 'The trauma inflicted upon M.C. (Miranda) and the irreparable harm to her family are direct consequences of Grindr's reckless disregard for the safety of minor children who are routinely preyed upon by adult predators who use Grindr's platform and design as a trap,' the suit states. The plaintiff is identified in court filings by the initials D.W. and listed as an executor of Miranda's estate. Lorne Kaiser, a South Florida attorney for the plaintiff, declined in an interview to identify the plaintiff or the plaintiff's relationship to Miranda because he didn't have permission from his client to do so. Grindr LLC has not yet filed a response to the suit. The West Hollywood-based company's press office did not respond to two emails from the Tampa Bay Times seeking comment for this story. Launched in 2009, Grindr markets itself as the world's largest social networking apps for LGBTQ+ people, but it attracts a 'sexually diverse' userbase that include people looking to prey on minors, according to the lawsuit. The complaint includes many of the details that have come to light about the investigation that led to the arrest of Steven Gress, 35, and Michelle Brandes, 37, on first-degree murder and other charges. Authorities say that Miranda met Gress on Grindr on or about Feb. 14. Gress went to pick up the teen at or near the Gulfport home where she lived with her grandmother and brought her back to the apartment he shared with Brandes on 27th Avenue North in St. Petersburg. Gress told detectives that he was told she was 21 but later learned she was 16, according to an arrest affidavit. Gress took Miranda back to Gulfport and at some point she returned to the St. Petersburg apartment. Gress said he became convinced Miranda had stolen his ring and, for the better part of a week, 'lumped her up,' the affidavit states. It ended Feb. 23. A witness said Brandes wrapped the girl's head in plastic. Gress told her not to cover her nose, but Brandes did, the witness said. Miranda suffocated. Gress described Brandes shoving a billiard ball into Miranda's throat and covering her face in plastic wrap. He said he couldn't get to her quickly enough to poke holes in the plastic so she could breathe, according to the affidavit. After Miranda died, they drove to Brandes' mother's house in Largo, where Gress used a chainsaw to dismember Miranda's body, according to police. They put the remains in trash bags and the next day left them in a dumpster in Ruskin. Police learned the contents of the dumpster likely went to the county's incinerator. Police said there is no evidence Miranda took the ring, and Brandes later claimed to have found it in Gress's car. Gress and Brandes have pleaded not guilty to murder and kidnapping charges. Prosecutors will seek the death penalty if they are convicted. 'Long before February 14, 2025, it was clear to Grindr that it was only a matter of time before its app, as Grindr marketed it and designed it, would cause the torture, rape, and murder of a child,' the lawsuit states. The complaint says that the app requires only a self-reported birthdate to confirm users are at least 18, with no cross-checking against official documentation or third-party verification at sign-up. Miranda's death 'exposes the platform's gross negligence in relying on a farcical self-reported age verification system,' the suit states. 'This performative gesture, as absurd as a bar or strip club asking teenagers to state their age without checking ID, allowed a minor to access an adult-oriented platform with foreseeable catastrophic consequences.' The company could institute measures such as government-issued identification verification or facial age estimation system but has not done so, according to the complaint. 'The company had the means to keep minors off its platform, but it withheld them to preserve easy onboarding and avoid disrupting user growth, even when the cost is the safety of children,' the suit states. The app's geolocation services 'deliver hyper-precise, real-time geolocation tracking — accurate to within a few feet — designed to facilitate immediate sexual encounters,' the suit states. 'As such, Grindr arranges user profiles based on their distance from other users for instant and spontaneous sexual hookups creating a uniquely hazardous environment for minors.' The lawsuit, which notes that Miranda had a son, alleges nine counts including wrongful death, negligence, infliction of emotional distress, participating in a sex trafficking venture and deceptive and unfair trade practices. It seeks a jury trial and compensatory and punitive damages. The complaint also asks the court to order Grindr to implement more robust age verification measures and to cease what the lawsuit alleges are misleading claims about the app's safety. Kaiser said the lawsuit is meant to hold Grindr accountable for its role in Miranda's death just as prosecutors are holding Gress and Brandes accountable through the criminal justice process. 'Without Grindr, we believe that Miranda would have never met this Steven Gress character, and she'd still be alive,' Kaiser said. 'This was a completely foreseeable event. Grinder has been warned for years and years about children and minors getting on this platform, and it's obviously a dangerous platform for children.'
