Dawood Ibrahim was madly in love with this Dev Anand's heroine, killed the producer, she is now living as..., not Mandakini, name is...
During the golden era of cinema, Bollywood had more drama than on-screen scripts. At that time, the industry was operating under the shadows of underworld figures. One such name who dominated headlines and secret lines was none other than Dawood Ibrahim. His influence and power over Bollywood were huge. From financing films, making casting choices, directing film releases, to even the interpersonal lives of actors and actresses, Dawood Ibrahim had a huge impact. Among the many lives that were affected by Dawood's influence, one life that had a huge impact was that of Pakistani actress Anita Ayub. Who was Anita Ayub?
Anita Ayub was born in Karachi, Pakistan. Before venturing into acting, Anita completed her master's degree in English Literature. Later, she moved to India to pursue her passion and joined the Roshan Taneja Acting School in Mumbai. She started her showbiz career with modelling and was discovered by legendary actor-filmmaker Dev Anand in a magazine ad. Mesmerized by her striking beauty and strong presence, Dev Anand cast her in his film Pyar Ka Tarana (1993). Even though the film couldn't make a mark initially at the box office, it gradually got its due appreciation. Later, she also appeared in a superhit film, Gangster, which further raised her to fame. Why was Anita Ayub Blacklisted From The Industry?
However, her budding career saw a dip as soon as the rumors of her relationship with underworld don Dawood Ibrahim started doing the rounds. She was frequently seen with Dawood Ibrahim, which sparked a media frenzy. As per reports, Dawood's relationship with Anita was the reason for her eclipsing career. It was also believed that the producer Javed Siddiqui, who had reportedly refused to cast Anita in a film, was shot dead; many people believed that the culprit behind this was none other than Dawood Ibrahim. Although Anita was never charged for this, this controversy left a mark on her name.
Later, some reports also suspected that Anita was Dawood's spy. Even though the information was never officially confirmed, this allegation and suspicion led to Anita's blacklisting from the industry. Many people in the far turned down offers to her, and she was slowly sidelined from the world of entertainment. Eventually, Anita went back to Pakistan and later tied the knot with Indian businessman Saumil Patel. The duo also had a son, Shezar, but unfortunately, their marriage couldn't sustain itself for long, and they ended up getting divorced. After their separation, she married Pakistani businessman Subak Majeed and eventually settled in New York.
Anita Ayub, who was once known as Bollywood's big thing, faded out faster than a fleeting dream.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
42 minutes ago
- NDTV
Joe Root's Blunt Take On Overtaking Sachin Tendulkar In Highest Test Run-Scorer's List: "Not..."
Born in December 1990, more than a year after Sachin Tendulkar made his iconic Test debut in Karachi, England's Joe Root grew up doing what most cricket-loving kids of his generation did - trying to copy the Little Master. More than three decades on, Root now finds himself second only to Tendulkar in the list of all-time Test run-getters as he reflected on the Indian maestro's legacy his own journey as a youngster inspired by the Indian icon. "He's one of the greats the game has seen, hasn't he? I mean, all the things that he managed to achieve with the pressures that he had to shoulder and burden were incredible,' Root said during a conversation with Harsha Bhogle on Sony Liv. The Yorkshireman surpassed Ricky Ponting 's tally of 13,378 runs on Friday, day three of the fourth Test against India, and now sits at 13,409 runs from 157 Tests -- behind only Tendulkar's towering 15,921. Root made his Test debut in the 2012 Nagpur Test, a series that marked the twilight of Tendulkar's career. Recalling the surreal moment, Root said: "There's someone, again, that you watched play as a young kid and you wanted to copy and emulate and then to get the opportunity to play against him as well. "I mean, he made his Test debut before I was born and then you find yourself playing in a Test match against him. It was an incredible experience to go to India. The whole crowd cheers because Sachin's coming into bat. It was bizarre to witness but just shows the greatness of the man and the legend that he is.' Asked about chasing Tendulkar's record, Root told BBC Test Match Special: "It's not something that I will focus on. Those sort of things should look after themselves." In the all time most Test run-scores' list, Root has since gone on to eclipse the likes of Ricky Ponting, Rahul Dravid and Jacques Kallis too. 'Ricky's someone that I grew up admiring, watching, trying to emulate, copy in the garden and at my local club — trying to play the pull shot that he's obviously world famous for. "So even just to be spoken about in the same sentence as those guys, the people that you grew up wanting to emulate and pretending to be is pretty cool," added Root. Much of his success in recent years, Root credits to honest self-reflection during the pandemic and some crucial advice from former England skipper Nasser Hussain. 'I actually spoke to Nass quite a bit,' Root told Sky Sports. "I said, 'can I get some footage?' and just look at modes of dismissal and if there were any trends and seeing the different ways I was getting out at different points in my innings. "One thing I've done within that period is actually try and look at the game slightly differently. "For that start of my career, a lot of it was based on my technique: where my hands are, where my head is, am I lined up, is my trigger right? "Whereas in this second phase of things, it's been more about managing risk and thinking how can I eliminate as many modes of dismissal as possible with the highest output?"
Deccan Herald
an hour ago
- Deccan Herald
Those things should look after themselves: Fan boy Root on chasing Tendulkar's Test record
More than three decades on, Root now finds himself second only to Tendulkar in the list of all-time Test run-getters as he reflected on the Indian maestro's legacy his own journey as a youngster inspired by the Indian icon.
Hindustan Times
an hour ago
- Hindustan Times
The world was his stage, and he played many parts
Ratan Thiyam, the legendary Indian playwright and theatre director who passed away earlier this week, was more than just a master craftsman of the stage; he was a profound philosopher who consistently challenged the prevailing notions of modernity in theatre and, by extension, in human existence. Born in Imphal, Manipur, in 1948, Thiyam emerged from a region steeped in rich martial, ritualistic, and storytelling traditions. His journey, from studying at the National School of Drama in Delhi to returning to his roots to establish the Chorus Repertory Theatre in 1976, was a deliberate act of questioning the western-centric theatrical paradigms that often dominated the discourse of 'modern' theatre. This stance places him among a global cohort of visionary theatre makers, including Japan's Yukio Ninagawa, Nigeria's Wole Soyinka, and his own great Indian contemporaries, Neelam Mansingh Chaudhuri and Heisnam Kanhailal, who similarly interrogated modernity by drawing deeply from their indigenous cultural wellsprings. I had the great opportunity to see many of his productions over the years, and much like many other theatre makers of my generation, his work was always the gold standard for how far the limits of one's art could be pushed and how interrogatively beautiful one's questions to oneself and one's society could be. Thiyam's critique of modernity was not a rejection of progress outright, but rather a nuanced interrogation of its often-unseen costs: The erosion of cultural identity, the spiritual vacuum created by material pursuits, and the disconnect from nature and ancestral wisdom. He believed that true modernity lay not in blind imitation of western forms, but in a deep engagement with one's cultural heritage, allowing it to inform and enrich contemporary expression. This philosophy became the cornerstone of the Theatre of Roots movement, of which he was a leading figure, echoing the cultural rootedness globally seen in Soyinka's commitment to Yoruba traditions or Ninagawa's embrace of Kabuki and Noh. It is not a coincidence that at a time when India had been a free country for three decades and the world wars had been three decades past, committed artists such as Thiyam, around the world, were the frontrunners in questioning both the form and content that shaped the lives of humanity. In that sense, Thiyam was a global luminary not merely because of how widely his theatre was seen but more importantly for how significantly he was part of a worldwide movement of interrogating the question of modernity, led by the brightest minds in the theatre and arts. For our own contemporary practice, there is often a misunderstanding that the contemporary is synonymous with the modern; Thiyam is a guiding light who illuminates radical and modern ideas through classics, often revealing the orthodoxies of many modern telling. His theatrical language was a direct manifestation of this tension between modernity and tradition, deeply intertwined with a distinctive visual culture. In an era where theatre often leaned towards naturalism and dialogue-heavy narratives, Thiyam embraced silence, ritual, and a powerful visual vocabulary. His productions were characterised by the evocative use of light, shadow, and music, minimal yet symbolic props, and the incorporation of indigenous Manipuri martial arts like Thang-Ta. One of Thiyam's most celebrated works, Chakravyuh (1984), based on an episode from the Mahabharata, is a searing indictment of war and the cyclical nature of violence, themes that are acutely relevant in the modern world. Similarly, Andha Yug (The Blind Age), adapted from Dharamvir Bharati's Hindi verse play, explored the moral collapse and spiritual reckoning in the aftermath of the Mahabharata war. Staged famously in an open-air performance in Tonga, Japan, on the eve of the Hiroshima atomic holocaust anniversary, the play became a poignant commentary on humanity's capacity for self-destruction in the modern age. Thiyam's direction amplified the existential angst and the profound sense of loss, using stark imagery and a powerful chorus to convey the spiritual barrenness that often accompanies unchecked 'progress'. His Manipur trilogy, particularly Wahoudok (Prologue), directly addressed the impact of modernisation on traditional values and ecological balance. In this play, Thiyam explored ancient Meitei creation myths, juxtaposing them with the perceived threats posed by contemporary civilisation. He lamented the gradual cultural and ecological degradation of his native land, advocating for a return to the traditional reverence for nature and spiritual ecology. Thiyam's adaptations of western classics, such as Sophocles's Antigone (retitled Lengshonnei) and Shakespeare's Macbeth, further exemplify his unique approach. Instead of merely transplanting these plays onto an Indian stage, he 'cooked foreign ideas in a Manipuri kitchen', as he famously put it. He reinterpreted these universal narratives through the lens of Meitei culture, infusing them with local philosophical and performative traditions. This act of localisation was a powerful statement against the cultural homogenisation often associated with globalisation and a testament to the enduring relevance of indigenous forms. By rooting these stories deeply in his own cultural context, he demonstrated that universality is achieved not through imitation, but through profound authenticity. Beyond his artistic endeavours, Thiyam was a figure of significant political importance, using his art as a potent form of social commentary and protest. He was unafraid to speak up against policies and politics that threatened the cultural or human fabric of his region, particularly during times of ethnic unrest in Manipur. His theatre became a vehicle for expressing the pain and struggles of his people, often wrapping his protest in metaphors of epic proportions. A testament to his conviction, Thiyam famously returned his Padma Shri award in 2001 in protest against the central government's extension of the territorial limits of the ceasefire with the National Socialist Council of Nagaland (Isak-Muivah) and the violent impacts of this action on Manipur; an act that underscored his unwavering artistic integrity and moral courage. For Thiyam, theatre was not confined to proscenium boundaries; it was a living discourse that interrogated power, injustice, and the erosion of values. The image of Ratan Thiyam that will always be etched in my mind is of him bowing on his knees in front of the audience, along with his company at the end of every performance, and the entire audience standing up not just for a standing ovation, but to acknowledge the theatrical irony, that a god had bowed in front of his subjects. That we now knew, that we would never leave the theatre the way we entered it. That before and after watching a Chorus Repertory performance, one can never think about being modern and embracing tradition, in the same way, ever again. Abhishek Majumdar is a playwright and theatre director. He is the artistic director of Nalanda Arts Studio, Bengaluru, and programme head of the Theater Programme at New York University in Abu Dhabi. The views expressed are personal.
