Grassroots pressure on Gov. Evers reflects nationwide impatience with Dems
More than 100 citizens from an array of grassroots groups packed the Wisconsin state Senate parlor and marched on Gov. Tony Evers' office Tuesday, their chants bouncing off the marble walls inside the Capitol. They were there to deliver a letter — which they urged others to sign online — demanding that Evers veto the state budget if it doesn't include key elements of the governor's own budget proposal.
'The whole Democratic grassroots is now demanding that national leaders stand and fight,' said Robert Kraig, executive director of Citizen Action of Wisconsin, who helped organize the effort, 'and I think that spirit is now being translated down to the state level.'
Public school advocates, child care providers, teachers' unions and advocates for criminal justice reform and health care access came to demand that Evers take a stronger stand and threaten to use his significant veto power in negotiations with Republicans.
'There has been a lot of talk over the last year about whether or not we can get this done as adults, or whether we have to be impolite,' Michael Jones, president of Madison Teachers, Inc., said of state budget negotiations. 'Too much gets conceded about being polite,' he added. 'Politeness without reciprocal respect is just being a sucker.'
In their letter, the advocates assured Evers that Wisconsinites were behind his original budget proposal — the one Republican legislative leaders threw in the trash. The advocates urged him to 'hold the line' and reject any budget that doesn't accept federal Medicaid expansion money, provide a 60% state reimbursement to schools for special education costs, close the Green Bay Correctional Institution, restore his proposed $480 million for child care and reject the snowballing growth of school vouchers.
Brooke Legler, a child care provider and co-founder of Wisconsin Early Childhood Action Needed (W.E.C.A.N.), has been leading a recent high-profile effort to sound the alarm about the loss of child care funds. 'So many of us are going to be closing our doors because we cannot keep going and parents can't afford to pay what they are paying,' she said during a press conference in the Senate parlor. Treating child care like any other business doesn't work, she added. Instead, it needs to be seen as a public good. 'Gov. Evers declared this the year of the kid,' Legler said, but 'it's not going to be' if Evers signs a budget that leaves out crucial funding for child care.
Tanya Atkinson of Planned Parenthood Wisconsin spoke at the press conference about congressional Republicans' effort to cancel Medicaid funding for patient care at Planned Parenthood.
In Wisconsin, 60% of Planned Parenthood's patients have Medicaid as their form of insurance, she said. Most of them live in rural areas, are low-income, or are women of color who 'continue to be further pushed out of our health care system,' Atkinson said. 'And it doesn't have to be that way. It is time for us to take the politics out of sexual reproductive health altogether.'
Atkinson and the other assembled advocates praised Evers' budget proposal, including the part that would finally allow Wisconsin to join the 40 other states that have accepted the federal Medicaid expansion, making 90,000 more Wisconsinites eligible for Medicaid coverage and bringing about $1.5 billion into the state in the next budget cycle.
Shaniya Cooper, a college student from Milwaukee and a BadgerCare recipient who lives with lupus, talked about how scary it was to realize she could lose her Medicaid coverage under congressional Republicans' budget plan. 'To me, this is life or death,' she said. When she first learned about proposed Medicaid cuts, 'I cried,' she said. 'I felt fear and dread.'
She described having a flare-up of her lupus, with swelling and fluid around her heart, and then finding out she had to fill out paperwork to reapply for Medicaid, since it was unclear if her treatment would still be covered.
'It isn't just about the paperwork. It's about waking up each day with the fear that the care I might need might be gone tomorrow,' she said, 'It's about knowing that people are quietly suffering mentally and emotionally from the stress and the anxiety that these policies are creating.' Her voice broke and people around her yelled encouragement. 'You got this!' someone shouted. 'What's at stake here is humanity,' she continued, 'and if we do nothing, we allow these cuts to happen, we are silently endorsing the neglect and slow death of those who cannot afford prime insurance. That is not a civil society. That is not justice.'
'We are here because we will not be pitted against each other to fight for crumbs in a time of plenty,' said Heather DuBois Bourenane of the Wisconsin Public Education Network. 'We will not be divided on the issues that matter most where we live, because some people refuse to listen to us.'
DuBois Bourenane derided what she called a 'cycle of disinvestment, first of all, but it's also a cycle of disrespect,' by Republicans who dismissed Evers' budget proposals despite overwhelming public support. Increasing funding for schools, expanding Medicaid coverage and reforming the criminal justice system by closing prisons and reducing incarceration are popular measures. 'Gov. Evers has the power, with his veto pen, to break [the cycle],' she said, 'and we're calling on him to use the full force, the full power of that pen, to say, enough is enough. It stops with me.'
'There's a tremendous amount of Democratic leverage in this budget, if you consider both the number of Democratic members in the Senate and the veto,' Kraig said.
'These are groups with large memberships calling on the governor to stand and fight,' he added.
Evers did not make an appearance or respond to the rowdy group at the Capitol. But it was clear they have no intention of going away quietly,
SUBSCRIBE: GET THE MORNING HEADLINES DELIVERED TO YOUR INBOX
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


New York Post
15 minutes ago
- New York Post
Democrats facing crisis as more than 2M voters leave party in four years: analysis
The Democratic Party is bleeding registered voters, suffering a 4.5 million swing against it that could take years to recover from, according to a new report. Between the 2020 and 2024 presidential elections, Democrats lost about 2.1 million voters across the 30 states that track registration by political party, according to a New York Times analysis of data gathered by the L2 tracking firm. Over the same period, the Republican Party gained 2.4 million registered voters. Officially, there are still more registered Democrats than Republicans nationwide, but that number is incomplete because blue states like California and New York allow voters to register by party — as does the District of Columbia — while reliably red states like Texas, Missouri and Ohio do not. Most alarmingly for Democrats, the decline is nationwide, with the US seeing more new voters registering with the GOP in 2024 for the first time in six years. Democrats also saw their registered voter advantage dwindle in four 2024 battleground states — Arizona, Nevada, North Carolina and Pennsylvania — all of which President Trump carried this past Nov. 5. Democrats lost about 2.1 million registered voters in the 30 states that track registration by political party. AP Michael Pruser, who tracks voter registration closely as the director of data science for Decision Desk HQ, warned that the numbers not only help explain Trump's victory last year — in which he became the first Republican presidential candidate to win the popular vote in 20 years — but also forecast significant headwinds for Democrats in next year's midterm elections as well as the 2028 presidential vote. 'I don't want to say, 'The death cycle of the Democratic Party,'' Pruser told the Times, 'but there seems to be no end to this.' 'There is no silver lining or cavalry coming across the hill. This is month after month, year after year,' he added. In North Carolina, Democrats lost 115,523 voters between the 2020 and 2024 election, with Republicans gaining more than 140,000 members and erasing the Dems' registration advantage, according to the L2 data. More new voters registered to be Republican than Democrat last year, the first time since 2018. Michael Nagle Democrats suffered similar losses in Arizona and Pennsylvania, while in Nevada — a state whose politics were long dominated by the Las Vegas-based Culinary Workers Union — the share of registered Democrats suffered the second-steepest plunge of those states measured between 2020 and 2024. (Only deep-red West Virginia saw more precipitous losses.). Even Democratic bastions like New York and California were not safe from voter erosion, with Dems losing 305,922 registered voters in the Empire State in between the two elections. In California, Democrats lost 680,556 voters between 2020 and 2024. All in all, Democrats went from enjoying an advantage of nearly 11 percentage points over Republicans in registered voter numbers in 2020 to just over six percentage points across the 30 states and DC in 2024, the Times found. Experts believe that the fall of new Democratic registrations can be linked to the growing number of voters choosing to be independents or unaffiliated, a trend that is sapping both parties' rolls. In 2018, more than one-third (34%) of new voter registrations nationwide were Democrats, while registered Republicans made up just 20% of new voters. As of last year, however, Republicans had erased that gap, with party supporters making up 29% of new voters, while Democrats made up 26% of new voters.


Newsweek
15 minutes ago
- Newsweek
Gavin Newsom's Redistricting Ballot Measure Chances of Passing—New Poll
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. California Governor Gavin Newsom's redistricting ballot measure has support from a majority of the state's voters, according to a new poll. Newsweek reached out to Newsom and the California GOP for comment via email. Why It Matters The redistricting arms race between California, Texas and other states could have key implications for the midterms. Texas, with the support of President Donald Trump, first announced plans to redraw its map to become more favorable to Republicans and thwart losses in the midterms, but Newsom has warned California could redraw its map to benefit Democrats in return. California Democrats' ability to do so may hinge on the outcome of a ballot measure Newsom announced last week that would allow a new map drafted by legislators to temporarily replace the boundaries drawn up by the state's independent redistricting committee following the 2020 census. If the ballot measure is successful, it could neutralize efforts from Texas Republicans. But if it fails, Republicans may be able to net several seats in not only Texas, but also other GOP states like Indiana and Missouri. What to Know A new poll from Newsom's pollster, reported by Axios, suggests a majority of voters are prepared to support the ballot measure. The poll, conducted by David Binder, showed that 57 percent of California voters are in support of the proposal. Only 35 percent were opposed to it, while 8 percent remained undecided. Among Democrats, the ballot measure had 84 percent support, while only 13 percent opposed it. Among Republicans, 79 percent were opposed, the poll found, according to Axios. California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks during a press conference in Los Angeles on August 14, 2025. California Governor Gavin Newsom speaks during a press conference in Los Angeles on August 14, poll surveyed 1,000 likely voters from August 10 to August 14, 2025, and had a margin of error of plus or minus 3 percentage points. California remains a solidly blue state where Democrats handily outnumber Republicans. Former Vice President Kamala Harris carried it by 20 points last November, so Democrats are hopeful this ballot measure will fall on partisan lines. But the state has an independent redistricting community that was passed by voters and remains popular. A Politico poll released last week found that 64 percent of California voters support keeping the commission, while only 36 percent support returning redistricting authority to the state legislature. Newsom, who is viewed as a potential 2028 presidential candidate, has cast the ballot measure as a temporary measure, which would no longer be in effect after the 2030 census, which is only in response to Texas' redistricting efforts. It would not go into effect unless Texas or other Republican states first redraw their lines. Republicans, however, have described it as a power grab that violates the will of Californians. What People Are Saying David Binder wrote in the poll, per Axios: "Voter trends on this measure closely mirror the presidential election results of November 2024, in which Kamala Harris defeated Donald Trump in California by 58% to 38%. Poll results indicate that Proposition 50 will fall along similar partisan lines." Representative Kevin Kiley, a California Republican, wrote to X on Tuesday: "Newsom is overthrowing the Redistricting Commission in order to make California 'a whole lot bluer.' To accomplish this, his proposal expressly overrides the entire State Constitution. Partisan gerrymandering will become the supreme law of the land." Governor Newsom wrote to X on Tuesday: "Unlike Texas, we're not following @realDonaldTrump's orders to quietly try to redistrict our way out of losing the next election. In California, we're working transparently to respond if Texas enacts new maps — and we'll give the power to the people to make our final decision." What Happens Next Voters will make their decision about the redistricting plan in November. Both Democrats and Republicans will spend the coming months making their case to voters on whether the ballot measure should pass. Meanwhile, the redistricting war continues across the country, with Trump urging Texas Republicans to pass their plan "ASAP."


Axios
15 minutes ago
- Axios
Texas law requiring Ten Commandments temporarily halted in some schools
A federal judge in San Antonio temporarily barred some school districts from implementing a Texas law requiring every public school classroom to display the Ten Commandments. Why it matters: The ruling slows one of the nation's most aggressive pushes to mandate religious displays in public schools — setting up a likely First Amendment fight that could reach the Supreme Court. Catch up quick: The law, passed by the Republican-controlled Legislature earlier this year, mandated a 16x20-inch Ten Commandments poster in every classroom and was set to take effect Sept. 1. Sixteen Texas families from San Antonio, Austin, Houston and elsewhere — backed by the American Civil Liberties Union — sued in July to stop it, naming 11 school districts, including Alamo Heights, Northside, Northeast and Lackland ISDs. Caveat: U.S. District Judge Fred Biery's order only blocks the law in the 11 districts named in the lawsuit — in the Austin, San Antonio, Houston and Dallas areas — not statewide. What they're saying: Biery wrote that the law would likely result in unconstitutional religious coercion. "The displays are likely to pressure the child-Plaintiffs into religious observance, meditation on, veneration, and adoption of the State's favored religious scripture, and into suppressing expression of their own religious or nonreligious background and beliefs while at school," he wrote. "Children's religious beliefs should be instilled by parents and faith communities, not politicians and public schools," San Antonio plaintiff Rabbi Mara Nathan said in a statement. The other side: Texas Attorney General Ken Paxton told CBS he would appeal the ruling. "The Ten Commandments are a cornerstone of our moral and legal heritage, and their presence in classrooms serves as a reminder of the values that guide responsible citizenship," Paxton said in a statement. Texas will always defend our right to uphold the foundational principles that have built this nation, and I will absolutely be appealing this flawed decision."