"It Only Ran For A Couple Years In The Early '90s": Adults Are Revealing The TV Shows From Their Childhood That They're 100% Convinced No One Remembers
Back in the '70s, '80s, and '90s, children had SO many TV shows to watch — so many, in fact, that as adults, they might've forgotten a few of them. So when Reddit user Ok-Ingenuity4608 asked: "What is a show you watched during your childhood that you are convinced nobody remembers?" over 14,000 people shared their answers. Here are some of the top ones below.
1. "There was a show called Sagwa, the Chinese Siamese Cat that I watched as a kid, and I feel like nobody remembers it! It was about a little Siamese cat in ancient China, and it had such a unique animation style and sweet stories. It aired on PBS, but I rarely hear anyone talk about it now."
5. "Does anyone remember the early 2000s show As Told By Ginger? That theme song is still stuck in my head."
View this video on YouTube
11. " Bananas in Pyjamas. No one knows what I'm talking about. I even had the dolls. I loved that show."
View this video on YouTube
12. " The Big Comfy Couch."
View this video on YouTube
16. " Lamb Chop's Play-Along? Heck, I barely remember, lol."
View this video on YouTube
17. "Anyone here old enough to remember Jabberjaw? A 1970s cartoon about a shark who was in a band. Hated that dumb show and somehow ended up with a lunch box of it one year. We must've waited to buy my lunchbox 'til the last minute, and that's all that was left. If it weren't for being stuck with that lunchbox, I doubt I'd remember the show."
View this video on YouTube
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
2 hours ago
- Newsweek
Mom Films Toddler Watching 'Ms Rachel', Captures Milestone Moment Instead
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A couple filming their son accidentally captured his first unaided steps on video, as he became distracted by the TV. Lianne, 42, lives in Buckinghamshire UK with her wife, Jordan, and their 15-month-old son, Grayson, who has recently learned to walk on his own. And, by pure accident, the couple captured his first unaided steps on camera—because he was distracted by the global YouTube phenomenon Ms Rachel, beloved by babies, toddlers and many parents worldwide. As Lianne explained to Newsweek: "We were doing a video to capture Grayson's progress from crawling, to walking with a walker, to walking," which is a popular trend on social media, as parents create video montages of their babies growing up. "As we were filming the 'walking with a walker' video, he decided to take his first steps into our living room where Ms Rachel was on the TV!" Lianne shared the adorable moment to her TikTok account @liannel2810 on June 8, captioning it: "When Miss Rachel [sic] ruins your crawling to walking baby video," along with a laughing emoji. Grayson uses a walking toy to move down the hall, but gets distracted by the TV. Grayson uses a walking toy to move down the hall, but gets distracted by the TV. TikTok @liannel2810 And in words over the video itself, she added: "When your toddler gets distracted by Miss Rachel [sic] whilst doing the crawling to walking trend and takes their actual unaided first steps." It shows Grayson using a wooden toy walker, slowly making his way down the hall as viewed from a camera set up in the family's sitting room. But as Grayson uses the walker to continue down the hall, he looks into the room and then stops, as he's recognized the educational YouTuber on the TV screen. The baby then casually lets go of the walker—and walks, barely wobbling, into the room to get a better view—and Lianne and Jordan can be heard bursting into laughter as they witness, and record, their son's first steps. Lianne, who gave her first name only, told Newsweek: "We were both shocked, as prior to this he would only walk with us holding his hands or using his walker." And it appears Grayson isn't the only one whose first steps were towards Ms Rachel, as commenters flocked to the video, viewed more than 83,000 times, to share their own stories. Grayson stops to watch Ms Rachel, then walks unaided for the first time to get a better look. Grayson stops to watch Ms Rachel, then walks unaided for the first time to get a better look. TikTok @liannel2810 "Love this, I defo [co] parent with Miss Rachel [sic]," one user wrote, as another admitted: "My little boy did his first unaided steps to walk to the TV where Ms Rachel was on." Another joked Grayson had "definitely been having a sneaky run round when you [have] not been looking." On average, babies take their first unaided steps around 14 months old, and may indicate they're ready to begin walking independently after learning to do so while holding a parent's hand or furniture for balance, according to a medically-reviewed report from What to Expect. Lianne said: "We are always super proud of all Grayson's achievements and milestones so it was really lovely to see—but also really funny. "It's almost like he was thinking, 'why am I in the hallway when Ms Rachel's on?'" Do you have funny and adorable videos or pictures you want to share? Send them to life@ with some extra details, and they could appear on our website.
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Wife Storms Out of Husband's Birthday Dinner After He Tells Everyone She Is Pregnant as a Prank — Right After Miscarriage
A woman who threw her husband a steakhouse birthday party says he ruined the evening by pranking her in a cruel way While she stood up to give him a toast, he joked that she was "pregnant" — something he called a "prank," but that came just months after a miscarriage The woman writes on Reddit that she left him at the restaurant and had him Uber homeA 28-year-old woman wants to be reimbursed for her husband's birthday dinner after he embarrassed her in front of the guests with a prank. In a since-deleted post shared to Reddit, the woman writes that she took her 31-year-old husband out to dinner for his birthday, reserving a table at his favorite steakhouse. She invited 10 close friends and family members and "paid for everything" herself. "At dinner, I stood up to give a short toast about how proud I was of him for hitting a milestone at work," she explains. "I barely got two sentences in before he cuts me off and says, 'You know what would really make this birthday better? If [my name] finally admitted she's pregnant.' " The woman, who is not pregnant nor is she trying to get pregnant, notes that she is sensitive about the topic following a recent miscarriage. "Everyone at the table gasped, then stared at me for confirmation. My mother-in-law immediately started squealing and tearing up," she recalls. "My boss (who I invited because he helped get my husband promoted) actually stood up to congratulate us." She continues, "I looked at him in total disbelief and said, 'What the hell are you doing?' He laughed and said it was a prank. Just a joke." The woman got up and left. She paid the bill from her car via an app and texted everyone that the night was over. She told her husband, meanwhile, that "he could Uber home." "When he did get back, he called me humorless, said I humiliated him on his birthday, and now even his family is saying I was 'cold' to him over a 'harmless joke,'" she writes. "He says I embarrassed him by walking out and that I made everyone uncomfortable. I think he humiliated me first." The title of the post suggests that she now wants her husband to reimburse her, as she writes that she is "refusing to pay" for the dinner following the prank. Never miss a story — sign up for to stay up-to-date on the best of what PEOPLE has to offer, from celebrity news to compelling human interest stories. Reddit users are squarely on the woman's side, with one writing, "This wasn't a prank. It was public emotional sabotage. "That's not harmless. That's not funny. That's cruel," the commenter added. "It's the cruelty for me. Miscarriage is so painful," another chimed in. "Her husband's lack of basic human decency and consideration is astounding." Another commenter offered advice, writing, "This is what I was coming to say. Consciously or not, he is blaming her, and his joke was cruel. I'm sorry for your miscarriage. I would suggest telling your husband you are reevaluating staying married without individual and couples counseling. And put trying to conceive on hold for a bit - this person does not have your back." Read the original article on People
Business Insider
4 hours ago
- Business Insider
Why YouTube is trying to replace your favorite TV shows
A new golf comedy called "Shanked," which follows the hijinks at a country club where employees clash with pampered members, made its debut this month. The first episode runs about 20 minutes and resembles a low-budget comedy you might have once seen on Comedy Central. But it's not on cable. It's on YouTube. Welcome to 2025, when the big question in Hollywood isn't whether YouTube can work in the living room, but rather, how much of the entertainment landscape can it conquer. "Shanked" isn't the only scripted show on YouTube, with top creators like Dhar Mann and Alan Chikin Chow making TV-like series for the platform. Meanwhile, streamers like Netflix and Amazon's Prime Video are also updating their strategies, both by taking cues from cable TV — with ads and costly live sports — and seeing how they can mine social media for creator talent. For the creators of "Shanked," YouTube was a no-brainer. Ryan Horrigan of production company London Alley said he saw a lack of low-budget comedies on TV at the same time YouTube was increasingly favoring 20-minute episodic series. Why not a comedy, he thought. James Lynch, a comedian who co-created and stars in the show, said he felt the lines between entertainment platforms were increasingly blurring. "We love shows like 'Severance,' but every time I go to a friend's house, there's always something on YouTube," he said. Google-owned YouTube has nurtured a creator economy that Goldman Sachs estimated would grow to about $480 billion by 2027. Many in the entertainment and advertising world dismissed YouTube as a repository for amateur videos and movie trailers until it became the No. 1 viewed platform on TVs, per Nielsen, ahead of the "real TV" companies Netflix, Disney, and Prime Video. As YouTube and TV begin to converge, it looks like the Hollywood system as we know it will never be the same. But how the ecosystem will look when the dust settles is much more difficult to parse. YouTube is encouraging episodic series Lately, YouTube has been rolling out tools and features to encourage creators to make shows for the living room. It's also doing more to match advertisers to creators to support the kinds of shows you're used to seeing on TV. At Brandcast, YouTube's big annual presentation to the advertising community, it underlined the point by showing off top creators like IShowSpeed and Michelle Khare, who are making episodic series. And it's making a big push to win an Emmy to prove it can support quality TV. Viewership is one thing, but advertising, the lifeblood of entertainment, is another. Many major brands still want to be associated with buzzy scripted shows and movies that drive the mainstream conversation, like "The White Lotus," and most creators aren't close to that yet. Only a handful, like MrBeast and Dude Perfect, are making Hollywood-style productions. AI tools could reduce that friction, though, by cutting time and costs from video production. "Creator content is dominating TV watch time — not just on phones, but on the biggest screens in the house, replacing what used to be traditional television. Yet brands are still spending like it's 2015, chasing impressions over impact," said Nick Cicero, founder of Mondo Metrics, a media measurement company. Advertisers are closing the gap, though. Ad holding company giant WPP recently estimated that creators would earn $185 billion between direct brand deals and platform revenue share, surpassing ad spending on TV companies like Disney and Paramount. Top ad spender Unilever also said it would move to spend 50% of its advertising on social media platforms, up from about 30%, and work with 20 times more influencers. Can Hollywood adapt? YouTube's growth could be a problem for Hollywood, which is built on direct ownership of IP and entertainment that moves the culture but costs a ton. Studios and streamers aren't spending like they were when everyone was trying to catch Netflix, but they still need new stuff to keep viewers coming back and capture younger audiences. Creator-led shows offer one way forward. But can they pull it off? There are promising signs. Amazon is the most prominent example of a company betting huge on a creator. It spent more than $100 million to make MrBeast's "Beast Games," which became its most-watched unscripted show, and just renewed it for two more seasons. Netflix has done deals with The Sidemen, kids' educator Ms. Rachel, and more. Warner Bros. Discovery's HBO Max has a new reality show starring Jake Paul and his brother, Logan, "Paul American." And Disney's Hulu has a hit in "The Secret Lives of Mormon Wives." Entertainment companies have gotten more sophisticated about how they work with creators. They're tapping them for their ideas rather than simply looking for a piece of their audience, in contrast with some past flopped creator experiments. Netflix is looking at YouTubers as producers as well as on-screen talent, an unscripted agent told Business Insider. NBCUniversal's Peacock just announced a slate of shows developed by creators via an accelerator program. Tubi has an initiative called Stubios to nurture up-and-coming filmmakers. Media and entertainment companies are also looking at other forms of low-cost content, like soapy mini-dramas and video podcasts. There are challenges, however. Creators like YouTube because there's no gatekeeper. It gives them a lot of data, lets them own their content, and gives them a relatively generous 55% cut of the ad revenue. Creator talent reps told BI some of their clients had walked away from potential Netflix deals because the streamer wouldn't budge from the Hollywood playbook, in which it owns ancillary rights to things like e-commerce revenue. Scott Purdy, a media consultant at KPMG, said entertainment companies would likely start to look at YouTube and other social platforms as potential places to actually launch shows, starting with low-budget fare. "For most companies, most options are on the table," he said. Meanwhile, producers like Horrigan are blue-skying other creator-led formats to put on YouTube. "Talent is still going to want to play in both sandboxes, but we're moving up the stack," he said. "What's next — is horror going to be a thing on YouTube, teen romance? I think that's going to be a thing as well."
