Former top aide to Jill Biden is subpoenaed by House Oversight panel
WASHINGTON (AP) — Republicans on the House Oversight Committee issued a subpoena Thursday to Anthony Bernal, a senior aide to former first lady Jill Biden, as part of their rapidly expanding investigation into former President Joe Biden's mental fitness while in office.
The subpoena signed by Rep. James Comer of Kentucky, the Republican Oversight chairman, requires Bernal to appear for a deposition on July 16. It came after several weeks of back-and-forth with Bernal's lawyer over the timing of a voluntary interview.
"Given your close connection with both former President Biden and former First Lady Jill Biden, the Committee sought to understand if you contributed to an effort to hide former President Biden's fitness to serve from the American people," the subpoena reads. 'To avoid any further delays, your appearance before the Committee is now compelled.'
Bernal is the second former Biden staffer to be subpoenaed by the committee and unlikely to be the last. The committee this week heard voluntary testimony from Neera Tanden, a former director of Biden's domestic policy counsel, and is intent on securing interviews with several other members of Biden's inner circle as part of its investigation.
Bernal did not respond Thursday to a message seeking comment.
Comer has also subpoenaed Dr. Kevin O'Connor, who served as Biden's physician at the White House. O'Connor will testify before the committee on July 9.
It's all part of a remarkable Republican effort, supported by President Donald Trump, to investigate the last occupant of the Oval Office six months after he left office. Trump himself has ordered White House lawyers and the Justice Department to investigate Biden, questioning the legitimacy of his use of the autopen to sign pardons and other documents.
Boosting the GOP investigation, Trump has waived executive privilege for eight former Biden administration officials to testify to Congress, including Bernal, according to a White House official who was not authorized to speak publicly and insisted on anonymity.
With the privilege lifted, former staffers are free to discuss their interactions with Biden while he was president.
In addition to Bernal, executive privilege has been waived for Biden White House senior advisers Mike Donilon and Anita Dunn, former White House chief of staff Ron Klain, former deputy chief of staff Bruce Reed, former counselor to the president Steve Ricchetti, former deputy chief of staff Annie Tomasini and a former assistant to the president, Ashley Williams. Comer is seeking interviews with all of them.
Democrats have dismissed the inquiry into Biden's mental state as a partisan exercise that distracts from other pressing issues.
Rep. Wesley Bell, a Missouri Democrat who sits on the Oversight committee, said after the interview with Tanden that it 'was an extraordinary waste of time' and produced 'no new evidence.'
Bell said lawmakers should focus on issues like the costs of food, housing and potential changes to healthcare policy rather than 'dig up some kind of post-impeachment, or whatever we're doing here.'
The unfolding investigation has significant implications for politics and policy. Republican lawmakers have argued that any executive actions or policies enacted through the autopen procedure could be found invalid if Biden were somehow incapacitated or not of a sound state of mind while in office.
Trump and his allies have claimed, without evidence, that Biden was not aware of the actions his administration had taken on a range of issues, including presidential pardons, environmental policy and labor rights, among other issues.
A move to reverse such executive actions, which would almost certainly face legal scrutiny and a battle in the courts, could impact scores of executive orders taken throughout Biden's term.
'Let this subpoena send a clear message to Biden's inner circle: We will stop at nothing to expose the truth about Joe Biden's decline (and) unauthorized use of the autopen,' Comer wrote on social media.
Biden said several weeks ago that he was fully in control as president.
'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations,' the former president said in a statement. 'Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false.'
Trump this month directed his administration to investigate Biden's actions as president, arguing that aides engaged in a 'conspiracy' to mask Biden's mental state. Senate Republicans have also launched their own inquiries.
'We need to know who was in charge during the last months of the Biden administration. Was it his wife, his chief of staff, nameless others? None of these people were elected by the American people, nor were they authorized by the Constitution and laws of the United States to carry out the duties of the president of the United States,' Sen. John Cornyn, R-Texas, said during a June hearing.
___
Associated Press writer Darlene Superville contributed to this report.
Biden's statement on that from a few weeks ago:'Let me be clear: I made the decisions during my presidency. I made the decisions about the pardons, executive orders, legislation, and proclamations. Any suggestion that I didn't is ridiculous and false.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
an hour ago
- The Hill
'We Hope So': Trump On MEGABILL Meeting July 4 Deadline
President Trump hosted a 'One Big, Beautiful Event' Thursday afternoon from the White House as the GOP "Megabill" full of his domestic priorities makes its way through Congress. Republican leaders have voiced optimism they can get the legislation to Trump's desk by July 4 — but that timeline has faced some road bumps due to internal divisions over certain spending cuts and tax provisions. The Senate parliamentarian has also rejected many of the House-passed measures. The president has pressured GOP holdouts to support the bill, even if it means pushing into the lawmakers' recess. Thursday's event has been billed as his last-ditch effort to win them over.
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
No tax on tips and overtime: What workers should know and who stands to see their taxes shrink
There are plenty of provisions in the massive tax bill known as the One Big Beautiful Bill Act that lawmakers are hotly contesting as Republicans rush to finalize the bill by their self-imposed July 4 deadline. But one tax law change that — until recently — seemed to have broad, bipartisan support is the proposal to eradicate taxes on tips. The problem is, that provision — at least, as it's been proposed both in the huge tax bill as well as in a standalone act that quickly passed the Senate with bipartisan support — wouldn't help all that many workers. And, truth be told, even that provision isn't a slam dunk, as some Republicans have said it's a pricey outlay with little prospect of sparking the economic growth they like to see from tax cuts. Also part of the major tax bill is a proposal to remove taxes on overtime pay, although the House and Senate aren't currently in sync on whether the tax break should be capped or not. Here's how the Senate bill compares to the House bill on each of these two provisions. Senate version House version Type of tax break Tax deduction Tax deduction Value of tax break Up to $25,000 No cap Income limits Tax break decreases by $100 for every $1,000 of modified adjusted gross income above:$150,000 (all other filers); $300,000 (married filing jointly) Tax break unavailable at modified adjusted gross income above:$160,000 (all filers) Senate version House version Type of tax break Tax deduction Tax deduction Value of tax break $12,500 (all other filers); $25,000 (married filing jointly) No cap Income limits Tax break decreases by $100 for every $1,000 of modified adjusted gross income above:$150,000 (all other filers); $300,000 (married filing jointly) Tax break unavailable at income above:$160,000 (all filers) Under current law, a worker must pay federal income tax and payroll taxes on tip income, just as they do on regular wages. Employees are required to report monthly tips exceeding $20 to their employers, who must then withhold income and FICA taxes and report the amount to the IRS. However, that could change if the big, beautiful bill becomes law. The Senate's current version would create a new deduction for qualified tip income, eliminating federal income taxes on up to $25,000 in tips for workers for tax years 2025 through 2028. The tax break would start to phase out for taxpayers with modified adjusted gross income (MAGI) of $150,000 ($300,000 if married filing jointly) — the value of the deduction would drop by $100 for every $1,000 of income above that amount. The House's version doesn't cap the dollar value of the tax break, but it would limit the tax break to taxpayers with MAGI of $160,000 or less. (Neither proposal affects payroll, or FICA, taxes.) 'An estimated four million individuals receive tip income. So those people could see a significant tax benefit,' says Mark Luscombe, principal tax analyst with Wolters Kluwer Tax & Accounting. 'The [proposed] deductions for tips are available to non-itemizers, so they can be claimed even if the taxpayer claims the standard deduction.' Workers would still need to report tip income and pay payroll taxes. While federal income tax would be withheld from paychecks, those amounts would be refunded when filing their income tax return. The tax break wouldn't apply only to employees. Some independent contractors and business owners could also qualify, provided their business gross receipts exceed business deductions, losses and costs, including the cost of goods sold. Get started: Match with an advisor who can help you achieve your financial goals While this provision could eliminate taxes on tip income for millions of Americans, only a fraction of taxpayers may see a meaningful benefit. A study by the nonpartisan Tax Policy Center found that households earning $33,000 or less wouldn't benefit much, as they typically owe little to no federal income tax. For all of these households (including those who don't earn tip income), after-tax income would rise by just $10 a year on average. Fully 40 percent of U.S. households that report tip income would not see any tax break from the proposal, according to the Tax Policy Center report. That means 60 percent of households that report having tip income would benefit (that translates to about 2 percent of all U.S. households enjoying this tax break), and their tax bills would drop by an average of $1,800 a year, according to the report. An average of $1,800 a year is not nothing. But that reward wouldn't go to the lowest-earning households. Of those households making less than $33,000 a year, just 1.4 percent of households would benefit, and for those households, their after-tax income would rise by $450 a year on average. Learn more: New 'bonus' tax deduction up to $6,000 could be on the way for those age 65 or older Employees who earn overtime may get a break on their federal taxes if the big bill becomes law. Under current law, employees must receive overtime pay — at least time and a half — for any hours worked beyond 40 in a workweek. 'There has been a trend toward less use of overtime pay; however, under the Biden administration, the salary threshold for employees eligible for overtime pay was significantly raised, currently at $58,656 and adjusted for inflation every three years,' Luscombe says. 'The House bill will require clear reporting of overtime pay by the employer to support the claimed deduction.' The proposed overtime tax break would function similarly to the tip income deduction. Overtime wages would still be subject to withholding, but workers could deduct federal income taxes paid on those wages when filing their returns, even if they don't itemize. The deduction would apply to tax years 2025 through 2028. The White House estimates that the average overtime worker would receive a tax cut of between $1,400 and $1,750 annually. But experts argue that the tax benefits wouldn't benefit those who earn lower levels of income. While some experts say workers who earn overtime and tip income would pay less taxes if the big bill becomes law, others warn the measure could increase the federal deficit and result in a significant loss of revenue. The Joint Committee on Taxation estimates that the tip provision would reduce federal revenues by $40 billion from fiscal years 2025 to 2034, with most of the impact concentrated between 2026 to 2029, when the deduction would be in effect. The Congressional Budget Office estimates exempting overtime pay would cost $124 billion through 2028. Some analysts also warn that eliminating taxes on overtime pay could disrupt the labor market. The Tax Foundation, a nonprofit tax policy group, said removing income taxes on overtime could 'distort' the labor market by encouraging more workers to take overtime shifts, potentially making hourly roles more attractive than salaried positions that are exempt from overtime rules. 'Although the bill tries to restrict businesses not currently relying on tip income and overtime pay from seeking to take advantage of these proposed changes, it is still possible that there could be shifts toward tip income and more overtime pay to try to take advantage of the deductions,' Luscombe says. Learn more: These 9 states have no income tax — that doesn't always mean you'll save money Error while retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data Error while retrieving data
Hamilton Spectator
an hour ago
- Hamilton Spectator
Top photos from Latin America and the Caribbean
June 20-26, 2025 Chileans got dressed up for a Gay Pride parade, cricket players from Australia and West Indies faced off on the Caribbean island of Barbados and Indigenous people in Bolivia and Ecuador marked the Southern Hemisphere's winter solstice . Colombians who pick up trash to sell as recycled material blanketed Bogota's main plaza with plastic bottles to protest decreasing income and tougher conditions for scavengers, and Venezuelans carried Iranian flags at a demonstration organized by the government against Israel's war on Iran. Tampa Bay Rays' shortstop Wander Franco was found guilty of sexual abuse and received a 2-year suspended sentence. This gallery highlights some of the most compelling images made or published in the past week by The Associated Press from Latin America and the Caribbean. The selection was curated by AP photo editor Leslie Mazoch based in Mexico City. ___ Follow AP visual journalism: AP Images blog: Instagram: Error! Sorry, there was an error processing your request. There was a problem with the recaptcha. Please try again. You may unsubscribe at any time. By signing up, you agree to our terms of use and privacy policy . This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google privacy policy and terms of service apply. Want more of the latest from us? Sign up for more at our newsletter page .
