
Jesse Watters declares ‘Big Balls, we love you,' as he celebrates Trump's DC crime crackdown
Watters praised Edward Coristine for taking a 'beating for the rest of the city' during Monday evening's episode of Jesse Watters Primetime, about two weeks after the 19-year-old was brutally assaulted in an attempted carjacking.
According to the Fox News host, Coristine's assault was directly linked to the president mobilizing the military in D.C. last Tuesday.
'When Big Balls went down, that's when Trump had to call it,' Watters told fellow Fox News host Will Cain. 'If Big Balls isn't safe, no one's safe. And I'm glad he took a beating for the rest of the city, and he's back up on his feet.'
In closing, Watters declared: 'So, Big Balls, we love you.'
Cain also chimed in that, though he doesn't frequent the capital, he said that through 'anecdotal evidence' he can see just 'how bad' crime is there.
'And you're seeing this evidenced by the fact that, as you've pointed out, so many people are happy to see President Trump take over Washington, D.C., and make it feel safe,' he added.
Since Trump tried – and subsequently failed – to hand over responsibility for policing the district to Pam Bondi, the attorney general announced on Tuesday morning that 465 arrests have been made – 52 on Monday evening alone.
Days after posting a picture of a bloodied Coristine across social media, Trump insisted at a press conference last Monday (August 11) that his strategy was necessary because crime in D.C. is 'out of control.'
The president claimed the city required 'liberation' from 'violent gangs and bloodthirsty criminals, roving mobs of wild youth, drugged-out maniacs and homeless people.'
His claim is not consistent with official crime statistics over the past two years, which report that street crime has declined to 30-year lows, leading his opponents to suggest he is seeking a 'distraction' from the Jeffrey Epstein firestorm.
Last week, tourists in D.C. were met by the unusual and eerie sight of U.S. military members patrolling the city upon sunrise.
Members of the National Guard were present along the Mall last Thursday as part of the administration's show of force, which was trailed in advance by an insider who spoke to ABC News.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The Independent
17 minutes ago
- The Independent
New pics of Trump holding court in Oval Office branded ‘embarrassing' as world leaders sit around his desk: ‘Like schoolchildren'
New pictures showing Donald Trump sitting in the Oval Office in front of major world leaders has been criticized as an "embarrassing" power play by the president, in what should have been a display of global unity. Some on social media noted that the set up, with Trump behind the Resolute Desk and his European counterparts on chairs opposite him, presented the president as hosting a bunch of 'unruly schoolchildren.' The president was joined for the photo-op by leaders including British prime minister Sir Keir Starmer, French president Emmanual Macron, German Chancellor Freidrich Merz, Italian prime minister Giorgia Meloni and Finnish president Alexander Stubb. Also in attendance were European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen, NATO Secretary-General Mark Rutte, and Ukrainian president Volodymyr Zelensky. Another photo showed a smiling Trump posing with a new golf club, gifted to him by Zelensky. However, the meeting of the circled leaders drew the ire of social media users, with some commenting that the staging and White House mantra of of 'peace through strength' was 'deeply disrespectful to U.S. history itself.' 'Permenant peace is never truly obtained through strength. It may hold for a while under pressure, but it won't last,' wrote one user. 'What a breathtakingly rude, narcissistic asshole,' another said. 'Instead of a conference table where everyone can meet equally, Chump lined them up like unruly school children in a row with himself as the authority figure. Chump can just f*** all the way off.' Others questioned how the leaders, who came to Washington D.C. as 'equals' had allowed such a belittling set up. 'Embarrassing,' wrote one user, with another going further, writing 'I cannot believe they let Trump seat them like a bunch of schoolchildren. 'Do none of these 'leaders' have any testosterone whatsoever or PR teams that can approve/reject seating arrangements. Most embarrassing thing I've ever seen for the EU.'


The Sun
18 minutes ago
- The Sun
Bryan Kohberger can SUE over leaked jail footage after investigation launched into ‘shocking clip from inside his cell'
BRYAN Kohberger would have grounds to sue over alleged leaked footage of him alone in his jail cell, an expert has claimed. The clip was published and widely shared on Reddit and other social media platforms on Friday, appearing to show the Idaho student killer, 30, in his cell with bright red hands just weeks after his sentencing. 6 6 6 It comes after reports Kohberger suffers from obsessive-compulsive disorder and regularly washes his hands. The Idaho Department of Correction (IDOC) issued a statement after the video circulated online, warning that it was a violation of their code if real - but was potentially fake or AI produced. "While we cannot yet confirm the veracity of the videos, if verified, they are a clear violation of IDOC policy, and the parties responsible will be held accountable, up to and including termination," it said. "We caution that some videos may be fake or AI-enhanced." The IDOC confirmed it's "investigating the matter." The U.S. Sun is chosing not to publish the full clip until its authenticity and origin is confirmed. In the footage, a man is seeing walking from one side of the jail cell to another and is then seen placing an item on top of a makeshift rack. Kohberger is supposedly seen in the video staring up at the shelf and looking around as he shows no emotion. Criminal defense attorney John W. Day told The U.S. Sun that Kohberger himself would have grounds to sue if the video is real. He also alleged that if the clip was filmed by a prison staffer and leaked online, they could also be fired and hit with a civil suit by their employer, he alleged. All Bryan Kohberger documents are finally released in Washington with eerie details of Idaho murder investigation Day said, 'Kohberger himself could sue for invasion of privacy claims, but it's hard to imagine any jury in the world would be sympathetic to a man who admitted to four killings. "If it was a government employee, jail staffer, or law enforcement officer - they could most certainly be fired for violating prison or jail policies, and potentially prosecuted for misuse of public records, and/or breach of confidentiality, depending on the jurisdiction. "Every jail in the country will have policies about misusing jail property and releasing information about inmates held at their facilities. 'No competent jail administrator would put up with an employee secretly taking video of a high-profile inmate and distributing it to the world - even if the inmate is a cold-blooded killer like Bryan Kohberger. "It makes a jail or prison look unprofessional." Jail guards and officials are sued and/or prosecuted all the time for misconduct against inmates." Criminal defense attorney John W. Day Day added, "Jail guards and officials are sued and/or prosecuted all the time for misconduct against inmates, but I haven't found a case where there was a criminal prosecution over leaked video, not to say there are not cases out there. "The main point is - jail administrators would be embarrassed and angry if a rogue employee filmed something like Kohberger in his cell and disseminated it to the public — it would highlight that the jail has no control over its employees." The U.S. Sun has reached out to the IDOC for further comment and Kohberger's lawyer, but did not hear back. The IDOC's statement also added that staff had been warned about sharing infomation about the killer behind bars. "On July 23 and again on July 25, IDOC leadership sent two emails to staff reminding them of our policies and expectations concerning professionalism and the appropriate use of technology and social media," it said. "Videotaping and publicly sharing security footage is prohibited conduct, and we will be reviewing all legal options, including criminal prosecution." They added, "The safety and security of our staff and incarcerated population remain our top priority." The full details of Bryan Kohberger's sentence On July 23, 2025, Judge Steven Hippler sentenced Bryan Kohberger to the following: Count 1: Burglary - 10 years fixed, zero years in determinate. $50,000 fine. Count 2: First-degree murder of Madison Mogen: Fixed term of life in prison without the possibility of parole. $50,000 fine and civil penalty of $5,000 payable to the family of the victim. Count 3: First-degree murder of Kaylee Goncalves: Fixed term of life in prison without the possibility of parole. $50,000 fine and civil penalty of $5,000 payable to the family of the victim. Count 4: First-degree murder of Xana Kernodle: Fixed term of life in prison without the possibility of parole. $50,000 fine and civil penalty of $5,000 payable to the family of the victim. Count 5: First-degree murder of Ethan Chapin: Fixed term of life in prison without the possibility of parole. $50,000 fine and civil penalty of $5,000 payable to the family of the victim. The sentencings will run consecutively to one another. JAIL SPECULATION It is not clear where the video could have been filmed, as Kohberger has been in more than one jail. But the IDOC's statement appears to confirm it looks like the inside of the prison. Kohberger is currently being held at the Idaho Maximum Security Institution, but previously spent time at the Ada County Jail and the Latah County Jail. Due to the size of his cell, many social media users have speculated it could have been taken at Ada County. The Ada County Sheriff's Office refuted the speculation in a statement on their Facebook page, however. 'We are aware of the video footage circulating online showing Bryan Kohberger in a cell. We can confirm it was not recorded at and does not feature the Ada County Jail," they said. Former criminology student Kohberger was handed four life sentences plus 10 years without the possibility of parole last month after accepting a plea deal over the murders of four University of Idaho students. Kohberger is now known as inmate number 163214 and is allegedly housed in the medical unit. He was due to go to trial in August for the fatal stabbings of Kaylee Goncalves, Madison Mogen, Xana Kernodle, and Ethan Chapin in an off-campus home in Moscow, Idaho, on November 13, 2022. He was studying for a Ph.D. in criminology at Washington State University in Pullman, Washington, at the time of the murders. Kohberger was arrested at his parents' home in Pennsylvania weeks after the tragedy as police closed in on him. They had linked him to the crime scene using DNA recovered from a knife sheath, according to a probable cause affidavit. His cell phone location data and surveillance footage of a car the same make and model as his own also helped investigators to allegedly place him at the scene. Since he was convicted, authorities have publicly released hundreds of documents relating to his case. One inmate recalled how Kohberger quickly immersed himself in TV coverage of his arrest when he was first locked up in early January 2023. But they claimed he would change the channel if his family or friends were mentioned. The man described the killer as "highly intelligent and analytical," though lacking in basic knowledge about ordinary things such as cars. "His eyes were… creepy, I guess, but other than that, he seemed like a pretty normal guy," he added. Kohberger's compulsive cleaning habits were impossible to ignore, according to the documents. He showered for an hour at a time, washed his hands constantly, and tore through three bars of soap a week, leaving his hands raw. A second prisoner confirmed the obsessive routines, saying Kohberger insisted on fresh bedding and clothes every day. 6 6 6


Sky News
18 minutes ago
- Sky News
What would US-backed security guarantees for Ukraine look like?
Promises of security guarantees for Ukraine have been lauded as "game-changing" and "historic" in the hope of bringing an end to the war with Russia. As all eyes moved from Donald Trump's summit with Vladimir Putin in Alaska to talks with Volodymyr Zelenskyy in Washington, the White House claimed Russia has agreed to the US providing 'NATO-style protection' when the fighting ends. Although there has been no confirmation from the Kremlin, Ukraine, the UK, and other Western allies say details of a post-war security agreement will be finalised in the coming days. What has been said so far? Security guarantees have long been talked about as a way of ensuring peace in Ukraine when fighting comes to an end. Since March, when the UK and France spearheaded a largely European 'coalition of the willing' and potential peacekeeping force, many have claimed it would be ineffective without American backing. The US has repeatedly refused to be drawn on its involvement - until now. Two days after Mr Putin travelled to Alaska for talks with the Trump team, US special envoy Steve Witkoff claimed Russia had agreed to Ukrainian security guarantees. He claimed that during the summit, the Kremlin had conceded the US "could offer Article-5 like protection", which he described as "game-changing". Article 5 is one of the founding principles of NATO and states that an attack on any of its 32 member states is considered an attack on them all. This was bolstered by the US president himself after he met his Ukrainian counterpart in Washington on Monday. He said the pair had "discussed security guarantees", which would be "provided by the various European countries" - "with coordination with the United States of America". Writing on X the following day, the Ukrainian leader said the "concrete content" of the security agreement would be "formalised on paper within the next 10 days". US reports say security agreement talks will be headed by Secretary of State Marco Rubio. 5:57 What would security guarantees look like? Very few details have emerged so far, despite the series of high-profile meetings. Speaking to Fox News on Tuesday, Mr Trump said European nations are going to "frontload" the security agreement with soldiers. "They want to have boots on the ground", he told the broadcaster, referring to the UK, France, and Germany in particular. He insisted the US would not send ground troops, adding: "You have my assurance and I'm president." Sir Keir Starmer said the coalition of the willing is "preparing for the deployment of a reassurance force" in the event of "hostilities ending". This was the original basis for the coalition - soldiers from various European and allied nations placed strategically across Ukraine to deter Russia from launching future attacks. But troops alone are unlikely to be enough of a deterrent for Vladimir Putin, military analyst Sean Bell says. "This is all about credibility and I don't think boots on the ground is a credible answer," he tells Sky News. Stationing soldiers along Ukraine's 1,000-mile border with Russia would require around 100,000 soldiers at a time, which would have to be trained, deployed, and rotated, requiring 300,000 in total. The entire UK Army would only make up 10% of that, with France likely able to contribute a further 10%, Bell says. Several European nations would feel unable to sacrifice any troops for an umbrella force due to their proximity to Ukraine and risk of further Russian aggression. "You're not even close to getting the numbers you need," Bell adds. "And even if you could, putting all of NATO's frontline forces in one country facing Russia would be really dangerous - and leave China, North Korea, Iran, or Russia free to do whatever they wanted." History of failed security agreements in Ukraine Current proposals for Ukrainian security guarantees are far from the first. In December 1994, Ukraine signed the Budapest Memorandum alongside the UK, US, and Russia. The Ukrainians agreed to give up their Soviet-inherited nuclear weapons in exchange for recognition of their sovereignty and a place on the UN's Nuclear Non-Proliferation Treaty. Twenty years later in 2014, however, Russia violated the terms with its illegal annexation of Crimea and the war between Russian-backed separatists and Ukrainian in the Donbas region. Similarly, the Minsk Agreements of 2014 and 2015 were designed to bring an end to the Donbas war. Mediated by France and Germany, they promised a ceasefire, withdrawal of weapons, and local elections in the separatist-occupied Donbas, but were repeatedly violated and failed to result in lasting peace. 'Article 5-like protection' When Mr Witkoff first mentioned security guarantees again, he described them as "Article 5-like" or "NATO-style". Article 5 is one of the founding principles of NATO and states that an attack on any of its 32 member states is considered an attack on them all. It has only ever been invoked once since its inception in 1949 - by the US in response to the 9/11 attacks of 2001. Russia has repeatedly insisted Ukraine should not be allowed to join NATO and cited the risk of it happening among its original reasons for attacking Kyiv in 2022. NATO general-secretary Mark Rutte has said Ukrainian membership is not on the table, but that an alternative "Article 5-type" arrangement could be viable. The alliance's military leaders are due to meet on Wednesday to discuss options. It is not clear how such a special security agreement and formal NATO membership would differ. Bell says that negotiations on this - and any surrendering of Ukrainian territory - will be the two most difficult in ending the war. But he stresses they are both key in providing the "flesh on the bones" to what the coalition of the willing has offered so far. "It will be about trying to find things that make the Western commitment to the security of Ukraine enduring," Bell adds. US airpower, intelligence and a better Ukrainian military Other potential options for a security agreement include air support, a no-maritime zone, intelligence sharing, and military supplies. Imposing either a no-fly over Ukraine or no-maritime zone across the Black Sea would "play to NATO's strengths" - as US air and naval capabilities alone far outstrip Russia's, Bell says. Sharing American intelligence with Kyiv to warn of any future Russian aggression would also be a "massive strength" to any potential deterrence force, he adds. Ukraine is already offering to buy an extra $90bn (£66.6bn) in US weapons with the help of European funds, Mr Zelenskyy said this week. And any security agreement would likely extend to other military equipment, logistics, and training to help Ukraine better defend itself years down the line, Bell says. "At first it would need credible Western support, but over time, you would hope the international community makes sure Ukraine can build its own indigenous capability. "Because while there's a lot of focus on Ukraine at the moment, in five years' time, there will be different governments and different priorities - so that has to endure."