
Scrambling ministers insist £5billion India trade deal will NOT 'undercut' British workers amid row over 'two-tier' tax exemption
The UK-India trade deal will not undercut British workers, a top minister insisted today amid a row over a tax break for migrant workers.
Business secretary Jonathan Reynolds, the architect of the agreement, came out swinging this morning as Labour faced a major backlash to the £5bn agreement announced yesterday.
Under the agreement, tens of thousands of temporary Indian workers will be exempt from paying National Insurance in Britain, making them cheaper to hire.
New Delhi heralded the deal as an 'unprecedented' win, but the UK Prime Minister was accused of introducing 'two-tier taxes' after National Insurance contributions for British firms were increased in last year's Budget.
Writing for MailOnline, shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith said it could put 'hardworking Brits and British companies ... at a competitive disadvantage against Indian companies bringing in Indian workers'.
But Mr Reynolds this morning said critics of the deal were 'confused' and suggested unhappy Tories were jealous they had not managed to achieve a deal when they were in government.
Speaking to the BBC he said the UK has similar deals with 50 other countries including the US, Japan and Chile, the latter getting a five-year exemption from the Tories a few years ago.
Asked whether the agreement meant Indian workers paying less tax than British counterparts doing the same job, Mr Reynolds told the Today programme: 'No.'
He added: 'There is no situation where I would ever tolerate British workers being undercut through any trade agreement we would sign. That is not part of this deal.
'What the Conservatives are confused about, and Reform as well, is a situation where a business in India seconds someone for a short period of time to the UK, or a UK business seconds a worker to India for a short period of time, where you don't pay in simultaneously now to both social security systems.'
The agreement will see workers who are seconded to the UK offices of Indian-based employers, or a multi-national with offices in the country, exempt from NI for the first three years – allowing them to avoid paying both at home, as per Indian law, and in the UK.
The firm will also not have to pay the contributions. The deal will be reciprocal for British workers transferred to workplaces in India.
Officials have not provided an assessment of the cost or impact on UK businesses.
The change is understood to have been a key demand by New Delhi's negotiators who said the agreement, which has been three years in the making, will result in 'significant financial gains' for Indian companies.
The deal will also see the UK lower tariffs on clothes, shoes and food such as frozen prawns from the subcontinent, in exchange for reciprocal cuts for products including whisky and cars.
The tax break was not mentioned by Downing Street in its announcement.
But a statement by the Indian government said it would 'lead to significant financial gains for the Indian service providers and enhance their competitiveness in the UK market that would create new job opportunities as well as benefit large number of Indians working in the UK'.
Grim figures yesterday revealed the UK's services sector had shrunk for the first time in 18 months, blamed on the NI increase – which came into force in April – and Donald Trump's trade war.
Ministers say the long-coveted agreement will add £4.8 billion a year to the economy by 2040, with dramatic reductions to levies on scotch whisky, car and other exports from Britain.
More than a dozen rounds of talks involving successive governments have taken place since 2022.
Mr Reynolds and Indian commerce minister Piyush Goyal held final talks in London last week after relaunching negotiations two months ago.
'Two-tier' Keir has sold British workers down the river, writes Andrew Griffith
Keir Starmer campaigned energetically for a second referendum with free movement of people.
He used every trick in the book to try and prevent the UK leaving the EU.
He blocked our Brexit deal 48 times when he was Jeremy Corbyn's bag carrier.
How ironic then, that he is the biggest beneficiary of a Brexit benefit – the India trade deal.
I am yet to hear Labour Ministers crowing about the India Trade deal thank Brexit through gritted teeth for this free trade arrangement. I won't hold my breath.
Unlike the EU, India is on the up. It has an outstanding entrepreneurial spirit and British businesses do well exporting Scottish Whisky, cars, and high-tech aerospace products there. It's why we spent three long years doing the hard yards negotiating the deal.
It could boost our economy, provide some relief to bosses battered by this Labour government and improve trade with one of the fastest growing economies in the world.
But it seems that, as per usual, when Labour negotiates, Britain loses. And today, it is truer than ever – Two tier Keir has been up to his usual tricks, and sold British workers down the river.
Whilst Labour have hiked the Jobs Tax on British workers, they have given a tax cut to Indian workers.
That means hardworking Brits and British companies could be at a competitive disadvantage against Indian companies bringing in Indian workers.
Unsurprisingly, there was no mention of this own goal in any UK government announcement. But Narendra Modi proudly announced it himself and exposed what Keir Starmer tried to bury from the British public.
Labour tried to cover it up, but it was never going to work when the Indian government was so delighted with its negotiating victory. They've been caught in the act.
It means India's biggest win is flooding the UK market with its people. Bizarrely, under this deal, yoga teachers, buskers and takeaway chefs now qualify as skilled labour – meaning they will also be able to bring their dependents. Keir Starmer seems determined to make us the soft touch immigration capital of the world and never misses an opportunity to surrender.
Already, because of Labour's choices, business confidence is tanking, prices are up and growth is down, all while immigration and taxes are at record highs. In Labour's desperation to try and undo some of the damage they have levelled on British businesses, they risk making everything significantly worse.
As with all of these things, the devil is in the detail. And we will look closely at the details of this deal, but it already seems to be unravelling before our eyes.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Reuters
31 minutes ago
- Reuters
India's Paytm slumps after government says reports of UPI transaction fees false
June 12 (Reuters) - Shares of digital payments firm Paytm ( opens new tab slumped as much as 10% on Thursday after India's finance ministry said, opens new tab that reports about the introduction of fees on the popular unified payments interface (UPI) transactions were false and baseless. The shares posted their sharpest intraday fall since February 2024, before coming off lows to trade down 8%. India's benchmark Nifty 50 (.NSEI), opens new tab was trading 0.2% lower. In India, merchants pay fees to banks or payment service providers, such as Paytm, for transactions. There is no fees on UPI payments. The delay or non-introduction of the fees is "sentiment negative for Paytm", brokerage UBS said, adding that the firm's adjusted core profits could decline more than 10% in fiscal years 2026 and 2027 if increased incentives are absent.


Telegraph
an hour ago
- Telegraph
More than 130 years later, this pragmatic trust still offers something new
Questor is The Telegraph's stockpicking column, helping you decode the markets and offering insights on where to invest for the past six decades. The UK equity market has been a happy hunting ground for income-seeking investors, and it continues to offer a yield premium to other developed equity markets. However, more recent events, particularly across competing income-producing asset classes, have shifted the emphasis for equity income investors towards total returns, dividend growth and the benefits of a pragmatic approach to stock selection. In the context of an evolving landscape of UK equity income strategies, few names stand out as consistently as Law Debenture. This venerable institution, with almost 136 years of history, combines an actively managed UK equity investment portfolio with the robust growth of its wholly-owned independent professional services (IPS) business, which is comprised of three divisions – pensions, corporate trust and corporate services. This combination creates a unique structure that supports the trust's history of consistent outperformance. The investment portfolio is managed by the experienced Janus Henderson duo of James Henderson and Laura Foll, and benefits from a contrarian and value-focused style. The investment approach followed by Henderson and Foll is unconstrained by the equity income mandate, can invest across the market cap spectrum and targets companies trading at reasonable valuations with conservative balance sheets and experienced management teams. One of the standout features of Law Debenture is the IPS business, which accounts for around 19pc of its net asset value (Nav) and has funded approximately 30pc of its dividends over the past decade. IPS has delivered mid-to-high single-digit growth and around two thirds of IPS revenues are recurring.


The Independent
2 hours ago
- The Independent
What to know after anti-immigrant violence flares in a Northern Ireland town
Police in Northern Ireland say 17 officers were injured during a second night of anti-immigrant violence in the town of Ballymena, where rioters threw bricks, bottles, petrol bombs and fireworks and set several vehicles and houses on fire. Police used water cannon and fired rubber bullets to disperse a crowd of several hundred people. The Police Service of Northern Ireland said Wednesday that the violence died down by about 1 a.m. Five people were arrested on suspicion of 'riotous behavior.' What sparked the violence Violence erupted Monday after a peaceful march to show support for the family of the victim of an alleged sexual assault on the weekend. Two 14-year-old boys have been charged. The suspects have not been identified because of their age. They were supported in court by a Romanian interpreter. After the march, a crowd of mostly young people set several houses on fire and pelted police with projectiles. The Police Service of Northern Ireland said 15 officers were injured that night. There were similar scenes after dark on Tuesday, as well as small pockets of disorder in several other Northern Ireland towns. Police said agitators on social media were helping fuel what Assistant Chief Constable Ryan Henderson called 'racist thuggery.' The town's history Some politicians said immigration had strained the town of about 30,000 some 25 miles (40 km) northwest of Belfast, long known as a bastion of hardline pro-British Loyalism. Jim Allister, leader of the conservative party Traditional Unionist Voice, said 'unchecked migration, which is beyond what the town can cope with, is a source of past and future tensions.' Some Romanians in Ballymena told Britain's PA news agency they had lived in the town for years and were shocked by the violence. Several houses in the Clonavon Terrace area that was the focus of the violence put up signs identifying their residents as British or Filipino in an apparent attempt to avoid being targeted. Henderson said there was no evidence that Loyalist paramilitaries, who still hold sway over Protestant communities, were behind the disorder. Past Northern Ireland history Northern Ireland has a long history of street disorder stretching back to tensions between the British unionist and Irish nationalist communities. Though three decades of violence known as 'the Troubles' largely ended after a 1998 peace accord, tensions remain between those — largely Protestants — who see themselves as British and Irish nationalists, who are mostly Catholic. In Belfast, 'peace walls' still separate working-class Protestant and Catholic areas. Street rioters sporadically clash with police, and recently immigrants have become a target. Anti-immigrant violence erupted in Northern Ireland as well as England last year after three girls were stabbed to death at a Taylor Swift-themed dance class in the northwest England town of Southport. Authorities said online misinformation wrongly identifying the U.K.-born teenage attacker as a migrant played a part. Government appeals for calm Police condemned the latest violence and said they would call in officers from England and Wales to bolster their response if needed. All the parties in Northern Ireland's power-sharing government issued a joint statement appealing for calm and urging people to reject 'the divisive agenda being pursued by a minority of destructive, bad faith actors." On the alleged sexual assault, the statement added that 'it is paramount that the justice process is now allowed to take its course so that this heinous crime can be robustly investigated. Those weaponizing the situation in order to sow racial tensions do not care about seeing justice and have nothing to offer their communities but division and disorder.'