logo
Scrambling ministers insist £5billion India trade deal will NOT 'undercut' British workers amid row over 'two-tier' tax exemption

Scrambling ministers insist £5billion India trade deal will NOT 'undercut' British workers amid row over 'two-tier' tax exemption

Daily Mail​07-05-2025
The UK-India trade deal will not undercut British workers, a top minister insisted today amid a row over a tax break for migrant workers.
Business secretary Jonathan Reynolds, the architect of the agreement, came out swinging this morning as Labour faced a major backlash to the £5bn agreement announced yesterday.
Under the agreement, tens of thousands of temporary Indian workers will be exempt from paying National Insurance in Britain, making them cheaper to hire.
New Delhi heralded the deal as an 'unprecedented' win, but the UK Prime Minister was accused of introducing 'two-tier taxes' after National Insurance contributions for British firms were increased in last year's Budget.
Writing for MailOnline, shadow business secretary Andrew Griffith said it could put 'hardworking Brits and British companies ... at a competitive disadvantage against Indian companies bringing in Indian workers'.
But Mr Reynolds this morning said critics of the deal were 'confused' and suggested unhappy Tories were jealous they had not managed to achieve a deal when they were in government.
Speaking to the BBC he said the UK has similar deals with 50 other countries including the US, Japan and Chile, the latter getting a five-year exemption from the Tories a few years ago.
Asked whether the agreement meant Indian workers paying less tax than British counterparts doing the same job, Mr Reynolds told the Today programme: 'No.'
He added: 'There is no situation where I would ever tolerate British workers being undercut through any trade agreement we would sign. That is not part of this deal.
'What the Conservatives are confused about, and Reform as well, is a situation where a business in India seconds someone for a short period of time to the UK, or a UK business seconds a worker to India for a short period of time, where you don't pay in simultaneously now to both social security systems.'
The agreement will see workers who are seconded to the UK offices of Indian-based employers, or a multi-national with offices in the country, exempt from NI for the first three years – allowing them to avoid paying both at home, as per Indian law, and in the UK.
The firm will also not have to pay the contributions. The deal will be reciprocal for British workers transferred to workplaces in India.
Officials have not provided an assessment of the cost or impact on UK businesses.
The change is understood to have been a key demand by New Delhi's negotiators who said the agreement, which has been three years in the making, will result in 'significant financial gains' for Indian companies.
The deal will also see the UK lower tariffs on clothes, shoes and food such as frozen prawns from the subcontinent, in exchange for reciprocal cuts for products including whisky and cars.
The tax break was not mentioned by Downing Street in its announcement.
But a statement by the Indian government said it would 'lead to significant financial gains for the Indian service providers and enhance their competitiveness in the UK market that would create new job opportunities as well as benefit large number of Indians working in the UK'.
Grim figures yesterday revealed the UK's services sector had shrunk for the first time in 18 months, blamed on the NI increase – which came into force in April – and Donald Trump's trade war.
Ministers say the long-coveted agreement will add £4.8 billion a year to the economy by 2040, with dramatic reductions to levies on scotch whisky, car and other exports from Britain.
More than a dozen rounds of talks involving successive governments have taken place since 2022.
Mr Reynolds and Indian commerce minister Piyush Goyal held final talks in London last week after relaunching negotiations two months ago.
'Two-tier' Keir has sold British workers down the river, writes Andrew Griffith
Keir Starmer campaigned energetically for a second referendum with free movement of people.
He used every trick in the book to try and prevent the UK leaving the EU.
He blocked our Brexit deal 48 times when he was Jeremy Corbyn's bag carrier.
How ironic then, that he is the biggest beneficiary of a Brexit benefit – the India trade deal.
I am yet to hear Labour Ministers crowing about the India Trade deal thank Brexit through gritted teeth for this free trade arrangement. I won't hold my breath.
Unlike the EU, India is on the up. It has an outstanding entrepreneurial spirit and British businesses do well exporting Scottish Whisky, cars, and high-tech aerospace products there. It's why we spent three long years doing the hard yards negotiating the deal.
It could boost our economy, provide some relief to bosses battered by this Labour government and improve trade with one of the fastest growing economies in the world.
But it seems that, as per usual, when Labour negotiates, Britain loses. And today, it is truer than ever – Two tier Keir has been up to his usual tricks, and sold British workers down the river.
Whilst Labour have hiked the Jobs Tax on British workers, they have given a tax cut to Indian workers.
That means hardworking Brits and British companies could be at a competitive disadvantage against Indian companies bringing in Indian workers.
Unsurprisingly, there was no mention of this own goal in any UK government announcement. But Narendra Modi proudly announced it himself and exposed what Keir Starmer tried to bury from the British public.
Labour tried to cover it up, but it was never going to work when the Indian government was so delighted with its negotiating victory. They've been caught in the act.
It means India's biggest win is flooding the UK market with its people. Bizarrely, under this deal, yoga teachers, buskers and takeaway chefs now qualify as skilled labour – meaning they will also be able to bring their dependents. Keir Starmer seems determined to make us the soft touch immigration capital of the world and never misses an opportunity to surrender.
Already, because of Labour's choices, business confidence is tanking, prices are up and growth is down, all while immigration and taxes are at record highs. In Labour's desperation to try and undo some of the damage they have levelled on British businesses, they risk making everything significantly worse.
As with all of these things, the devil is in the detail. And we will look closely at the details of this deal, but it already seems to be unravelling before our eyes.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Wang Yi: China and India should be partners, not adversaries says foreign minister
Wang Yi: China and India should be partners, not adversaries says foreign minister

BBC News

time11 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Wang Yi: China and India should be partners, not adversaries says foreign minister

India and China should view each other as "partners" rather than "adversaries or threats", Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi said on Monday, as he arrived for a two-day visit to Delhi. Yi met with Indian Foreign Minister S Jaishankar - only the second such meeting between the two sides since 2020 - when deadly clashes in the Galwan valley in Ladakh, a disputed Himalayan border region, led to a complete breakdown of ties between the countries. Relations are now on a "positive trend" towards cooperation, Yi said ahead of a meeting with Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi on Tuesday. Jaishankar said that India and China were seeking to "move ahead from a difficult period in our ties". The two counterparts held discussions on a range of bilateral issues from trade to pilgrimages and river data sharing. Yi is also scheduled to meet India's National Security Advisor Ajit Doval for on-going negotiations on resolving the boundary dispute between the two countries. The visit is being seen as the latest sign of a thaw in ties between the nuclear-armed neighbours. India and China had agreed on patrolling arrangements to de-escalate tensions along the disputed Himalayan border in October last year. Since then, the two sides have taken a range of steps to normalise relations, including China allowing Indian pilgrims to visit key places in the Tibet autonomous region this year. India has also restarted visa services to Chinese tourists and agreed to resume talks to open border trade through designated are also reports that direct flights between the two countries will resume this year. India and China strive to reset ties but with cautionIndia and China agree to de-escalate border tensionsYi's meetings are expected to lay the groundwork for Modi's first visit to China in seven years later this month, to attend the summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organisation (SCO), a regional security bloc. Reports suggest Modi might also hold bilateral talks with China's President Xi Jinping, but neither side has confirmed this. The rapprochement between the countries comes in the backdrop of India's worsening bilateral relationship with the this month, US President Donald Trump imposed an additional 25% penalty on Indian imports for buying oil and weapons from Russia, taking total tariffs to 50% - the highest in Monday, White House Trade Advisor Peter Navarro wrote an opinion piece in The Financial Times in which he accused India of "cozying up to both Russia and China"."India acts as a global clearinghouse for Russian oil, converting embargoed crude into high-value exports while giving Moscow the dollars it needs," Navarro wrote."If India wants to be treated as a strategic partner of the U.S., it needs to start acting like one," he his remarks after meeting with Yi on Monday, Jaishankar said talks would include global developments. "We seek a fair, balanced and multi-polar world order, including a multipolar Asia," Jaishankar said. "Reformed multilateralism is also the call of the day. In the current environment, there is clearly the imperative of maintaining and enhancing stability in the global economy as well," he added. Follow BBC News India on Instagram, YouTube, X and Facebook

The sacrifices parents make to afford children's school uniform
The sacrifices parents make to afford children's school uniform

The Independent

time11 minutes ago

  • The Independent

The sacrifices parents make to afford children's school uniform

A survey indicates that over a quarter of parents will go without food or heating to afford school uniform, with many relying on credit cards or 'buy now, pay later' schemes. Education Secretary Bridget Phillipson has called on schools to reduce branded uniform items, ahead of a new law capping compulsory branded items to three from September 2026. The Children 's Wellbeing and Schools Bill aims to alleviate financial strain on families, with 85 per cent of parents believing schools could cut costs by reducing branded items. While parents largely support the cap, some schoolwear retailers caution that it could lead to higher overall costs if unbranded items prove less durable. School leaders recognise the financial pressures on families, with some already relaxing uniform rules, though one headteacher suggested the cap might hinder behaviour management.

Stop children using VPNs to watch porn, ministers told
Stop children using VPNs to watch porn, ministers told

BBC News

time12 minutes ago

  • BBC News

Stop children using VPNs to watch porn, ministers told

The government needs to stop children using virtual private networks (VPNs) to bypass age checks on porn sites, the children's commissioner for England has said. Dame Rachel de Souza told BBC Newsnight it was "absolutely a loophole that needs closing" and called for age verification on VPNs. VPNs can disguise your location online - allowing you to use the internet as though you are in another country. It means that they can be used to bypass requirements of the Online Safety Act, which mandated platforms with certain adult content to start checking the age of users.A government spokesperson said VPNs are legal tools for adults and there are no plans to ban them. The children's commissioner's recommendation is included in a new report, which found the proportion of children saying they have seen pornography online has risen in the past two yearsLast month VPNs were the most downloaded apps on Apple's App Store in the UK after sites such as PornHub, Reddit and X began requiring age verification. Virtual private networks connect users to websites using a remote server and conceal their actual IP address and location, meaning they can circumvent blocks on particular sites or Rachel told BBC Newsnight: "Of course, we need age verification on VPNs - it's absolutely a loophole that needs closing and that's one of my major recommendations."The report calls for the ministers to explore requiring VPNs "to implement highly effective age assurances to stop underage users from accessing pornography." The report, titled "Sex Is Kind Of Broken", also found more children are stumbling across pornography accidentally, with some of the 16 to 21-year-olds surveyed saying they had viewed it "aged six or younger".The data was gathered prior to the amendments to the Online Safety Act in July, which brought in age verification tools for pornography. Dame Rachel described the findings as "rock bottom". "This tells us how much of the problem is about the design of platforms, algorithms and recommendation systems that put harmful content in front of children who never sought it out," the commissioner said, calling for the report to act as a "line in the sand".More than half of respondents to the survey had viewed strangulation as children, prompting Dame Rachel to also ask the government to ban depictions of it. Pornography depicting rape of a sleeping person was also seen by 44% of respondents as children.X, formerly known as Twitter, remained the most common source of pornography for children, the report Department of Science, Innovation and Technology told the BBC "children have been left to grow up in a lawless online world for too long" and "the Online Safety Act is changing that'.On Dame Rachel's VPN comments, the spokesperson said there are no plans to ban them "but if platforms deliberately push workarounds like VPNs to children, they face tough enforcement and heavy fines." In an exclusive interview with BBC Newsnight Dame Rachel said "what's really worrying is how this is changing the behaviour of young people".Josh Lane was addicted to porn by 14-years-old after first finding it accidentally on Google search aged told Newsnight the addiction caused him to isolate himself from friends and family because he was "afraid of anyone discovering that I was hooked."Mr Lane described finding "the only place I could get, I guess, love and intimacy was from pornography" at the same time as feeling "heaps of guilt and shame"Now 25, he has not looked at porn in almost a year but said the addiction is "a problem that affects you forever". Kerry Smith, CEO of the Internet Watch Foundation, said "children's exposure to extreme or violent sexual imagery can normalise harmful sexual behaviours, and is increasingly linked to sexual violence against girls and women". She added: "It is clear this is something we all need to be taking seriously, and the safeguards adult sites have put in place to make sure children can't access sexual content must be robust and meaningful."

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store