Donald Trump says he wants to stop Vladimir Putin's 'war machine' but his sanctions–tariffs combo could backfire
This time, it's where they're going — far from the front lines — that's important. And some analysts are warning it could backfire.
After weeks of bluster, things got real on Wednesday with an executive order for an additional 25 per cent levies on all US imports from India.
Combined with the 25 per cent "reciprocal" tariff announced last week, it becomes a 50 per cent tariff on a country Trump said was fuelling the "war machine" by buying billions of dollars of Russian oil.
The White House has flagged more announcements in the coming days.
Trump is trying to dig an economic hole around Moscow so big it forces his counterpart there, Vladimir Putin, back to the negotiating table.
It's a simple strategy. Measures designed to hurt Russia's finances that have been in place for years will effectively be expanded to include those who line the Kremlin's pockets.
India and China have already been singled out for what's known as secondary sanctions.
Combined with new tariffs, like those announced on Wednesday, the US could end up being the one that pays the price.
Russia has already been subjected to a multitude of penalties imposed by Western governments, including Australia, and their allies, before and after its full-scale invasion of Ukraine.
Moscow's banks are blocked from accessing global financial markets. Oligarchs' assets abroad are frozen. Many countries have shunned trade.
All this was designed to stop Putin's ability to fund his military.
And yet, more than three years later, it continues to fight.
It's become clear that ending the war will take something more. That's where the US president's new plan comes in.
India's external affairs ministry released a statement on Wednesday calling the extra tariffs "extremely unfortunate" and warning the country would "take all actions necessary to protect its national interests".
Michael O'Kane is a senior partner at London's Peters&Peters law firm and the co-founder of the Global Sanctions website, which tracks the latest developments in this space.
He's sceptical about the effectiveness of secondary sanctions, because the West "continually underestimates Russia's ability to pivot and evade any new measures that are being put in place".
"And I don't see any reason why that isn't going to continue."
One of the main ways the Kremlin does this is by exporting its oil via a so-called "shadow fleet" of ships.
It's estimated this force comprises around 1,400 aging tankers that supply a black market of exports and evade the West's naval net with flags of convenience and convoluted ownership structures.
"We now have an under-the-radar network of vessels, agents and brokers who are engaged in this activity," O'Kane says.
"The two main buyers are India and China, and they are hugely complex, enormous economies where there's a great deal of difficulty in putting some kind of stranglehold on them."
Trump's sanctions/tariffs combination will have different repercussions for China, India and Russia, but experts say the US will be affected too.
India's new 25 per cent levies are set to begin in 21 days, while previously announced 25 per cent tariffs will come into effect on Thursday.
It means by the end of the month, New Delhi will face some of the highest levies on exports of all the US's trading partners.
"With such obnoxious tariff rates, trade between the two nations would be practically dead," Madhavi Arora, an economist at Emkay Global, told the Reuters news agency.
While that will hurt India more than the US, slapping new taxes on an important strategic partner could cause significant geopolitical consequences for Washington.
"The United States security competition with China in the South China Sea and down into the Indian Ocean is a matter of significant concern to the White House," O'Kane says.
"They need to have formidable allies. That's why we've seen this AUKUS arrangement being set up, it's all with the view of being able to contain China from a security perspective.
"India plays an important role too, and it would seem to me as though taking action against India at this stage could undermine this effort."
While India has begun to learn its fate, new US tariffs and secondary sanctions on China — a superpower with which it is currently locked in trade negotiations — haven't yet been revealed
Beijing also welcomes Russia's oil, and immunity from Trump's wrath appears unlikely.
Dr Patricia M Kim is a fellow at the Brookings Institution's Centre for Asia Policy Studies and John L Thornton China Centre.
"It's hard to imagine Beijing would publicly side with Washington against Moscow or appear to bow to American pressure by cutting purchases of Russian oil," she says, adding any new tariffs announced by the White House would have consequences for Beijing and "deal a blow to Chian's export-driven sectors, especially those heavily reliant on the US market".
"But it would hurt the US as well."
Unlike its trade relationship with India, the US imports masses of cheap electronics and consumer goods from China's manufacturing hubs — all of which could become a lot more expensive for Americans already complaining about the cost of living.
It also relies on rare earths from China, which accounts for almost 70 per cent of global production, to build things like planes, missiles and cars.
Earlier this year, the US got a taste of how Beijing reacts to being targeted, when a suite of new tariffs were met with swift reciprocal measures.
The world's two largest economies got into the ring, and while they've temporarily stopped throwing punches, the White House has hinted this week it may start again.
Trump's new plan to try and put pressure on Russia may seem straightforward, but it could pave the way for a new reality after the guns fall silent in Ukraine, and some will find it frightening.
Russia exploiting its new, lucrative black market. India cosying up to the Kremlin. And a disrespected China searching for new ways to punish a country that can't do without its wares.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Sky News AU
13 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
Vladimir Putin ‘prioritising' war strategic gains over peace negotiations
Sky News US analyst Michael Ware discusses the meeting between Russian President Vladimir Putin and US Special Envoy Steve Witkoff, claiming nothing of 'substance' came from it. 'It does appear, according to the White House, that Moscow has expressed interest in President Vladimir Putin meeting personally with President Trump next week,' Mr Ware said. 'The problem here is we can't get too excited too soon because Vladimir Putin genuinely believes he can still grind out a military victory on the ground. 'Vladimir Putin is prioritising strategic gains on the battlefield over President Trump's promises to help inject life back into the Russian economy.'

Sky News AU
13 minutes ago
- Sky News AU
US to impose further sanctions on Russia despite ‘highly productive' talks with Putin
US President Donald Trump claims the meeting between Special Envoy Steve Witkoff and Russian President Vladimir Putin was 'highly productive'. The clock is ticking for Moscow to enter a ceasefire deal with Ukraine after the American leader brought forward the deadline. President Trump posted on his Truth Social: 'My Special Envoy, Steve Witkoff, just had a highly productive meeting with Russian President Vladimir Putin. Great progress was made. 'Afterwards, I updated some of our European Allies. Everyone agrees this war must come to a close, and we will work towards that in the days and weeks to come. However, while the talks were described as 'positive' by the Kremlin, the White House has announced further sanctions will be imposed on Russia this week.

ABC News
13 minutes ago
- ABC News
Why a showdown over Texas congressional districts could shape Trump's presidential future
Texas has become the site of a massive political showdown that could have a direct influence on US President Donald Trump's ability to continue his agenda. Democrats have scattered to friendly states across the country and warrants have been issued for their arrest. At the core of the fight is a map that could be key to Republicans retaining their majority in Congress. Here's a basic breakdown of the stoush. In late July, Texas Republicans put forward a proposal to redraw the state's congressional map. The map lays out the borders of Texas's 38 congressional districts (equivalent to Australia's federal electorates), which each vote for a politician to represent them in the US House of Representatives. Texas Democrats were quick to point out the new version of the map would result in Republicans gaining five seats. That's a tactic known as gerrymandering, where districts are redrawn to include more voters in favour of one party to give a political advantage. Democrats didn't support the proposal, but because they don't hold power in the Texas state legislature, they were unable to vote it down. So instead, they fled the state to prevent a vote entirely. Governor Greg Abbott retaliated by ordering the arrest of the Democrats and threatening to have them removed from office. The battle in Texas holds massive repercussions for Mr Trump's power at a federal level. Republicans currently only hold the US House of Representatives by a very fine margin of 219-212. But they are expected to lose seats in the midterm elections next year, when all members of the US House of Representatives stand for re-election. It means the Republicans are at serious risk of losing their majority. Redistricting Texas would give them a five-seat cushion, which could be what saves them from losing the majority. If Democrats take control of the House of Representatives, Mr Trump would need to negotiate with his opponents to get laws passed. Yes. The Supreme Court found in 2006 that there was nothing in the US Constitution that prevented Texas from redrawing its districts. In 2009, the court also found there were no judicial powers to stop districts from being redrawn for partisan advantage. Mr Abbott argues redistricting is necessary to better reflect voters who supported Mr Trump in the 2024 election, when he easily won Texas. "Gerrymandering can be done, or drawing lines, can be done on the basis of political makeup, as in Republicans versus Democrats, and there's nothing illegal about that," he said in an interview with Fox News on Monday. "All of these districts that are being added are districts that were won by Trump." Republicans hold the majority in the Texas State Legislature, so if the redistricting went to a vote, it would have been passed. Democrats sized up their limited power and options, and decided their only chance to put the brakes on the redistricting was to block the vote from going ahead at all. The Texas constitution requires at least two-thirds of the state's House of Representatives to be present when conducting legislative business. With 150 seats in the House, that means at least 100 representatives are needed, and while they don't have the majority, Democrats do hold 62 seats. As long as 51 are out of state, the House can't hold the redistricting vote. It hasn't worked when they've tried it in the past. They did so twice in 2003 to stop Republicans from redrawing voter maps. In 2021, Democrats fled for 38 days over an elections bill and new voting restrictions. These efforts only delayed the measures they were seeking to thwart — all were eventually passed when Democrats returned to Austin. The current legislature session runs until August 19, but Mr Abbott could keep calling 30-day special sessions until enough Democrats return. But districts need to be approved before the opening of Texas candidate filing for the 2026 midterms on November 8. So for Democrats to succeed with their current strategy, at least 51 would need to stay out of the state until then. Texas House Democratic Caucus Chair Gene Wu says Democrats will do "whatever it takes" to stop the proposal. Legal experts and even Republican state Attorney-General Ken Paxton say it would be difficult to enforce consequences against the Democrats while they are safely camped out in sympathetic states. "Until they show up themselves back in Texas, sometimes it's hard to actually execute on that," Mr Paxton said in an interview with conservative podcaster Benny Johnson. When Democrats left Texas in 2021, the Texas Supreme Court held that House leaders had the authority to "physically compel the attendance" of missing members. But no Democrats were forcibly brought back to Texas after warrants were served. While House Speaker Dustin Burrows has issued civil arrest warrants for the missing Democrats, it's unclear whether they can or will be enforced outside Texas's borders. Mr Abbott has ordered the state troopers to find and arrest the Democrats, threatened to have them removed from office and has officially asked the state's highest court to remove Mr Wu, arguing he has vacated his seat. The attorney-general said having seats declared vacated could be a long process, and would require individual lawsuits filed against each missing representative. Still, Mr Paxton said he would press ahead with lawsuits if the Democrats had not returned by Friday. "We'll see where it goes," Republican state senator Charles Perry said. The Democrats will likely be hit with a hefty bill, though. Refusing to show up for a legislative session is a civil violation of legislative rules, and each representative can be fined $500 for every day they are not at the Capitol. Democratic-controlled states have warned if Texas goes ahead with redistricting, they could so the same. California Governor Gavin Newsom has asked politicians in his state to find ways for the Democrats to increase their majority. Governors Kathy Hochul in New York and JB Pritzker in Illinois have made similar calls. "Everything's on the table," Mr Pritzker wrote in a post on X. "Republicans are using every method they can, whether it's cheating or breaking the law. "We've got to do everything we can to stand up and fight back — we're not sitting around and complaining from the sidelines when we have the ability to stop them." Republicans are looking beyond Texas, too. Vice-President JD Vance is expected to bring the redistricting fight to Indiana as he meets with Governor Mike Braun on Thursday. Florida Governor Ron DeSantis has suggested he may pursue redistricting, too. ABC/wires