UK Government urged to reconsider decision to cut cash for peace fund
The IFI was originally set up by the UK and Irish governments as an independent international organisation in 1986.
It delivers a range of peace and reconciliation initiatives across Northern Ireland and Irish border counties, including supporting communities to work towards removal of the remaining peace walls.
Sinn Fein North Belfast MP John Finucane said he is concerned about the move, and said he will raise it directly with Secretary of State Hilary Benn.
'It is extremely concerning that the British Government is to cut funding for IFI,' he said.
'IFI was established to promote peace, reconciliation and a better future for all communities across Ireland.
'Peace is hard-won and hard-fought. It can never be taken for granted, and crucial funds like this must continue to be supported.
'The British Government should be increasing funding in light of the withdrawal of US support, not imposing further hardship.
'I will be writing to British Secretary of State Hilary Benn, calling for his Government to reverse this decision and ensure IFI can continue its vital grassroots-led programmes.'
Responding, a UK Government spokesperson said: 'This Government inherited a very challenging fiscal position, and needed to take difficult but necessary decisions to place the public finances on a sustainable footing.
'As a result, the Government has decided not to continue with the £1 million contribution to the International Fund for Ireland in 2024-25.
'The Government remains supportive of the IFI's aims of promoting peace and reconciliation.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Herald Scotland
39 minutes ago
- The Herald Scotland
Where is the vision to provide jobs from green energy projects?
Both Westminster and Holyrood focus on the production of green energy but fail to provide the major benefits of manufacturing the components that would provide work for thousands. There is no ambition, vision or plan for our manufacturing industry but they will be providing millions in funding for rich energy companies while manufacturing is bereft of work. Robert Buirds, Port Glasgow. The public will be sickened The decision in principle by the Scottish Government to grant planning permission for a completely unnecessary massive offshore wind farm, Berwick Bank, to be constructed in an environmentally sensitive location beggars belief, especially given the scale of the well-judged opposition which has simply been ignored. We note that "SSE Renewables will have to provide a plan to counter any impact the wind farm may have on seabirds to be approved by ministers", but this is thin gruel, especially as SSE is quoted as admitting in its own environmental impact assessment that more than 31,000 bird collisions are estimated during its lifespan. What will its proposed "mitigation" provide? It is to be hoped that it will be something better than the farcically inappropriate plans that Equinor has put in place to construct an inappropriately sited nesting habitat for Arctic terns hundreds of miles from its proposed massive wind farm extension off the coast of Norfolk. Whatever it is, it is difficult to see how it can provide more than a small sticking plaster for a deliberate act of ecocide that should never have been granted permission The Scottish Government may well have shot itself in the foot. Even people who would not normally object to a wind farm are sickened by this decision. The sleeping giant in the name of Joe Public has awakened. Aileen Jackson, Scotland Against Spin, Uplawmoor. Read more letters Energy transition is a farce The energy transition of Scotland (and the UK) is veering from ambition to farce. Most people acknowledge climate change's reality and support action, but current policies are incoherent and self-defeating. Shutting down North Sea oil and gas while obsessing over intermittent wind energy leaves us all paying a steep price. That price is staggering. Our energy costs, the highest in Europe and roughly four times those in the US, strangle industry, export our carbon footprint to high coal-burning nations, deter investment, and undermine ambitions to lead in high-tech sectors like artificial intelligence. Data centres, vital for AI, demand vast electricity and water supplies – ambitions that will vanish without secure, affordable power. Wind power has a role, but its limitations are stark. Intermittent turbines require 100% backup like costly, potentially hazardous battery parks, idling gas plants, and nearly doubled transmission lines scarring the Highlands. We must also confront the 'green' components' toxic waste and China's dominance of the supply chain, leaving us strategically vulnerable. Meanwhile, a gold rush mentality prevails. Landowners and foreign developers reap fortunes, communities receive scant 'shiny beads', and massive infrastructure rises despite local objections. This mishmash of ideas, driven by political vanity rather than strategy, lacks joined-up thinking. In the First World War, people spoke of 'lions led by donkeys'. Today, we have citizens and businesses led by donkey politicians, stumbling through an energy policy that is economically ruinous and strategically reckless. The solution is obvious: a balanced energy mix: renewables, nuclear for baseload, and domestic hydrocarbons (including 'clean' cheap coal for specific industries like steel and AI) to bridge intermittent failures and the high cost of renewables. Without this, net zero risks collapsing under its own absurdities. Ian Lakin, Aberdeen. Labour's brass neck Surely a special brass neck award is due to the Labour Party on its gaslighting of Scotland? In June Rachel Reeves informed Equinor, the Norwegian energy giant, that the extra tax on Scotland's oil and gas industry would be spent on carbon capture; £22 billion is to go to carbon capture in England while Scotland has been promised a miserly £200 million. The utterly useless Scottish Secretary Ian Murray is bragging of a 'massive jobs opportunity for Scotland' over defence spending, when the bulk of any new money will go to building submarines in England. Typically Scotland has received only about half of its per capita spend (4% for 8.2% of the population) due over decades (Whitehall even stopped publishing the stats because they were so bad) and the money usually goes to big corporations rather than local companies. Isn't it time that these pronouncements were fact-checked by the media, and the political operators making them were put on the spot, because they are so out of line with the truth? GR Weir, Ochiltree. Disgraceful Festival bans Speaking on Sky News, well-known actor Brian Cox has once again criticised Donald Trump and reiterated his desire for Scottish independence. He might be in Edinburgh right now but normally he resides in does not help. Additionally he has waded in to say he abhors "cancel culture" but the very festival he is appearing at has done just that by banning two comedians because they were Jewish. It has allowed actors in favour of Palestine without a problem. Mr Cox can perhaps see the dilemma here? Can we expect him to speak out over these cancellations and, in fact, can we expect his beloved SNP Government to speak out too? It is not a good look for the [[Edinburgh]] Festival which ought to be promoting Scottish values including fairness. Dr Gerald Edwards, Glasgow. Why heed Netanyahu? Benjamin Netanyahu continues to enact his policy of ethnic cleansing unabated in Gaza using starvation and a variety of other methods. It beggars belief that Rebecca McCurdy obviously considers such an individual's opinion on the future of [[Gaza]] of some worth ("Why PM missed mark on recognising state of [[Palestine]]", [[The Herald]], July 31), citing that the recognition of a Palestinian state would be rewarding Hamas. We have surely arrived at a dangerous and surreal place when we are asked to heed the advice of someone indicted for war crimes by the International Criminal Court, regarding the very people he is killing. Khalida Rasul, Glasgow. Terror does have its rewards With spectacular irony, the Israeli regime describes the recognition of a Palestinian state as a reward for terrorism. They should know! For 80 years they have inflicted terror on the Palestinian people, culminating now in the murder of 60,000 people. If that is not an act of terror, what is? This piece of nonsense is repeatedly echoed by the BBC and our print Israel has been richly rewarded for it in the form of land acquisition and military support from the United States and the United Kingdom. Clearly, terror has its rewards. David Currie, Tarland. Israel's Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu (Image: PA) Why change UK policy? For whatever good reason, the UK Government's policy for years has been that it doesn't recognise the existence of a state of [[Palestine]]. What has changed to persuade it that its previous justification for that policy no longer exists? Trying to influence [[Israel]] to do something is a different matter unrelated to that justification which surely remains in place? Prime Minister Starmer therefore needs to explain precisely what he believes allows him now, all of a sudden, to dismiss the previous justification for the long standing non-recognition policy. It would be helpful also if at the same time he clarified the borders of such a state he intends to recognise and his intention to maintain the current UK proscription of Hamas. Finally, he needs to address the intervention by 40 peers (including seven KCs) questioning the legitimacy of his intentions. All in all, it is beginning to look like another u-turn is likely in September. Even if recognition actually does happen, it will be pointless as Keir Starmer must know [[Israel]] will simply ignore it. History will judge it as no more than an ill-thought-out party political stunt in an attempt to placate his backbenchers and shore up Labour's Muslim vote on which the election of some of them depends. Alan Fitzpatrick, Dunlop.
Metro
40 minutes ago
- Metro
'I create fake IDs of your MP so you can get round Online Safety Act'
'It will be funny when Keir Starmer's driving licence is leaked online,' said Tim Knight, the creator of Use-Their-ID, a website that generates IDs of any sitting MP in response to the Online Safety Act. Type in a postcode, and in just seconds you can get something that looks uncomfortably real – a photo, a signature, a date of birth, a home address. Like the prime minister's ID, all of it is fake, of course – but people are trying to use it to bypass age verification checks online. Use-Their-ID is part prank, part protest against the controversial law, which aims to stop children from seeing harmful content relating to suicide, self-harm, eating disorders and pornography. Since the Online Safety Act came into effect last Friday, more than 100,000 driving licences have been generated on Knight's website. Explaining the idea behind it, the 39-year-old told Metro that it is 'inevitable' that sooner or later, there will be a major data leak and British passports and driving licences will be released online. He added: 'My gut reaction was, well, if the government is going to require me to send my ID all over the internet to view anything that it deems to be 'adult content', that sounds like a privacy and a security nightmare. 'Websites that are implementing age verification checks are incentivised to do it as cheaply as possible – which means outsourcing it to a third party. 'Then it just goes to the cheapest bidder, right? And that means that these checks will not be being done securely and safely or thoroughly. '[The Online Safety Act] is a disaster for privacy online, but also security… It is a big overreach from the government.' Personal information leaks are not the only element of the process that he is worried about. Knight said that people are 'being cut off from a good selection of online resources' because they are too concerned about their privacy to upload their IDs. He pointed to website like Spotify, which now forces ID checks before its users can listen to music with explicit lyrics. The Wikimedia Foundation, which runs Wikipedia, has said that unless the website is made exempt, it would likely be barred under the law. 'All sorts of websites – like suicide prevention resources, so not the porn sites that the government is talking about – are building verification checks,' the creator said. 'They are suddenly having to build walls to keep out children. And we are also seeing websites around the internet blocking UK traffic altogether. 'So we are just being cut off from a good selection of resources on the internet.' It is not just Knight who is protesting the Online Safety Act. Only a week since it was enforced, nearly 500,000 people signed a petition asking for it to be repealed. In response, the government said it had 'no plans' to scrap it. Secretary of State for Science, Innovation and Technology, Peter Kyle, said that those who want it gone are 'on the side of predators'. Like Knights, critics argue that the legislation is too vague and far-reaching. Under the Online Safety Act, websites must take action to protect children. More specifically, they have to: remove harmful and illegal content from their platforms act quickly to prevent children (but not adults) from seeing harmful content remove illegal content (for example content relating to self-harm, abuse, suicide and eating disorders) They face large fines if they fail to comply with the sweeping rules. He added: 'MPs seem to have come up with this legislation based on their gut feeling – and not really listening to experts. 'The entire tech industry – and I do not just mean American social media companies – are all face-palming right now at how silly the legislation is. 'It has turned the UK into a bit of a laughing stock.' Knight created Use-Their ID as a 'joke'. He thought it would be 'funny when the inevitable data leaks do happen and MP's ID cards show up' online. As a software engineer, he builds web applications for a living, so he does 'actually know about the security side of things'. In the last week, people have praised his site, describing it as an 'excellent use of his skills'. More Trending Comments from supporters read 'thank you immensely' and 'thank you for caring', with one of them saying: 'Thank you so much for the ID website, it is both bloody funny and an excellent idea. 'Best of luck if anyone comes after you.' A spokesperson for the Department for Science, Innovation and Technology told Metro: The law is clear: platforms must not promote ways to circumvent requirements of the Act , and those who fall short will face serious enforcement action. 'Ofcom is already assessing platform compliance to ensure robust safeguards are in place to prevent circumvention, and investigations are underway into 37 sites.' Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@ For more stories like this, check our news page. MORE: British soldiers' details to be given to kids they allegedly fathered in Kenya MORE: The school special needs crisis that will impact every one of us MORE: Infant dies in hot car after being left by dad who 'forgot about him'
BBC News
41 minutes ago
- BBC News
Residents' views wanted on Manx way of life to help 'shape future'
The views of thousands of Isle of Man residents on a variety of topics from crime to healthcare are being sought in a bid to help the government "shape policies for the future".The 2025 Social Attitudes Survey is the latest annual consultation that is sent randomly to 3,000 is wanted on issues from public services and healthcare to safety and crime.A government spokeswoman said it would help to "shape government policies for the future and can be used to better understand public opinion". It would also help "assess government initiatives", she voluntary survey, run by Statistics Isle of Man, runs until 6 September, and is accessible by invitation only. 'Representative' The process was previously conducted annually between 2016 and 2019 but was paused due to the coronavirus pandemic and started up again last results of the 2024 survey found that housing and financial pressures were making local residents less the questionnaire is sent to 3,000 households, the resident that completes it is decided by who has the closest birthday to the date the letter is is to "ensure that the responses are as representative as possible of the island's community", the spokeswoman explained. Once the invite is extended, people can complete the survey either online, by requesting a paper copy, or by arranging a face-to-face meeting with a member of the Statistics Isle of Man responses remain anonymous. Read more stories from the Isle of Man on the BBC, watch BBC North West Tonight on BBC iPlayer and follow BBC Isle of Man on Facebook and X.
