Assisted dying Bill MP confident Parliament will vote yes
The Labour MP was joined by bereaved and terminally ill people on the eve of the vote, as they recounted the emotional toll the current law has had on them and their loved ones and pleaded for change.
Since introducing her Terminally Ill Adults (End of Life) Bill in Parliament last year, Ms Leadbeater has argued dying people must be given choice at the end of their lives, but opponents of her Bill have warned it fails to guarantee protections for society's most vulnerable.
Making her case for a change in the law, Ms Leadbeater said: 'We have the most robust piece of legislation in the world in front of us tomorrow, and I know that many colleagues have engaged very closely with the legislation and will make their decision based on those facts and that evidence, and that cannot be disputed.
'But we need to do something, and we need to do it quickly.'
A YouGov poll of 2,003 adults in Great Britain, surveyed last month and published on Thursday, suggested public support for the Bill remains high at 73% – unchanged from November.
The proportion of people who feel assisted dying should be legal in principle has risen slightly, to 75% from 73% in November.
Friday will be the first time the Bill has been debated and voted on in its entirety since last year's historic yes vote, when MPs supported the principle of assisted dying for England and Wales by a majority of 55.
MPs are entitled to have a free vote on the Bill, meaning they decide according to their conscience rather than along party lines.
The relatively narrow majority means every vote will count on Friday, to secure the Bill's passage to the House of Lords for further debate and voting.
As an example, the Bill would fall if 28 MPs switched directly from voting yes to no, but only if all other MPs voted exactly the same way as they did in November, including those who abstained.
Asked how she is feeling ahead of the vote, Ms Leadbeater acknowledged there could be some change in the numbers, but insisted she is still confident the Bill will pass the third reading stage and move through to the Lords.
She told reporters on Thursday: 'There might be some small movement in the middle, some people might maybe change their mind one way, others will change their mind the other way but fundamentally I don't anticipate that that majority would be heavily eroded so I do feel confident we can get through tomorrow successfully.'
Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer has indicated he will continue to back the Bill, as he did last year, saying earlier this week that his 'position is long-standing and well-known' on assisted dying.
Health Secretary Wes Streeting, while describing Ms Leadbeater's work on the proposed legislation as 'extremely helpful', confirmed in April that he still intended to vote against it.
Ms Leadbeater warned: 'If we don't pass this law tomorrow, it could be another decade before this issue is brought back to Parliament.
'It's 10 years since we last had a vote, 2015, if we leave it now, I worry it could be a heck of a long time and in that time how many more stories (of suffering) will we hear?'
Ms Leadbeater was joined for the press briefing by surgeon, barrister and MP Neil Shastri-Hurst and former lord chancellor Lord Charlie Falconer.
Also present were terminally ill patients Sophie Blake, a single mother with terminal breast cancer, and Pamela Fisher, a Church of England lay preacher.
While supporters of the Bill say it is coming back to the Commons with better safeguards after more than 90 hours of parliamentary time spent on it to date, opponents claim the process has been rushed and that changes to the Bill mean it is now weaker than it was when first introduced.
Some Labour MPs opposed to the Bill wrote to Commons leader Lucy Powell earlier this week to ask for more time, but she confirmed to Parliament on Thursday that timing is a matter for the House to decide because it is not a piece of Government legislation.
Ms Leadbeater said she felt the need to 'strongly push back' on the accusation of the legislation being rushed.
She said: 'This is not being rushed through, this is not a quick thing that's happened overnight, it has gone through hours and hours and hours of scrutiny.'
She added she also finds it 'difficult' to accept that the process itself for someone to have their assisted dying application approved is 'quite lengthy', but said this is necessary because of the 'thorough' safeguards.
The proposed legislation would allow terminally ill adults in England and Wales, with fewer than six months to live, to apply for an assisted death, subject to approval by two doctors and a panel featuring a social worker, senior legal figure and psychiatrist.
Significant changes since it succeeded in the initial vote in Parliament include the replacement of a High Court safeguard with the expert panels, and a doubling of the implementation period to a maximum of four years for an assisted dying service to be in place should the Bill pass into law.
Academic and disability campaigner Miro Griffiths has sent an open letter to MPs asking them not to endorse the 'perilous piece of legislation' even if they support assisted dying in principle.
He wrote: 'I would ask you to devote your energy to improving ethical and progressive forms of support: blanket suicide prevention, palliative care, and measures that create a more just and inclusive society for disabled people. This is the better way forward.'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
29 minutes ago
- The Independent
I told Jeremy Corbyn starting a new party was a bad idea, says Diane Abbott
Diane Abbott advised Jeremy Corbyn against setting up a new political party, she said, over concerns it would struggle to get a foothold in Britain because of the voting system. Ms Abbott, who served as Mr Corbyn's shadow home secretary when he was Labour leader, said she had spoken to him before its launch, and said it was not a good idea. Speaking at an event at the Edinburgh Book Festival, the current longest-serving female MP said: 'There were people around Jeremy encouraging him to set up a new party, and I told him not to. 'It's very difficult under first-past-the-post system for a new party to absolutely win. If it wasn't first-past-the-post, then you can see how a new party could come through, but I understand why he did it.' Ms Abbott said she thought the party, formed by her long-time friend Mr Corbyn alongside independent MP Zarah Sultana, would outperform people's expectations. It was launched last month, but is still without a formal name. She said she believed it would take advantage of a broader discontent with politics in Britain. She paid tribute to Mr Corbyn and Ms Sultana but said: 'At this point in time, it's difficult to see how a brand new party wins. 'However, I think Jeremy's party is going to do a lot better than people think because a lot of people who are not necessarily terribly left-wing people, are a tiny bit disappointed about the way we've gone in the past year.' The MP for Hackney North and Stoke Newington indicated her disappointment with the Labour government. She had the whip withdrawn for the second time in two years in July, after she expressed a lack of regret about comments to the Observer in 2023 that suggested that Jewish, Irish and Traveller people experience prejudice, but not racism. However, she implied she would not join Mr Corbyn's party. Ms Abbott said: 'It's a tricky state of play. I wouldn't have thought that you'd have a Labour government and they'd be cutting winter fuel allowance for the elderly and benefits for the disabled.' She was also critical of the Government's proscription of Palestine Action and labelled the decision 'a complete disgrace'. 'What they are seeking to do is proscribe protest as such,' she said. 'I mean, we all saw the pictures of the people in Trafalgar Square – 500 people? Half of them over 60. Come on, these are terrorists? I think this is an attempt to bear down on (protest).' She added her more than 40 years in Labour meant it was too late to leave it. She was elected to Parliament in 1987, and was the only black female MP in the Commons for a decade until Labour's landslide under Tony Blair. In response to a question about whether she thought she would ever be accepted 'at the heart' of the Labour Party, she replied: 'I think I am at the heart of the Labour Party, it's other people who aren't.' Ms Abbott, whose book A Woman Like Me was the subject of the interview in the Scottish capital by campaigner Talat Yaqoob, also told the audience of her anger at not being called by Commons speaker Sir Lindsay Hoyle in the aftermath of racist comments by Conservative Party donor Frank Hester in 2024. She said she had stood during a Prime Minister's Question session more than 40 times to be called to speak, after Sir Keir Starmer, Rishi Sunak and Sir Ed Davey had all spoken about the incident. Mr Hester was reported to have said Ms Abbott made him want to 'hate all black women' and that she 'should be shot'. The remarks brought widespread condemnation, including from Sir Keir, but she told the event her office was used to receiving racist abuse. 'I've been an MP for 38 years, and custom practice in the chamber is if you're being talked about, you get called. It's just a courtesy. I was so shocked that I wasn't called. 'But I heard later from someone who had reason to know, that what happened was that Rishi didn't want me called, because (Hester) was a Tory donor and it would look bad for them, and I'm afraid Keir Starmer didn't want me called because he wanted to milk the issue (for) political advantage, without mentioning me.' She said Sir Keir had approached her after the questions session and asked what he could do to help. 'I said, 'Yes, you can restore the whip'. And as if he hadn't heard, he said, 'Is there anything I can do for you?' It was like he was deaf. And I said, 'Yes, you can restore the whip', and he realised I wasn't going to play that game and he went off.'
Daily Mail
30 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Anti-Putin activist, 26, 'took his own life' after asylum bid was rejected as he 'feared being sent back to Russia'
An anti-Putin activist has been found dead in London after his asylum bid was rejected. After more than a year's wait for an appeal hearing, Alexander Frolov, 26, was found dead in Acton, west London, on July 28. His friends believe that he took his own life because of the mental pressure of being sent back to Russia. Originally arriving in the UK under a temporary visa as an agricultural worker in 2021, Alexander submitted his asylum application in December 2022. When Russia launched its invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, his friend Galina Shakirova said he was unable to return home as he 'refused to take part in killing people'. According to The i Paper, his asylum application was rejected in April 2024. Alexander had appealed the decision and was waiting for his hearing to be rescheduled when he died. Metropolitan Police are not believed to be investigating any suspicious circumstances into his death and an inquest will be held next week. He was described by the Russian Democratic Society as a 'dedicated opponent of Putin's regime'. They added he was a 'volunteer who gave his time to help others, and a constant presence at anti-war protests'. 'Alexander believed in the possibility of a free and democratic Russia and hoped to one day return to it,' the group said. His friend Galina, who met Alexander when they worked together as stewards at anti-war rally, called him 'kind, generous, quietly dependable'. She said: 'Imagine being an opposition activist who knows that returning home almost certainly means prison. You've spoken out publicly. You've worked with organisations labelled in Russia as 'undesirable' or 'extremist'. 'Then you ask for protection – hoping for safety, for a chance to survive. And instead, you're refused.' The Home Office said: 'It is our long-standing policy not to comment on individual cases.'
Telegraph
30 minutes ago
- Telegraph
What sharing a bottle of wine with your spouse every night really means for your health
Since they first met in 2009, Sarah Wellband and her partner James have settled into a nightly routine which involves, at the minimum, sharing the best part of a bottle of wine together. 'We have a gin and tonic, followed by two or three glasses of wine with dinner and watching TV,' says Wellband, a 62-year-old remedial hypnotherapist. Such a routine, seven nights a week, would probably amount to somewhere between 46 and 62 units of alcohol per week, depending on whether that third glass of wine was consumed – far more than the NHS recommended guidelines of 14 units. However, Wellband says that the drinking habits of her and her 70-year-old partner are far from an issue. Instead, she insists that they form an important part of their general wellbeing. '7pm is news and a drink time,' she says. 'It signals the end of the day and time to wind down and catch up with each other. The routine is more important than the alcohol, but it helps. We are well aware of our limits and will leave a glass rather than finish it for the sake of it, but we just find it a nice way to end the day.' Recently however, the potentially long-term harm from excessive daily drinking has been brought once more to the spotlight. Earlier this year, a study found that consuming more than eight alcoholic drinks a week increases your risk of incurring the brain degeneration commonly linked with dementia, while former TV executive Martin Frizell recently gave an interview about his wife Fiona Phillips's battle with early-onset Alzheimer's, and openly mused as to whether their habit of drinking a bottle of wine a night in their younger years had been a contributing factor. Yet the link between alcohol and chronic diseases is a little more nuanced than often portrayed. While excessive drinking has been identified as a direct cause of at least seven types of cancer and a known risk factor for dementia, the exact risk varies considerably from person to person. As Debbie Shawcross, professor of hepatology and chronic liver failure at King's College London, explains, women have far lower levels of the enzyme that breaks down alcohol compared with men, which makes them more susceptible, and studies have even shown that women are more likely to display signs of 'leaky gut' – a term which characterises greater intestinal permeability, meaning that toxins are more likely to leak out into the bloodstream – following a binge than men. An alcohol 'binge' is characterised as more than six units (a standard-sized glass of wine contains 2.1 units) in a single session for women and eight units for men. Some people do also carry gene variants that improve alcohol metabolism, allowing them to knock back the booze with no apparent ill effects – and Wellband says that she and her partner never get drunk on their nightly routine – while your diet can also be a contributing factor. 'Environmental, social and lifestyle factors also play a role,' says Shawcross. 'For example, being overweight or having an unhealthy diet rich in ultra-processed foods can increase the risk of alcohol harm on the body.' On average though, sharing a bottle of wine every night with your spouse isn't the greatest thing for your long-term health. Here's the very latest on how this amount of daily booze can affect your body, and what some of the UK's leading experts advise in terms of how to still enjoy alcohol in a safer way. What are the effects on the brain? As Anya Topiwala, a senior clinical researcher at the University of Oxford, points out, half a bottle of wine a night works out at a minimum of 35 units per week for white wine and 42 units if you're only drinking red wine, which generally contains more alcohol per volume. 'If sustained, I would say there is a high likelihood of this negatively impacting your brain and memory,' she says. This comes from studies she's conducted which have found that people drinking more than 14 units per week, or seven medium-sized glasses of wine, have small total brain volumes, greater age-related shrinkage of the hippocampus – the brain's memory hub and one of the areas particularly impacted by Alzheimer's – and faster cognitive decline. 'Alcohol is a neurotoxin,' says Topiwala. 'Put simply, it kills brain cells. Additionally, heavy drinking often leads to a deficiency in vitamin B1 which can also damage the brain.' But it's not all doom and gloom. By reducing the amount you drink, even by a glass or two per week, it's possible to mitigate and even reverse some of these issues, something which Topiwala has witnessed first-hand in her practice as an old-age psychiatrist, with various patients seeing their short-term memory and recall improving after reducing their alcohol intake. 'I can think of many patients who have experienced a cognitive benefit from cutting down,' she says. What are the effects on the liver? Between 90 and 98 per cent of the alcohol you consume is broken down by your liver, making it one of the organs most acutely impacted by booze. Based on her own clinical and research knowledge, Shawcross says that people consuming half a bottle of wine per night will be particularly at risk of developing fatty liver – a condition where the liver becomes progressively clogged up with harmful visceral fat. Over time, this makes you more prone to cirrhosis or scarring and liver cancer. But she says that cutting down, even slightly, would undoubtedly help. 'There is no safe level of drinking, but if you didn't drink at all for two to three nights per week, there would be even more benefits,' says Shawcross. 'For example, you'd see a reduction in the amount of liver fat, as measured on a scan.' Shawcross is keen to point out that if you are not getting drunk, as noted by Wellband and her partner, it is not necessarily a sign that you have a protective gene variant which allows you to metabolise alcohol more quickly, limiting its damaging effects on the body. She explains that people can develop a tolerance to higher amounts of alcohol because the liver has a different group of enzymes which kick into action when there are consistently large amounts of alcohol in the bloodstream. This isn't a good thing, as harmful fat and other forms of damage will still be accruing, but it makes you less aware of alcohol's effects. 'When this different set of enzymes is consistently activated, it means you need to drink more alcohol to feel its effects,' she says. What is the effect on the heart? Consuming more than 7.5 units of alcohol a day – or most of a bottle of wine by yourself – is thought to increase risk of hypertension, where the pressure on your blood vessels is too high. Over time, this may lead to other issues such as arrhythmia or abnormal heart rhythms. 'Alcohol increases blood pressure and if this is untreated, it puts strain on the heart,' says Shawcross. Studies have indicated that hypertension risk seems to increase proportionally with the amount you drink. So a glass of wine per day will still make you more susceptible than not drinking at all, but is certainly less problematic than two or three glasses. What are the effects on the muscles and bones? As John Kiely, a researcher at the University of Limerick, puts it, alcohol accelerates many of the ravages of ageing, from loss of muscle to reduced coordination and increased vulnerability to twinges, strains and other injuries. In particular, if you've consumed half a bottle of wine one night, it probably isn't a wise idea to hit the gym or do some vigorous gardening the next day as the alcohol will impair your immune system's ability to reach and repair any damaged muscles or tendons, leaving you feeling all the more tender and sore. If you are drinking half a bottle of wine on a regular basis, Kiely suggests that you will be much more likely to get injured. There's also the matter of the progressive muscle and bone loss which most of us experience as part of ageing. Studies have long shown that regular, heavy drinking in middle age accelerates bone weakness and interrupts normal cycles of muscle repair, making it harder to hold onto the strength we have, as we age. 'An otherwise healthy diet and lifestyle will reduce these risks but persistent heavy drinking drives progressively accumulating issues that a healthy lifestyle alone can't fully counteract,' says Kiely. 'For example, alcohol lowers levels of key hormones [for muscle growth] like testosterone and growth hormone, while cortisol, a key stress hormone that drives muscle breakdown, rises. And because alcohol also reduces the absorption of calcium and suppresses the activity of bone-building cells, you're likely to have a faster decline in bone density, making your bones more fragile.' The good news is that such effects do not seem to be as pronounced with moderate drinking. 'A single glass of wine a night for women, or two for men, is unlikely to cause measurable harm to muscle health and little risk for bone health,' says Kiely. 'This is particularly the case for people who stay active and eat well.' What is the effect on how quickly you age? Drinking too much has long been associated with faster signs of visible ageing, such as more wrinkles, saggy skin and a duller complexion, but we now know that consuming half a bottle of wine each night actually ages you at the DNA level. In 2022, Topiwala carried out a study showing that consuming more than 17 units of alcohol per week – or around eight standard glasses of wine – causes damage to the tips of chromosomes, known as telomeres, which play an important role in keeping your DNA stable. 'Alcohol directly damages DNA, causing breaks and mutations,' says Topiwala. 'This is thought to explain why alcohol increases cancer risk.' What you can do to limit the risks While all of this may seem like something of a downer, all these risks are most apparent when it comes to heavy drinking. Research has also repeatedly shown that we can still enjoy alcohol throughout mid and later life and minimise the negative impacts on our health through having a few non-drinking days each week, eating well and exercising, and, particularly, consuming alcohol with a meal wherever possible. For example, one study of more than 300,000 people in the UK found that people who predominantly drank alcohol with meals had a 12 per cent lower risk of premature death from cardiovascular diseases and cancer, compared with those who mainly consumed their alcohol on its own. But for Wellband, like many others, the idea of changing the nightly drinking routine is not something that she and her partner are willing to contemplate, at least for now. 'We have no intention of changing our ways,' she says. 'Although I was adopted I have since discovered my birth mother is 82 and still drinks two or three glasses of wine every night so I'm following her lead. My partner and I have gradually reduced the amount we drink – on the rare occasion we go out for lunch we'll now have a glass of wine each rather than a bottle. Living on a farm with horses and other animals means that we have to be fit and active, but equally we enjoy our evening drinks and would be loath to give them up.' How can you adjust your drinking habit? For anyone looking to try to switch to drinking less, Dr Richard Piper, chief executive at Alcohol Change UK, offers the following guide: Try to spread your week's alcohol across more days Our bodies and our minds are grateful for any breaks we can give them. Pepper your week with several alcohol-free days. Aiming for fewer than five units in a single day will mean your overall weekly consumption should drop. Replace with lower-strength or alcohol-free alternatives There is a wonderful range and availability of alcohol-free alternatives in shops, pubs and bars now, which are improving year on year. Our taste testers particularly recommend the Mash Gang ranges of alcohol-free beers (Journey Juice and Lesser Evil were given a 5/5 rating), while Nozeco Spritz is an alcohol-free cocktail which stands out from others on the market. For wine, our tasters suggested Lindeman's Cabernet Sauvignon as a reliable alcohol-free red to go with a steak dinner. Download the free Try Dry app Developed by experts using behaviour-change science, this app allows you to track your consumption, take a health quiz to see what your current relationship with alcohol looks like and access tips and ideas on cutting back. Try having some alcohol-free weeks Not every week needs to have alcohol in it. In fact, if this idea feels alien to you, that is a sure sign you might have a stubborn drinking habit. Having one or two whole weeks off alcohol every month is a great way to cut back. Sarah Wellband's hypnotherapy clinic, Out of Chaos Therapy, advises on how to change problematic behaviours from disordered eating to phobias
