‘Unprecedented danger' seen to loom over Taiwan Strait after Lai's ‘hostile force' remark
Taiwanese leader William Lai Ching-te's moves to reinstate military trials and his reference to mainland China as a 'hostile' force.
Advertisement
In comments following a high-level security meeting in Taipei on Thursday, Lai characterised mainland China as a 'foreign hostile force' as he underlined the need for stronger measures to tackle what he said were Beijing's infiltration and subversive efforts 'from within us'.
It was the strongest such rhetoric yet from the leader of the ruling, independence-leaning Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) amid spiralling tensions across the Taiwan Strait.
Lai also proposed a series of security measures, including reinstating military trials, setting up a 'disclosure mechanism' for
officials who visit the mainland , and tightening the residency criteria for individuals from mainland China, Hong Kong and Macau.
02:01
'Every bit of strength': Taiwanese leader William Lai vows to boost island's defences
'Every bit of strength': Taiwanese leader William Lai vows to boost island's defences
Lai's announcement, made on the eve of the 20th anniversary of the mainland's
Anti-Secession Law , triggered swift condemnation from Beijing – with its Taiwan Affairs Office warning that he was pushing Taiwan towards 'the perilous brink of war' with his 'highly provocative' comments.
Advertisement
The mainland foreign ministry also rebuked the Group of 7 for 'interfering in China's internal affairs' after a joint statement from the bloc on Friday 'reiterated their opposition to any unilateral attempts to change the status quo by force or coercion'.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
RTHK
2 days ago
- RTHK
Seoul sees signs of North reciprocity on loudspeakers
Seoul sees signs of North reciprocity on loudspeakers A South Korean soldier dismantles a loudspeaker system near the demiltarized zone in Paju in June. File photo: Reuters North Korean troops have started removing propaganda loudspeakers used to blare unsettling noises along the border, South Korea's military said on Saturday, days after Seoul's new administration dismantled ones on its side of the frontier. The two countries had already halted propaganda broadcasts along the demilitarised zone, Seoul's military said in June after the election of President Lee Jae Myung, who is seeking to ease tensions with Pyongyang. South Korea's defence ministry said on Monday it had begun removing loudspeakers from its side of the border as "a practical measure aimed at helping ease tensions with the North". South Korea had been blaring K-pop and news reports to the North in response to Pyongyang transmitting bizarre, unsettling noises along the border that had become a major nuisance for South Korean locals. But under Lee's administration, in June, Seoul halted the loudspeaker broadcasts and in turn, a day later, North Korea stopped their broadcasts as well. "The South Korean military has detected North Korean troops dismantling propaganda loudspeakers in some parts along the front line from this morning," Seoul's Joint Chiefs of Staff said on Saturday. "It remains to be confirmed whether the devices have been removed across all regions, and the military will continue to monitor related activities," they added. Seoul had begun the loudspeaker broadcasts last year in response to a barrage of trash-filled balloons flown south by Pyongyang. The North had sent thousands of the balloons southwards at that time, saying they were retaliation for propaganda balloons launched by South Korean activists. Relations between the two Koreas had been at one of their lowest points in years, under the South's then-president Yoon Suk-yeol, with Seoul taking a hard line towards Pyongyang, which has drawn ever closer to Moscow in the wake of Russia's invasion of Ukraine. Lee has taken a different approach in dealing with the North since his June election, including requesting civic groups to stop sending anti-North propaganda leaflets. Lee has also said he would seek talks with the North without preconditions, following a deep freeze under his predecessor. The two countries technically remain at war because the 1950-53 Korean War ended in an armistice, not a peace treaty. (AFP)
HKFP
2 days ago
- HKFP
‘We can't pull out': Taiwan's orchid growers dig in as US tariffs shoot up
Since the start of US President Donald Trump's global trade war, Taiwanese orchid grower Lee Tsang-yu has watched tariffs on his seedlings shoot from nothing to 20 percent. But, after weathering many economic crises, the 61-year-old seasoned farmer is digging in. Lee is cultivating new markets in Thailand and expanding in Vietnam, Indonesia and Brazil, while cutting back shipments to the United States. 'The US is such a huge market, we can't pull out, and we won't,' said Lee, whose company, Charming Agriculture, operates four rugby field-sized greenhouses in Houbi, a district of the southern city of Tainan. Taiwan's more than 300 orchid growers rank among the world's biggest producers of the thick-leaved plants, with Phalaenopsis orchids, also known as moth orchids, dominating exports. The island's orchid shipments reached NT$6.1 billion (US$204 million) in 2024, with about NT$2 billion worth of plants sent to the United States, its biggest market, official data shows. Until now, most growers have been absorbing the cost of the 10 percent tariff that Trump slapped on nearly every trading partner in April, said Ahby Tseng, 53, secretary-general of the Taiwan Orchid Growers Association. But 'no one can bear' all of Trump's temporary 20 percent levy on Taiwan announced last week, he said. Tseng said Taiwan's main rival in the United States was the Netherlands, which has been hit with a relatively lighter 15 percent tariff. The five percentage point difference is significant, he said. 'It is actually very difficult to immediately pass the cost on to consumers because consumers can choose not to buy, or they can choose to buy other types of flowers,' Tseng said. And stockpiling orchids in a warehouse wasn't an option given that the plants 'keep growing'. While the higher tariff would erode his bottom line, Lee said he was more concerned about the general state of the US economy since Trump took office. 'Everything has become more expensive in the US, and consumer spending is shrinking — that's what worries me,' he said. 'Since late May, we've already cut shipments by 15 percent. Before that, the US accounted for 45 percent of our exports.' Lee said he was optimistic his efforts to expand into other markets, though slow and not always as lucrative, would 'gradually offset this impact'. Taiwan's orchids also had a competitive edge, he said — their flowers could last longer than Dutch plants.
AllAfrica
2 days ago
- AllAfrica
Taiwan's future precarious—with or without US-China conflict
Taiwan has often compared itself to being a 'shrimp between two whales.' That expression has never been more apt than today with the US and China – which considers Taiwan to be part of its territory – locked in a standoff over the future of the island. At an event I attended some years ago, a Chinese scholar remarked when the issue of the US-China rivalry came up that they believed there was an African saying: 'When two elephants are either having a fight, or making love, the grass around them gets trampled.' It was best for everyone, they advised the other attendees, for the two superpowers to have a workmanlike, unexciting relationship rather than take the risk of things getting too friendly or hostile. But whether or not the current period of conflict continues or the US and China magically become more aligned, the challenges facing Taiwan are severe. First off, Taiwan is itself in a period of domestic turbulence. The government of Taiwanese President William Lai Ching-te, leader of the Democratic Progressive Party, was elected in January 2024 with a little over 40% of the vote. This was considerably less than his predecessor from the same party, Tsai Ing-wen. One of the main opposition leaders, Ke Wen-je of the Taiwan People's party, has since then been arrested on corruption charges. He is accused of accepting half a million US dollars in bribes during his term as mayor of Taipei, as well as misreporting campaign finances during his presidential run. Most recently, in late July, recall votes were held where citizens in 24 districts of Taiwan chose whether or not to remove their legislator from office. This is the result of a law in Taiwan stipulating a new vote if 10% of the electorate in a specific constituency express dissatisfaction at the previous outcome. Activists supporting the government mobilised to achieve this. The votes seem to be associated with frustration that, while the Democratic Progressive party controls the presidency, it cannot get legislation through a parliament dominated by its opponents. All of the votes were directed at seats held by the Kuomintang, the main opposition party in recent years, which is accused by its critics of being pro-China. Not a single seat was overturned. When the steady nationalism of Xi Jinping's leadership in Beijing is factored in, with its conviction that the global influence of the West is slowly declining and the East – dominated by China – is in the nascent, one can see why the issue of Taiwan might look more precarious and worrying. This is regardless of the various predictions that 2027 is the date that China has set to go for reunification. For the US, President Donald Trump's fixation has remained on correcting what he sees as China's unfair trade advantages with its largest single economic partner – something he has long talked about. The White House proclaimed in March, when the first set of trade negotiations with China concluded after tariffs were imposed by both sides, that: 'for too long, unfair trade practices and America's massive trade deficit with China have fuelled the offshoring of American jobs and the decline of our manufacturing sector.' The aim at the most recent set of talks in Stockholm, Sweden, in late July was to drive towards a new deal. Trump has also reportedly talked of taking a huge delegation of business people to China at some point later in 2025. This is despite the fact that so far since his inauguration in January, and despite many reasons to talk, Xi and Trump have yet to physically meet. Taiwanese people are therefore right to feel increasingly uneasy. Under Trump's predecessor, Joe Biden, they received verbal commitments that the US would come to Taiwan's aid if it was attacked. This was not formal US policy, which has long maintained an ambiguous stance on Taiwan. Ambiguity has returned with a vengeance under Trump. His secretary of defense, Pete Hegseth, has said that the US stands by Taiwan. But these days in Washington all roads lead to the Oval Office, and Trump's stance is far harder to predict. If China were to dangle a trade deal in front of the US president – committing to buy more US goods, put in more investment that is non-problematic on security grounds in the US and generally abide by American demands – would Trump be able to resist? It could be presented as a historic achievement, a new concordant between the world's two greatest powers who had seemed until then set on conflict and clash. There might even be the much-desired Nobel Peace Prize in it for the US leader. Trump, for his part, appears increasingly reluctant to back Taiwan in ways that risk provoking Beijing. Lai delayed a trip to Latin America in July after the Trump administration reportedly told him to cancel a proposed stopover in New York. And the US cancelled a meeting with Taiwan's defense minister one month earlier. The likelihood remains that, if a real crisis occurs, then the US will climb down from the middle wall and do something to defend Taiwan. Any trade deal between Beijing and Washington will also probably be a highly circumscribed one. China is not an easy partner to negotiate with, and it is unlikely to offer Trump the kind of capitulation he is seeking. Even so, these are very unpredictable times. The key calculation going forward will be the simple one of what the US gains and loses from all its relationships – and that includes Taiwan. Kerry Brown is professor of Chinese Politics and director of the Lau China Institute, King's College London This article is republished from The Conversation under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article.
