
Rallies and shouts of ‘turun' will not lead to resignation of PM — Hafiz Hassan
One can therefore look beyond the written law to help ensure the continuation of constitutionalism and the rule of law. (see Zainun Ali JCA (as she then was) in Dato' Dr Zambry bin Abd Kadir v Dato' Seri Ir Hj Mohammad Nizar bin Jamaluddin (Attorney General of Malaysia, intervener) [2009] 5 MLJ 464)
The first of the unwritten sources – that is, convention – is a well established source.
In the Zambry v Nizar case, the established convention on loss of confidence was acknowledged by Raus Sharif JCA (as he then was).
The appellate court, though, may not have decided on the convention. As such, the statement on the convention is – what lawyers call – obiter dictum. The term is Latin for 'something that is said in passing' or simply 'other things said'.
Under the doctrine of stare decisis or binding legal precedent, obiter dictum (plural dicta) is not binding.
It is the ratio decidendi (plural rationes decidendi) of a judgment that is binding. The term means 'the ground or reason of decision' or simply 'the rule in a decision'. It is the legal principle upon which the decision in a specific case is founded.
The rule in the Zambry v Nizar case in the higher Federal Court when Nizar appealed against the decision of the Court of Appeal is this:
There is nothing in the Perak State Constitution stipulating that the loss of confidence in the Menteri Besar (MB) may only be established through a vote in the Legislative Assembly (LA).
Evidence of loss of confidence in the MB may be gathered from other extraneous sources, provided they are properly established.
Such sources should include the admission by the MB himself and/or representations made by members of the LA that the MB no longer enjoys the support of the majority of the members of the LA.
On the facts of the case, there was evidence of such admission by Nizar himself and the loss of confidence of the majority of the members of the LA in the leadership of Nizar as expressed by 31 members of the LA.
As there is similarly nothing in the Federal Constitution stipulating that the loss of confidence in the prime minister may only be established through a vote in the Dewan Rakyat, the ratio in the Zambry v Nizar case applies to establishing the loss of confidence in the prime minister.
But while a vote on a motion of confidence in the Dewan Rakyat is not the only mechanism to establish or determine the loss of confidence, shouts of 'turun' certainly do not determine the loss of confidence.
And while demonstrations or representations made by MPs – properly established – of the loss of confidence in the prime minister outside the Dewan Rakyat is a decided mechanism, public rallies are not – no matter the number of rally protestors: 10,000, 100,000 or 1 million.
MPs can shout 'turun' in the Dewan Rakyat; they can join the public in a rally to call for the prime minister to 'turun' in the exercise of their basic freedoms guaranteed by the Federal Constitution.
But neither will lead to the resignation of the prime minister.
All it takes is a majority vote of 'Aye' to a motion of no confidence in the prime minister or properly established representations made by MPs that the prime minister has lost the confidence of the majority of MPs.
That's 112 out of 222 MPs.
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has dared the Opposition to 'go and table a no-confidence motion' in the Dewan Rakyat.
Will the Opposition take the dare after the 'turun Anwar' rally?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Malay Mail
25 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Sasar Wardieburn housing project for armed forces to kick off in early 2026, Setapak to follow in 2030
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 5 — Construction of the Satu Anggota Satu Rumah (SASaR) housing project at Wardieburn Camp here, involving 974 units, is expected to begin in the first quarter of 2026, said Deputy Defence Minister Adly Zahari. He said another SASaR project at Genting Klang Camp in Setapak, comprising 6,400 units, is scheduled to start in 2030. At present, the only ongoing SASaR project in Kuala Lumpur is in Sungai Besi, with 3,500 apartment units, which are expected to be completed in the fourth quarter of this year. 'Two upcoming projects, SASaR Wardieburn and SASaR Setapak, will add 7,374 more units, bringing the total number of SASaR units in the city to 10,874,' he said during a question-and-answer session in the Dewan Rakyat. He was responding to Datuk Seri Ikmal Hisham Abdul Aziz (PN-Tanah Merah) on the status of SASaR projects, initially scheduled for phased completion starting in 2026. On whether the projects involve land swaps, Adly said both will use a cross-subsidy model without any land exchange. Housing prices will be based on development carried out by appointed developers. The projects will be developed in phases, in line with the construction of a new Armed Forces training centre in Port Dickson. 'We must first complete the Wardieburn and Port Dickson projects, relocate personnel and only then begin work at Genting Klang,' he said. Separately, Adly said the Royal Malaysian Air Force (RMAF) is expected to receive its first Unmanned Aircraft System (UAS) in 2026 under Phase 1 of the procurement programme. Phase 2 will follow under the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP), as part of the RMAF Capability Development Plan 2055 (CAP55). He said the acquisition includes efforts to engage local industries in the Unmanned Aerial Vehicle (UAV) supply chain to support the national defence ecosystem. 'The Armed Forces have conducted several high-level committee meetings to refine capabilities in line with the 2026–2030 Future Force development phase,' he said in response to Jimmy Puah Wee Tse (PH-Tebrau), who asked whether UAV integration is planned for Malaysia's air defence system. — Bernama


Malay Mail
25 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
Gobind: Digital Ministry developing AI tool to detect deepfakes, fight cybercrime
KUALA LUMPUR, Aug 5 — Digital Minister Gobind Singh Deo today said the ministry is developing an artificial intelligence (AI) tool to assist in cybercrime investigations, through CyberSecurity Malaysia and in collaboration with Universiti Kebangsaan Malaysia. He said the tool is designed to analyse and verify the authenticity of images and videos. 'This tool is expected to assist in cybercrime investigations involving online fraud, identity theft and the spread of false or defamatory content,' he told the Dewan Rakyat. He also said the ministry is preparing a set of comprehensive guidelines to govern the ethical and responsible use of AI. These guidelines, being developed by the Department of Personal Data Protection, are expected to be completed between January and March 2026. 'The guidelines cover data protection impact assessments to minimise risks to personal data, data protection by design to embed safeguards in system development, and measures to prevent the misuse of automated decision-making and profiling,' he added. Gobind said the Guidelines on AI Adaptation (GPAISA) have already been introduced to ensure government agencies deploy AI in a safe, ethical manner and in compliance with legal and human rights standards. To support implementation, he said the ministry is also investing in training programmes such as AI4Rakyat and MD Workforce Training, under the Malaysia Digital Economy Corporation (MDEC), targeting civil servants, enforcement officers, and private sector stakeholders. He said the government is in the process of reviewing the National AI Roadmap for 2026 to 2030, as part of its efforts to address future threats posed by AI-related crimes and to shape relevant policy responses. 'The roadmap will cover key aspects such as AI governance, cyber threats driven by AI, and broader technological challenges. I hope we will be able to launch this document by the end of the year,' he said. He expressed hope that the roadmap would not only guide Malaysia's national initiatives but also contribute to regional cooperation within Asean, and potentially at the global level.


The Sun
2 hours ago
- The Sun
Malaysia, Indonesia review JDA for Sulawesi Sea maritime dispute
KUALA LUMPUR: Malaysia and Indonesia are still studying the possibility of a Joint Development Agreement (JDA) to address the maritime boundary dispute in the Sulawesi Sea, said Foreign Minister Datuk Seri Mohamad Hasan. He said the JDA is an initial effort to find the best solution for both countries, with no details finalised at this stage. 'It is still under early discussion between both countries and any decision must be mutually beneficial,' he said during a question-and-answer session in the Dewan Rakyat today. Mohamad said the federal government continues to work closely with the Sabah government in all negotiations related to maritime delimitation between Malaysia and Indonesia. He was responding to a question from Isnaraissah Munirah Majilis (Warisan-Kota Belud) regarding the proposed JDA in blocks ND 6 and ND 7 in the Sulawesi Sea, and whether it would follow the Malaysia-Thailand Joint Development Authority (MTJDA) model or another approach, considering that the rights of Sabah and Sarawak are protected under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63). Mohamad Hasan reiterated that the federal government values Sabah's views to ensure Malaysia's sovereignty and interests are protected. He said maritime boundary discussions are conducted carefully and based on legal and technical principles. Responding to a question on briefing Sabah MPs and assemblymen on the issue, Mohamad said the Foreign Ministry's Maritime Affairs Department is ready to brief Parliament members and Sabah representatives to prevent misunderstandings and slander. 'We will arrange a suitable date to avoid the issue becoming a thorn in the flesh or a source of slander, especially ahead of the Sabah state election,' he said. On the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling over the Sipadan and Ligitan islands, Mohamad said the decision is unrelated to the Sulawesi Sea dispute. The ruling only concerned the determination of a straight coordinate line at four minutes 10 seconds, based on the positions of Sipadan and Ligitan Islands, and did not refer to the Sulawesi Sea. 'Like the Batu Puteh ruling, the ICJ decision involved only the specific territory, not the surrounding areas. Negotiations with Indonesia on the JDA continue and there will be no unilateral decisions,' he said. Legally, Malaysia follows the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (UNCLOS), which defines the baseline or intertidal zone based on the lowest tide level. 'Indonesia argues that the area is sea at high tide, but Malaysia adheres to the internationally recognised interpretation based on low tide,' Mohamad said. - Bernama