
Rallies and shouts of ‘turun' will not lead to resignation of PM — Hafiz Hassan
One can therefore look beyond the written law to help ensure the continuation of constitutionalism and the rule of law. (see Zainun Ali JCA (as she then was) in Dato' Dr Zambry bin Abd Kadir v Dato' Seri Ir Hj Mohammad Nizar bin Jamaluddin (Attorney General of Malaysia, intervener) [2009] 5 MLJ 464)
The first of the unwritten sources – that is, convention – is a well established source.
In the Zambry v Nizar case, the established convention on loss of confidence was acknowledged by Raus Sharif JCA (as he then was).
The appellate court, though, may not have decided on the convention. As such, the statement on the convention is – what lawyers call – obiter dictum. The term is Latin for 'something that is said in passing' or simply 'other things said'.
Under the doctrine of stare decisis or binding legal precedent, obiter dictum (plural dicta) is not binding.
It is the ratio decidendi (plural rationes decidendi) of a judgment that is binding. The term means 'the ground or reason of decision' or simply 'the rule in a decision'. It is the legal principle upon which the decision in a specific case is founded.
The rule in the Zambry v Nizar case in the higher Federal Court when Nizar appealed against the decision of the Court of Appeal is this:
There is nothing in the Perak State Constitution stipulating that the loss of confidence in the Menteri Besar (MB) may only be established through a vote in the Legislative Assembly (LA).
Evidence of loss of confidence in the MB may be gathered from other extraneous sources, provided they are properly established.
Such sources should include the admission by the MB himself and/or representations made by members of the LA that the MB no longer enjoys the support of the majority of the members of the LA.
On the facts of the case, there was evidence of such admission by Nizar himself and the loss of confidence of the majority of the members of the LA in the leadership of Nizar as expressed by 31 members of the LA.
As there is similarly nothing in the Federal Constitution stipulating that the loss of confidence in the prime minister may only be established through a vote in the Dewan Rakyat, the ratio in the Zambry v Nizar case applies to establishing the loss of confidence in the prime minister.
But while a vote on a motion of confidence in the Dewan Rakyat is not the only mechanism to establish or determine the loss of confidence, shouts of 'turun' certainly do not determine the loss of confidence.
And while demonstrations or representations made by MPs – properly established – of the loss of confidence in the prime minister outside the Dewan Rakyat is a decided mechanism, public rallies are not – no matter the number of rally protestors: 10,000, 100,000 or 1 million.
MPs can shout 'turun' in the Dewan Rakyat; they can join the public in a rally to call for the prime minister to 'turun' in the exercise of their basic freedoms guaranteed by the Federal Constitution.
But neither will lead to the resignation of the prime minister.
All it takes is a majority vote of 'Aye' to a motion of no confidence in the prime minister or properly established representations made by MPs that the prime minister has lost the confidence of the majority of MPs.
That's 112 out of 222 MPs.
Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim has dared the Opposition to 'go and table a no-confidence motion' in the Dewan Rakyat.
Will the Opposition take the dare after the 'turun Anwar' rally?
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Zaliha replaces Syed Ibrahim as Johor PKR chief
Dr Zaliha Mustafa is also the federal territories minister. (Bernama pic) PETALING JAYA : PKR today announced several leadership changes across state chapters, with federal territories minister Dr Zaliha Mustafa replacing Syed Ibrahim Syed Noh as the party's Johor chief. In a statement, PKR information chief Fahmi Fadzil said the appointments were made following a political bureau meeting chaired by PKR president Anwar Ibrahim today. Other key appointments include Shamsul Iskandar Akin returning as Melaka chief, replacing Rafee Ibrahim. Ahmad Farhan Fauzi replaces PKR secretary-general Fuziah Salleh as Pahang chief while Zainudin Awang takes over from Ahmad Nazri Yusof as Terengganu chief. Ahmad Nazib Johari now leads Sarawak, replacing Roland Engan – who was appointed a party vice-president last week. Azman Abidin stays on as federal territories chief, Amirudin Shari continues as Selangor chief, while Aminuddin Harun remains the Negeri Sembilan chief. Saifuddin Nasution Ismail was retained as Kedah chief, Suparadi Noor remains the Kelantan chief, while Mustapha Sakmud continues as Sabah chief. Hairul Amir Sabri and Noor Amin Ahmad were appointed Perak and Perlis chiefs, respectively. Sim Tze Tzin, a former deputy agriculture minister, has been appointed the party's new strategic director, taking over from Akmal Nasir. Fahmi said the meeting also discussed current political developments and strategies for upcoming elections.


Free Malaysia Today
an hour ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Govt to boost creative economy, prioritise animation sector
Communications minister Fahmi Fadzil said MyCreative Ventures would manage funding while Finas would oversee certification and licensing. KUALA LUMPUR : The government is focusing on strengthening the creative economy to boost Malaysia's competitiveness and produce high-value content for both the local and international markets. Communications minister Fahmi Fadzil said the aim is to develop commercially viable works that can be exported, while also nurturing talent and expanding the creative industry's value chain. 'We hope these efforts will increase our competitiveness through the production of works with high commercial value for local and international enjoyment, including the exports of IPs,' he said at a press conference after the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP) was tabled in the Dewan Rakyat today. Fahmi said his ministry would direct MyCreative Ventures to manage funding while Finas would oversee certification and licensing – particularly in line with the government's focus on animation. He said this follows Prime Minister Anwar Ibrahim's instruction to prioritise the animation sector. Fahmi also announced a nationwide online briefing tonight to grassroots leaders to explain the government's initiatives under the 13MP. 'When we support grassroots efforts in spreading government aspirations, the people benefit in the long run,' he said. Earlier today, Anwar tabled the 13MP in the Dewan Rakyat, which included major reforms to the education and economic systems, and policies for an ageing population.


The Star
2 hours ago
- The Star
Impeachment almost impossible if Philippine Supreme Court doesn't revise its verdict, says rep Terry Ridon
MANILA: Impeaching any high-ranking official may be almost impossible if the Supreme Court (SC) does not revise its decision on Vice President Sara Duterte's impeachment case, Bicol Saro party-list Rep. Terry Ridon said on Thursday (July 31). Ridon, in an ambush interview at the Batasang Pambansa complex, explained that with the SC decision, an impeachable official can just ask a friend in the House of Representatives to file a weak impeachment case against him or her, and this will automatically kick in the one-year prohibition period on impeachment proceedings. On July 25, SC spokesperson Camille Ting announced that the Articles of Impeachment forwarded by the House to the Senate was deemed unconstitutional by the high tribunal for violating the 1987 Constitution's one-year ban rule. 'I think this sentiment was played out in the last couple of days – the actual objections of lawyers, lawyers' groups, people's organisations and our esteemed luminaries – about the effects of this particular decision, and I will reiterate it today. If the Supreme Court stands on this decision and it does not reconsider the ruling, nobody in the Philippines would be impeached,' Ridon, a lawyer by profession, told reporters. 'Because any high-ranking official — a president, vice president, Supreme Court justice – if they have a friend who is a House member, they will endorse a complaint, ask them to file a complaint against me. Whether or not the House addresses that, the one year ban period starts,' he added. According to Ridon, it is an 'unfortunate situation which we hope that the Supreme Court will reconsider.' On February 5, Duterte was impeached after 215 House lawmakers from the 19th Congress filed and signed a fourth complaint, which was hinged on allegations of confidential fund misuse within her offices, threats to ranking officials, and other possible violations of the Constitution. The Articles of Impeachment were immediately forwarded to the Senate on the same day, as the 1987 Constitution requires a trial to start forthwith if at least one-third of all House members — or just 102 out of 306 — have signed and endorsed the petition. In February, two petitions seeking to stop the impeachment complaints were filed before the SC. The first was from Mindanao-based lawyers who claimed that the House did not observe the Constitution's rules, which require it to act on filed impeachment complaints within 10 session days. The first impeachment complaint was filed in December 2024 and was only referred to the House committee on rules on February 5. The House, however, asserted in its reply to the SC that all the impeachment complaints were addressed within 10 session days, noting that the term 'session days' should not be mistaken with 'calendar days' or 'working days.' In its explanation, the House presented a table showing when the sessions were held. The day that the first complaint was submitted to House Secretary General Reginald Velasco's office, December 2, was the 26th Session Day of the 19th Congress' Third Regular Session. On the other hand, the three impeachment complaints were forwarded by Velasco to House Speaker Ferdinand Martin Romualdez on February 5, and these were brought to the plenary on the same day — which was the 36th Session day of the Third Regular Session. The House believes this means it took exactly 10 session days before the first complaint was transmitted. While the Articles of Impeachment were deemed unconstitutional, SC clarified that it does not absolve the vice president, adding that the next impeachment complaint can be filed against the vice president by February 6, 2026. The House is expected to file a motion for reconsideration on the SC's decision regarding the impeachment. The Senate, on the other hand, is scheduled to tackle the matter on Wednesday (Aug 6). - Philippine Daily Inquirer/ANN