Malaysia, Indonesia review JDA for Sulawesi Sea maritime dispute
He said the JDA is an initial effort to find the best solution for both countries, with no details finalised at this stage.
'It is still under early discussion between both countries and any decision must be mutually beneficial,' he said during a question-and-answer session in the Dewan Rakyat today.
Mohamad said the federal government continues to work closely with the Sabah government in all negotiations related to maritime delimitation between Malaysia and Indonesia.
He was responding to a question from Isnaraissah Munirah Majilis (Warisan-Kota Belud) regarding the proposed JDA in blocks ND 6 and ND 7 in the Sulawesi Sea, and whether it would follow the Malaysia-Thailand Joint Development Authority (MTJDA) model or another approach, considering that the rights of Sabah and Sarawak are protected under the Malaysia Agreement 1963 (MA63).
Mohamad Hasan reiterated that the federal government values Sabah's views to ensure Malaysia's sovereignty and interests are protected.
He said maritime boundary discussions are conducted carefully and based on legal and technical principles.
Responding to a question on briefing Sabah MPs and assemblymen on the issue, Mohamad said the Foreign Ministry's Maritime Affairs Department is ready to brief Parliament members and Sabah representatives to prevent misunderstandings and slander.
'We will arrange a suitable date to avoid the issue becoming a thorn in the flesh or a source of slander, especially ahead of the Sabah state election,' he said.
On the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruling over the Sipadan and Ligitan islands, Mohamad said the decision is unrelated to the Sulawesi Sea dispute.
The ruling only concerned the determination of a straight coordinate line at four minutes 10 seconds, based on the positions of Sipadan and Ligitan Islands, and did not refer to the Sulawesi Sea.
'Like the Batu Puteh ruling, the ICJ decision involved only the specific territory, not the surrounding areas. Negotiations with Indonesia on the JDA continue and there will be no unilateral decisions,' he said.
Legally, Malaysia follows the United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea 1982 (UNCLOS), which defines the baseline or intertidal zone based on the lowest tide level.
'Indonesia argues that the area is sea at high tide, but Malaysia adheres to the internationally recognised interpretation based on low tide,' Mohamad said. - Bernama
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Star
2 minutes ago
- The Star
Cost of living, multi-lane free flow implementation and reciprocal tariff among focus at Parliament today
KUALA LUMPUR: Government efforts to ease the cost of living, the implementation of the Multi-Lane Free Flow (MLFF) toll system, and the issue of reciprocal tariffs imposed by the United States on Malaysia are among the key matters scheduled for discussion in the Dewan Rakyat sitting on Wednesday (Aug 6). According to the Order Paper published on the Parliament's website, during the question-and-answer session, Datuk Syed Abu Hussin Hafiz Syed Abdul Fasal (PN-Bukit Gantang) will ask the Domestic Trade and Cost of Living Minister to state the measures taken by the National Action Council on Cost of Living (Naccol) to help reduce the cost of living. Shaharizukirnain Abd Kadir (PN-Setiu) will pose a question to the Works Minister on the status of MLFF toll collection implementation, besides seeking clarification on improvements to systems such as Radio Frequency Identification (RFID) to ensure the new system's effectiveness. Datuk Seri Dr Wee Jeck Seng (BN-Tanjung Piai) will raise a question to the Investment, Trade and Industry Minister regarding the status and effectiveness of negotiations between Malaysia and the United States on the implementation of reciprocal tariffs. He also asked for government assurances that the move would not adversely affect trade, supply chains or the small and medium enterprise (SME) sector in Malaysia. Yeo Bee Yin (PH-Puchong) will question the Youth and Sports Minister on key improvements introduced by the ministry in the National Youth Consultative Council and the significant proposals made by youths, as well as the ministry's efforts in conveying these proposals to the government. Mohd Nazri Abu Hassan (PN-Merbok), meanwhile, will ask the Housing and Local Government Minister whether the ministry had allocated special provisions to state governments or related agencies to manage solid waste and clean up illegal dumping sites outside the jurisdiction of local authorities. Following the question session, the Dewan Rakyat will resume the debate on the 13th Malaysia Plan (13MP), which was tabled by Prime Minister Datuk Seri Anwar Ibrahim last Thursday. The current Dewan Rakyat sitting takes place over 24 days until Aug 28. - Bernama
Malay Mail
2 minutes ago
- Malay Mail
No peace without precision: The Thai-Cambodian GBC must begin to resolve all nagging issues — Phar Kim Beng
AUG 6 — The ceasefire signed in Putrajaya on July 28, 2025, between Thailand and Cambodia was hailed as a major diplomatic breakthrough. However, beneath its polished language lies a fragile framework that will collapse unless the General Border Committee (GBC), currently in session in Kuala Lumpur, addresses a series of unresolved tensions with urgency and clarity. Foremost among these is the unanswered question of who will monitor the withdrawal of troops and prevent any new deployments in contested zones. Without a trusted and neutral third party, such promises are easily broken and impossible to verify. The current peace monitors from Malaysia, China, Japan, and the United States may not be sufficient, especially given the sheer scale of the 817-kilometre border and the twelve flashpoints where conflict flared between July 24 and July 28. For a true cessation of hostilities, troop movements on both sides must be entirely frozen. Strategic repositioning or subtle encroachments during ceasefire periods will only sow the seeds of renewed conflict. This makes real-time, ground-level surveillance indispensable. At the same time, the agreement is conspicuously silent on one vital front: the role of hyper-nationalist media in inflaming tensions. Without explicit commitments from both governments to rein in incendiary reporting, especially narratives that frame the conflict as a patriotic defence of ancestral lands, the peace process remains at risk of being sabotaged by the very public it hopes to protect. Another danger lies in the control over land vacated during the ceasefire. No territory evacuated should be reoccupied, sabotaged, or booby-trapped. Such actions, often driven by fear of losing fertile territory, would turn confidence-building measures into acts of provocation. Malaysia, as the host and Asean Chair, bears a disproportionate share of the enforcement burden. Yet without full access to the military doctrines, operational maps, and rules of engagement from both Thailand and Cambodia, Malaysia's Armed Forces risk stepping into a volatile situation unprepared. Trust cannot be one-sided; full transparency must accompany regional trust-building. Equally important is the symbolic authority of both monarchies. In Thailand and Cambodia, the words of kings matter. An attaché talks with people next to foreign military attaches from major powers and Asean member countries, and a Thai military personnel, during a visit to a shelter for displaced people in Sisaket province on August 1, 2025. — Reuters pic A formal and public endorsement of the ceasefire by the monarchs—alongside military and civilian leaders—would send a powerful signal to the broader population that peace is not merely strategic but sacred. The arms trade also poses a serious threat. Illegal weapons from old and current stockpiles continue to circulate through black markets, feeding the rise of ethno-nationalist militias. These supply chains must be severed. Without action, the conflict risks devolving into a proxy war led by non-state actors immune to formal agreements. Asean cannot afford to remain passive. The previous (Laos), current (Malaysia), and future (Philippines) Chairs of Asean must collectively signal that this conflict violates the very principles of the Treaty of Amity and Cooperation. Thailand, especially, as the 2028 Chair, must lead by example. Economics should now become a deterrent. President Donald Trump has declared that parties refusing to comply with the ceasefire will be excluded from US trade negotiations. Asean should adopt a similar stance. Countries that endanger regional stability should be denied access to the Asean Free Trade Area and the Digital Economy Framework Agreement. Peace must have its rewards, but war must bear its costs. What was elegantly drafted on July 28 now needs refinement. Over the four days of GBC meetings in Kuala Lumpur, from August 4 to 7, the 54-member delegation must close all remaining gaps. Indonesia, Singapore, and other Asean states with satellite capabilities must be the eyes in the sky to ensure that the promises made at the table are honoured on the ground. Peace is not a slogan. It must be enforced, monitored, and—above all—earned. * Phar Kim Beng is professor of Asean Studies, International Islamic University of Malaysia; director, Institute of Internationalization and Asean Studies (IINTAS) ** This is the personal opinion of the writer or publication and does not necessarily represent the views of Malay Mail.
Free Malaysia Today
20 minutes ago
- Free Malaysia Today
Youth group pans Warisan's pledge to write off student loans
Warisan president Shafie Apdal also promised free education for the people of Sabah. (Facebook pic) PETALING JAYA : A youth NGO has dismissed Warisan's pledge to write off outstanding student loans for Sabahans if it forms the government after the state election to come, describing it as mere rhetoric. The Sabah Youth Council said even if Warisan kept its promise, the financial implications would be huge, and would impact other sectors in terms of funding. Abqaree Fawwaz Abekan. Council president Abqaree Fawwaz Abekan said it would be more practical for the party, led by former chief minister Shafie Apdal, to subsidise the loans by 50%, especially for the needy. 'It is impossible to just write off the loans,' he told FMT, adding that it would be a better use of state government funds to resolve water woes and repair the roads instead. 'To spend on students who borrowed from the National Higher Education Fund Corporation means that only a small percentage would benefit.' Speaking to FMT, meanwhile, Kunak assemblyman Norazlinah Arif said Warisan had a tendency of making grand promises to secure political power. 'Such a promise is highly unrealistic. What about individuals who have already repaid their loans, or those who've borrowed from other agencies like Mara?' she asked. Norazlinah Arif. 'The public needs to recognise that Warisan, in its bid for power, often resorts to making lofty pledges and exploiting public concerns for its advantage.' Shafie pledged to write off the loans at an event in Sabah on Saturday. He also promised free education for the people of Sabah. His pledge was also criticised by Parti Gagasan Rakyat Sabah information chief Nizam Abu Bakar Titingan, who urged people not to be taken in by such rhetoric. Nizam was reported by The Star as saying that such promises were unrealistic and populist. He also said that no education-based policies beneficial to the people were put in place during Shafie's time in the state government. 'The fact remains that not a single education debt was written off when he was chief minister,' he was quoted as saying.
