Q4 earnings watch: Demand slowdown puts FMCG's ‘fast-moving' promise to test
A Mint analysis of 19 FMCG firms shows that aggregate year-on-year revenue growth remained stagnant at 6.1% in Q4, marginally down from 6.6% in the preceding December quarter. In stark contrast, net profits surged dramatically from 12.1% year-on-year growth in Q3FY25 to an impressive 31% in Q4FY25, underscoring the widening divergence between these key performance metrics.
This analysis was based on standalone data sourced from the Capitaline database for companies that have released their latest financial results so far.
Revenue growth has remained muted for FMCG firms across all quarters of 2024-25, reflecting a persistent demand slowdown that continues to weigh on topline performance across the sector. Conversely, net profit has risen steadily over the same period, barring a dip in the September quarter of FY25. This divergence has pressured margins: net profit margins fell to 12.8% in Q4 from 13.7% in Q3, but improved compared to the year-ago period.
Read this | Q4 earnings watch: Whispers of rural recovery as revenues buck broader trend
Efforts to protect profitability are evident in a contraction in aggregate expenses in the second half of the fiscal year, reversing nearly 9% growth seen in the first half.
However, some costs have started creeping up as input prices for essential commodities increased towards the end of 2024, despite overall inflation stabilizing. Raw material costs as a share of net sales rose to 28.5% in Q4, up from 27.3% in Q3 and 27.7% a year earlier. Most firms appear to have passed these higher costs onto consumers, with further price hikes expected to support revenue growth.
A NielsenIQ report underscores this trend, showing 11% year-on-year value growth for the FMCG segment in the March quarter, driven by a 5.1% volume gain and a 5.6% price increase.
Read this | FMCG's mixed bag: Rural strength masks slump in latest quarter
Still, the company-wise analysis reveals a mixed performance. While seven of the 16 profitable firms saw net profits shrink in Q4, with five of them posting double-digit declines, robust growth in eight other firms helped offset these losses.
Notably, companies such as VST Industries, GM Breweries, and Dabur India, which reported the steepest net profit declines, also saw revenue drop in the March quarter, suggesting a link between topline challenges and bottomline performance for certain players.
Also read | The complicated relationship between consumer sentiment and stocks
This is the tenth part of a series of data stories about the ongoing Q4 earnings season. Read previous parts of our earnings series here.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Mint
7 hours ago
- Mint
Delhi's Saket court summons Samir Kumar Modi in Godfrey Phillips defamation case
The Saket sessions court in Delhi on Thursday ordered summons to cigarette maker Godfrey Phillips India's (GPI) former director Samir Kumar Modi in a defamation case filed by two of the company's seven independent directors. Additional sessions judge Sheetal Chaudhary Pradhan set aside the trial court's 19 May order dismissing the complaint and directed the lower court to proceed with summoning Modi. 'Considering the aforesaid appreciation of the facts and circumstances of this case and also the case laws, the impugned order dated 19.05.2025 passed by the learned trial court stands set aside. The present revision petition stands allowed… the trial court is directed to summon the accused/respondent and proceed further as per law," the court said in its order, a copy of which was seen by Mint. Boardroom clash The dispute stems from a boardroom clash at GPI in May 2024, during which Modi alleged he was assaulted. Independent directors Atul Kumar Gupta and Nirmala Bagri accuse him of defaming them by publicly claiming they had consented to the alleged assault. The other independent directors are Lalit Bhasin, Ajay Vohra, Avtar Singh Monga, Sumant Bharadwaj, and Subramanian Lakshminarayanan. Also Read: Supreme Court stays ₹273.5 crore GST notice against Patanjali Ayurved Modi, the youngest of three children of the late business tycoon K.K. Modi—and brother to former IPL chief Lalit Modi and sister Charu Modi—was removed from the board on 7 August 2024. GPI is a key player in India's tobacco market and partners with Marlboro-maker Philip Morris. Lalit Samir have differed with mother Bina Modi, who heads the board of Godfrey Phillips. Samir was removed from the board of the company last year while Bina Modi was re-elected as the chairman and managing director of the company. Samir had accused the board members of colluding to arrange an assault on him as he was trying to attend a key board meeting in May last year. Defamation case According to the complaint, the events unfolded on 30 May 2024 when an audit committee meeting was underway ahead of a scheduled board meeting. Modi, then an executive director but not a member of the committee, allegedly got into a heated argument with a security officer outside the meeting room. To avoid disruption, senior board members invited him in, where he allegedly shouted angrily and banged folders on the table. Despite the incident, the meeting concluded, and Modi later participated in the board meeting without signs of injury. Later On 1 June 2024, The Economic Times published an interview in which Modi alleged that the complainants and other board members orchestrated a 'planned attack" to stop him from attending the meeting. Also Read: A Wikipedia note, a customs case, and Paytm's big win The directors deny the charge, citing CCTV footage showing Modi as the aggressor, and claim the remarks were false, scandalous, and intended to damage their reputations. They say that Smir Modi's statements created a false impression that they condoned or arranged an assault, causing them social, professional, and reputational harm prompting them to approach the court. The defamation complaint under Sections 499 and 500 of the Indian Penal Code was filed in November 2024. The trial court dismissed it in May 2025, prompting the directors to seek revision before the sessions court. Sessions Court's Findings The sessions court noted that the Economic Times interview contained allegations harmful to the complainants, who were easily identifiable as public figures and board members of a well-known company. The complainants had submitted the article with a Section 65B certificate and named the reporter as a witness. The court further observed that defamation can be directed at identifiable groups, such as a company's board members. It ruled that the trial court had erred by assuming the existence of other litigation was sufficient grounds for dismissal and by denying the complainants the opportunity to present their witnesses. Also Read: States race to woo EV makers with land sops and tax breaks as Centre eases off Section 65B allows electronic records—such as emails, scanned copies, or web pages—to be accepted as evidence in court, provided they come with a certificate confirming their authenticity and how they were produced.
Mint
8 hours ago
- Mint
IndianOil reports over 80% growth in Q1 net profit at ₹6,808 cr on higher sales
New Delhi: State-run Indian Oil Corp. Ltd on Thursday reported an 83% increase in its consolidated net profit to ₹ 6,808.12 crore, up from ₹ 3,722.63 crore in the year-ago period. Speaking to reporters, Arvinder Singh Sahney, the chairman and managing director of Indian Oil, highlighted higher sales, both domestic and export and refinery throughput. The company reported the highest-ever quarterly sales volumes of 26.3 million metric tonnes. In the same period last fiscal, the company had reported 25.2 million metric tonnes of sales. "We achieved the highest-ever quarterly sales (in Q1). Petroleum sales, POL (petroleum, oil and lubricants) is up by 4% (quarter-on-quarter basis) at 22.4 million tonnes. Petchem (petrochemical) sales witnessed an increase of 10% in Q1 at 0.8 million tonnes. Exports increased by 14% at 1.36 million tonnes," Sahney said, while adding that exports by the company largely include diesel and naptha. A company statement said that during the period under review, refineries' throughput for Q1 FY25-26 was 18.683 million metric tonnes with 107% capacity utilization as compared to 18.168 million metric tonnes in Q1 FY24-25. The public sector oil marketing company's net total income for the first quarter of the ongoing fiscal (FY26) was ₹ 2.22 trillion, nearly 1% higher than ₹ 2.20 trillion in the year ago period. Amid ease in crude oil prices, IndianOil's total expenses fell 0.6% to ₹ 2.15 trillion in the April-June quarter, compared to ₹ 2.16 trillion in the first quarter of the last fiscal (FY25). "Improvement in net profit is mainly on account of higher refining and marketing margins being set off to some extent by inventory losses in Q1 25-26 as compared to inventory gains in Q1 24-25," a company statement said. On the issue of import of Russian oil amid US tariffs, the CMD said that import of crude from Russia and other sources is business as usual for the company and there is no deliberate plan to decrease import from Russia. "We are buying crude as per the economics. We are not making any extra effort for either increasing or decreasing the Russian crude," he said. In the first quarter of FY26, Russian crude comprised around 24% of the company's import basket and in case the market and global scenarios remain same the share of Russian crude is expected to remain around the same levels in the ongoing quarter (July-September), Sahney added. In the corresponding quarter of last fiscal the share of Russian crude was around 30%. On 2 August, Mint reported that India continues to buy oil from Russia, notwithstanding the penalty and calling out by the US. State-owned refiners—Indian Oil Corp. Ltd (IOC), Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd (BPCL), and Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd (HPCL)—continue to buy oil from Russian suppliers, and negotiations are underway for spot deals, Mint reported.
Mint
11 hours ago
- Mint
IndianOil reports over 80% growth in Q1 net profit at ₹6,808 cr on higher sales
New Delhi: State-run Indian Oil Corp. Ltd on Thursday reported an 83% increase in its consolidated net profit to ₹ 6,808.12 crore, up from ₹ 3,722.63 crore in the year-ago period. Speaking to reporters, Arvinder Singh Sahney, the chairman and managing director of Indian Oil, highlighted higher sales, both domestic and export and refinery throughput. The company reported the highest-ever quarterly sales volumes of 26.3 million metric tonnes. In the same period last fiscal, the company had reported 25.2 million metric tonnes of sales. "We achieved the highest-ever quarterly sales (in Q1). Petroleum sales, POL (petroleum, oil and lubricants) is up by 4% (quarter-on-quarter basis) at 22.4 million tonnes. Petchem (petrochemical) sales witnessed an increase of 10% in Q1 at 0.8 million tonnes. Exports increased by 14% at 1.36 million tonnes," Sahney said, while adding that exports by the company largely include diesel and naptha. A company statement said that during the period under review, refineries' throughput for Q1 FY25-26 was 18.683 million metric tonnes with 107% capacity utilization as compared to 18.168 million metric tonnes in Q1 FY24-25. The public sector oil marketing company's net total income for the first quarter of the ongoing fiscal (FY26) was ₹ 2.22 trillion, nearly 1% higher than ₹ 2.20 trillion in the year ago period. Amid ease in crude oil prices, IndianOil's total expenses fell 0.6% to ₹ 2.15 trillion in the April-June quarter, compared to ₹ 2.16 trillion in the first quarter of the last fiscal (FY25). "Improvement in net profit is mainly on account of higher refining and marketing margins being set off to some extent by inventory losses in Q1 25-26 as compared to inventory gains in Q1 24-25," a company statement said. On the issue of import of Russian oil amid US tariffs, the CMD said that import of crude from Russia and other sources is business as usual for the company and there is no deliberate plan to decrease import from Russia. "We are buying crude as per the economics. We are not making any extra effort for either increasing or decreasing the Russian crude," he said. In the first quarter of FY26, Russian crude comprised around 24% of the company's import basket and in case the market and global scenarios remain same the share of Russian crude is expected to remain around the same levels in the ongoing quarter (July-September), Sahney added. In the corresponding quarter of last fiscal the share of Russian crude was around 30%. On 2 August, Mint reported that India continues to buy oil from Russia, notwithstanding the penalty and calling out by the US. State-owned refiners—Indian Oil Corp. Ltd (IOC), Bharat Petroleum Corp. Ltd (BPCL), and Hindustan Petroleum Corp. Ltd (HPCL)—continue to buy oil from Russian suppliers, and negotiations are underway for spot deals, Mint reported. Its shares on BSE closed at ₹ 140.15 on Thursday, up 1.6% from its previous close.
