logo
Rushanara Ali's resignation hands yet another gift to Nigel Farage

Rushanara Ali's resignation hands yet another gift to Nigel Farage

Timesa day ago
For a government with a majority of more than 150, Sir Keir Starmer's administration already has a strangely beleaguered air. Losing a fourth minister over personal scandals in little more than a year will only add to the damaging sense of exhaustion, more familiar from the end of a term of office than the start.
Rushanara Ali's resignation as homelessness minister was at least swifter than that of Tulip Siddiq, who exposed Starmer to weeks of painful headlines about whether it was really possible to remain as anti-corruption minister while facing questions her links to her aunt's ousted Bangladeshi regime.
But Ali's departure also comes with less of a sense that she was pushed out than Louise Haigh's resignation as transport secretary over a past fraud conviction, or Andrew Gwynne's sacking as health minister over offensive WhatsApp messages.
• Homelessness minister quits after 'hiking rent at house by £700 a month'
Indeed, No 10 initially failed to see the problem and went on the offensive on Ali's behalf. A senior government official even phoned an executive at the i paper, which broke the story, to demand they retract claims that Ali had ejected her tenants. Senior ministers including the chancellor and home secretary were then sent out to say Ali had not broken any rules.
It quickly became obvious on Thursday that this stance was not tenable. Ali had indeed not broken any rules — but only because the government's Renters' Rights Bill banning exactly what she had done were not yet in force.
It is reasonable to argue that Ali did nothing wrong in giving her tenants notice because she was trying to sell her house and then, when she failed to do so, reletting it at a market rent.
It is also perfectly reasonable to argue that booting out tenants and then jacking up the rent is so egregious that it should be made illegal.
What it is not reasonable is to make both arguments simultaneously. By Thursday afternoon all main opposition parties were calling for Ali to quit and it became clear she had lost the confidence of housing charities.
There was public criticism from some on the Labour left, always unhappy with the idea of MPs being landlords. Even some Labour MPs expressed private frustration that Ali could not see how bad it looked.
Starmer rode to power on a wave of public disgust at a Tory government where — as he repeatedly put it — it seemed like there was 'one rule for them, another for everyone else'. Labour may feel that Tory accusations of 'staggering hypocrisy' are, well, staggering hypocrisy. But there is no doubt about how corrosive it will be for Starmer if voters start to believe that Labour have become as sleazy and hypocritical as the last lot.
After all, a party whose core argument is that they are all the same and all as bad as each other is leading in the polls. Once again, the person who will be happiest this morning is Nigel Farage.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Keir Starmer's latest approval rating is out and it's not good news
Keir Starmer's latest approval rating is out and it's not good news

Wales Online

timea few seconds ago

  • Wales Online

Keir Starmer's latest approval rating is out and it's not good news

Keir Starmer's latest approval rating is out and it's not good news Two key issues, Israel and the Online Safety Act, were looked at in this latest polling Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer during a summer visit to a library (Image: PA) Keir Starmer's approval rating has shown no sign of improvement, latest polling has shown. His net score, on all leadership attributes, has fallen and he remains on a low rating of -41%. ‌ Polling by Opinium Research of 2,050 UK adults aged 18+ from August 6 to August 8 has been weighted to be politically and nationally representative. Politicians are currently not sitting in Parliament as it is the summer recess, but even that break has not given the Prime Minister any boost as he takes a political gamble. ‌ Two key issues, Israel and the Online Safety Act, were looked at in this latest polling. ‌ The pollsters say that in terms of the Israel/Palestine conflict, two in five (42%) now see Israel as a threat to the UK, while only 18% still see it as an ally. This is slightly more than view Palestine as a threat (36%). Public disapproval of Starmer's handling of the conflict has increased by 14 points since October 2024, with 45% disapproving (+12 points on October 2024), compared to 17% who approve (-2 on October 2024). While 33% think he has provided sufficient support to Israel and Israeli citizens, two in five (40%) think he has not provided sufficient support for citizens in Gaza and could show more. ‌ Meanwhile 44% think the UK should recognise Palestine as an independent state – almost double the amount who think it should not (23%). For our free daily briefing on the biggest issues facing the nation, sign up to the Wales Matters newsletter here . The Online Safety Act, which has recently been implemented, has more than half of people's approval, with 54% supporting its aims. Just 17% oppose it. The pollsters also asked about social media and schools finding 83% of people think social media should be banned for children under 13, with three in five (58%) thinking it should be banned for under 16s. ‌ Seven in ten (70%) think mobile phone use should be banned during the school day for under-16s, with a further 36% thinking it should be banned for all pupils in school or college, even if they're up to 18 years old. Two thirds (66%) think schools should teach pupils how to use emerging technologies such as AI, whereas 20% do not. Additionally, while half (50%) think pupils should be allowed to use AI to do research, most people (73%) think schoolchildren should not be allowed to use it to write their homework or essays. James Crouch, head of policy and public affairs at Opinium, said: "There is growing disapproval of Israel, with more than twice as many Britons viewing it as a threat to the UK than as an ally. Public dissatisfaction is mounting over Keir Starmer's handling of the Israel–Gaza conflict, particularly regarding the support offered to Gazan citizens. Article continues below "With state recognition on the agenda, the British public believes Palestine has as much right to exist as Israel. "As Israel's actions drift further from British public opinion, its latest plan to move Gaza City's population south presents Starmer with a difficult challenge: navigating the conflict in a way that shows meaningful support without alienating his own voters."

Zelensky rules out ceding territory and says Kyiv must take part in negotiations
Zelensky rules out ceding territory and says Kyiv must take part in negotiations

BreakingNews.ie

timea minute ago

  • BreakingNews.ie

Zelensky rules out ceding territory and says Kyiv must take part in negotiations

Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky has rejected the idea that his country would give up land to end the war with Russia after US President Donald Trump suggested a peace deal could include 'some swapping of territories'. Mr Zelensky said Ukraine 'will not give Russia any awards for what it has done' and that 'Ukrainians will not give their land to the occupier'. Advertisement The remarks came after Mr Trump said he would meet with Vladimir Putin even if the Russian leader would not meet with Mr Zelensky. The Trump-Putin meeting, scheduled for Friday in Alaska, is seen as a potential breakthrough in the more than three-year war. Mr Zelensky dismissed the planned summit, warning that any negotiations to end Europe's biggest conflict since the Second World War must include Kyiv. 'Any decisions that are without Ukraine are at the same time decisions against peace. They will not bring anything. These are dead decisions. They will never work,' he said. Advertisement In a statement posted to Telegram, Mr Zelensky said Ukraine's territorial integrity, enshrined in the constitution, must be non-negotiable. Ukrainian officials previously told The Associated Press privately that Kyiv would be amenable to a peace deal that would de facto recognise Ukraine's inability to regain lost territories militarily. – The Trump-Putin summit The Trump-Putin meeting may prove pivotal in a war that began when Russia invaded its western neighbour and has led to tens of thousands of deaths, although there is no guarantee it will stop the fighting since Moscow and Kyiv remain far apart on their conditions for peace. 'It seems entirely logical for our delegation to fly across the Bering Strait simply, and for such an important and anticipated summit of the leaders of the two countries to be held in Alaska,' Mr Putin's foreign affairs adviser, Yuri Ushakov, said on Saturday in a statement posted to the Kremlin's news channel. Advertisement President Donald Trump (Mark Schiefelbein/AP) In his comments at the White House on Friday, Mr Trump gave no details on the 'swapping of territories'. Analysts, including some close to the Kremlin, have suggested that Russia could offer to give up territory it controls outside of the four regions it claims to have annexed. Mr Trump said his meeting with Mr Putin would come before any sit-down discussion involving Mr Zelensky. His announcement that he planned to host one of America's adversaries on US soil broke with expectations that they would meet in a third country. Advertisement – Reactions in Kyiv On the streets of Kyiv, reactions to the idea of Ukraine ceding territory to Russia ranged from scepticism to quiet resignation. 'It may not be capitulation, but it would be a loss,' said Ihor Usatenko, a 67-year-old pensioner, who said he would consider ceding territory 'on condition for compensation and, possibly, some reparations'. Anastasia Yemelianova, 31, said she was torn: 'Honestly, I have two answers to that question. The first is as a person who loves her country, I don't want to compromise within myself,' she told the AP. 'But seeing all these deaths and knowing that my mother is now living in Nikopol under shelling and my father is fighting, I want all this to end as soon as possible.' Advertisement Svitlana Dobrynska, whose son died fighting, rejected outright concessions but supported halting combat to save lives. Russian President Vladimir Putin (Mikhial Sinitsyn/AP) 'We don't have the opportunity to launch an offensive to recapture our territories,' the 57-year-old pensioner said. 'But to prevent people from dying, we can simply stop military operations, sign some kind of agreement, but not give up our territories.' – Ultimatums and sanctions Before Mr Trump announced the summit, his efforts to pressure Russia to stop the fighting had delivered no progress. Mr Trump had moved up an ultimatum to impose additional sanctions on Russia and introduce secondary tariffs targeting countries that buy Russian oil if the Kremlin did not move toward a settlement. The deadline was on Friday. The White House did not answer questions on Saturday about possible sanctions. The Kremlin's bigger army is slowly advancing deeper into Ukraine at great cost in troops and armour while it relentlessly bombards Ukrainian cities. On Saturday, two people died and 16 were wounded when a Russian drone hit a minibus in the suburbs of the Ukrainian city of Kherson, regional governor Oleksandr Prokudin said. Two others died after a Russian drone struck their car in the Zaporizhzhia region, according to regional governor Ivan Fedorov. Ukraine's air force said it intercepted 16 of the 47 Russian drones launched overnight, while 31 drones hit targets across 15 different locations. It also said it shot down one of the two missiles Russia deployed. Russia's Defence Ministry said its air defences shot down 97 Ukrainian drones over Russia and the Black Sea overnight and 21 more Saturday morning.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store